scholarly journals Plum Pox Virus Mixed Infection Detected on Apricot in Pakistan

Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 1108-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kollerová ◽  
S. Nováková ◽  
Z. Šubr ◽  
M. Glasa

Sharka, caused by Plum pox virus (PPV), is the most detrimental viral disease of stone fruit trees. First reported from Bulgaria in 1917, the virus is now widespread in Europe, the Mediterranean Basin, and Asia Minor and is sporadically present in North and South America. On the basis of molecular and serological properties, six PPV subgroups are recognized, from which PPV-D, PPV-M, and PPV-Rec are the most common (1,2). Several apricot trees (Prunus armeniaca) showing mild, pale green rings and diffuse chlorotic spots on leaves were found in a small orchard in the Baltistan District in northern Pakistan at approximately 2,400 m above sea level. Dried leaf samples from one symptomatic tree randomly selected from the orchard were positive for PPV using double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with antisera prepared in the laboratory, immunoblot analysis, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting the capsid protein (CP) gene using standard procedures (1). To check the subgroup affiliation and evaluate the molecular variability, the 562-bp variable region spanning the C-terminus of NIb and the N-terminus of the CP was amplified, the RT-PCR product was cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI), and positive clones were analyzed by restriction and sequence analyses. Interestingly, sequence analysis of four clones revealed mixed infection, i.e., the presence of two different PPV isolates in the apricot sample. One isolate belonged to PPV-D (GenBank Accession No. DQ422147) and the other belonged to the PPV-Rec subgroup (GenBank Accession No. DQ422148). Multiple alignment of the sequenced genome portion of the Pakistan PPV-D isolate indicated 96 to 99% nt identity with various PPV-D isolates without unique, clear-cut differences. Similarly, the PPV-Rec isolate had 98 to 99% identity with European PPV-Rec isolates and retained the cross-over at nucleotide position 8450 in the 3′ terminus of NIb. This sequence had the amino acid signature at the N-terminus of the CP typical of the PPV-Rec subgroup (2). Moreover, no particular clustering of the Pakistan isolates within PPV-D and PPV-Rec could be observed after phylogenetic analysis. The DAG motif, essential for aphid transmission, was present in both sequences. To our knowledge, this is the first indication of PPV occurrence in Pakistan and first identification of the PPV-Rec isolate outside Europe. Together with previous reports on the PPV presence in China and Kazakhstan (3,4), this report indicates the need for more detailed epidemiological studies focusing the PPV spread and its molecular diversity in Asia. References: (1) T. Candresse et al. Phytopathology 88:198, 1998. (2) M. Glasa et al. J. Gen. Virol. 85:2671, 2004. (3) M. Navrátil et al. Plant Dis. 89:338, 2005. (4) S. Spiegel et al. Plant Dis. 88:973, 2004.

Plant Disease ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Navratil ◽  
D. Safarova ◽  
R. Karesova ◽  
K. Petrzik

Plum pox disease, caused by Plum pox virus (PPV), is the most severe virus disease of plums, apricots, and peaches. The disease causes heavy losses for fruit growers and the international trade of propagation materials and fresh fruits. PPV was first reported in Bulgaria in 1917 (1). It is now widespread in Europe and has been reported from Cyprus, Syria, Egypt, India, Kazakhstan, Chile, the United States, and Canada. Leaves on symptomatic apricot trees (Prunus armeniaca cvs. Hong Mei and Bai Mei and a selected genotype) in the Hunan Province of China showed typical yellow rings and diffused chlorotic spots. Samples from three suspected trees were repeatedly analyzed using double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the summers of 2001-2003. PPV was detected in leaves, bark, and leaf buds of all three trees using ELISA with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies provided by M. Navratil, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic (3). The results were confirmed using RT-PCR amplification of a 243-bp of the coat protein gene with a PPV-specific primer pair (2). BLAST analysis of two RT-PCR product sequences (GenBank Accession Nos. AY750961 and AY795603) showed 100% homology to multiple sequences of the PPV-D strain (GenBank Accession Nos. X81080, AF440743, and AF401295). The third sequence (GenBank Accession No. AY795602) had a C at position 112 rather than the T found in the other sequences. The ELISA, RT-PCR, and sequence results indicate that PPV-D was present in the apricot trees. To our knowledge, this is the first indication of PPV occurrence in China. This sporadic incidence of PPV on apricot trees requires addressing problems with the occurrence and spread of plum pox diseases in China and starting an eradication program. References: (1) D. Atanasoff. Annu. Univ. Sofia Fac. Agron. et Sylvic. 11:49, 1932. (2) T. Candresse et al. Phytopathology. 88:198, 1998. (3) I. Hilgert et al. Hybridoma. 12:215, 1993.


