scholarly journals Twenty Years of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program: Results for Candida Species From 1997–2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S79-S94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
Daniel J Diekema ◽  
John D Turnidge ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Ronald N Jones
Keyword(s):  
Candida Glabrata ◽  
Hot Spot ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Candida Auris ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Clinical Breakpoints

AbstractBackgroundThe emergence of antifungal resistance threatens effective treatment of invasive fungal infection (IFI). Invasive candidiasis is the most common health care–associated IFI. We evaluated the activity of fluconazole (FLU) against 20 788 invasive isolates of Candida (37 species) collected from 135 medical centers in 39 countries (1997–2016). The activity of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin (MCF) was evaluated against 15 308 isolates worldwide (2006–2016).MethodsSpecies identification was accomplished using phenotypic (1997–2001), genotypic, and proteomic methods (2006–2016). All isolates were tested using reference methods and clinical breakpoints published in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute documents.ResultsA decrease in the isolation of Candida albicans and an increase in the isolation of Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis were observed over time. Candida glabrata was the most common non–C. albicans species detected in all geographic regions except for Latin America, where C. parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis were more common. Six Candida auris isolates were detected: 1 each in 2009, 2013, 2014, and 2015 and 2 in 2016; all were from nosocomial bloodstream infections and were FLU-resistant (R). The highest rates of FLU-R isolates were seen in C. glabrata from North America (NA; 10.6%) and in C. tropicalis from the Asia-Pacific region (9.2%). A steady increase in isolation of C. glabrata and resistance to FLU was detected over 20 years in the United States. Echinocandin-R (EC-R) ranged from 3.5% for C. glabrata to 0.1% for C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Resistance to MCF was highest among C. glabrata (2.8%) and C. tropicalis (1.3%) from NA. Mutations on FKS hot spot (HS) regions were detected among 70 EC-R isolates (51/70 were C. glabrata). Most isolates harboring FKS HS mutations were resistant to 2 or more ECs.ConclusionsEC-R and FLU-R remain uncommon among contemporary Candida isolates; however, a slow and steady emergence of resistance to both antifungal classes was observed in C. glabrata and C. tropicalis isolates.

scholarly journals Summary of Ceftaroline Activity against Pathogens in the United States, 2010: Report from the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) Surveillance Program

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 2933-2940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Therapeutic Decision Making ◽  
Tract Infections

ABSTRACTTheAssessingWorldwideAntimicrobialResistanceEvaluation (AWARE) surveillance program is a sentinel resistance monitoring system designed to track the activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents. In the United States, a total of 8,434 isolates were collected during the 2010 surveillance program from 65 medical centers distributed across the nine census regions (5 to 10 medical centers per region). All organisms were isolated from documented infections, including 3,055 (36.2%) bloodstream infections, 2,282 (27.1%) respiratory tract infections, 1,965 (23.3%) acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, 665 (7.9%) urinary tract infections, and 467 (5.5%) miscellaneous other infection sites. Ceftaroline was the most potent β-lactam agent tested against staphylococci. The MIC90values were 1 μg/ml for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA; 98.4% susceptible) and 0.5 μg/ml for methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Ceftaroline was 16- to 32-fold more potent than ceftriaxone against methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal strains. All staphylococcus isolates (S. aureusand CoNS) were inhibited at ceftaroline MIC values of ≤2 μg/ml. Ceftaroline also displayed potent activity against streptococci (MIC90, 0.015 μg/ml for beta-hemolytic streptococci; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml for penicillin-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae). Potent activity was also shown against Gram-negative pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae,Haemophilus parainfluenzae, andMoraxella catarrhalis). Furthermore, wild-type strains ofEnterobacteriaceae(non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing strains and non-AmpC-hyperproducing strains) were often susceptible to ceftaroline. Continued monitoring through surveillance networks will allow for the assessment of the evolution of resistance as this new cephalosporin is used more broadly to provide clinicians with up-to-date information to assist in antibiotic stewardship and therapeutic decision making.

