CTNI-32. CASE SERIES OF BRAF INHIBITORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF BRAFV600E GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi66-vi66
Author(s):  
Naveed Wagle ◽  
Jose Carrillo ◽  
Akanksha Sharma ◽  
Minhdan Nguyen ◽  
Judy Truong ◽  
...  

Abstract Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Beyond upfront therapy with radiation and temozolomide chemotherapy there is no standard therapy that has been effective. Inhibitors of BRAF and MEK, a downstream protein immediately following BRAF, have been shown to have survival benefit for patients with other BRAF V600E mutant neoplasm including advanced melanoma. We describe our experience using this combined target therapy for two patients with BRAF V600E mutant glioblastoma. Two adult patients with pathologically diagnosed glioblastoma presented with radiographic evidence of tumor progression after prior treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Neither had received radiation therapy within 3 months of starting treatment. Molecular characterization was performed though Caris which showed evidence of BRAF V600E mutation. BRAF inhibitors were initiated in combination with standard therapy options. MRI imaging was obtained to monitor for disease progression. BRAF inhibitors were tolerated well without any side effects not previously reported. Partial objective response was seen in both patients on subsequent MRI imaging within 8 weeks of starting treatment. Progression free survival and overall survival have not been reached in either case. BRAF inhibition may have therapeutic benefit in BRAF mutated glioblastoma. Partial response was seen in this case series. The molecular profile of glioblastoma may suggest treatment options beyond standard chemotherapy options. This series supports the use of BRAF inhibitors for the treatment of BRAFV600E glioblastoma A controlled trial should be supported.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii90-ii90
Author(s):  
Nikita Dhir ◽  
Sheila Chandrahas ◽  
Chibuzo O’Suoji ◽  
Mohamad Al-Rahawan

Abstract BACKGROUND The BRAF-V600E gene is a protein kinase involved in regulation of the mitogen activated protein kinase pathway (MAPK/MEK) and downstream extracellular receptor kinase (ERK). The BRAF-V600E mutation has a significant role in the progression of pediatric brain tumors. 85% of pediatric CNS tumors express the BRAF mutation. Thus, BRAF targeted therapy in pediatric CNS malignancies has potential to become the standard of care for tumors expressing this mutation. OBJECTIVE Current pediatric CNS brain tumor treatment focuses on chemotherapy and radiation, causing significant toxic side effects for patients. The significance of this case series lies in relaying our experience using targeted therapy in BRAF-V600E positive CNS pediatric brain tumors. METHODS We followed the disease course, progression, and treatment of three pediatric patients with three different CNS tumors. Each of these individuals was treated with surgical resection, chemotherapy, and/or radiation as per standard protocol. When that modality failed to reduce tumor progression, we found that each of their different tumors was BRAF-V600E positive and they were all started on targeted therapy. DISCUSSION Vemurafenib, Dabrafenib, and Trametinib are BRAF-V600E/MEK inhibitors that were initially used to treat melanomas. However, more research has shown that various pediatric CNS tumors are BRAF-V600 positive. Therapy with these BRAF inhibitors has been shown to slow tumor progression, but toxicity can be severe. This case series shows one patient with successful tumor regression, one patient with prolonged disease stabilization, and one patient with initial response but subsequent progression and ultimate death. It has been shown that using BRAF inhibitors in lower grade CNS tumors are more effective than higher grade CNS tumors. CONCLUSION The success of Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib/Trametinib in causing pediatric CNS tumor regression is promising, but further studies are needed to solidify their role in pediatric CNS cancers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6085-TPS6085
Author(s):  
Matthew H. Taylor ◽  
Rom S. Leidner ◽  
Richard Bryan Bell ◽  
Bernard Fox ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
...  

