scholarly journals Ocular Fundus Abnormalities in Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The FOTO-ICU Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul A Sharma ◽  
Philip S Garza ◽  
Valérie Biousse ◽  
Owen B Samuels ◽  
Nancy J Newman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Ocular fundus abnormalities, especially intraocular hemorrhage, may represent a clinically useful prognostic marker in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). OBJECTIVE To evaluate associations between ocular fundus abnormalities and clinical outcomes in acute SAH. METHODS Prospective evaluation of acute SAH patients with ocular fundus photography at bedside. Multivariable logistic models were used to evaluate associations between fundus abnormalities and poor outcome (inpatient death, care withdrawal, or discharge Glasgow Outcome Score <4) and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths-of-stay, controlling for APACHE II score, respiratory failure at ICU admission, Hunt & Hess score, aneurysmal etiology, age, and sex. RESULTS Fundus abnormalities were present in 29/79 patients with acute SAH (35.4%), and 20/79 (25.3%) had intraocular hemorrhage. In univariate analyses, poor outcomes were more likely among patients with fundus abnormalities vs without (15/28 [53.6%] vs 15/51 [29.4%], P = .03); median length of ICU stay was longer in patients with intraocular hemorrhage than without (18 d [interquartile range (IQR) 12-25] vs 11 [IQR 7-17], P = .03). Logistic regression with fundus abnormality as predictor of interest showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR] 5.33 [95% CI 1.09-26.0], P = .045), higher APACHE II (OR, per 1-point increase, 1.35 [95% CI 1.08-1.78], P = .01), and aneurysmal etiology (OR 4.35 [95% CI 1.01-22.9], P = .048), but not fundus abnormalities (OR 1.56 [95% CI 0.43-5.65], P = .49) or intraocular hemorrhage (OR 1.28 [95% CI 0.26-5.59], P = .75) were associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION Although ocular fundus abnormalities are associated with disease severity in SAH, they do not add value to patients’ acute management beyond other risk factors already in use.