scholarly journals 1226. In Vitro Activity of Tebipenem and Comparators Against Enterobacterales Collected from Patients with Bloodstream Infections as Part of the 2019 Global STEWARD Surveillance Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S702-S702
Author(s):  
Ian A Critchley ◽  
Nicole Cotroneo ◽  
Rodrigo E Mendes ◽  
Michael J Pucci
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Clinical Development ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Oral Agents ◽  
The Us ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Enterobacterales (ENT) are frequently implicated in BSI with an increase in organisms producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). This challenges a possible transition to current oral agents due to co-resistance. Carbapenems are active against ESBL-ENT and tebipenem (TBP) is a new oral carbapenem in clinical development. The aim of the study was to assess resistance (R) among BSI isolates and activity of TBP and comparators against ENT collected in a 2019 surveillance study. Methods 2612 ENT from BSI were centrally tested by reference broth microdilution. Isolates were from medical centers in the US, Europe (EU), Latin America (LA) and Asia Pacific (AP). MIC results were interpreted according to CLSI, including ESBL assignment. CRE were sequenced to identify carbapenemase genes. Results Among the ENT, non-susceptibility (NS) rates to ceftazidime, levofloxacin were 20.4 and 27.0%, respectively, and R to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was 31.1%. NS rates for ertapenem (ETP) and MER were 4.9 and 2.7%, respectively. MIC90s for TBP, ETP and MER were 0.12, 0.12 and 0.06 µg/mL, respectively. The MIC90 for TBP was 0.06 µg/mL for ENT from the US and 0.12 µg/mL for isolates from EU, LA and AP. Escherichia coli (EC) was the most prevalent (52% of ENT isolates) and the MIC90 for TBP ranged from 0.015 µg/mL for isolates in the US/EU to 0.03 µg/mL for isolates in LA/AP. ESBL-EC ranged from 15.7% in US to 34.3% in LA. TBP was active against ESBL-EC with an MIC90 of 0.03 µg/mL. Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) accounted for 22.7% of BSI caused by ENT and TBP MIC90 ranged from 0.06 µg/mL for KP in US to >8 µg/mL in EU, LA and AP. MER-R KP ranged from 2.4% in US to 14.9% in LA. KPC-2, -3 and NDM were the most prevalent carbapenemases. TBP MIC90 values for MER-S ESBL KP in EU, LA and AP were ≤0.12 µg/mL. Conclusion TBP activity was similar to ETP and MER against ENT responsible for BSI. R to oral agents was compromised by ESBL co-resistance. TBP was among the most active agents against EC isolates and ESBL phenotypes. Among KP, TBP was more active against isolates from US where prevalence of CRE was lower than EU, LA and AP. TBP may be considered as an alternative oral option for BSI caused by non-CRE ESBL-producing ENT. Disclosures Ian A. Critchley, Ph.D., Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Nicole Cotroneo, Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie (Research Grant or Support)AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)Cipla Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Cipla USA Inc. (Research Grant or Support)ContraFect Corporation (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)

scholarly journals 693. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected From Patients with Bloodstream Infections as Part of the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2014–2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S314-S314
Author(s):  
Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽  
Gregory Stone ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Susceptibility Data

Abstract Background Avibactam (AVI) is a β-lactamase inhibitor with potent inhibitory activity against Class A, Class C, and some Class D serine β-lactamases. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) with AVI has been approved in Europe and in the United States for several indications. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Enterobacteriaceae (Eba) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) isolates collected from patients with bloodstream infections as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2014–2017. Methods A total of 53416 Eba and 15050 Pae nonduplicate clinically significant isolates, including 5155 Eba and 845 Pae isolated from bloodstream infections, were collected by 167 hospital laboratories in 36 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding China), and the Middle East/Africa region. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL AVI. Meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Eba and Pae isolates were screened for the presence of β-lactamase genes. Results Susceptibility data are shown in the Table. Percentages of susceptibility (% S) to the tested agents were 0.2–2.8% lower among Eba and Pae from bloodstream infections compared with isolates from combined sources in most cases. CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against all Eba bloodstream isolates and subsets of CAZ-NS and colistin-resistant (CST-R) isolates (MIC90, 0.5–2 µg/mL, 96.0–100% S). Reduced activity against MEM-NS Eba was attributable to carriage of class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) because all MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. CAZ-AVI also showed good in vitro activity against the majority of Pae bloodstream isolates (MIC90, 16 µg/mL, 89.5% S). Activity was reduced against CAZ-NS, MEM-NS and CST-R subsets (53.7–85.0% S), which included isolates carrying MBLs, but exceeded the activity of CAZ and MEM against these subsets by 15–65%. CST and amikacin were the only tested comparators that demonstrated comparable or greater activity against Pae bloodstream isolates. Conclusion CAZ-AVI provides a valuable therapeutic option for treating bloodstream infections caused by MBL-negative Eba and Pae isolates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 1569. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Comparator Agents against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected from Patients with Bloodstream Infections as Part of the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2015-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S783-S784
Author(s):  
Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽  
Sibylle Lob ◽  
Greg Stone ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Independent Contractor

