scholarly journals 06. United States Healthcare Provider Preferences for Adult Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S127-S127
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Vietri ◽  
Kelley Meyers ◽  
Christine Poulos ◽  
Erica Chilson ◽  
Carolyn Sweeney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Pneumococcal Vaccine ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Vaccine Recommendations ◽  
Immunocompetent Adults

Abstract Background Pneumococcal vaccine recommendations for US adults are complex, varying by age and underlying conditions, and include both 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will vote on new recommendations in October after the 15- (PCV15) and 20-valent (PCV20) conjugate vaccines are approved. Stakeholder acceptability is part of ACIP’s evidence to recommendation framework, but few data are available on health care providers’ (HCPs) preferences for potential recommendations. Methods 752 HCPs (300 physicians, 150 nurse practitioners, 150 physician assistants, & 152 pharmacists) were surveyed. Object case best-worst scaling (BWS) was used to elicit preferences for hypothetical recommendations for 1) adults 19-64 years with chronic conditions and 2) immunocompetent adults ≥65 years. Presented recommendations included combinations of PCV15/PCV20 either as routine or after shared clinical decision making (SCDM), and PPSV23 as routine, SCDM, or no recommendation. Following BWS, HCPs were asked to assume ACIP was considering implementing both of their preferred recommendations for the age/risk groups. HCPs were then given the opportunity to change their selections and propose recommendations not included in the BWS exercise. Additional information was collected using conventional survey items. Results Routine use of higher-valent PCVs in sequence with PPSV23 was most often preferred for both adults 19-64 with chronic conditions (40%) and immunocompetent adults ≥65 (49%) when elicited separately for each age/risk group. Most respondents (63%) revised their recommendations after considering implementation, which resulted in most (59%) favoring recommendations harmonized across the age/risk groups, and 75% favoring routine use of PCV15 or PCV20 among immunocompetent adults ≥65. When asked directly, HCPs generally approved of the idea of simplifying adult pneumococcal vaccine recommendations, harmonizing the interval between vaccines, and lowering the cutoff for age-based recommendations below 65 years. Conclusion US HCPs generally prefer simplification of the adult pneumococcal recommendation, favoring broad routine use of both higher-valent PCVs and PPSV23. Disclosures Jeffrey Vietri, PhD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Kelley Meyers, PhD, RTI Health Solutions (Independent Contractor) Christine Poulos, PhD, Pfizer Inc (Other Financial or Material Support, Employee of RTI-HS, which received funds from Pfizer to conduct the study) Erica Chilson, PharmD, Pfizer, Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Vincenza Snow, MD, Pfizer Vaccines (Employee)

scholarly journals Preferences for Adult Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations Among United States Health Care Providers

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-670
Author(s):  
Patricia Sacco ◽  
Kelley Myers ◽  
Christine Poulos ◽  
Carolyn Sweeney ◽  
Kelly Hollis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Pneumococcal Vaccine ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Vaccine Recommendations

scholarly journals Epidemiological Characteristics of Carrying Viral Hepatitis B Antigen in the Population of the Nišava District

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Marina Kostić ◽  
Biljana Kocić ◽  
Nataša Rančić
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Epidemiological Surveillance ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Upward Trend ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

Summary The aim of this paper was to determine the trend of diseases and epidemiological characteristics of viral antigen carrying of hepatitis B for better implementation of prevention and control of the disease activity. The annual reports, reports of diseases - deaths from infectious diseases, epidemiological survey of the Public Health Institute (IPH) Niš were used as the material. The period from 2002 to 2011 in the Nišava District was considered. A descriptive method was used. HBsAg carrying shows an upward trend (y=15+3.27 x). Most carriers are males (57.27%), live in urban areas (98.16/ 100.000 population), average age 41.92 years old ±SD 18.59, pensioners (22.42%). 54.05% are nephrology patients (almost all retirees under the age of 60 years old). Only 15.76% were hospitalized. The data on the vaccination status are insufficient. In 5.45%, co-infection with hepatitis C virus was found. 63.33% belong to the group of patients for whom there were no data on the mode of transmission. Hemodialysis patients make 16.67%, blood donors 9.39%, 6.36% pregnant women and injecting drug users 1.21%. The upward trend of carrying, the presence of all known risk groups in the population of carrying in the Nišava District points to the need for improved epidemiological surveillance, strict application of protective measures, conducting of statutory vaccination of all categories of people exposed to particular risk of infection as well as continuing education on preventive measures of both population and health care providers.