2021 ◽  

Background and purpose: There are high occurrences of abnormal electrocardio-graphic (ECG) in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Thus, we want to determine whether any specific characteristics in ECG are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with SAH inhospital. Methods: A total of 145 patient who selected from 270 cases with non-traumatic SAH was included in this study. A standard surface ECG was assessed for all patients within 72 hours of SAH onset. All patients were stratified into Good or Poor outcome groups according to the in-hospital mortality or neurological worsening (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons, WFNS class) when they discharge from our hospital. Results: These patients in Poor outcome (n = 29) had significantly high heart rate (93.52± 22.23 bpm vs 78.42 ± 18 bpm, P < 0.01), prolonged QTc (458.17 ± 44.88 ms vs 436.89 ± 43.46 ms, P = 0.027) and corrected Tpeak–Tend interval (cTp-e, 106.19 ± 22.22 ms vs 93.14 ± 21.04 ms, P = 0.007) and high occurrence of ECG abnormalities including ST segment (90% vs 44%, P < 0.01) and left ventricular high voltage (28%vs 10%, P = 0.03). Multivariable logistic regression identified independent variables indicating poor outcome in-hospital including abnormal ST (OR = 2.507, 95% CI, 1.051-5.941, P = 0.037) and WFNS class (OR = 2.280, 95% CI, 1.605-3.240, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Abnormal ST segment of ECG is an independent indicator for poor inhospital outcomes regardless the severity of patients with SAH and warrant to further study their mechanism in the future.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3340-3340
Author(s):  
Nalini K Pati ◽  
Biju George ◽  
Ian Kerridge ◽  
Nicole Gilroy ◽  
Vineet Nayyar ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3340 Poster Board III-228 Aim: To identify factors predicting outcome of patients admitted to intensive care (ICU) following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods: Retrospective audit of all allo-HSCT patients requiring ICU admission. Results: Between 2000 and 2009, 392 patients underwent allo-HSCT. Of these, 106 (27%) had 129 ICU admissions. The median age was 47 (range 16-65) with myeloablative transplant in 89 and reduced intensity in 40 patients. Respiratory failure was the main reason for admission (54.6%) followed by sepsis (41.5%). During the period of ICU admission, 29.2% demonstrated improvement in organ failures, 39.2% remained stable and 28.4% deteriorated. Sixty-seven patients (51.9%) were discharged from ICU but only 48 (37%) were subsequently discharged from the hospital (ICU). Univariate analysis identified ICU admission within 30 days post HSCT, number of organ failures at admission, progression of organ failure during ICU admission, APACHE II score at admission, steroid refractory GVHD, and requirement for inotropic support or dialysis as significant predictors for survival in ICU. Patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation had a poorer outcome than the group who did not (84.4% Vs 20.0%, p=0.001). Those who required only non-invasive ventilation generally had a good outcome with 84.4% surviving til ICU discharge. While bacterial infection prior to ICU admission did not alter the outcome (p=0.221), the onset of a new infection in ICU was associated with a poor outcome (p=0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified steroid refractory GvHD (P=0.027; 95% CI of 1.17-14.8), APACHE II score > 30 (p=0.003; 95% CI 1.5-10.5), admission <30 days post HSCT (p = 0.015; 95% CI 0.12-0.8), requirement of invasive ventilatory support (p = 0.005, 95% CI 2.58 – 223.83) and dialysis (p = 0.011; 95%CI 1.401 – 13.20) as significant factors for a poor outcome. Conclusion: More than 50% of patients admitted to ICU following allogeneic HSCT survive. A high APACHE II score, steroid refractory GVHD, admission into ICU within 30 days of HSCT, multiorgan failure, progression of organ failure during ICU stay, and the need for ventilation or dialysis, carries a dismal prognosis. Identification of risk factors associated with a poor outcome will assist in clinical management and may ultimately improve the outcome of patients requiring ICU admission following allogeneic HSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex M Mortimer ◽  
Celia Bradford ◽  
Brendan Steinfort ◽  
Ken Faulder ◽  
Nazih Assaad ◽  
...  

BackgroundEndovascular coiling (EVC) has been shown to yield superior clinical outcomes to surgical clipping (SC) in the treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. The reasons for these differences remain obscure. We aimed to assess outcomes of EVC and SC relative to baseline physiological derangement.MethodsThis was an exploratory analysis of prospectively collected trial data. Physiological derangement was assessed using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system. Other contributory variables such as age, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade, and development of complications, including hydrocephalus and vasospasm, were included in the analysis. Clinical outcome was independently assessed at 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Hospital stay, ventilated days, and total norepinephrine dose were also used as secondary outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression.ResultsEVC was performed in 69 patients and SC in 66 patients. More profound physiological derangement (APACHE II score >15) was the strongest predictor of poor outcome in the overall cohort (OR 17.80, 95% CI 4.78 to 66.21, p<0.0001). For those with more deranged physiology (APACHE II score>15; 59 patients), WFNS grade ≥4 (OR 6.74, 1.43 to 31.75) and SC (OR 6.33, 1.27 to 31.38) were significant predictors of poor outcome (p<0.05). Favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) was seen in 11% of SC patients compared with 38% of EVC patients in this subgroup. SC patients had significantly increased total norepinephrine dose, ventilated days, and hospital stay (p<0.05).ConclusionsMore profound physiological derangement at baseline is a strong predictor of eventual poor outcome, and outcomes for patients with more profound baseline physiological derangement may be improved if undergoing a coiling procedure.


