scholarly journals ACTR-05. PROCARBAZINE AND CCNU CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA WITH MGMT PROMOTER METHYLATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi13-vi13
Author(s):  
Yong Kil Hong ◽  
Seung Ho Yang
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract BACKGROUND While procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine), and vincristine (PCV) has been an alternative chemotherapy option for malignant gliomas, it is worth investigating whether the combination of only procarbazine and CCNU is comparable because vincristine adds toxicity with uncertain benefit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. METHODS Eight patients with recurrent GBM following concurrent chemoradiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant therapy were enrolled in this trial; they received no other chemotherapeutic agents or target therapy. They received CCNU (75 mg/m2) on day 1 and procarbazine (60 mg/m2) through days 11 and 24 every 4 weeks. The median cycle of CCNU and procarbazine was 3.5 (range: 2–6). RESULTS One patient achieved stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy was eight weeks (range: 5–73), and the PFS rates were 25% and 12.5% at 16 and 30 weeks, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) from the initial diagnosis to death was 40 months, and the median OS from the administration of procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy to death was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval: 6.7–12.7). Serious adverse events were found at six visits, and two cases were considered to be grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSION The efficacy of procarbazine and CCNU chemotherapy is not satisfactory. This study suggests the need to develop other treatment strategies for recurrent and TMZ-refractory GBM

scholarly journals MGMT-Methylation in Non-Neoplastic Diseases of the Central Nervous System

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 3845
Author(s):  
Sarah Teuber-Hanselmann ◽  
Karl Worm ◽  
Nicole Macha ◽  
Andreas Junker
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Demyelinating Diseases ◽  
Brain Diseases ◽  
Tumor Biomarker ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
First Time

Quantifying O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation plays an essential role in assessing the potential efficacy of alkylating agents in the chemotherapy of malignant gliomas. MGMT promoter methylation is considered to be a characteristic of subgroups of certain malignancies but has also been described in various peripheral inflammatory diseases. However, MGMT promoter methylation levels have not yet been investigated in non-neoplastic brain diseases. This study demonstrates for the first time that one can indeed detect slightly enhanced MGMT promoter methylation in individual cases of inflammatory demyelinating CNS diseases such as multiple sclerosis and progressive multifocal leucencephalopathy (PML), as well as in other demyelinating diseases such as central pontine and exptrapontine myelinolysis, and diseases with myelin damage such as Wallerian degeneration. In this context, we identified a reduction in the expression of the demethylase TET1 as a possible cause for the enhanced MGMT promoter methylation. Hence, we show for the first time that MGMT hypermethylation occurs in chronic diseases that are not strictly associated to distinct pathogens, oncogenic viruses or neoplasms but that lead to damage of the myelin sheath in various ways. While this gives new insights into epigenetic and pathophysiological processes involved in de- and remyelination, which might offer new therapeutic opportunities for demyelinating diseases in the future, it also reduces the specificity of MGMT hypermethylation as a tumor biomarker.

scholarly journals Phase I/IIa Study of Cilengitide and Temozolomide With Concomitant Radiotherapy Followed by Cilengitide and Temozolomide Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (16) ◽  
pp. 2712-2718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Monika E. Hegi ◽  
Bart Neyns ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Uwe Schlegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Purpose Invasion and migration are key processes of glioblastoma and are tightly linked to tumor recurrence. Integrin inhibition using cilengitide has shown synergy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in vitro and promising activity in recurrent glioblastoma. This multicenter, phase I/IIa study investigated the efficacy and safety of cilengitide in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients and Methods Patients (age ≥ 18 to ≤ 70 years) were treated with cilengitide (500 mg) administered twice weekly intravenously in addition to standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Treatment was continued until disease progression or for up to 35 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Results Fifty-two patients (median age, 57 years; 62% male) were included. Six- and 12-month PFS rates were 69% (95% CI, 54% to 80%) and 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%). Median PFS was 8 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 10.7 months). Twelve- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% (95% CI, 53% to 79%) and 35% (95% CI, 22% to 48%). Median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 23.2 months). PFS and OS were longer in patients with tumors with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation (13.4 and 23.2 months) versus those without MGMT promoter methylation (3.4 and 13.1 months). The combination of cilengitide with temozolomide and radiotherapy was well tolerated, with no additional toxicity. No pharmacokinetic interactions between temozolomide and cilengitide were identified. Conclusion Compared with historical controls, the addition of concomitant and adjuvant cilengitide to standard chemoradiotherapy demonstrated promising activity in patients with glioblastoma with MGMT promoter methylation.

scholarly journals P14.108 Bevacizumab versus alkylating chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii93-iii94
Author(s):  
K Seystahl ◽  
B Hentschel ◽  
S Loew ◽  
D Gramatzki ◽  
J Felsberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
First Recurrence

