A Journey to Improved Inpatient Glycemic Control by Redesigning Meal Delivery and Insulin Administration

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Engle ◽  
Allison Ferguson ◽  
Willa Fields
2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 2430-2437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dace L. Trence ◽  
Janet L. Kelly ◽  
Irl B. Hirsch

There is increasing evidence that aggressive glycemic control for patients admitted into the hospital improves clinical outcomes, especially for patients with cardiovascular disease. There appear to be a variety of mechanisms for this. Although hyperglycemia has been shown to result in poor wound healing and more infectious complications, especially after cardiac surgical procedures, what has become clear is that the treatment of hyperglycemia with iv glucose, insulin, and potassium (GIK) results in better clinical outcomes even in patients without diabetes. The mechanisms for this are not year clear, but could be related to the insulin administration, perhaps due to suppression of various cytokines or free fatty acids. The practical use of insulin in these patients requires basic understanding of the use of both iv and sc insulin. Although there are several appropriate options for both of these routes of administration, it is critical that all caregivers involved in this population’s care are knowledgeable about insulin strategies.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lino Scarpioni ◽  
Sergio Ballocchi ◽  
Aurelio Castelli ◽  
Roberto Scarpioni

Objective To compare, in diabetic uremic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the effects of two patterns of insulin administration, four times daily subcutaneous (SC) injections and intraperitoneal (IP) route, on blood glucose, insulin, lactate, beta-hydroxybutyrate and glycerol levels. Patients and Methods We examined 6 uremic insulin-dependent diabetic patients on CAPD. The two insulin regimens, SC and IP, were tested successively in randomized sequence in each patient. At the end of each treatment period we determined the 24-our profiles of blood glucose, free insulin, lactate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and glycerol. Results Mean blood glucose over 24 hours (SC 7.21 ±0.61 mmol/L, IP 7.49±0.93 mmol/L), Schlichtkrull's M value, an index of glycemic control and stability (SC 10±3, IP 10±5), and the blood intermediate metabolites beta-hydroxybutyrate, lactate, and glycerol were similar in both groups. Mean serum free insulin was significantly higher during subcutaneous treatment (SC 257. 4±127.2 pmol/L, IP 170.4±83.4 pmol/L, p < 0.001). Insulin requirements were 2.5 times greater for the intraperitoneal route (SC 51 ±4 U/24 hours, IP 130±43 U/24 hours). Conclusions In uremic diabetic patients on CAPD, good glycemic control may be achieved either with subcutaneous intensive insulin therapy or with intraperitoneal insulin administration. The latter method allows reduction of circulating free insulin levels, but requires a higher dose of insulin per day.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 288-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasi I. Nevalainen ◽  
Jorma T. Lahtela ◽  
Jukka Mustonen ◽  
Amos Pasternack

We evaluated in a cross-over manner the consequences of subcutaneously and intraperitoneally given insulin on glucose control, insulin sensitivity, and serum lipids in 8 type I diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The patients were treated with both subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin for at least three months. After each period, metabolic studies were performed. Despite significantly improved glycemic control (Hb A^ 10.00±0.38% after subcutaneous and 8.40±0.36% after intraperitoneal insulin, p = 0.01), serum lipids showed unfavorable changes. High-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol was significantly lower (1.28±0.18 mmol/L vs 0.88±0.06 mmol/L, p = 0.03) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/HDL-cholesterol ratio was higher (p = 0.025) during intraperitoneal insulin. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were higher during intraperitoneal insulin administration. Severe hypoglycemic episodes were more common during subcutaneous than intraperitoneal insulin. It is concluded that, although intraperitoneal insulin administration offers significantly better glycemic control and insulin sensitivity than subcutaneous insulin, the effect on serum lipids is more disadvantageous possibly via a direct effect of insulin on the liver.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A232-A232
Author(s):  
J HAMMER ◽  
S HOWELL ◽  
M HOROWITZ ◽  
N TALLEY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document