VASA ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bürger ◽  
Meyer ◽  
Tautenhahn ◽  
Halloul

Background: Objective evaluation of the management of patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm in emergency situations has been described rarely. Patients and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm (mean age, 70.3 years; range, 56–89 years; SD 7.8) were admitted between January 1993 and March 1998. Emergency protocols, final reports, and follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. APACHE II scores at admission and fifth postoperative day were assessed. Results: The time between the appearance of first symptoms and the referral of patients to the hospital was more than 5 hours in 37 patients (71%). Thirty-eight patients (71%) had signs of shock at time of admission. Ultrasound was performed in 81% of patients as the first diagnostic procedure. The most frequent site of aortic rupture was the left retroperitoneum (87%). Intraoperatively, acute left ventricular failure occurred in four patients, and cardiac arrest in two others. The postoperative course was complicated significantly in 34 patients. The overall mortality rate was 36.5% (n = 19). In 35 patients, APACHE II score was assessed, showing a probability of death of more than 40% in five patients and lower than 30% in 17 others. No patient showing probability of death of above 75% at the fifth postoperative day survived (n = 7). Conclusions: Ruptured aortic aneurysm demands surgical intervention. Clinical outcome is also influenced by preclinical and anesthetic management. The severity of disease as well as the patient’s prognosis can be approximated using APACHE II score. Treatment results of heterogenous patient groups can be compared.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (6 (part 1)) ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
R. Ya. Shpaner ◽  
◽  
A. Zh. Bayalieva ◽  
◽  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Zheng ◽  
Rui Xu ◽  
Zongduo Guo ◽  
Xiaochuan Sun

Objective: With the aging of the world population, the number of elderly patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is gradually growing. We aim to investigate the potential association between plasma ALT level and clinical complications of elderly aSAH patients, and explore its predictive value for clinical outcomes of elderly aSAH patients. Methods: Between January 2013 and March 2018, 152 elderly aSAH patients were analyzed in this study. Clinical information, imaging findings and laboratory data were reviewed. According to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), clinical outcomes at 3 months were classified into favorable outcomes (GOS 4-5) and poor outcomes (GOS 1-3). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the indicators associated with poor outcomes, and receiver curves (ROC) and corresponding area under the curve (AUC) were used to detect the accuracy of the indicator. Results: A total of 48 (31.6 %) elderly patients with aSAH had poor outcome at 3 months. In addition to ICH, IVH, Hunt-Hess 4 or 5 Grade and Modified Fisher 3 or 4 Grade, plasma ALT level was also strongly associated with poor outcome of elderly aSAH patients. After adjusting for other covariates, plasma ALT level remained independently associated with pulmonary infection (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00–1.09; P = 0.018), cardiac complications (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.08; P = 0.014) and urinary infection (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00–1.08; P = 0.032). Besides, plasma ALT level had a predictive ability in the occurrence of systemic complications (AUC 0.676; 95% CI: 0.586– 0.766; P<0.001) and poor outcome (AUC 0.689; 95% CI: 0.605–0.773; P<0.001) in elderly aSAH patients. Conclusion: Plasma ALT level of elderly patients with aSAH was significantly associated with systemic complications, and had additional clinical value in predicting outcomes. Given that plasma ALT levels on admission could help to identify high-risk elderly patients with aSAH, these findings are of clinical relevance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoya Matsuda ◽  
Masato Naraoka ◽  
Hiroki Ohkuma ◽  
Norihito Shimamura ◽  
Katsuhiro Ito ◽  
...  

Background: Several clinical studies have indicated the efficacy of cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 3, in preventing cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). They were not double-blinded trial resulting in disunited results on assessment of end points among the studies. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess the effectiveness of cilostazol on cerebral vasospasm. Methods: Patients with aneurysmal SAH admitted within 24 h after the ictus who met the following criteria were enrolled in this study: SAH on CT scan was diffuse thick, diffuse thin, or local thick, Hunt and Hess score was less than 4, administration of cilostazol or placebo could be started within 48 h of SAH. Patients were randomly allocated to placebo or cilostazol after repair of a ruptured saccular aneurysm by aneurysmal neck clipping or endovascular coiling, and the administration of cilostazol or placebo was continued up to 14 days after initiation of treatment. The primary end point was the occurrence of symptomatic vasospasm (sVS), and secondary end points were angiographic vasospasm (aVS) evaluated on digital subtraction angiography, vasospasm-related new cerebral infarction evaluated on CT scan or MRI, and clinical outcome at 3 months of SAH as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale, in which poor outcome was defined as severe disability, vegetative state, and death. All end points were evaluated with blinded assessment. Results: One hundred forty eight patients were randomly allocated to the cilostazol group (n = 74) or the control group (n = 74). The occurrence of sVS was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the control group (10.8 vs. 24.3%, p = 0.031), and multiple logistic analysis showed that cilostazol use was an independent factor reducing sVS (OR 0.293, 95% CI 0.099-0.568, p = 0.027). The incidence of aVS and vasospasm-related cerebral infarction were not significantly different between the groups. Poor outcome was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the control group (5.4 vs. 17.6%, p = 0.011), and multiple logistic analyses demonstrated that cilostazol use was an independent factor that reduced the incidence of poor outcome (OR 0.221, 95% CI 0.054-0.903, p = 0.035). Severe adverse events due to cilostazol administration did not occur during the study period. Conclusions: Cilostazol administration is effective in preventing sVS and improving outcomes without severe adverse events. A larger-scale study including more cases was necessary to confirm this efficacy of cilostazol.


Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Alexander Supady ◽  
Jeff DellaVolpe ◽  
Fabio Silvio Taccone ◽  
Dominik Scharpf ◽  
Matthias Ulmer ◽  
...  

The role of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (V-V ECMO) in severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still under debate and conclusive data from large cohorts are scarce. Furthermore, criteria for the selection of patients that benefit most from this highly invasive and resource-demanding therapy are yet to be defined. In this study, we assess survival in an international multicenter cohort of COVID-19 patients treated with V-V ECMO and evaluate the performance of several clinical scores to predict 30-day survival. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated retrospective non-interventional international multicenter registry study (NCT04405973, first registered 28 May 2020). In 127 patients treated with V-V ECMO at 15 centers in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Belgium, and the United States, we calculated the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score, Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) Score, Predicting Death for Severe ARDS on V‑V ECMO (PRESERVE) Score, and 30-day survival. Results: In our study cohort which enrolled 127 patients, overall 30-day survival was 54%. Median SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, RESP, and PRESERVE were 9, 36, 17, 1, and 4, respectively. The prognostic accuracy for all these scores (area under the receiver operating characteristic—AUROC) ranged between 0.548 and 0.605. Conclusions: The use of scores for the prediction of mortality cannot be recommended for treatment decisions in severe COVID-19 ARDS undergoing V-V ECMO; nevertheless, scoring results below or above a specific cut-off value may be considered as an additional tool in the evaluation of prognosis. Survival rates in this cohort of COVID-19 patients treated with V‑V ECMO were slightly lower than those reported in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110042
Author(s):  
Xiaoke Shang ◽  
Yanggan Wang

Aims: The study aimed to compare and analyze the outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) who had extubation after weaning from mechanical ventilation. Methods: A total 120 patients with AHRF were enrolled into this study. These patients underwent tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. They were organized into two groups according to the score of Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II); group A: APACHE II score <12; group B: 12⩽ APACHE II score <24. Group A had 72 patients and patients given HFNC were randomly assigned to subgroup I while patients given NPPV were assigned to subgroup II (36 patients in each subgroup). Group B had 48 patients and patients given HFNC were randomly assigned to subgroup I while patients given NPPV were assigned to subgroup II (24 patients in each subgroup). General information, respiratory parameters, endpoint event, and comorbidities of adverse effect were compared and analyzed between the two subgroups. Results: The incidence of abdominal distension was significantly higher in patients treated with NPPV than in those treated with HFNC in group A (19.44% versus 0, p = 0.005) and group B (25% versus 0, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference between the HFNC- and NPPV-treated patients in blood pH, oxygenation index, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, respiratory rate, and blood lactic acid concentration in either group ( p > 0.05). Occurrence rate of re-intubation within 72 h of extubation was slightly, but not significantly, higher in NPPV-treated patients ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between HFNC and NPPV in preventing respiratory failure in patients with AHRF with an APACHE II score <24 after extubation. However, HFNC was superior to NPPV with less incidence of abdominal distension. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document