Systemic Bone Changes Accompanying Early Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients Treated With Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Alone

1994 ◽  
Vol &NA; (298) ◽  
pp. 250???258
Author(s):  
PAULINE PITT ◽  
JULIET COMPSTON ◽  
PREMILA TRIVEDI ◽  
JON SALISBURY ◽  
HEDLEY BERRY ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte T Luong ◽  
Barbara S Chong ◽  
Dionne M Lowder

OBJECTIVE: To review new pharmacologic agents approved for use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966–January 2000) was conducted to identify English-language literature available on the pharmacotherapy of RA, focusing on celecoxib, leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab. These articles, relevant abstracts, and data provided by the manufacturers were used to collect pertinent data. STUDY SELECTION: All controlled and uncontrolled trials were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Agents were reviewed with regard to mechanism of action, efficacy, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, dosing, precautions/contraindications, adverse effects, and cost. DATA SYNTHESIS: Traditional pharmacologic treatments for RA have been limited by toxicity, loss of efficacy, or both. Increasing discoveries into the mechanisms of inflammation in RA have led to the development of new agents in hopes of addressing these limitations. With the development of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, the potential exists to minimize the gastrotoxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Leflunomide has been shown to be equal to or less efficacious than methotrexate, and may be beneficial as a second-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The biologic response modifiers, etanercept and infliximab, are alternatives that have shown benefit alone or in combination with methotrexate. However, they should be reserved for patients who fail to respond to DMARD therapy. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents as well as their role in combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib, leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab are the newest agents approved for RA. Clinical trials have shown that these agents are beneficial in the treatment of RA; however, long-term safety and efficacy data are lacking.


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Green ◽  
Atul A Deodhar

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie O. Keeling ◽  
Samantha L. Bowker ◽  
Anamaria Savu ◽  
Padma Kaul

Objective.The effects of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) on maternal and neonatal outcomes at a population level have not previously been well compared.Methods.A contemporary pregnancy cohort of 312,081 women and corresponding birth events was assembled for the province of Alberta from the random selection of 1 live birth event per woman. We identified 3 groups: (1) no inflammatory arthritis (no IA, n = 308,989), (2) RA (n = 631), and (3) SpA (n = 2461). We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes, comorbid conditions, and medication use among the 3 groups. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the independent association between RA and SpA, relative to no IA, and the outcomes of small for gestation age (SGA) and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.Results.Pregnant women with RA were significantly more likely to have preterm delivery (13.5%), cesarean delivery (33.9%), hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (10.5%), and SGA babies (15.6%), compared to pregnant women with either SpA or no IA. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and corticosteroid use were significantly higher in pregnant women with RA compared to the other groups. Women with RA were significantly more likely to have an SGA baby (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.21–1.88; p < 0.01), and hypertensive disorder in pregnancy (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.16–1.97; p < 0.01), compared to women with no IA, while no difference was found between women with SpA and those with no IA.Conclusion.Women with RA have a higher risk of worse maternal and neonatal outcomes, whereas the risk of these events is similar between women with and without SpA.


1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1944-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith S. Walker ◽  
Rachel B. Sheather-Reid ◽  
John J. Carmody ◽  
Richard O. Day ◽  
Janet H. Vial

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1850-1855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leticia Leon ◽  
Lydia Abasolo ◽  
Loreto Carmona ◽  
Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez ◽  
Jose Ramon Lamas ◽  
...  

Objective.To analyze sociodemographic and clinic-related factors associated with the use of orthopedic surgical procedures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), focusing on the potential role of new biologic therapies.Methods.A retrospective medical record review was performed in a probability sample of 1272 patients with RA from 47 units distributed in 19 Spanish regions. Sociodemographic and clinical features, use of drugs, and arthritis-related joint surgeries were recorded following a standardized protocol.Results.A total of 94 patients (7.4%) underwent any orthopedic surgery during their disease course, with a total of 114 surgeries; 47 (41.2%) of these surgeries were total joint replacement (TJR). The median time to first orthopedic procedure was 7.9 years from the onset of RA symptoms, and the rate of orthopedic surgery (excluding TJR) was 4.5 procedures per 100 person-years from the beginning of RA, while the rate of TJR was 2.25 interventions per 100 person-years. A higher risk of undergoing an orthopedic surgical procedure was associated with taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) in the previous 2 years, female sex, longterm disease, and the presence of extraarticular complications. The risk factors for undergoing a TJR were being old, having a longterm disease, and taking biologic therapies.Conclusion.In the era of biologics, our national audit found a low percentage of patients who underwent orthopedic surgery, probably reflecting a thorough management of the RA. Sociodemographic factors, longterm RA, extraarticular complications, and NSAID were associated with orthopedic surgery.


1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
J. K. Lacki ◽  
U. Mackiewicz ◽  
S. Mackiewicz ◽  
W. Muller

To verify the hypothesis that methotrexate may affect the serum level of agalactosyl IgG (IgG[0]) we followed the changes in IgG galactosylation patterns in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with either methotrexate (MTX) or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID). The average values of IgG[0] in RA patients at the beginning of the observation were significantly higher as compared to healthy controls (0.45 ± 0.39 vs. −0.03 ± 0.09, p<0.05). The findings of IgG[0] after one-year follow-up were also higher as compared to healthy controls (0.38 ± 0.39 vs. −0.03 ± 0.09, p<0.05). We did not notice any statistically significant difference in IgG[0] between MTX and NSAID treated patients at the beginning of the study (0.49 ± 0.42 vs. 0.42 ± 0.38, NS). However, during one-year MTX treatment IgG[0] significantly dropped (0.49 ± 0.42 vs. 0.25 ± 0.24, p<0.01). We did not establish any fluctuation in IgG[0] in the group of patients treated with NSAID (0.42 ± 0.38 vs. 0.46 ± 0.45, NS). The data thus far obtained suggest that IgG[0] may serve as an indicator for the disease course in patients with RA. Secondly, the clinical improvement and IgG[0] decrease after methotrexate implies, that the immunoregulatory abnormality in RA may be susceptible to correction by immunotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document