scholarly journals 152. Applying A Difference-in-Difference Analysis to Assess Effect of Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies on Changes in Antimicrobial Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S86-S86
Author(s):  
Ann F Chou ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Makoto M Jones ◽  
Christopher J Graber ◽  
Matthew B Goetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pharmacist ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Time Points ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background About 30–50% of inpatient antimicrobial therapy is sub-optimal. Health care facilities have utilized various antimicrobial stewardship (AS) strategies to optimize appropriate antimicrobial use, improve health outcomes, and promote patient safety. However, little evidence exists to assess relationships between AS strategies and antimicrobial use. This study examined the impact of changes in AS strategies on antimicrobial use over time. Methods This study used data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare Analysis & Informatics Group (HAIG) AS survey, administered at 130 VA facilities in 2012 and 2015, and antimicrobial utilization from VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Four AS strategies were examined: having an AS team, feedback mechanism on antimicrobial use, infectious diseases (ID) attending physicians, and clinical pharmacist on wards. Change in AS strategies were computed by taking the difference in the presence of a given strategy in a facility between 2012–2015. The outcome was the difference between antimicrobial use per 1000 patient days in 2012–2013 and 2015–2016. Employing multiple regression analysis, changes in antimicrobial use was estimated as a function of changes in AS strategies, controlling for ID human resources in and organizational complexity. Results Of the 4 strategies, only change in availability of AS teams had an impact on antimicrobial use. Compared to facilities with no AS teams at both time points, antibiotic use decreased by 63.9 uses per 1000 patient days in facilities that did not have a AS team in 2012 but implemented one in 2015 (p=0.0183). Facilities that had an AS team at both time points decreased use by 62.2 per 1000 patient days (p=0.0324). Conclusion The findings showed that AS teams reduced inpatient antibiotic use over time. While changes in having feedback on antimicrobial use and clinical pharmacist on wards showed reduced antimicrobial use between 2012–2015, the differences were not statistically significant. These strategies may already be a part of a comprehensive AS program and employed by AS teams. In further development of stewardship programs within healthcare organizations, the association between AS teams and antibiotic use should inform program design and implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1629. Targeted Antimicrobial Use Admission Provides an Actionable Denominator for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Evaluating Inpatient Length of Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S42-S42
Author(s):  
April Dyer ◽  
Elizabeth Dodds Ashley ◽  
Angelina Davis ◽  
Melissa Johnson ◽  
Travis Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Electronic Prescribing ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Length Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Actionable, easy to interpret antibiotic use (AU) metrics provide antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) with clear targets. Current aggregate AU metrics lack the ability to discriminate between long courses in a limited number of patients versus short courses in a large number of patients. Methods We developed a novel AU denominator termed “targeted antimicrobial use admission,” defined as an inpatient admission in which a selected agent or group of agents was administered. When used with length of therapy (LOT), it provides the average number of days patients receive the targeted agent(s) during inpatient hospital admissions. To demonstrate the added utility of this metric, we used descriptive statistics to compare it to LOT, LOT/1,000 patient days, LOT/1,000 admissions, and LOT/admission to quantify intravenous (IV) vancomycin use among 25 hospitals in the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON) for calendar year 2017. The metric was also used to compare hospitals to one another and track durations at an example hospital over time. Results Total LOT included 128,680 days of IV vancomycin (table). LOT/targeted antimicrobial use admission is the only metric that allows programs to quickly assess agent durations. Conclusion Stewardship programs seeking to shorten durations of therapy can track this metric over time to determine the impact of their ASP efforts (Figure 1). The metric can also be used to compare average durations of IV vancomycin by hospital to determine when and if agent-focused audit and feedback or antibiotic timeouts may be useful (Figure 2). The network mean provides a target for agent-specific de-escalations, in days, for facilities with longer durations. LOT/targeted antimicrobial use admission provides an actionable metric for quantifying antimicrobial durations. This metric is easy to interpret and can feasibly be captured through the electronic prescribing record to aid in selecting ASP strategy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals The outcome of implementing antimicrobial stewardship program for hospitalized children