Plant Disease ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Levy ◽  
V. Damsteegt ◽  
R. Welliver

Plum pox (Sharka) is the most important virus disease of Prunus in Europe and the Mediterranean region and is caused by Plum pox potyvirus (PPV). In September 1999, PPV-like symptoms were observed in peach fruit culls in a packinghouse in Pennsylvania. All symptomatic fruit originated from a single block of peach (P. persica cv. Encore) in Adams County. Trees in the block exhibited ring pattern symptoms on their leaves. A potyvirus was detected in symptomatic fruit using the Poty-Group enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test from Agdia (Elkhart, IN). Reactions for symptomatic peach fruit and leaves also were positive using triple-antibody sandwich ELISA with the PPV polyclonal antibody from Bioreba (Carrboro, NC) for coating, the Poty-Group monoclonal antibody (MAb; Agdia) as the intermediate antibody, and double-antibody sandwich ELISA with PPV detection kits from Sanofi (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-La-Coquette, France) and Agdia and the REAL PPV kit (Durviz, Valencia, Spain) containing universal (5B) and strain typing (4DG5 and AL) PPV MAbs (1). PPV also was identified by immunocapture-reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (IC-RT-PCR) amplification and subsequent sequencing of the 220-bp 3′ noncoding region (2) (>99% sequence homology to PPV) and by IC-RT-PCR amplification of a 243-bp product in the coat protein (CP) gene (1). The virus was identified as PPV strain D based on serological typing with strainspecific MAbs and on PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the CP IC-RT-PCR product with Rsa1 and Alu1 (1). This is the first report of PPV in North America. References: (1) T. Candresse et al. Phytopathology 88:198, 1998. (2) L. Levy and A. Hadidi. EPPO Bull. 24:595, 1994.


Plant Disease ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1405-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Staniulis ◽  
J. Stankiene ◽  
K. Sasnauskas ◽  
A. Dargeviciute