Nurse Practitioner Challenges to the Orthodox Structure of Health Care Delivery: Regulation and Restraints on Trade

1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-225
Author(s):  
Karla Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Allied Health Care

AbstractUntil recently, physicians have been the primary health care providers in the United States. In response to the rising health care costs and public demand of the past decade, allied health care providers have challenged this orthodox structure of health care delivery. Among these allied health care providers are nurse practitioners, who have attempted to expand traditional roles of the registered nurse.This article focuses on the legal issues raised by several major obstacles to the expansion of nurse practitioner services: licensing restrictions, third party reimbursement policies, and denial of access to medical facilities and physician back-up services. The successful judicial challenges to discriminatory practices against other allied health care providers will be explored as a solution to the nurse practitioners’ dilemma.

scholarly journals “What Is Right for Me, Is Not Necessarily Right for You”: The Endogenous Factors Influencing Nonparticipation in Medical Assistance in Dying

2021 ◽  
pp. 104973232110088
Author(s):  
Janine Brown ◽  
Donna Goodridge ◽  
Lilian Thorpe ◽  
Alexander Crizzle
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Emotional Labor ◽  
Emotional Impact ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Endogenous Factors ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Professional Experiences ◽  
The Social

Access to medical assistance in dying (MAID) is influenced by legislation, health care providers (HCPs), the number of patient requests, and the patients’ locations. This research explored the factors that influenced HCPs’ nonparticipation in formal MAID processes and their needs to support this emerging practice area. Using an interpretive description methodology, we interviewed 17 physicians and 18 nurse practitioners who identified as non-participators in formal MAID processes. Nonparticipation was influenced by their (a) previous personal and professional experiences, (b) comfort with death, (c) conceptualization of duty, (d) preferred end-of-life care approaches, (e) faith or spirituality beliefs, (f) self-accountability, (g) consideration of emotional labor, and (h) future emotional impact. They identified a need for clear care pathways and safe passage. Two separate yet overlapping concepts were identified, conscientious objection to and nonparticipation in MAID, and we discussed options to support the social contract of care between HCPs and patients.

scholarly journals Is Video Laryngoscopy the Optimal Tool for Successful Intubation in a Neonatal Simulation Setting? A Single-Center Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. e5-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iram Musharaf ◽  
Sibasis Daspal ◽  
John Shatzer
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Endotracheal intubation is a skill required for resuscitation. Due to various reasons, intubation opportunities are decreasing for health care providers. Objective To compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) for interprofessional neonatal intubation skills in a simulated setting. Methods This was a prospective nonrandomized simulation crossover trial. Twenty-six participants were divided into three groups based on their frequency of intubation. Group 1 included pediatric residents; group 2 respiratory therapists and transport nurses; and group 3 neonatal nurse practitioners and physicians working in neonatology. We compared intubation success rate, intubation time, and laryngoscope preference. Results Success rates were 100% for both DL and VL in groups 1 and 2, and 88.9% for DL and 100% for VL in group 3. Median intubation times for DL and VL were 22 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 14.3–22.8 seconds) and 12.5 seconds (IQR 10.3–38.8 seconds) in group 1 (p = 0.779); 17 seconds (IQR 8–21 seconds) and 12 seconds (IQR 9–16.5 seconds) in group 2 (p = 0.476); and 11 seconds (IQR 7.5–15.5 seconds) and 15 seconds (IQR 11.5–36 seconds) in group 3 (p = 0.024). Conclusion We conclude that novice providers tend to perform better with VL, while more experienced providers perform better with DL. In this era of decreased clinical training opportunities, VL may serve as a useful tool to teach residents and other novice health care providers.