Abstract BACKGROUND The use of alkylating chemotherapy versus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma remains controversial. Here we tested the hypothesis that the activity of alkylators, but not that of bevacizumab, would be associated with the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed a cohort of patients treated at centers of the German Glioma Network or the University Hospital Zurich with alkylating agent-based chemotherapy (n=260) or bevacizumab without or with irinotecan (n=84) for first recurrence of glioblastoma. Outcome was stratified for MGMT status and cross-over to bevacizumab or alkylators at further tumor progression. RESULTS Median post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) for patients receiving alkylating agent chemotherapy at first recurrence was longer than for patients receiving bevacizumab (11.1 versus 7.4 months, p<0.001). The use of alkylating agents was associated with longer PRS-1 for patients with a methylated versus an unmethylated MGMT promoter (p=0.017). For patients receiving bevacizumab, PRS-1 was not different with or without MGMT promoter methylation. PRS-1 was longer in the group receiving alkylating chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab for patients with a methylated (p<0.001) or unmethylated MGMT promoter (p=0.034). For patients with alkylators at first recurrence receiving bevacizumab at any further recurrence, PRS-1 was longer than in patients receiving bevacizumab first and alkylators thereafter (p=0.002). CONCLUSION This study confirms limited value of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma independent of MGMT status. Alkylating agents have activity in recurrent glioblastoma, especially in the context of a methylated MGMT promoter.

scholarly journals Treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas with fotemustine monotherapy: impact of dose and correlation with MGMT promoter methylation

BMC Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Fabi ◽  
Giulio Metro ◽  
Michelangelo Russillo ◽  
Antonello Vidiri ◽  
Carmine Maria Carapella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

scholarly journals Procarbazine and CCNU Chemotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma with MGMT Promoter Methylation

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Se-Hyuk Kim ◽  
Heon Yoo ◽  
Jong Hee Chang ◽  
Chae-Yong Kim ◽  
Dong Sup Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

scholarly journals GENE-35. MGMT PROMOTER METHYLATION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED LGG AS A POTENTIAL BIOMARKER FOR TMZ-ASSOCIATED HYPERMUTATION AT RECURRENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi105-vi105
Author(s):  
Radhika Mathur ◽  
Yalan Zhang ◽  
Matthew Grimmer ◽  
Chibo Hong ◽  
Mitchel Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Methylation Level ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Mechanistic Basis

Abstract Low-grade gliomas (LGGs), which include grade II astrocytoma and grade II oligodendroglioma, inevitably recur despite aggressive treatment with surgery, and sometimes, with radiation and the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ). The clinical benefit of TMZ in LGG is unclear, and a subset of TMZ-treated LGGs recur with hypermutation in association with malignant progression to high-grade tumors. It is currently unknown why some TMZ-treated LGGs recur with hypermutation while others do not. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein that reverses mutagenic lesions induced by TMZ. The amount of MGMT protein in a cell is regulated at the epigenetic level by promoter methylation. Here, we hypothesize that epigenetic silencing of MGMT by promoter methylation facilitates TMZ-induced mutagenesis and contributes to the development of hypermutation. We demonstrate in a cohort of 37 TMZ-treated patients with an initial diagnosis of IDH-mutant LGG that methylation level of the MGMT promoter in initial untreated tumors is significantly associated with hypermutation at recurrence. We also confirm our previous finding that methylation level of the MGMT promoter in recurrent hypermutated tumors is higher than in recurrent tumors that are not hypermutated. These results provide a plausible mechanistic basis for observed differences in propensity of TMZ-treated LGG patients to develop hypermutation at recurrence. Furthermore, they establish the potential of MGMT promoter methylation level to inform treatment decisions in the clinic for patients with newly diagnosed LGG.

Clinical Significance of O-6-Methylguanine-DNA-Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Ti Tong
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Background: The correlation between O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and esophageal cancer remains controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical effect of MGMT promoter methylation on esophageal carcinoma patients. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases. The overall OR and corresponding 95% CI were calculated using the random-effects model. Results: Finally, 17 eligible studies were identified in this meta-analysis; these studies included a total of 1,368 patients with esophageal carcinoma and 1,489 with nonmalignant controls. MGMT promoter methylation was significantly higher in esophageal carcinoma tissue samples than in nonmalignant tissue samples (OR 3.64, p < 0.001). Promoter methylation of the MGMT gene was not associated with gender, cigarette smoking, drinking behavior, or tumor differentiation, but MGMT promoter methylation was correlated with age (≥60 vs. <60 years: OR 1.64, p = 0.028), lymph node status (positive status vs. negative status: OR 2.39, p = 0.024), and clinical stage (stages 3-4 vs. 1-2: OR 10.59, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that MGMT promoter methylation may be correlated with esophageal cancer carcinogenesis and could be associated with age, lymph node status, and clinical stage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document