Wellbeing Policy Evaluation and Appraisal

Author(s):  
Paul Frijters ◽  
Christian Krekel

The third chapter offers a methodology for those readers who are tasked with actually conducting policy evaluations and appraisals based on subjective wellbeing data, including wellbeing cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses, impact assessments, or business plans. It first gives a simple and fairly non-formal exposition of how wellbeing cost-effectiveness works. It then sets up the methodology formally and discusses the various technical standards and issues that might arise when implementing them, for example double-counting of impacts. The chapter illustrates the methodology using various examples, ranging from simple to more technical. It also introduces and discusses data sources related to wellbeing, with a particular focus on the United Kingdom at present but also beyond, as well as rules of thumb and matters associated with the use of evidence and literature on wellbeing more generally.

Drug Safety ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 541-551
Author(s):  
Ana Ruigómez ◽  
Estel Plana ◽  
Alicia Gilsenan ◽  
Joan Fortuny ◽  
Miguel Cainzos-Achirica ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. e0175920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Amdahl ◽  
Jose Diaz ◽  
Arati Sharma ◽  
Jinhee Park ◽  
David Chandiwana ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John Chandler ◽  
Elisabeth Berg ◽  
Marion Ellison ◽  
Jim Barry

This chapter discusses the contemporary position of social work in the United Kingdom, and in particular the challenges to what is seen as a managerial-technicist version of social work. The chapter begins with focus on the situation from the 1990s to the present day in which this version of social work takes root and flourishes. The discussion then concentrates on three different routes away from a managerial-technicist social work: the first, reconfiguring professional practice in the direction of evaluation in practice, the second ‘reclaiming social work’ on the Hackney relationship-based model and the third ‘reclaiming social work’ in a more radical, highly politicised way. Special attention is devoted to a discussion about how much autonomy the social workers have in different models, but also what kind of autonomy and for what purpose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Drummond ◽  
David Banta

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe generally the development and present situation with health technology assessment (HTA) in the United Kingdom.Methods: The methods used are a review of important materials that have described the development process and present situation, supplemented by some personal experiences.Results: The United Kingdom has been characterized historically as a country with a strong interest in evidence in health care, both clinical trials for efficacy and cost-effectiveness analyses. However, this evidence was not well-linked to the needs of the National Health Services (NHS) before formation of the NHS R&D Programme in 1991, The R&D Programme brought substantial resources into HTA and related activities, with the central aim of improving health care in Britain and increasing value for money. However, policy makers as well as staff of the R&D Programme were dissatisfied with the use of the HTA results in clinical and administrative practice. Therefore, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) was formed in 1999. NICE issues guidance intended to influence practical decision making in health care at the national and local levels, based on efficacy information and, in some cases, economic analyses. NICE is now also seeking ways to maximize impacts on practice.Conclusions: The UK experience shows that information on clinical and cost-effectiveness may not be enough to change practice, at least in the short-run. Still, one may conclude that the United Kingdom now has one of the few most important and influential HTA programs in the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document