scholarly journals MR perfusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of high-grade gliomas after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praneil Patel ◽  
Hediyeh Baradaran ◽  
Diana Delgado ◽  
Gulce Askin ◽  
Paul Christos ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul W. Abbasi ◽  
Henriette E. Westerlaan ◽  
Gea A. Holtman ◽  
Kamal M. Aden ◽  
Peter Jan van Laar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Tiziano Di Carlo ◽  
Federico Cagnazzo ◽  
Nicola Benedetto ◽  
Riccardo Morganti ◽  
Paolo Perrini

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e112550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Jiang ◽  
Fei-Zhou Du ◽  
Ci He ◽  
Ming Gu ◽  
Zhen-Wu Ke ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Stephen Taylor ◽  
Justyna O. Ekert ◽  
Viktoria Sefcikova ◽  
Naomi Fersht ◽  
George Samandouras

Abstract BackgroundHigh-grade gliomas remain the most common primary brain tumour with limited treatments options and early recurrence rates following adjuvant treatments. However, differentiating true tumour progression (TTP) from treatment-related effects or pseudoprogression (PsP), may critically influence subsequent management options. Structural MRI is routinely employed to evaluate treatment responses, but misdiagnosis of TTP or PsP may lead to continuation of ineffective or premature cessation of effective treatments, respectively. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) method. The entirety of the Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched for methods differentiating PsP and TTP, and studies were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of included studies were summarised in a forest plot. Three of the identified methods were assessed in a separate subgroup meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty-six studies assessing seven distinct neuroimaging methods in 1145 patients were included in the systematic review. 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET (FET PET) and amide proton transfer-weighted MRI (APTw-MRI) showed high diagnostic accuracy, but results were based on single low-powered studies. The highest performing methods in the subgroup analysis were DWI (AUC = 0.95 [0.92 – 0.96]) and DSC-pMRI (AUC = 0.94 [0.91 – 0.95]), compared to DCE-pMRI (AUC = 0.90 [0.87 – 0.93]).ConclusionsBoth DWI and DSC-pMRI performed with high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating PsP from TTP. Considering the technical parameters and feasibility of each identified method, DSC-pMRI was found to be the most promising technique.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Su ◽  
Qing-Feng Huang ◽  
Hong-Lin Chen ◽  
Jian Chen

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 386
Author(s):  
Alice Giotta Lucifero ◽  
Sabino Luzzi

The resilience of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) against conventional chemotherapies is due to their heterogeneous genetic landscape, adaptive phenotypic changes, and immune escape mechanisms. Innovative immunotherapies have been developed to counteract the immunosuppressive capability of gliomas. Nevertheless, further research is needed to assess the efficacy of the immuno-based approach. The aim of this study is to review the newest immunotherapeutic approaches for glioma, focusing on the drug types, mechanisms of action, clinical pieces of evidence, and future challenges. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)-based literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using the keywords “active/adoptive immunotherapy,” “monoclonal antibodies,” “vaccine,” and “engineered T cell.”, combined with “malignant brain tumor”, “high-grade glioma.” Only articles written in English published in the last 10 years were selected, filtered based on best relevance. Active immunotherapies include systemic temozolomide, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccines. In several preclinical and clinical trials, adoptive immunotherapies, including T, natural killer, and natural killer T engineered cells, have been shown to be potential treatment options for relapsing gliomas. Systemic temozolomide is considered the backbone for newly diagnosed HGGs. Bevacizumab and rindopepimut are promising second-line treatments. Adoptive immunotherapies have been proven for relapsing tumors, but further evidence is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document