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 3737
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. El-Nawawy ◽  
Reham M. Wagdy ◽  
Ahmed Kh. Abou Ahmed ◽  
Marwa A. Moustafa
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient’S Outcome ◽  
The Impact

Background: An effective approach to improve antimicrobial use for hospitalized patients is an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). The present study aimed to implement ASP for inpatient children based on prospective-audit-with-feedback intervention in order to evaluate the impact on patient’s outcome, antimicrobial use, and the hospital cost.Methods: The study was conducted throughout 6 months over 275 children admitted with different infections at Main Children’s hospital in Alexandria included; group I (with ASP) and group II (standard antimicrobials as controls).Results: The study revealed that on patient’s admission, single antibiotic use was higher among the ASP group while double antimicrobial therapy was higher among the non-ASP with significant difference (p=0.001). Less percentage of patients who consumed vancomycin, meropenem amoxicillin-clavulanic and metronidazole was observed among ASP group with a significant difference of the last two drugs when compared to controls (p=<0.001, 0.011, respectively). The study reported the higher percent of improved ASP patient’s after 72 hours of admission with a significant difference to controls (73.2% versus 62.5%, p=0.038). Complications occurred more likely for the non-ASP group (odds ratio 7.374 with 95% CI 1.68-32.33). In general, there was a clear reduction of the patient antibiotic cost/day and overall cost per patient, however, it was not significant among the studied patients.Conclusions:  Our local ASP model provided a high quality of care for hospitalized children and effectively reduced the antimicrobial consumption.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs at Veterans Affairs Hospitals: Results of a Nationwide Survey

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann F. Chou ◽  
Christopher J. Graber ◽  
Makoto Jones ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Matthew Bidwell Goetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pharmacist ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Nationwide Survey ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Usage ◽  
Formal Policy

BACKGROUNDAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are variably implemented.OBJECTIVETo characterize variations of antimicrobial stewardship structure and practices across all inpatient Veterans Affairs facilities in 2012 and correlate key characteristics with antimicrobial usage.DESIGNA web-based survey regarding stewardship activities was administered to each facility’s designated contact. Bivariate associations between facility characteristics and inpatient antimicrobial use during 2012 were determined.SETTINGTotal of 130 Veterans Affairs facilities with inpatient services.RESULTSOf 130 responding facilities, 29 (22%) had a formal policy establishing an ASP, and 12 (9%) had an approved ASP business plan. Antimicrobial stewardship teams were present in 49 facilities (38%); 34 teams included a clinical pharmacist with formal infectious diseases (ID) training. Stewardship activities varied across facilities, including development of yearly antibiograms (122 [94%]), formulary restrictions (120 [92%]), stop orders for antimicrobial duration (98 [75%]), and written clinical pathways for specific conditions (96 [74%]). Decreased antimicrobial usage was associated with having at least 1 full-time ID physician (P=.03), an ID fellowship program (P=.003), and a clinical pharmacist with formal ID training (P=.006) as well as frequency of systematic patient-level reviews of antimicrobial use (P=.01) and having a policy to address antimicrobial use in the context of Clostridium difficile infection (P=.01). Stop orders for antimicrobial duration were associated with increased use (P=.03).CONCLUSIONSASP-related activities varied considerably. Decreased antibiotic use appeared related to ID presence and certain select practices. Further statistical assessments may help optimize antimicrobial practices.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:647–654