Plum pox (sharka) disease caused by plum pox potyvirus (PPV) is considered the most important virus disease of stone fruit trees in Europe and the Mediterranean region. Nearly all those countries that produce stone fruits are affected (3). The causal virus of the disease is a European Plant Protection Organization A2 quarantine pathogen. Symptoms of leaf mottling, diffuse chlorotic spots, rings, and vein banding of varied intensity characteristic for plum pox virus infection were observed in the plum (Prunus domestica) orchard tree collection of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture in Babtai in 1996. Presence of this virus in the diseased trees was confirmed by double antibody sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with kits from BIOREBA (Reinach, Switzerland) and by polyclonal antibodies raised against a Moldavian isolate of PPV courtesy of T. D. Verderevskaya (Institute of Horticulture, Kishinev, Moldova). ELISAs with both sources of antiserum were positive for presence of PPV. Electron microscopy revealed the presence of potyvirus-like particles averaging 770 nm in extracts of mechanically inoculated plants of Chenopodium foetidum (chlorotic LL [local lesions]) and Pisum sativum cvs. Rainiai and Citron (mottling). For molecular diagnosis and characterization of this isolate, PPV-971, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was employed. Total RNA from the leaves of infected pea was isolated as described (2). High molecular weight RNA selectively precipitated with 2 M lithium chloride was used for RT-PCR amplification of the coat protein encoding sequence by use of specific primers complementary to 5′ and 3′ parts of PPV coat protein L1 (GenBank accession no. X81081). Amino acid sequence comparison with GenBank data indicated 98.2% similarity with coat protein of PPV potyvirus isolated by E. Mais et al. (accession no. X81083) and 97.3% with PPV strain Rankovic (1).The specific DNA fragment, corresponding to predicted coat protein sequence size, was cloned into Escherichia coli pUC57 for DNA sequencing. Expression of the cloned sequence in bacteria and yeast expression systems is under investigation. The presence of PPV in plum trees in the 9-year-old collection at Babtai was confirmed by DAS-ELISA in 1997 and again in 1998. PPV was then detected in 20% of symptomatic trees of three cultivars. The Lithuanian PPV isolate reacted positively with “universal” Mab.5b and with a Mab (Mab.4DG5) specific for PPV-D. No reaction was observed with Mabs specific for PPV-M (Mab.AL), PPV-C (Mab.AC and Mab.TUV), and PPV-El Amar (Mab.EA24). PPV-971 seems to be a typical member of the less aggressive Dideron strain cluster of PPV (D. Boscia, personal communication). This is the first report of PPV in Lithuania and confirms the necessity for continuing the precautionary measures established in this country for indexing of nursery plum trees used for graft propagation. References: (1) S. Lain et al. Virus Res. 13:157, 1989. (2) J. Logemann et al. Anal. Biochem. 163:16, 1987. (3) M. Nemeth. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 24:525, 1994.


Plant Disease ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 88 (9) ◽  
pp. 973-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Spiegel ◽  
E. M. Kovalenko ◽  
A. Varga ◽  
D. James

Plum pox virus (PPV) was detected in wild apricot and cultivated plum maintained in a germ plasm collection in Kazakhstan. Both isolates were typed as D strain, with no evidence of recombination. The virus was detected by triple-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilizing the universal PPV-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) 5B as the secondary antibody, and by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay using primers that amplified a 243-bp fragment in the C-terminus of the coat protein (CP) coding region. Immunocapture (IC) RT-PCR was used to detect PPV in nine wild apricot accessions, including eight ELISA-negative and one ELISA-positive. The plum and apricot isolates reacted positively in Western blot assay with the universal MAb 5B, and negatively with the strain-M-specific MAb-AL. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis applied to the amplified 243-bp fragment showed that restriction sites for AluI and RsaI were present in the were present in the plum and apricot samples. An amplified 836-bp cDNA fragment derived from the P3-6K1 coding region of both isolates had restriction profiles typical for strain D. Nucleotide identities of 99 to 100% were observed for the 243-bp fragments of the Kazakhstan isolates when compared with the corresponding regions of strain D, and 94 to 95% identity with strain M. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the entire CP coding region of the plum and apricotisolates resulted in the identification of a unique deletion of six nucleotides (two deduced proline amino acid residues) in the N-terminal region in the plum isolate. This is the first deletion of this nature observed among PPV isolates. The DAG motif was present in both isolates. Several nucleotide substitutions in the CP coding region were common to the plum and apricot isolates and appear to be unique to the Kazakstan isolates. This suggests a close relationship between the isolates.


Plant Disease ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Xu ◽  
T.-L. DeHaan ◽  
S. H. De Boer

Potato mop-top virus (PMTV) was detected in potatoes grown in the United States and Canada during surveillance testing by a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting the coat protein gene in RNA3. Out of 3,221 lots of seed and ware potatoes that were tested, 4.3% were positive for PMTV. The reliability of the survey results was confirmed by reextraction of selected samples and additional RT-PCR tests using two primer sets targeting gene segments in RNA2 and RNA3. Amplicons generated from RNA2 and RNA3 were identified by analysis of fragment length polymorphisms after digestion with BamHI and HindIII, respectively. PMTV was further identified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, bioassay on Nicotiana debneyi, and transmission electron microscopy. Sequencing of a portion of the coat protein gene revealed near 100% identity among isolates from the United States and Canada and >97% homology of the North American isolates with European isolates.