Abstract Background Avibactam (AVI) is a β-lactamase inhibitor with potent inhibitory activity against Class A, Class C, and some Class D serine β-lactamases. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) with AVI has been approved in Europe and in the United States for several indications. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Enterobacterales (Eba) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) isolates collected from patients with bloodstream infections as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2015-2018. Methods A total of 57048 Eba and 15813 Pae non-duplicate clinically significant isolates, including 7720 Eba and 1286 Pae isolated from bloodstream infections, were collected in 52 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding mainland China), and the Middle East/Africa region. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/ml AVI. Meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Eba and Pae isolates were screened for the presence of β-lactamase genes. Results Susceptibility data are shown in the Table. Percentages of susceptibility (% S) to the tested agents were 0.3-2.9% lower among Eba and Pae from bloodstream infections compared to isolates from combined sources in most cases. CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against all Eba bloodstream isolates and the CAZ-NS subset (MIC90, 0.5-2 µg/ml, 93.4-98.1% S). Reduced activity against MEM-NS Eba was attributable to carriage of class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) because 99% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. None of the tested comparators exceeded the activity of CAZ-AVI. CAZ-AVI also showed good in vitro activity against the majority of Pae bloodstream isolates (MIC90, 16 µg/ml, 89.4% S). Activity was reduced against CAZ-NS and MEM-NS subsets (54.2-63.8% S), which included isolates carrying MBLs, but exceeded the activity of CAZ and MEM against these subsets by 26-31 percentage points. Amikacin was the only tested comparator that demonstrated comparable activity against Pae bloodstream isolates. Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI provides a valuable therapeutic option for treating bloodstream infections caused by MBL-negative Eba and Pae isolates. Disclosures Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals Geographic and Temporal Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Over 20 Years From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Ana C Gales ◽  
Jennifer M Streit ◽  
Michael D Huband ◽  
Athanasios Tsakris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Latin America ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance

Abstract Background The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program was established in 1997 and encompasses over 750 000 bacterial isolates from ≥400 medical centers worldwide. Among the pathogens tested, Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains a common cause of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bloodstream infections and pneumonia in hospitalized patients. In the present study, we reviewed geographic and temporal trends in resistant phenotypes of P. aeruginosa over 20 years of the SENTRY Program. Methods From 1997 to 2016, 52 022 clinically significant consecutive isolates were submitted from ≥200 medical centers representing the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Latin America, and North America. Only 1 isolate per patient per infection episode was submitted. Isolates were identified by standard algorithms and/or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Susceptibility testing was performed by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods and interpreted using CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 2018 criteria at JMI Laboratories. Results The most common infection from which P. aeruginosa was isolated was pneumonia in hospitalized patients (44.6%) followed by bloodstream infection (27.9%), with pneumonia having a slightly higher rate of MDR (27.7%) than bloodstream infections (23.7%). The region with the highest percentage of MDR phenotypes was Latin America (41.1%), followed by Europe (28.4%). The MDR rates were highest in 2005–2008 and have decreased in the most recent period. Colistin was the most active drug tested (99.4% susceptible), followed by amikacin (90.5% susceptible). Conclusions Over the 20 years of SENTRY Program surveillance, the rate of MDR P. aeruginosa infections has decreased, particularly in Latin America. Whether the trend of decreasing resistance in P. aeruginosa is maintained will be documented in future SENTRY Program and other surveillance reports.

scholarly journals Bloodstream Infections Due to Candida Species: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998

