A Pilot Study of Microsatellite Instability and Endometrial Cancer Survival in White and African American Women

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele L. Cote ◽  
Audrey Kam ◽  
Cherry Yin-Yi Chang ◽  
Leon Raskin ◽  
Kerryn W. Reding ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 478-484
Author(s):  
Rebecca Reno

Background: Increasing breastfeeding rates among low-income African American women may work toward the achievement of health equity. The dynamic breastfeeding assessment process (D-BAP) is a community-grounded, equity-focused intervention designed to increase prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy. Research aim: The aims of the pilot study were (a) to determine the effect of the D-BAP on breastfeeding self-efficacy among pregnant, low-income African American women, (b) to examine the findings among women with no previous breastfeeding experience, and (c) to compare the findings between women with prior breastfeeding experience and those without it. Methods: A pre/post, paired-samples design was utilized. Convenience sampling was used to recruit pregnant, low-income African American women ( N = 25). Participants completed the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form prior to and following the D-BAP. Results: The Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that participation in the D-BAP had a statistically significant influence on breastfeeding self-efficacy ( z = −2.01, p = .04). Among a subsample of participants with no previous breastfeeding experience ( n = 12), completion of the D-BAP resulted in a statistically significant increase in breastfeeding self-efficacy ( z = −2.36, p = .02). There was no statistically significant difference between those with prior breastfeeding experience and those without it. Conclusion: Breastfeeding among low-income African American women is a health equity issue for which culturally responsive, effective breastfeeding interventions are needed. This research demonstrates an association between completion of the D-BAP and an increase in prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 4200-4206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Randall ◽  
Katrina Armstrong

Purpose: To investigate disparities in treatment and outcomes between African-American and white women with endometrial cancer. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 1992 to 1998 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for 21,561 women with epithelial cancers of the endometrium. Sequential Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between tumor characteristics (stage, grade, and histologic type), sociodemographic characteristics (age and marital status), and treatment (surgery and radiation therapy) and the racial difference in mortality. Results: The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death from endometrial cancer for African-American women compared with white women was 2.57. However, African-American women were significantly more likely to present with advanced-stage disease and have poorly differentiated tumors or tumors with an unfavorable histologic type and were significantly less likely to undergo definitive surgery at all stages of disease. Adjusting for tumor and sociodemographic characteristics lowered the HR for African-American women to 1.80. Further adjustment for the use of surgery reduced the HR to 1.51. The association between surgery and survival was stronger among white women (HR, 0.26) than among African-American women (HR, 0.44). Conclusion: African-American women with endometrial cancer are significantly less likely to undergo primary surgery and have significantly shorter survival than white women with endometrial cancer. Racial differences in treatment are associated with racial differences in survival. The association between use of surgery and survival is weaker among African-American than white women, raising questions about potential racial differences in the effectiveness of surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison G. M. Brown ◽  
Linda B. Hudson ◽  
Kenneth Chui ◽  
Nesly Metayer ◽  
Namibia Lebron-Torres ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S102
Author(s):  
Daniel Saris ◽  
Anna Jo Smith ◽  
Colleen Brensinger ◽  
Sarah Kim ◽  
Ashley Haggerty ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document