Plant Disease ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. D. Damsteegt ◽  
R. Scorza ◽  
A. L. Stone ◽  
W. L. Schneider ◽  
K. Webb ◽  
...  

Plum pox (Sharka) is a serious virus disease of stone fruits caused by the Plum pox virus (PPV). To determine which species could function as potential hosts and virus reservoirs, we used aphid transmission and bud or chip grafting to evaluate the susceptibility of commercial, ornamental, and wild Prunus species to isolates of PPV found in Pennsylvania, USA. Following inoculation, test trees were observed for symptoms, analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), back-assayed to healthy peach, and followed through at least four cold-induced dormancy (CID) cycles over 4 years. Thirty-one of 33 Prunus species and cultivars were systemically infected following aphid transmission. Systemic infection could not be detected in P. cerasus (sour cherry) and P. × ‘Snofozam’ (Snow Fountains) despite repeated aphid inoculation attempts. Following grafting of PPV-infected budwood, all 40 species and varieties became infected, although species differed in their susceptibility. Within most species, some individual plants remained PPV negative throughout the study despite repeated inoculations. Infection in some species could be detected only through quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. Most species displayed clear symptoms, were highly positive by ELISA and RT-PCR, and could be back-inoculated into peach seedlings following CID. Our results indicate that a wide range of native and ornamental Prunus species are susceptible to U.S. isolates of PPV-D.


2004 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Martínez-Gómez ◽  
M. Rubio ◽  
F. Dicenta ◽  
T.M. Gradziel

Sharka [(plum pox virus (PPV)] mainly affects Prunus species, including apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), peach (Prunus persica L.), plum (Prunus salicina Lindl., Prunus domestica L.), and, to a lesser degree, sweet (Prunus avium L.) and sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Level of resistance to a Dideron isolate of PPV in seven California almond [P. dulcis (Miller) D.A. Webb], five processing peach cultivars, and two peach rootstocks was evaluated. In addition, almond and peach selections resulting from interspecific almond × peach hybridization and subsequent gene introgression were tested. Evaluations were conducted in controlled facilities after grafting the test genotypes onto inoculated GF305 peach rootstocks. Leaves were evaluated for PPV symptoms during three consecutive cycles of growth. ELISA-DASI and RT-PCR analysis were also employed to verify the presence or absence of PPV. Peach cultivars and rootstocks showed sharka symptoms and were ELISA-DASI or RT-PCR positive for some growth cycles, indicating their susceptibility to PPV. Almond cultivars and almond × peach hybrids did not show symptoms and were ELISA-DASI and RT-PCR negative, demonstrating resistance to PPV. Two (almond × peach) F2 selections as well as two of three backcrossed peach selections also showed a resistant behavior against the PPV-D isolate. Results demonstrate a high level of resistance in almond and indicate potential for PPV resistance transfer to commercial peach cultivars.


Plant Disease ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 1119-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. James ◽  
A. Varga ◽  
D. Thompson ◽  
S. Hayes