scholarly journals 39. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in a Community Hospital setting: An Interrupted Times Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S141-S142
Author(s):  
Jason Li ◽  
Ken Chan ◽  
Hina Parvez ◽  
Margaret Gorlin ◽  
Miriam A Smith
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Community hospitals have fewer resources for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) compared to larger tertiary hospitals. At our 312-bed community hospital, Long Island Jewish Forest Hills/Northwell, a combination of modified preauthorization, prospective audit feedback, and ASP education was implemented starting in August 2019 (Monday through Friday 9 am to 5 pm). Methods This retrospective study evaluated the impact of ASP interventions on the rate of targeted antimicrobial use over a 7 month pre- vs 7 month post- intervention period (Aug 2018 to Feb 2019 vs Aug 2019 to Feb 2020). Targeted antimicrobials included piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin, daptomycin, and carbapenems. The primary outcome was the monthly mean for overall targeted antimicrobial use measured by the rate of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present. Secondary outcomes were the individual rates of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present for each of the targeted antimicrobials, and the hospital’s overall standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR). Data were analyzed as a segmented regression of interrupted time series. Results Pre-intervention, there was an increasing trend (positive slope, p&lt; 0.05) in the monthly mean, hospital SAAR, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam use. Post-intervention, there was a significant change in slope for these same metrics, indicating a decrease in the mean use. Immediate impact of ASP interventions, measured by the difference in antibiotic use between the end of each intervention period, was visually evident in all cases except carbapenems (Fig. 1 through 4). The immediate impact on the overall monthly mean represented a significant reduction in the rate of antimicrobial days per 1000 days present, -12.72 (CI -21.02 to -4.42, P &lt; 0.0066). The pre- vs post- ASP gap for all measures was negative and consistent with fewer days of antibiotic use immediately following intervention. Conclusion A targeted, multifaceted ASP intervention utilizing modified preauthorization, prospective audit feedback, and education significantly reduced antibiotic use in a community hospital. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Increasing Voluntary Public Health Reporting to the NHSN Antimicrobial Use Option

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s296-s297
Author(s):  
Heather Dubendris ◽  
Amy Webb ◽  
Melinda Neuhauser ◽  
Arjun Srinivasan ◽  
Wendy Wise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Health Departments ◽  
Public Health Reporting ◽  
Use Stage ◽  
Education And Development ◽  
Health Registry ◽  
Over Time

Background: The CDC NHSN launched the Antimicrobial Use Option in 2011. The Antimicrobial Use Option allows users to implement risk-adjusted antimicrobial use benchmarking within- and between- facilities using the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) and to evaluate use over time. The SAAR can be used for public health surveillance and to guide an organization’s stewardship or quality improvement efforts. Methods: Antimicrobial Use Option enrollment grew through partner engagement, targeted education, and development of data benchmarking. We analyze enrollment over time and discuss key drivers of participation. Results: Initial 2011 Antimicrobial Use Option enrollment efforts awarded grant Funding: to 4 health departments. These health departments partnered with hospitals, which encouraged vendors to build infrastructure for electronic antimicrobial use reporting. CDC supported vendors through outreach and education. In 2012, with CDC support, Veterans’ Affairs (VA) Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center and partners began implementation of Antimicrobial Use Option reporting and validation of submitted data. These early efforts led to enrollment of 64 facilities by 2014 (Fig. 1). As awareness of the antimicrobial use option grew, we focused on facility engagement and development of benchmark metrics. A second round of grant Funding: in 2015 supported submission to the Antimicrobial Use Option from additional facilities by Funding: a vendor, a healthcare system, and an antimicrobial stewardship network. In 2015, CMS recognized the Antimicrobial Use Option as a choice for public health registry reporting under Meaningful Use Stage 3, resulting in an increase in participating hospitals. Antimicrobial Use Option enrollment increased in 2015 (n = 120), coinciding with national prioritization of antimicrobial stewardship. In 2016, the SAAR, was released in NHSN. We leveraged the SAAR to encourage participation from additional facilities and began quarterly calls to encourage continued participation from existing users. In 2016, the Department of Defense began submitting data to the Antimicrobial Use Option, resulting in 207 facilities enrolled in 2016, which grew to 616 in 2017. As of November 2019, 12 vendors self-report submission capabilities and 1,470 facilities, of ~6,800 active NHSN participants, are enrolled in the Antimicrobial Use Option. Two states have passed requirements regulating Antimicrobial Use Option reporting with Tennessee’s requirement going into effect in 2021. Conclusions: The Antimicrobial Use Option offers evidence that collaboration with partners, and leveraging of benchmarking metrics available to a national surveillance system can lead to increased voluntary participation in surveillance of high-priority public health data. Moving forward, we will continue expanding analytic capabilities and partner engagement.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