TPS6085 Background: Differentiated thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy and has a high frequency of actionable molecular aberrations including BRAF V600E mutations (45%), RET fusions (10%), and NTRK fusions ( < 2%). FDA approved systemic therapies for metastatic radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) include multikinase inhibitors (Lenvatinib and sorafenib), NTRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib for NTRK fusion+ cancers), and RET inhibitors (selpercatinib and pralsetinib for RET fusion+ cancers). Previous phase II clinical trials showed clinical efficacy with first and second generation BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF mutant RR-DTC. BRAF inhibitors have not yet been FDA approved for treatment of BRAF mutant RR-DTC. Effective therapeutic options for patients with BRAF mutant RR-DTC remains an important unmet clinical need. BRAF mutant thyroid cancers often show elevated expression of PD-L1. Additionally, BRAF inhibition results in increased expression of PD-L1 in thyroid cancer. This clinical trial seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of encorafenib plus binimetinib with or without nivolumab in patients with BRAF mutant metastatic RR-DTC. Encorafenib and binimetinib are highly selective and potent oral inhibitors of BRAF and MEK, respectively. Nivolumab is a potent inhibitor of the immune co-inhibitory receptor programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Methods: This is a phase II, single institution, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluating the combinations of (Arm 1) encorafenib 450 mg/day + binimetinib 45 mg twice daily and (Arm 2) encorafenib 450 mg/day + binimetinib 45 mg twice daily + nivolumab 480 mg I.V. every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic BRAF mutant RR-DTC. The trial will enroll 20 patients in each arm and treatment will be given in 28 day cycles for up to 2 years. Eligible patients must have metastatic/unresectable BRAF mutant RR-DTC, an ECOG performance status of 0-1 and adequate bone marrow, liver and kidney function. Patients with CNS metastases are included if the metastases have been treated and remained stable or are asymptomatic and ≤10 mm in diameter. Patients may be systemic therapy naïve or have previously been treated with multikinase inhibitors. Prior therapy with BRAF, MEK or immune checkpoint inhibitors is exclusionary. The primary endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (ORR) determined by RECIST v1.1 with restaging imaging every 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5.0). Arms 1 and 2 will be evaluated independently and are not powered for direct comparison. The trial design includes continuous toxicity monitoring with a Pocock-type stopping boundary. This clinical trial is in progress and 3 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04061980.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. i117-i117
Author(s):  
Michal Zapotocky ◽  
Scott Ryall ◽  
Kohei Fukuoka ◽  
Ana Guerreiro Stucklin ◽  
Julie Bennett ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naina McCann ◽  
Peter Scott ◽  
Christopher Parry ◽  
Michael Brown

Background Chronic carriage of S . Typhi or S. Paratyphi is an important source of enteric fever transmission. Existing guidance and treatment options for this condition are limited. This systematic review aims to assess the evidence concerning the efficacy of different antimicrobials in treating enteric fever chronic carriage. Methods We searched major bibliographic databases using relevant keywords between 1946 and September 2021. We included all interventional studies that included patients with confirmed enteric fever chronic carriage and deployed an antimicrobial that remains in clinical practice today. Case reports and case series of under 10 patients were excluded. Two reviewers screened abstracts, selected articles for final inclusion and quality-assessed the included studies for risk of bias. Extracted data was analysed, with pooling of data and eradication rates for each antimicrobial calculated. As only one randomised controlled trial was identified no meta-analysis was performed. Results Of the 593 papers identified by the initial search, a total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Evidence was identified for the use of fluoroquinolones and amoxicillin/ampicillin in the treatment for enteric fever chronic carriage. Fluoroquinolones were superior to amoxicillin/ampicillin with 92% of patients eradicated after one antimicrobial course compared to 68% (p = 0.02). The quality of included studies was poor, and all were carried out before 1990. Conclusion This review identified fluoroquinolones and amoxicillin as treatment options for enteric fever chronic carriage, with fluoroquinolones the more effective option. However, this evidence pre-dates rises in antimicrobial resistance in enteric fever and therefore the significance of these findings to today’s practice is unclear. Further research is needed to investigate whether these antimicrobials remain appropriate treatment options or whether alternative interventions are more effective.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3633-3633
Author(s):  
Hanneke van der Wijngaart ◽  
Louisa Rose Hoes ◽  
Jade Maxime van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Daphne Liselotte van Der Velden ◽  
Laurien Zeverijn ◽  
...  