Risks of Cardiovascular Disease and Beyond in Prescription of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manas A. Rane ◽  
Alexander Gitin ◽  
Benjamin Fiedler ◽  
Lawrence Fiedler ◽  
Charles H. Hennekens
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Relieve Pain ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Introduction: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) include aspirin, naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen, as well as selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors such as celecoxib. Their use is common, as well as their side effects which cause 100 000 hospitalizations and 17 000 deaths annually. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration strengthened its warning about the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) attributed to nonaspirin NSAIDs. Methods: When the sample size is large, randomization provides control of confounding not possible to achieve with any observational study. Further, observational studies and, especially, claims data have inherent confounding by indication larger than the small to moderate effects being sought. Results: While trials are necessary, they must be of sufficient size and duration and achieve high compliance and follow-up. Until then, clinicians should remain uncertain about benefits and risks of these drugs. Conclusions: Since the totality of evidence remains incomplete, health-care providers should consider all these aforementioned benefits and risks, both CVD and beyond, in deciding whether and, if so, which, NSAID to prescribe. The factors in the decision of whether and, if so, which NSAID to prescribe for relief of pain from inflammatory arthritis should not be limited to risks of CVD or gastrointestinal side effects but should also include potential benefits including improvements in overall quality of life resulting from decreases in pain or impairment from musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The judicious individual clinical decision-making about the prescription of NSAIDs to relieve pain based on all these considerations has the potential to do much more good than harm.

Consent, Refusal, and Waivers in Patient-Centered Dysphagia Care: Using Law, Ethics, and Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Horner ◽  
Maria Modayil ◽  
Laura Roche Chapman ◽  
An Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Legal Advice ◽  
Medical Context

PurposeWhen patients refuse medical or rehabilitation procedures, waivers of liability have been used to bar future lawsuits. The purpose of this tutorial is to review the myriad issues surrounding consent, refusal, and waivers. The larger goal is to invigorate clinical practice by providing clinicians with knowledge of ethics and law. This tutorial is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.MethodThe authors use a hypothetical case of a “noncompliant” individual under the care of an interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation team to illuminate the ethical and legal features of the patient–practitioner relationship; the elements of clinical decision-making capacity; the duty of disclosure and the right of informed consent or informed refusal; and the relationship among noncompliance, defensive practices, and iatrogenic harm. We explore the legal question of whether waivers of liability in the medical context are enforceable or unenforceable as a matter of public policy.ConclusionsSpeech-language pathologists, among other health care providers, have fiduciary and other ethical and legal obligations to patients. Because waivers try to shift liability for substandard care from health care providers to patients, courts usually find waivers of liability in the medical context unenforceable as a matter of public policy.

Patients’ Perceptions of Integrated Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries by Level of Need for Health Services

2022 ◽  
pp. 107755872110678
Author(s):  
Nancy Song ◽  
Molly Frean ◽  
Christian T. Covington ◽  
Maike Tietschert ◽  
Emilia Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Ordinary Least Square Regression

Requirements for integrating care across providers, settings, and over time increase with patients’ needs. Health care providers’ ability to offer care that patients experience as integrated may vary among patients with different levels of need. We explore the variation in patients’ perceptions of integrated care among Medicare beneficiaries based on the beneficiary’s level of need using ordinary least square regression for each of four high-need groups: beneficiaries (a) with complex chronic conditions, (b) with frailties, (c) below 65 with disability, and (d) with any (of the first three) high needs. We control for beneficiary demographics and other factors affecting integrated care, and we conduct sensitivity analyses controlling for multiple individual chronic conditions. We find significant positive associations with level of need for provider support for self-directed care and medication and home health management. Controlling for multiple individual chronic conditions reduces effect sizes and number of significant relationships.

scholarly journals Health Care Providers’ Performance, Mindset, and Attitudes Toward a Neonatal Resuscitation Computer-Based Simulator: Empirical Study

