scholarly journals 331Risk Factors for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci and Carbapenemase-producing Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Colonization at admission to a Tertiary-care Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S133-S134
Author(s):  
Angela Chow ◽  
Kalisvar Marimuthu ◽  
Bee Fong Poh ◽  
Nwe-Ni Win ◽  
Jia Qi Kum ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s72-s72
Author(s):  
Stephanie Rasmussen ◽  
Sarah Waldman

Background: Understanding the epidemiology and risk factors for nosocomial infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is necessary for the prevention and control of VRE infections in the hospital setting. We sought to determine the incidence of nosocomial infections of VRE and to ascertain predictors associated with nosocomial infection. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from patients with VRE infection from January 2019 to December 2020 at a tertiary-care center in northern California. VRE infections were designated as hospital onset (HO) if the specimen was collected >3 days after hospital admission or community onset (CO) if the specimen was collected ≤3 days after admission. Associations between HO infections with time, unit, and specimen were identified. Results: Over the 2-year period, 214 unique VRE infections were identified in hospitalized patients; 115 infections were CO and 99 were HO. HO-VRE were associated most frequently with stay in medical/telemetry units (68%), followed by oncology–transplant units (15%) and ICUs (12%). There were ~4.7 and ~3.6 HO-VRE infections per month in 2019 and 2020, respectively. No differences were identified between HO-VRE infections in 2 medical units regarding glycopeptide and cephalosporin use in those units. The sources of VRE infections were urinary 45%, bloodstream 15%, stool 10%, and other 30%. Of the 45 infections in urine, 51% were identified from catheters (Foley and straight) and 27% were identified from clean-catch urine. Interestingly, 71% of patients with VRE identified from urine did not report urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms at the time of collection. Urine was most often collected for urinalysis and culture from patients with nonspecific symptoms such as fever, leukocytosis, hypotension, tachycardia, or altered mental status. All urine collected from patients who reported UTI symptoms grew >100,000 CFU/mL in culture, while only 75% of cultures from patients without symptoms grew >100,000 CFU/mL. The most common antibiogram was resistance to ampicillin, cefazolin, levofloxacin, minocycline, penicillin, tetracycline, and/or vancomycin (42% of cases) and susceptibility to both daptomycin and linezolid (60% of cases). Conclusions: HO-VRE infections were frequently identified with urinary sources and were often associated with catheter use. However, the frequent lack of concurrent UTI symptoms suggests VRE colonization rather than infection in many cases. Understanding the epidemiology and risk factors for HO-VRE infections is essential for developing infection prevention protocols to reduce the incidence of those infections.Funding: NoDisclosures: None


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (02.1) ◽  
pp. 9S
Author(s):  
Kohar Annie Kissoyan ◽  
George F Araj ◽  
Ghassan M Matar

Introduction: The aim of this study was to correlate genes involved in carbapenem resistance to MIC levels among clinical ESBL and non-ESBL producing carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Methodology: E. coli (n = 76) and K. pneumoniae (n = 54), collected between July 2008 and July 2014, were analyzed. The MICs were determined against ertapenem (ERT), imipenem (IMP) and meropenem (MER). PCR was performed on all 130 isolates to amplify the resistance and outer membrane proteins (OMPs) encoding genes: blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-15, ompC and ompF. Sequencing was performed on selected isolates. Results: The prevalence of blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, blaTEM-1, and/or blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates were 36%, 12%, 20% and 80%, respectively, while among K. pneumoniae they were 37%, 28%, 28% and 72%, respectively. K. pneumoniae isolates positive for any of these genes had an MIC90 > 32μg/mL against ERT, IMP and MER, while in E. coli isolates there was a variation in the MIC90 values. Porin impermeabilities were due to mutations in ompC and ompF genes in E. coli, and loss of ompC and ompF genes in K. pneumoniae, and increased MIC90 values. Conclusion: The presence of more than one carbapenem resistance encoding gene and/or ESBL encoding gene did not have an effect on the MIC90 value in K. pneumoniae isolates, while in E. coli it showed higher MIC90 values.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nermin Kamal Saeed ◽  
Safaa Alkhawaja ◽  
Nashawa Fawzy Abd El Moez Azam ◽  
Khalil Alaradi ◽  
Mohammed Al-Biltagi

Abstract PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to estimate the rate of infection with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in the main governmental tertiary care hospital in Bahrain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All clinical samples with positive growth of CRE over 6-year period (January 2012–December 2017) were collected from the microbiology laboratory data. RESULTS: The CRE incidence was high in the first half of study period (2012–2014) and then decreased between 2015 and 2017, after implementation of intensified CRE control measure bundle. About 49.4% of CRE-positive samples were isolated from the elderly age group (above 65 years old), most of them were admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU). The most common isolated organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (87.0%), followed by Escherichia coli (7.9%). Isolates from deep tracheal aspirate and midstream urine specimens were the most common source of CRE isolates (27.3%) and (26.3%), respectively. Bacteremia was documented in 21.2% of cases. CRE isolates in the study showed high rates of resistance to aminoglycosides (72.2% resistant to amikacin and 67.3% to gentamicin). Alternatively, most isolates retained their susceptibility to colistin and tigecycline with sensitivity of 83.9% and 85.7%, respectively. Combined resistance to both colistin and tigecycline was observed in 0.06% of total isolates. CONCLUSION: Elderly population and ICU admission were important risk factors for CRE acquisition. Most of CRE isolates were sensitive to both colistin and tigecycline, which make them the best combination for empiric frontline therapy for suspected serious CRE infection in our facility. Implementing CRE-bundled infection control measures significantly reduced the incidence of CRE infection in our hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document