A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT METHODOLOGIES FOR THE NONINVASIVE DETECTION OF THE VENTILATORY ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD

2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S225
Author(s):  
P J. Santos
Author(s):  
Haochong Liu ◽  
Bo Leng ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Ye Liu ◽  
Dapeng Bao ◽  
...  

This study was aimed to: (1) investigate the effects of physiological functions of sprint interval training (SIT) on the aerobic capacity of elite badminton players; and (2) explore the potential mechanisms of oxygen uptake, transport and recovery within the process. Thirty-two elite badminton players volunteered to participate and were randomly divided into experimental (Male-SIT and Female-SIT group) and control groups (Male-CON and Female-CON) within each gender. During a total of eight weeks, SIT group performed three times of SIT training per week, including two power bike trainings and one multi-ball training, while the CON group undertook two Fartlek runs and one regular multi-ball training. The distance of YO-YO IR2 test (which evaluates player’s ability to recover between high intensity intermittent exercises) for Male-SIT and Female-SIT groups increased from 1083.0 ± 205.8 m to 1217.5 ± 190.5 m, and from 725 ± 132.9 m to 840 ± 126.5 m (p < 0.05), respectively, which were significantly higher than both CON groups (p < 0.05). For the Male-SIT group, the ventilatory anaerobic threshold and ventilatory anaerobic threshold in percentage of VO2max significantly increased from 3088.4 ± 450.9 mL/min to 3665.3 ± 263.5 mL/min (p < 0.05),and from 74 ± 10% to 85 ± 3% (p < 0.05) after the intervention, and the increases were significantly higher than the Male-CON group (p < 0.05); for the Female-SIT group, the ventilatory anaerobic threshold and ventilatory anaerobic threshold in percentage of VO2max were significantly elevated from 1940.1 ± 112.8 mL/min to 2176.9 ± 78.6 mL/min, and from 75 ± 4% to 82 ± 4% (p < 0.05) after the intervention, which also were significantly higher than those of the Female-CON group (p < 0.05). Finally, the lactate clearance rate was raised from 13 ± 3% to 21 ± 4% (p < 0.05) and from 21 ± 5% to 27 ± 4% for both Male-SIT and Female-SIT groups when compared to the pre-test, and this increase was significantly higher than the control groups (p < 0.05). As a training method, SIT could substantially improve maximum aerobic capacity and aerobic recovery ability by improving the oxygen uptake and delivery, thus enhancing their rapid repeated sprinting ability.


1985 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Talbot ◽  
W. H. Schuette ◽  
H. W. Tipton ◽  
L. E. Thibault ◽  
F. L. Brown ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Myers ◽  
Rochelle L. Goldsmith ◽  
Steven J. Keteyian ◽  
Clinton A. Brawner ◽  
Deirdre A. Brazil ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snezana Polovina ◽  
Ivana Nedeljekovic ◽  
Djordje Bajec ◽  
Mirjana Sumarac-Dumanovic ◽  
Dejan Radenkovic ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Kaczmarek ◽  
Dirk Habedank ◽  
Anne Obst ◽  
Marcus Dörr ◽  
Henry Völzke ◽  
...  

Background: The ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VO2@AT) has been used in preoperative risk assessment and rehabilitation for many years. Our aim was to determine the interobserver variability of AT using cardiopulmonary exercise (CPET) data from a large epidemiological study (SHIP, Study of Health in Pomerania). Methods: VO2@AT was determined from CPET of 1,079 cross-sectional volunteers, according to American Heart Association guidelines. VO2@AT determinations were compared between two experienced physicians, between physicians and qualified medical assistants, and between physicians or medical assistants and software-based algorithms. For the first 522 data sets, the two physicians discussed discrepant readings to reach consensus; the remaining data sets were analyzed without consensus discussion. Results: VO2@AT was detectable in 1,056 data sets. The physicians recorded identical VO2@AT values in 319 out of 522 cases before consensus discussion (61.1%; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–0.92) and in 700 out of 1,056 cases overall (66.3%; ICC: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.95–0.96), with an interobserver difference of 0 ± 8% (95% limits of agreement [LOA]: ±161 mL/min). The interobserver difference was − 2 ± 18% (95% LOA: ±418 mL/min) between a physician and medical assistants, and − 19 ± 24% to − 22 ± 26% (95% LOAs: ±719–806 mL/min) between physicians or medical assistants and software-based algorithms. Conclusions: Experienced physicians show high agreement when determining AT in asymptomatic volunteers. However, agreement between physicians and qualified medical assistants is lower, and there is substantial deviation in AT determination between physicians or medical assistants and software-based algorithms. This must be considered when using AT as a decision tool.


1984 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 213-216
Author(s):  
YOSHIYUKI FUKUBA ◽  
SACHIO USUI ◽  
HIDEO SASAHARA ◽  
KUNIO KIKUCHI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document