3633 Background: Extensive molecular profiling in cancer regularly reveals targets for which approved drugs are available in tumor types outside the registered label. Efficacy of off-label use of these drugs is unavailable. Access to these drugs for pts is challenging. In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP, Van der Velden et al, Nature 2019), pts are treated based on their tumor molecular profile. Here, we present the results of the successful cohort “Olaparib for tumors with BRCA1/2 alterations”. Methods: Twenty five adult cancer patients (pts) who exhausted all treatment options and had BRCA1/2 loss of function (LoF) mutations (found in routine diagnostics) were included. No pts were eligible for on-label treatment with PARP inhibitors. Pts were treated with olaparib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB: objective response or stable disease (SD) ≥ 16 weeks). Pts were enrolled using a Simon-like two-stage model, with 8 pts in stage 1 and up to 24 pts in stage 2 if at least 1 pt had CB in stage 1. A fresh frozen biopsy was obtained from each pt for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and target confirmation. Results: Fourteen pts (56%) had CB. The objective response rate was 32%. Nine different cancer types were included: prostate (n=11), breast (n=4), ovarian (n=2), pancreatic (n=3), colorectal (n=2), biliary tract (n=2), kidney (n=1), adrenal gland (n=1) and endometrial (n=1). WGS could be performed on 58% of baseline tumor biopsies, confirming the original BRCA1/2 mutations in 86%. CB was observed in pts with both somatic and germline BRCA alterations and across tumor types. CB was only observed in cases with biallelic loss of BRCA1/2 in the tumor and when classified as HRD by a pan-cancer homologous recombination deficiency classifier (CHORD), which relies on genome-wide SNV, indel, and SV mutational footprints for HRD detection. No evidence of complete BRCA loss and HRD was observed in 5 pts with PD, while 4 patients with effective BRCA complete loss and HRD also had PD. WGS analysis of these pts suggested resistance mechanisms due to other oncogenic drivers (e.g FGFR1 amplification, CTNNB1 stabilization, KEAP1 inactivation). Conclusions: Olaparib seems to be an effective treatment option for pts with BRCA1/2 LoF mutated malignancies, regardless of histology, for both germline and somatic alterations, which needs confirmation in an independent cohort. CB of olaparib was observed in malignancies showing biallelic loss of BRCA1/2 and when classified as HRD, indicating the importance of the BRCA/HRD signature status. Clinical trial information: NCT02925234 .


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Cosentino ◽  
Luigi C. Turco ◽  
Gabriella Ferrandina ◽  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Salvatore Gueli Alletti ◽  
...  

The malignant transformation of endometriosis is a very uncommon event but can occur in 0.7% to 1% of all cases. Any histological type of tumor found in the endometrium might also occur in endometriosis. Most malignant tumors that originate from endometriosis are endometrioid adenocarcinomas and also clear-cell type carcinomas. On the other hand, sarcomas, especially endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), are extremely unusual representing 12% of all cases. ESS is an uncommon neoplasm and accounts for 0.2% of the uterine malignances. Malignant tumors arising from endometriosis can derive from the uterine wall as well as from extra-uterine sites. The most frequent extrauterine location is the ovary (78.7%), followed by the pelvic peritoneum (5.7%), the rectovaginal septum (4.3%), the colon (4.3%) and the vagina (2%), representing the majority of extragonadal sites. ESSs arising from the extrauterine and extraovarian endometriosis sites in the absence of a primary uterine lesion are extremely rare and the treatment options are not clear. Surgical debulking seems to be the best treatment. Adjuvant therapy, such as radiation, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy are not yet proven to be effective. Molecular target therapy could be a future possibility of treatment. A systematic review of English Medical Literature about incidence, treatment and prognosis of extrauterine ESS arising from endometriosis foci was performed. The selected articles on which this review is based are the following: 9 literature reviews, 8 retrospective studies, 7 case series, 1 prospective trial and 11 case reports.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi19-vi20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Alexander Stein ◽  
Martin van den Bent ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
Sascha Dietrich ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND There is a lack of treatment options for HGG and LGG patients. BRAFV600E mutations are uncommon in glioma, with a poor long-term prognosis. Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition extends progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in BRAF V600E–mutated melanoma, non small-cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. METHODS This phase 2, open-label trial (NCT02034110) evaluated dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor, 150mg BID) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor, 2mg QD) in patients with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including HGG and LGG. Eligible patients had histologically-confirmed recurrent or progressive glioma (LGG:WHO grade 1 or 2; HGG:WHO grade 3 or 4), with HGG patients required to have received radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) using RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and safety. RESULTS Interim analysis (IA) #14 (data cutoff: April 2, 2018) reported additional 3 months follow-up, with 49 patients enrolled (HGG, n=39; LGG, n=10) and 3 patients not evaluable for response. In HGG patients, ORR was 27% (10/37; 95%CI: 13.8%-44.1%), including CR (n=1), PR (n=9), and SD (n=11), with 16 patients currently ongoing treatment. In LGG patients, ORR was 56% (5/9; 95%CI: 26.8%-79.3%), including PR (n=5) and SD (n=4), with 6 patients currently ongoing treatment. OS, PFS, and DOR will be presented (IA#15). In HGG patients, adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (33%), headache (31%), rash (28%), and pyrexia (23%); grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (8%) and fatigue (5%). In LGG patients, AEs included headache (70%), fatigue, pyrexia (60% each), nausea, and arthralgia (50% each); grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (20%). CONCLUSIONS Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with recurrent or refractory BRAF V600E‒mutated HGG or LGG, with manageable AEs and no new safety signals.


