Laparoscopic-assisted Peritoneal Shunt Insertion for Ventriculoperitoneal and Lumboperitoneal Shunt Placement

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sosin ◽  
Sujata Sofat ◽  
Daniel R. Felbaum ◽  
Kenneth P. Seastedt ◽  
Kevin M. McGrail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Lumboperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

Lumboperitoneal shunt placement using computed tomography and fluoroscopy in conscious patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 618-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madoka Nakajima ◽  
Kuniaki Bando ◽  
Masakazu Miyajima ◽  
Hajime Arai
Keyword(s):  
Outpatient Surgery ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Normal Pressure ◽  
Shunt Valve ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Lumboperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Lower Limb Pain ◽  
Programmable Valve

The authors have developed a minimally invasive lumboperitoneal shunt placement procedure conducted after administration of a local anesthetic. The procedure involves placing a guide wire and a peel-away sheath under fluoroscopic and CT guidance. Between June 2004 and August 2006, 40 patients (21 men and 19 women; mean age 72.5 years [range 33–86 years]) underwent surgery. A Codman Hakim programmable valve system (82–3844, Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.) was used for the procedure. The mean operating time was 53 minutes, and 7 patients (17.5%) developed shunt dysfunction complications. These complications comprised an infected shunt valve in 2 patients, postoperative lower-limb pain in 1 patient, and shunt obstruction (caused by debris and hemorrhage) at the ventral and lumbar ends in 2 patients each. This procedure is less invasive than conventional lumboperitoneal shunt insertion and could be performed as an outpatient surgery for treatment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Ventriculoatrial Shunt Insertion

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Albert McAnsah Isaacs ◽  
Danae Krahn ◽  
Andrew M Walker ◽  
Heather Hurdle ◽  
Mark G Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Shunt Revision ◽  
Shunt Valve ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Distal Catheter ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Time Required

Abstract BACKGROUND Determining an optimal location within the right atrium (RA) for placement of the distal ventriculoatrial (VA) shunt catheter offer several operative challenges that place patients at risk for perioperative complications and downstream VA shunt failure. Utilizing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance to place distal VA shunt catheters may help to circumvent these risks. OBJECTIVE To review our current practice of VA shunt insertion using TEE guidance. METHODS A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent VA shunt procedures between December 19, 2016 and January 22, 2019, during which time intraoperative TEE was used for shunt placement was performed. Data on the time required for shunt placement and total procedure time, baseline echocardiography findings, and short- and long-term complications of shunt placement were assessed. RESULTS A total of 33 patients underwent VA shunt procedures, with a median follow-up time of 250 (88-412) d. The only immediate complication related to shunt placement or TEE use was transient ectopy in 1 patient. The mean time for atrial catheter insertion was 12.6 ± 4.8 min. Right-heart catheters were inserted between the RA-superior vena cava junction and 22 mm within the RA in all but 3 procedures. A total of 7/33 patients (21%) underwent shunt revision. Indications for revisions included distal clots, proximal obstruction, positive blood culture, and shunt valve revision. No other complications of VA shunt insertion were reported. CONCLUSION VA shunt insertion using TEE allows for precise distal catheter placement. Early patient experience confirms this technique has a low complication rate.

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion for the treatment of refractory perilymphatic fistula

2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Scott Lollis ◽  
Dudley J. Weider ◽  
Joseph M. Phillips ◽  
David W. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Functional Status ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Perilymphatic Fistula ◽  
Vp Shunt ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Time Work ◽  
Clinically Significant

