Divergence without Speciation
Part II discussed the developmental origins of novelty in terms of how the phenotype is reorganized during evolution. It did not deal extensively with the problem of adaptedness during evolutionary transitions. How are we to explain transitions from one well-adapted state to another? Many still-influential discussions of adaptive shifts, such as Simpson’s (1944) treatment of quantum evolution and Wright’s (1932) discussion of shifting balance, associate change with fitness cost. Speciational theories of change depict change as dependent upon reproductively isolated populations in new environments. This chapter discusses divergence without reproductive isolation of novel forms, where the presumed cost of change is sidestepped because of the presence of adaptive options in the population undergoing change. Darwin’s solution to the problem of maladaptation during change was strict gradualism in monomorphically adapted populations. Darwin (1859 [1966]) reasoned that transitions between specialized adaptive states need not be disruptive if they were to occur by a series of small steps. Wright’s (1932) shifting balance is another solution to the same problem, but in Wright’s theory, change is initiated by a chance combination of genes that happens to suit a population to a new adaptive mode. Without a gradual adaptive change or a lucky gene combination, a shift between two peaks on Wright’s adaptive landscape would imply passing through a valley of inferior adaptedness. Alternative phenotypes offer a third kind of solution, one that requires neither strict gradualism in a monomorphic population nor chance genetic events. In species with alternative phenotypes, a recurrent novelty that happens to prove advantageous to some individuals or in some circumstances can be refined via gradual genetic accommodation as an optional trait. Since this involves developmental diversification, not transformation or loss of existing traits, the new option develops as a new specialization alongside old ones. Shapiro notes that conditional expression of alternative phenotypes is a way of having two adaptive specializations “without carrying a genetic load,” or a cost of genotypes that oblige expression of phenotypes less favorable than the fittest one.