Author(s):  
Prinsloo S ◽  
◽  
Vallone V ◽  
Moreno N ◽  
Sanchez H ◽  
...  

Background: A major concern in interventional studies is the inability to accurately link patient report with objective measures. In this study, we associated functional brain measures with self-reported pain after patients underwent a neuromodulatory intervention. Specifically, Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) adversely affects many cancer patients but few effective treatment options are available, and mechanisms are not well understood. Objectives: We present three representative cases from a doubleblind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial which examined the efficacy of a targeted therapy of Electroencephalogram (EEG) Neurofeedback (NFB), in attenuating symptoms of CIPN. The primary outcome of the trial was efficacy of neurofeedback versus control groups. In this case series we explore mechanism, by linking patient reported outcomes with objective measures. Methods: Symptom descriptions and EEG data were collected for patients enrolled in neurofeedback, placebo feedback, and waitlist conditions. Subjective pain ratings and EEG data were compared before and after the 10-week intervention. Results: A patient receiving neurofeedback demonstrated decreased beta oscillations in Brodmann Area 6 (BA6) and reported noticeable decreases in numbness and temperature sensitivity. A patient receiving placebo demonstrated increased beta in BA6 and increased alpha oscillations in Brodmann areas 3 and 7 with improvement of symptoms. A waitlist participant showed no change in BA6 and reported increased neuropathic symptoms while on waitlist but subsequently received NFB treatment and reported symptom improvement. Conclusions: This case series indicates that NFB may be used to achieve targeted reduction in beta oscillations to treat CIPN. Possible mechanisms of action and implications for CIPN treatment are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153473542110617
Author(s):  
Stacy D’Andre ◽  
Sean McAllister ◽  
Jasdeepa Nagi ◽  
Karthik V. Giridhar ◽  
Eduardo Ruiz-Macias ◽  
...  

Background Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common and often severe side effect from many chemotherapeutic agents, with limited treatment options. There is no literature on the use of topical cannabinoids for chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Case Presentations The current manuscript presents a case series of patients presenting in oncology clinics at Sutter Health, CA and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from April 2019 to December 2020 with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy who used topical creams containing the cannabinoids delta-nine-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and/or cannabidiol (CBD). Conclusions This case series suggests that topical cannabinoids may be helpful for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. This paper also discusses the potential mechanisms of action by which topical cannabinoids might alleviate established CIPN symptoms. A randomized placebo-controlled trial using a standardized product is planned to study the actual efficacy of such treatment.


Author(s):  
Marcos Augusto Tomazi ◽  
Alexandre da Silveira Gerzson ◽  
Angelo Menuci Neto ◽  
André Luciano Pasinato da Costa

The edentulous atrophic posterior mandible is often a great challenge for implant rehabilitation. Although a number of treatment options have been proposed, including the use of short implants and surgical grafting techniques, in cases of severe bone atrophy, techniques for mobilization of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) have been shown to be efficient, with good results. Four female patients underwent IAN lateralization for prosthetic rehabilitation of the posterior mandible from 2013 to 2019, with 1 year to 5 years and 4 months of follow-up. This case series describes a new technique for mobilization of the IAN, named in-block lateralization, to facilitate access to the IAN and to reduce nerve manipulation. The implant is immediately installed (allowing nerve lateralization in unitary spaces) and the original mandibular anatomy is restored with autogenous bone from the original bed during the same surgical procedure. When well indicated and well performed, this new approach provides better and easier visualization of the IAN as well as safer manipulation aiming to achieve good results for implant stability and minimal risk of neurosensory disturbances, allowing rehabilitation even in unitary spaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document