Plum pox virus (PPV) isolate 3174-01 was detected by triple-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the universal PPV monoclonal antibody (MAb) 5B as the secondary antibody, and by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers that amplify a 243-bp fragment in the C-terminus of the coat protein coding region. The restriction sites RsaI and AluI were absent from this fragment, which is a feature unique to PPV-C isolates. The restriction sites in 3174-01 were replaced by GTAA/GTGA and GGCA, respectively. There was 95 to 99, 94, 91, and 92 to 94% identity of the 243-bp fragment of 3174-01 with the corresponding region of the strains C, D, EA, and M, respectively. Attempts to detect the virus by RT-PCR using strain C-specific primers in three different approaches were unsuccessful. All molecular techniques assessed in attempting to strain type isolate 3174-01 gave negative results, or results inconsistent for D or M in the case of P3-6K1 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Isolate 3174-01 reacted in Western blot assay with MAb 5B, with an estimated molecular mass of 32 kDa. No reaction was observed with D-, M-, EA-, or C-specific monoclonal antibodies in Western blot or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The molecular and serological data seem to indicate that PPV isolate 3174-01 does not belong to any of the recognized strains of PPV.


2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nieves Capote ◽  
M. Teresa Gorris ◽  
M. Carmen Martínez ◽  
Margarita Asensio ◽  
Antonio Olmos ◽  
...  

The dynamics of virus interference between two isolates of Plum pox virus (PPV) belonging to the main PPV types, D and M, were analyzed in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) by challenge inoculations. To assess the consequences of a PPV-M infection on plum already infected with PPV-D, and vice versa (predominance of one of the strains, recombination, synergism, symptoms aggravation, and so on), 30 Japanese plum trees were graft inoculated with PPV-D or PPV-M isolates in quarantine conditions. One year postinoculation, in the event that the inoculated isolates were detected in the whole plant, a second challenge inoculation (PPV-M or PPV-D, respectively) was performed by grafting. The presence of PPV-D, PPV-M, or both was monitored for 7 years by double-antibody sandwich indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using specific monoclonal antibodies. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with D- and M-specific primers confirmed the serological typing. Real-time RT-PCR assays were performed using D- and M-specific fluorescent 3′ minor groove binder-DNA probes, which were able to detect and quantify PPV populations in the inoculated plants with greater precision. The presence of PPV-D in Japanese plum did not cross-protect the trees against PPV-M infection. In PPV-D-infected plants, the PPV-M strain used as challenge inoculum behaved differently depending on the plum cultivar assayed. In cv. Black Diamond, PPV-M invaded the plant progressively, displacing the previous PPV-D population; whereas, in cv. Sun Gold, both PPV isolates coexisted in the plant. In contrast, the PPV-D isolate used was unable to infect plants of both cultivars in which a PPV-M population already was established. After 7 years, no synergism was observed and no recombination event between PPV-D and PPV-M genomes was detected.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Nunn ◽  
Shazia Masud ◽  
Mel Krajden ◽  
Monika Naus ◽  
Agatha N. Jassem

ABSTRACTMumps remains endemic in North America despite routine use of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. In 2016, an outbreak of mumps in British Columbia, Canada, provided an opportunity to determine the diagnostic utility of laboratory testing methods. Specimens from patients with clinical mumps were tested for infection using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibody detection and an in-house reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) targeting viral fusion and small hydrophobic (SH) genes. Viral genotyping was performed by SH gene sequencing. Laboratory data was linked with epidemiologic case data. Of the 139 confirmed cases, 94 (68%) had reported or documented history of MMR vaccination. Specimens were typically collected 1 day (for buccal and IgM tests) or 2 days (for urine tests) after symptom onset. Most confirmed cases (69%) were confirmed by buccal swab RT-PCR. Among cases tested by multiple methods, the percent positivity for buccal swab RT-PCR was 90% (96/107) compared to 43% (30/69) for both IgM ELISA and urine RT-PCR. Mumps IgM detection was higher in confirmed cases with no history of vaccination than in those with history (64% versus 34%,P= 0.02). The outbreak strain was identified as genotype G related to MuVi/Sheffield.GBR/1.05 but with conserved variations in five nucleotides within the SH gene that allowed linkage of geographically distinct cases. In conclusion, RT-PCR of buccal specimens had the highest diagnostic yield during a mumps outbreak in a partially vaccinated population. To optimize mumps diagnostic potential, clinicians should collect specimens depending on when the patient presents for care and their immunization history.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document