scholarly journals 1134. Antibiotic Indications and Appropriateness in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A 10 Center Point Prevalence Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S403-S404
Author(s):  
Kathleen Chiotos ◽  
Jennifer Blumenthal ◽  
Juri Boguniewicz ◽  
Debra Palazzi ◽  
Emily Berkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Point Prevalence Study

Abstract Background Antibiotics are prescribed in up to 80% of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, but multicenter studies systematically evaluating antibiotic indications and appropriateness in this high-utilizing population are lacking. Methods A multicenter point prevalence study was conducted at 10 geographically diverse tertiary care US children’s hospitals. All PICU patients < 21 years of age who were receiving systemic antibiotics at 8:00 AM on each study day were included. Study days occurred in February and March 2019. Data were abstracted by critical care and/or infectious diseases trained clinicians using standardized data collection forms and definitions of antibiotic appropriateness. Results 408 of 732 PICU patients (56%) received 618 antibiotics on the two study days. Empiric therapy for suspected bacterial infections without sepsis was the most common indication for antibiotics (22%), followed by treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and empiric therapy for septic shock (12% each, Figure 1). Overall, 194 antibiotic orders (32%) were classified as inappropriate and 158 patients (39%) received at least one inappropriate antibiotic. Vancomycin, cefepime, and ceftriaxone were the antibiotics most often inappropriately prescribed (Figure 2). Antibiotics prescribed inappropriately for the top 5 indications shown in Figure 1 accounted for 77% of all inappropriate antibiotic use. Prolonged ( >4 days) empiric therapy and prolonged ( >24 hours) post-operative prophylaxis were the most common reasons antibiotics prescribed for these indications were classified as inappropriate. Pneumonia and ventilator-associated infections were the most common infections for which antibiotics were prescribed inappropriately (46%). Reasons for inappropriate antibiotic use included lack of evidence supporting a bacterial infection (no radiographic infiltrate or significant increase in respiratory support) and use of unnecessarily broad antibiotics (Table 1). Conclusion Inappropriate antibiotic use is common in the PICU, particularly for pneumonia. Studies focused on defining optimal treatment strategies, as well as improved diagnostic approaches to curtail prolonged courses of empiric therapy, should be prioritized. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Foglia ◽  
Mary Dawn Meier ◽  
Alexis Elward
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Attributable Mortality ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Case Control Studies

SUMMARY Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the second most common hospital-acquired infection among pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Empiric therapy for VAP accounts for approximately 50% of antibiotic use in pediatric ICUs. VAP is associated with an excess of 3 days of mechanical ventilation among pediatric cardiothoracic surgery patients. The attributable mortality and excess length of ICU stay for patients with VAP have not been defined in matched case control studies. VAP is associated with an estimated $30,000 in attributable cost. Surveillance for VAP is complex and usually performed using clinical definitions established by the CDC. Invasive testing via bronchoalveolar lavage increases the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis. The pathogenesis in children is poorly understood, but several prospective cohort studies suggest that aspiration and immunodeficiency are risk factors. Educational interventions and efforts to improve adherence to hand hygiene for children have been associated with decreased VAP rates. Studies of antibiotic cycling in pediatric patients have not consistently shown this measure to prevent colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods. More consistent and precise approaches to the diagnosis of pediatric VAP are needed to better define the attributable morbidity and mortality, pathophysiology, and appropriate interventions to prevent this disease.

Etiology of Fever and Opportunities for Reduction of Antibiotic Use in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (08) ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Toltzis ◽  
Bonnie Rosolowski ◽  
Ann Salvator
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Axillary Temperature ◽  
Prospective Case Series