10.2196/21855 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e21855
Author(s):  
Maria Cutumisu ◽  
Simran K Ghoman ◽  
Chang Lu ◽  
Siddhi D Patel ◽  
Catalina Garcia-Hidalgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Growth Mindset ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Actual Performance ◽  
Action Sequence ◽  
Resuscitation Training ◽  
Computer Based

Background Neonatal resuscitation involves a complex sequence of actions to establish an infant’s cardiorespiratory function at birth. Many of these responses, which identify the best action sequence in each situation, are taught as part of the recurrent Neonatal Resuscitation Program training, but they have a low incidence in practice, which leaves health care providers (HCPs) less prepared to respond appropriately and efficiently when they do occur. Computer-based simulators are increasingly used to complement traditional training in medical education, especially in the COVID-19 pandemic era of mass transition to digital education. However, it is not known how learners’ attitudes toward computer-based learning and assessment environments influence their performance. Objective This study explores the relation between HCPs’ attitudes toward a computer-based simulator and their performance in the computer-based simulator, RETAIN (REsuscitation TrAINing), to uncover the predictors of performance in computer-based simulation environments for neonatal resuscitation. Methods Participants were 50 neonatal HCPs (45 females, 4 males, 1 not reported; 16 respiratory therapists, 33 registered nurses and nurse practitioners, and 1 physician) affiliated with a large university hospital. Participants completed a demographic presurvey before playing the game and an attitudinal postsurvey after completing the RETAIN game. Participants’ survey responses were collected to measure attitudes toward the computer-based simulator, among other factors. Knowledge on neonatal resuscitation was assessed in each round of the game through increasingly difficult neonatal resuscitation scenarios. This study investigated the moderating role of mindset on the association between the perceived benefits of understanding the terminology used in the computer-based simulator, RETAIN, and their performance on the neonatal resuscitation tasks covered by RETAIN. Results The results revealed that mindset moderated the relation between participants’ perceived terminology used in RETAIN and their actual performance in the game (F3,44=4.56, R2=0.24, adjusted R2=0.19; P=.007; estimate=–1.19, SE=0.38, t44=–3.12, 95% CI –1.96 to –0.42; P=.003). Specifically, participants who perceived the terminology useful also performed better but only when endorsing more of a growth mindset; they also performed worse when endorsing more of a fixed mindset. Most participants reported that they enjoyed playing the game. The more the HCPs agreed that the terminology in the tutorial and in the game was accessible, the better they performed in the game, but only when they reported endorsing a growth mindset exceeding the average mindset of all the participants (F3,44=6.31, R2=0.30, adjusted R2=0.25; P=.001; estimate=–1.21, SE=0.38, t44=−3.16, 95% CI –1.99 to –0.44; P=.003). Conclusions Mindset moderates the strength of the relationship between HCPs’ perception of the role that the terminology employed in a game simulator has on their performance and their actual performance in a computer-based simulator designed for neonatal resuscitation training. Implications of this research include the design and development of interactive learning environments that can support HCPs in performing better on neonatal resuscitation tasks.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress among the General Population in Saudi Arabia during Covid-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (24) ◽  
pp. 9183
Author(s):  
Hasan Saeed Alamri ◽  
Abdullah Algarni ◽  
Shehata F. Shehata ◽  
Ali Al Bshabshe ◽  
Nada N. Alshehri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
General Population ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Psychological Impact ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prevalence Of Depression

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on public mental health. Our objective was to assess prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among the general population in Saudi Arabia during this pandemic. A descriptive cross-sectional approach was used targeting all accessible populations in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from participants using an electronic pre-structured questionnaire. Psychological impact was assessed using the Arabic version of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). A total of 1597 participants completed the survey. In total, 17.1% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 10% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 12% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Depression, anxiety, and stress were significantly higher among females, younger respondents, and health care providers. Depression was higher among smokers, singles, and non-working respondents. Anxiety was higher among those reporting contacts with COVID-19 positive cases, previously quarantined and those with chronic health problems. Our findings reaffirm the importance of providing appropriate knowledge and specialized interventions to promote the mental well-being of the Saudi population, paying particular attention to high-risk groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document