T3 Are Burns a Chronic Condition: Examining Physical and Mental Functioning up to 20 Years After Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S2-S3
Author(s):  
Callie Abouzeid ◽  
Audrey E Wolfe ◽  
Gretchen J Carrougher ◽  
Nicole S Gibran ◽  
Radha K Holavanahalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
National Database ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Burn Survivors ◽  
Population Demographic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction Burn survivors often face many long-term physical and psychological symptoms associated with their injury. To date, however, few studies have examined the impact of burn injuries on quality of life beyond 2 years post-injury. The purpose of this study is to examine the physical and mental well-being of burn survivors up to 20 years after injury. Methods Data from the Burn Model System National Database (1997–2020) were analyzed. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at discharge with a recall of preinjury status, and then at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years after injury. Outcomes examined were the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Short Form-12. Trajectories were developed using linear mixed methods model with repeated measures of PCS and MCS scores over time and controlling for demographic and clinical variables. The model fitted score trajectory was generated with 95% confidence intervals to demonstrate score changes over time and associations with covariates. Results The study population included 420 adult burn survivors with a mean age of 42.4 years. The population was mainly male (66%) and white (76.4%) with a mean burn size of 21.5% and length of hospital stay of 31.3 days. Higher PCS scores were associated with follow-up time points closer to injury, shorter hospital stay, and younger age. Similarly, higher MCS scores were associated with earlier follow-up time points, shorter hospital stay, female gender, and non-perineal burns. MCS trajectories are demonstrated in the Figure. Conclusions Burn survivors’ physical and mental health worsened over time. Such a trend is different from previous reported results for mental health in the general population. Demographic and clinical predictors of recovery over time are identified.

scholarly journals Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Acute Bronchitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s32-s32
Author(s):  
Ebbing Lautenbach ◽  
Keith Hamilton ◽  
Robert Grundmeier ◽  
Melinda Neuhauser ◽  
Lauri Hicks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Acute Bronchitis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Diagnostic Codes ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antibiotic resistance has increased at alarming rates, driven predominantly by antibiotic overuse. Although most antibiotic use occurs in outpatients, antimicrobial stewardship programs have primarily focused on inpatient settings. A major challenge for outpatient stewardship is the lack of accurate and accessible electronic data to target interventions. We sought to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for outpatients with acute bronchitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). We used ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify encounters for acute bronchitis at any outpatient UPHS practice between March 15, 2017, and March 14, 2018. Exclusion criteria included underlying immunocompromising condition, other comorbidity influencing the need for antibiotics (eg, emphysema), or ICD-10 code at the same visit for a concurrent infection (eg, sinusitis). We randomly selected 300 (150 from academic practices and 150 from nonacademic practices) eligible subjects for detailed chart abstraction that assessed patient demographics and practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for assessment of the electronic algorithm. Because antibiotic use is not indicated for this study population, appropriateness was assessed based upon whether an antibiotic was prescribed or not. Results: Of 300 subjects, median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 50–68), 62% were women, 74% were seen in internal medicine (vs family medicine) practices, and 75% were seen by a physician (vs an advanced practice provider). On chart review, 167 (56%) subjects received an antibiotic. Of these subjects, 1 had documented concern for pertussis and 4 had excluding conditions for which there were no ICD-10 codes. One received an antibiotic prescription for a planned dental procedure. Thus, based on chart review, 161 (54%) subjects received antibiotics inappropriately. Using the electronic algorithm based on diagnostic codes, underlying and concurrent conditions, and prescribing data, the number of subjects with inappropriate prescribing was 170 (56%) because 3 subjects had antibiotic prescribing not noted based on chart review. The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were the following: sensitivity, 100% (161 of 161); specificity, 94% (130 of 139); positive predictive value, 95% (161 of 170); and negative predictive value, 100% (130 of 130). Conclusions: For outpatients with acute bronchitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. This algorithm could be used to efficiently assess prescribing among practices and individual clinicians. The impact of interventions based on this algorithm should be tested in future studies.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Promoting Antimicrobial Stewardship Education Among Pediatricians Through a Maintenance of Certification Part 4 Quality Impro