2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
R. N. Jones ◽  
G. V. Doern ◽  
H. S. Sader ◽  
S. A. Messer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Latin America ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Common Species ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
International Program ◽  
The Third ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance

ABSTRACT An international program of surveillance of bloodstream infections (BSI) in the United States, Canada, and Latin America detected 306 episodes of candidemia in 34 medical centers (22 in the United States, 6 in Canada, and 6 in Latin America) in 1997 and 328 episodes in 34 medical centers (22 in the United States, 5 in Canada, and 7 in Latin America) in 1998. Of the 634 BSI, 54.3% were due to Candida albicans, 16.4% were due to C. glabrata, 14.9% were due to C. parapsilosis, 8.2% were due to C. tropicalis, 1.6% were due to C. krusei, and 4.6% were due to other Candida spp. The percentage of BSI due to C. albicans decreased very slightly in the United States between 1997 and 1998 (56.2 to 54.4%;P = 0.68) and increased in both Canada (52.6 to 70.1%; P = 0.05) and Latin America (40.5 to 44.6%;P = 0.67). C. glabrata was the second most common species observed overall, and the percentage of BSI due toC. glabrata increased in all three geographic areas between 1997 and 1998. C. parapsilosis was the third most prevalent BSI isolate in both Canada and Latin America, accounting for 7.0 and 18.5% of BSI, respectively. Resistance to fluconazole (MIC, ≥64 μg/ml) and itraconazole (MIC, ≥1.0 μg/ml) was observed infrequently in both 1997 (2.3 and 8.5%, respectively) and 1998 (1.5 and 7.6%, respectively). Among the different species ofCandida, resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole was observed in C. glabrata and C. krusei, whereas isolates of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were all highly susceptible to both fluconazole (98.9 to 100% susceptible) and itraconazole (96.4 to 100% susceptible). Isolates from Canada and Latin America were generally more susceptible to both triazoles than U.S. isolates were. Continued surveillance appears necessary to detect these important changes.

scholarly journals 1263. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Comparator Agents against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected from Patients with Bloodstream Infections as Part of the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2017-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S720-S720
Author(s):  
Sibylle Lob ◽  
Meredith Hackel ◽  
Gregory Stone ◽  
Daniel F Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Independent Contractor

Abstract Background Avibactam (AVI) is a β-lactamase inhibitor with potent inhibitory activity against Class A, Class C, and some Class D serine β-lactamases. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) with AVI has been approved in Europe and in the United States for several indications. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Enterobacterales (Eba) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) isolates collected from patients with bloodstream infections as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2017-2019. Methods A total of 48193 Eba and 15376 Pae non-duplicate clinically significant isolates, including 9224 Eba and 1808 Pae isolated from bloodstream infections, were collected in 53 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding mainland China), and the Middle East/Africa region. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/ml AVI. Meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Eba and Pae isolates were screened for the presence of β-lactamase genes. Results Susceptibility data are shown in the Table. Percentages of susceptibility (% S) to the tested agents were 0.4-3.4% lower among Eba and Pae from bloodstream infections compared to isolates from combined sources in most cases. CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against all Eba bloodstream isolates and the CAZ-NS subset (MIC90, 0.5-4 µg/ml, 91.7-97.4% S). Reduced activity against MEM-NS Eba was attributable to carriage of class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) as 98.1% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. None of the tested comparators exceeded the activity of CAZ-AVI. CAZ-AVI also showed good in vitro activity against the majority of Pae bloodstream isolates (MIC90, 16 µg/ml, 89.7% S). Activity was reduced against CAZ-NS and MEM-NS subsets (55.9-63.0% S), which included isolates carrying MBLs, but exceeded the activity of CAZ against MEM-NS and MEM against CAZ-NS by 26-28 percentage points. Amikacin was the only tested comparator that demonstrated comparable activity against Pae bloodstream isolates. Results Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI provides a valuable therapeutic option for treating bloodstream infections caused by MBL-negative Eba and Pae isolates. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Gregory Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

scholarly journals Dalbavancin Activity When Tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated in Medical Centers on Six Continents (2011 to 2014)

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 3419-3425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
Jason E. Schuchert ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
The United States ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance

Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, was approved for use in 2014 by regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. The activity of dalbavancin was also widely assessed by determination of its activity againstStreptococcus pneumoniaeclinical isolates collected from patients on six continents monitored during two time intervals (2011 to 2013 and 2014). A total of 18,186 pneumococcal isolates were obtained from 49 nations and submitted to a monitoring laboratory as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program for reference susceptibility testing. The potency of dalbavancin againstS. pneumoniaewas consistent across the years that it was monitored, with the MIC50and MIC90being 0.015 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively, and all isolates were inhibited by ≤0.12 μg/ml. The activity of dalbavancin was not adversely influenced by nonsusceptibility to β-lactams (ceftriaxone or penicillin), macrolides, clindamycin, fluoroquinolones, or tetracyclines or multidrug resistance (MDR). Regional variations in dalbavancin activity were not detected, butS. pneumoniaestrains isolated in the Asia-Pacific region were more likely to be nonsusceptible to penicillin and ceftriaxone as well as to be MDR than strains isolated in North or South America and Europe. Direct comparisons of potency illustrated that dalbavancin (MIC50and MIC90, 0.015 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively) was 16-fold or more active than vancomycin (MIC50, 0.25 μg/ml), linezolid (MIC50, 1 μg/ml), levofloxacin (MIC50, 1 μg/ml), ceftriaxone (MIC90, 1 μg/ml), and penicillin (MIC90, 2 μg/ml). In conclusion, dalbavancin had potent and consistent activity against this contemporary (2011 to 2014) collection ofS. pneumoniaeisolates.

scholarly journals 1593. Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against OXA-48 β-lactamase–Producing Enterobacterales Collected in International Medical Centers, Including the United States, in 2017–2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S793-S793
Author(s):  
Lynn-Yao Lin ◽  
Dmitri Debabov ◽  
William Chang
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
The United States ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Multiple Resistance ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Custom Made

Abstract Background OXA-48 is a carbapenemase with low-level hydrolytic activity toward cephalosporins. This study evaluated in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem (MEM), meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), and other antimicrobial agents against 113 OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales with multiple resistance mechanisms collected in a 2017–2018 global surveillance program. Methods Nonduplicate clinical isolates of 113 Enterobacterales were collected from medical centers in 25 countries in 2017–2018. In vitro susceptibility tests were performed by broth microdilution with a custom-made panel consisting of CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime (CAZ), MEM, MVB, C/T, colistin (COL), gentamicin (GEN), levofloxacin (LEV), and amikacin (AMK). Whole genome sequencing or quantitative PCR data were used to analyze resistance mechanisms, such as OXA-48, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), original-spectrum β-lactamase (OSBL), and AmpC β-lactamase. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints were applied for susceptibility interpretations. Results Of 113 OXA-48–producing clinical isolates, 20 carried OXA-48 alone. The remaining 93 isolates carried additional β-lactamases, including 63 with ESBL (CTX-M-15) + OSBL (SHV, TEM), 15 with AmpC (DHA, AAC, CMY) + ESBL (CTX-M-15), and 15 with OSBL (SHV, TEM). 99.1% (all but 1) of all isolates tested were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, whereas 71.7%, 17.7%, and 14.2% were susceptible to MVB, MEM, and C/T, respectively. Among isolates harboring multiple resistance mechanisms (OXA-48 + ESBL + OSBL; n=63), 98.4%, 69.8%, 11.1%, and 7.9% were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, MVB, MEM, and C/T, respectively. Among isolates carrying OXA-48 + AmpC + ESBL + OSBL (n=15), 100%, 66.7%, 13.3%, and 13.3% were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, MVB, MEM, and C/T, respectively (Table). Aminoglycosides (AMK and GEN) and other β-lactams (eg, CAZ) were 20%–90% active against these isolates. COL was the second most effective comparator, inhibiting 83.2% of these isolates. Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI was the most effective agent in this study compared with other antibiotics, including β-lactams, β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, aminoglycosides, and COL, against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales carrying multiple β-lactamases. Disclosures Lynn-Yao Lin, MS, AbbVie (Employee) Dmitri Debabov, PhD, AbbVie (Employee) William Chang, BS, AbbVie (Employee)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document