scholarly journals T167. QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LONG ACTING INJECTABLE ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATIONS AMONG SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S295-S295
Author(s):  
Valeria Karakasi ◽  
Pavlos Pavlidis ◽  
Aikaterini Vlachaki

Abstract Background The purpose of this presentation is to investigate qualitative differences associated with treatment of Schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients with long acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, including adverse effects and efficacy. Methods Literature around LAI antipsychotics and their comparative data was reviewed and evaluated via all electronic databases up to December 2018. Results Metabolic, hepatic and cardiovascular complications in olanzapine treatment have been the major concern in most studies, despite the effectiveness of the medication, as coronary heart disease is strongly associated with a decrease in the life expectancy of schizophrenia patients (coupled with higher levels of smoking and malnutrition). Treatment with risperidone was associated with a worsening of depressive affect and suicidal ideation (except prolactin-related and extrapyramidal adverse effects), as well as sexual dysfunction. Hyperprolactinemia, extrapyramidal / neurological symptoms, and sexual dysfunction were the major problems with haloperidol treatment despite a good efficacy profile with respect to positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Sporadic effectiveness, agitation and, to a lesser extent, weight gain were some of the concerns in palimperidone treatment. Aripiprazole treatment was associated with a comparatively milder and in the long term more preferable adverse effect profile, while exhibiting similarly high levels of efficacy with olanzapine in controlling schizophrenia symptoms, but with a reported relatively higher rate in treatment discontinuation (drop-outs) in comparison to olanzapine and haloperidol in case of schizophrenia (in contrast to schizoaffective disorder in which high levels of both compliance and effectiveness are exhibited). Discussion The need for an individualized approach in psychiatric treatment highlighted so that the needs of each patient be taken into account by the therapist in choosing the optimal treatment within a given time frame.

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s815-s816
Author(s):  
M. Juncal Ruiz ◽  
B. Fernández-Abascal Puente ◽  
O. Porta Olivares ◽  
M. Gómez Revuelta ◽  
R. Landera Rodríguez ◽  
...  

IntroductionAntipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia is associated with relevant side effects: short-term as hypogonadism, gynecomastia, amenorrhoea, sexual dysfunction and galactorrhoea; long-term as cardiovascular disease, bone demineralization and breast and prostate tumors.AimsTo evaluate the effect of switching to long-acting injectable aripiprazole on long-lasting antypsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia.MethodsThis was a prospective observational 1-year study carried out in 125 outpatients with schizophrenia who were clinically stabilized but a switching to another antipsychotic was indicated. We measured the basal prolactine at the start of the study and 1 year after switching to long acting injecatable (LAI) aripiprazole.ResultsIn basal analytic, 48% had hyperprolactinemia (21.8–306.2 ng/mL) and 66.5% of them described side effects: 78% sexual dysfunction (72% men), 11% galactorrhoea (100% women), 5.5% amenorrhoea and 5.5% bone pain (100% women). In 48% of patients with hyperprolactinemia, the previous antipsychotics comprised: LAI-paliperidone (65,7%), oral-risperidone (7%), oral-olanzapine (6.1%), oral-paliperidone (5.2%), LAI-risperidone (4%) and others (12%). One year after switching to LAI-aripiprazole, prolactine levels were lower in all patients and in 85% prolactine levels were normalized. Overall, 72% described a clinical improvement, especially in terms of sexual dysfunction.ConclusionsSeveral studies have described an improvement of drug-induced hyperprolactinemia after switching to or adding oral aripiprazole. In our study, we observed that levels of prolactine were normalized in 85% of patients with a clinical improvement in almost all of cases. These findings suggest that switching to LAI aripiprazole may be an effective alternative for managing antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia due to its partial agonism in D2 brain receptors, especially in tuberoinfundibular pathway.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Crisis ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Ottino

This paper deals with an inpatient unit that recently opened in Geneva, specializing in the treatment of patients aged 16-21 years who had attempted suicide or felt the desire to commit suicide. This particular center was established because of the significant weaknesses found in the provision of care to adolescents who had attempted suicide. Despite the growing interest of health workers in this area of study over recent years, the frequency of suicide among the young has not decreased and there are numerous recurrences of the suicide attempts. Further, all efforts to improve the adolescents' compliance with psychiatric treatment have failed to date. The number of drop-outs from treatment is still very high. Thus, the objectives of our inpatient unit are as follows: (1) to overcome initial resistance to treatment and to improve long-term compliance; (2) to decrease the number of recurrent attempts as a consequence of the above, thus increasing life expectancy; (3) to offer the adolescents who have tried (or have contemplated) committing suicide an improved quality of life, after first helping them overcome the suicidal crisis. To achieve these goals, the therapeutic team of the unit proposes short stays during which the work with the adolescents consists of a very intensive psychoanalytic-oriented crisis intervention. Numerous practical aspects of our therapeutic approach in the inpatient unit are related here in detail, always with reference to our theoretical hypothesis.


The term ‘pollution’ is taken in its broadest sense and effects are recognized to be due to interference, tainting and toxicity. Each of these types of impact is discussed and assessed. It is concluded that no long-term adverse effects on fish stocks can be attributed to oil but that local impacts can be extremely damaging in the short term and that produce from specific localities can be tainted and unmarketable for long periods. In some coastal areas oil can be one among several contributors to reduced water quality, and the implications of this are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document