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s29-s29
Author(s):  
Prachi Singh ◽  
Brian Lee ◽  
Jenna Holmen
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Maintenance Of Certification ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Baseline Knowledge ◽  
Initial Survey ◽  
The Impact

Background: The rise of antimicrobial resistance has made it critical for clinicians to understand antimicrobial stewardship principles. We sought to determine whether the opportunity to participate in an American Board of Pediatrics Maintenance of Certification Part 4 (MOC4) quality improvement (QI) project would engage pediatricians and improve their knowledge about antimicrobial stewardship. Methods: In August 2019, a new clinical algorithm for acute appendicitis, spearheaded by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), was implemented at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland to standardize care and optimize antimicrobial use. Medical staff were invited to participate in a QI project evaluating the impact of this algorithm. Data were collected for the 2 quarters preceding implementation (baseline), for the quarter of implementation (transition period), and for the quarter after implementation. Participants were offered MOC4 credit for reviewing these 3 cycles of data and associated materials highlighting information about antimicrobial stewardship. An initial survey was given to participants to assess their baseline knowledge via 4 questions about antimicrobial use in surgical patients (Table 1). At the conclusion of the QI project, another survey was conducted to reassess participant knowledge and to evaluate overall satisfaction with the project. Results: In total, 150 clinicians completed the initial survey. Of these, 44% were general pediatricians and 56% were pediatric subspecialists. Based on years out of training, their levels of experience varied: >20 years in 24%, 11–20 years in 32.7%, 0–10 years in 34.7%, and currently in training in 8.7%. Of the 150 initial participants, 133 (89%) completed the QI project and the second survey. Between surveys, there was significant improvement in knowledge about the appropriate timing and duration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (Table 1). Moreover, 88% of participants responded that the QI project was extremely effective in helping them learn about antimicrobial stewardship principles and about ASP interventions. Conclusions: Participation in this MOC4 QI project resulted in significant improvement in knowledge about antimicrobial use in surgical patients, and the activity was perceived as a highly effective way to learn about antimicrobial stewardship. QI projects that leverage MOC4 credit can be a powerful tool for engaging pediatricians and disseminating education about antimicrobial stewardship.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Assessing the impact of antibiotic stewardship program elements on antibiotic use across acute-care hospitals: an observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 941-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Langford ◽  
Julie Hui-Chih Wu ◽  
Kevin A. Brown ◽  
Xuesong Wang ◽  
Valerie Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectivesAntibiotic use varies widely between hospitals, but the influence of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on this variability is not known. We aimed to determine the key structural and strategic aspects of ASPs associated with differences in risk-adjusted antibiotic utilization across facilities.DesignObservational study of acute-care hospitals in Ontario, CanadaMethodsA survey was sent to hospitals asking about both structural (8 elements) and strategic (32 elements) components of their ASP. Antibiotic use from hospital purchasing data was acquired for January 1 to December 31, 2014. Crude and adjusted defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days, accounting for hospital and aggregate patient characteristics, were calculated across facilities. Rate ratios (RR) of defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days were compared for hospitals with and without each antimicrobial stewardship element of interest.ResultsOf 127 eligible hospitals, 73 (57%) participated in the study. There was a 7-fold range in antibiotic use across these facilities (min, 253 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days; max, 1,872 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days). The presence of designated funding or resources for the ASP (RRadjusted, 0·87; 95% CI, 0·75–0·99), prospective audit and feedback (RRadjusted, 0·80; 95% CI, 0·67–0·96), and intravenous-to-oral conversion policies (RRadjusted, 0·79; 95% CI, 0·64–0·99) were associated with lower risk-adjusted antibiotic use.ConclusionsWide variability in antibiotic use across hospitals may be partially explained by both structural and strategic ASP elements. The presence of funding and resources, prospective audit and feedback, and intravenous-to-oral conversion should be considered priority elements of a robust ASP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document