Abstract Objective: To determine the cause of fever in critically ill children and to identify opportunities for reducing antibiotic use in this population. Design: Prospective case series. Setting: A tertiary-care medical-surgical pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Patients: Children admitted to the PICU who experienced fever (axillary temperature &gt;38.3°C). Measurements: Consecutive children who were febrile at any point in their PICU stay were investigated over two winter seasons. Etiology of the fever was determined by physical examination and routine microbiology and radiographic tests. Three subgroups were reviewed to approximate the number of antibiotic-days that could have been reduced; namely, those with an indeterminate source, those with a documented viral infection, and those receiving a prolonged course of antibiotics. A set of standards reflecting common antibiotic use then was applied to these three patient groups. Results: Of 211 subjects, the majority (83.3%) had either a definitive or suspected focus for their fever, and nearly all of these patients were judged to have an infectious etiology. The study population received a total of 2,036 antibiotic-days. Despite the high incidence of infectious causes of fever in our subjects, however, approximately 15% of total antibiotic-days could have been reduced by applying common-use standards. Conclusions: Fever in the PICU was usually of defined focus and infectious in origin. However, among febrile patients in the PICU, substantial opportunity exists for reduction of antibiotic use. Trials determining the safety of antibiotic reduction in this population should be pursued vigorously.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Pragmatic Biomarker-Driven Algorithm to Guide Antibiotic Use in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: the Optimizing Antibiotic Strategies in Sepsis (OASIS) II Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J Downes ◽  
Julie C Fitzgerald ◽  
Emily Schriver ◽  
Craig L K Boge ◽  
Michael E Russo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Bacterial Infection ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Period 2 ◽  
Rate Ratios

Abstract Background Biomarkers can facilitate safe antibiotic discontinuation in critically ill patients without bacterial infection. Methods We tested the ability of a biomarker-based algorithm to reduce excess antibiotic administration in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) without bacterial infections (uninfected) in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The algorithm suggested that PICU clinicians stop antibiotics if (1) C-reactive protein &lt;4 mg/dL and procalcitonin &lt;1 ng/mL at SIRS onset and (2) no evidence of bacterial infection by exam/testing by 48 hours. We evaluated excess broad-spectrum antibiotic use, defined as administration on days 3–9 after SIRS onset in uninfected children. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) compared unadjusted excess length of therapy (LOT) in the 34 months before (Period 1) and 12 months after (Period 2) implementation of this algorithm, stratified by biomarker values. Segmented linear regression evaluated excess LOT among all uninfected episodes over time and between the periods. Results We identified 457 eligible SIRS episodes without bacterial infection, 333 in Period 1 and 124 in Period 2. When both biomarkers were below the algorithm’s cut-points (n = 48 Period 1, n = 31 Period 2), unadjusted excess LOT was lower in Period 2 (IRR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.93). Among all 457 uninfected episodes, there were no significant differences in LOT (coefficient 0.9, P = .99) between the periods on segmented regression. Conclusions Implementation of a biomarker-based algorithm did not decrease overall antibiotic exposure among all uninfected patients in our PICU, although exposures were reduced in the subset of SIRS episodes where biomarkers were low.

Communication with patients' families in the intensive care unit: A point prevalence study

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selena S. Au ◽  
Amanda L. Roze des Ordons ◽  
Asma Amir Ali ◽  
Andrea Soo ◽  
Henry T. Stelfox
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Point Prevalence Study

scholarly journals Survival among patients admitted in PICU (Pediatric Intensive Care Unit) of tertiary childcare hospital.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1773-1777
Author(s):  
Fatima Jabeen ◽  
Asim Khurshid ◽  
Maria Saleem
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Study Participants

Objective: To determine the frequency of survival among patients admitted in Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of tertiary care hospital according to disease severity score PRISM III. Study Design: Descriptive study. Setting: PICU of The Children’s Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Multan. Period: October 2019 to April 2020. Material & Methods: A total of 205 admitted children in PICU were recruited. PRISM III forms were filled and PRISM III score was calculated for all study participants. Results: Of these 205 study cases, 124 (60.5 %) were male patients while 81 (39.5 %) were female patients. Mean age of our study cases was 3.64 ± 1.96 years. Mean duration of PICU stay was 4.52 ± 3.59 days and 139 (67.8%) patients had PICU stay for upto 5 days. Mean PRISM III score was 11.25 ± 4.69 and 69 (33.7%) had group I score, 118 (57.6%) had group II score, 14 (6.8%) had group III score and 4 (2%) had group IV score. Of these 205 study cases, mortality was noted in 31 (15.1%). Conclusion: High Frequency of mortality among children admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) was observed and mortality was found to be increasing with increasing PRISM III score.

International point prevalence study of Intensive Care Unit transfusion practices—Pilot study in the Netherlands

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-208
Author(s):  
S. de Bruin ◽  
M.Y. Alders ◽  
R. van Bruggen ◽  
D. de Korte ◽  
T.W.L. Scheeren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Point Prevalence Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document