Object The goal of this study was to provide preliminary data regarding clinical and functional outcome, including postoperative morbidity, related to ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion for refractory perilymphatic fistula. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of seven consecutive patients who had undergone VP shunt insertion for medically and surgically refractory perilymphatic fistula between 1996 and 2004. Patients were also contacted by telephone and asked to assess retrospectively their symptomatic improvement, changes in functional status, and changes in work status following shunt placement. Preoperative and postoperative functional statuses were assessed using a standardized instrument. In each patient, preoperative opening pressure was measured via lumbar puncture. Pressures ranged from 160 to 300 mm H2O, with a mean of 241 mm H2O. All patients reported significant improvement in symptom severity following surgery. Two patients reported complete resolution of symptoms. Three patients were able to resume full-time work. Clinically significant improvement in functional status was noted in six of seven patients. All patients would recommend the procedure to others in a similar situation. Conclusions Data in this study suggest that some patients with disabling vertigo, tinnitus, and headache due to perilymphatic fistula, whose conventional medical and surgical therapies have failed to produce a cure, benefit from VP shunt insertion. The authors hypothesize that VP shunt placement blunts intracranial pressure increases, which would cause secondary elevations in perilymphatic fluid pressure. Shunt insertion reduces perilymph leakage into the middle ear and may permit closure of the fistula.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion in Myelomeningocele Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 522-532
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. F. El Ghoul ◽  
Ahmed Hamdy Ashry ◽  
Mohamed Hamdy El-Sissy ◽  
Ibrahim Mohamed Ibrahim Lotfy
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Vp Shunt ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Group A ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Group B ◽  
Increased Icp

BACKGROUND: Myelomeningocele (MMC) is one of the most common developmental anomalies of the CNS. Many of these patients develop hydrocephalus (HCP). The rate of cerebrospinal fluid diversion in these patients varies significantly in literature, from 52% to 92%. MMC repair conventionally occurs in the post-natal period. With the technological advances in surgical practice and fetal surgeries, intra uterine MMC repair IUMR is adopted in some centers. Cerebrospinal fluid shunting has numerous complications, most notably shunt failure and shunt infection. Studies have suggested that patients with greater numbers of shunt revisions have poorer performance on neuropsychological testing. There is also good evidence to suggest that the IQs of patients with MMC who do not undergo shunt placement are higher than that of their shunt treated counterparts. AIM: In this study, we are trying to identify strong clinical and radiological predictors for the need of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion in patients with MMC who underwent surgical repair and closure of the defect initially. This will decrease the overall rate of shunt placement in this group of patients through applying a strict policy adopting only shunt insertion for the desperately needing patient. METHODS: Prospective clinical study conducted on 96 patients with MMC presented to Aboul Reish Pediatric Specialized Hospital, Cairo University. After confirming the diagnosis through clinical and radiological aids, patients are carefully examined, if HCP is evident clinically and radiologically a shunt is inserted together with MMC repair at the same session after excluding sepsis or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infection, (GROUP A). If there are no signs of increased ICP, MMC repair shall be done alone (GROUP B). Those patients shall be monitored carefully postoperatively and after discharge and shall be followed up regularly to early detect and promptly manage latent HCP. Multiple clinical and radiological indices were used throughout the follow-up period and statistical significance of each was measured. RESULTS: Shunt placement was required in 45 (46.88%) of the 96 patients. Eighteen patients (18.75%) needed the shunt as soon as they presented to us (GROUP A), because they were having clinically active HCP. Twenty-seven (28.13%) patients were operated on by MMC repair initially without shunt placement because they did not have signs of increased ICP at the time of presentation. Yet, they developed latent HCP requiring shunt placement during the follow-up period (GROUP B2). Fifty-one patients of the study population (53.13%) underwent surgical repair of the MMC without the need of further VP insertion and they were followed up for 6 months period after the repair without developing latent HCP (GROUP B1). Patients of GROUP B were the study population susceptible for the development of latent HCP. Out of 78 patients in GROUP B, only 27 patients (34.62%) needed a VP shunt. CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that the rate of shunt insertion in patients with MMC is lower than the previously reported rate in the literature. A more thorough evaluation of the patient’s post-operative need for a shunt is mandatory. We suggest that we could accept postoperative (after MMC repair) ventriculomegaly provided it does not mean any deterioration in the patient’s clinical or developmental state. We assume that reduction of shunt insertion rate will eventually reduce what has previously been an enormous burden for a significant proportion of children with MMC.

Ventricular reservoir versus ventriculosubgaleal shunt for posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in preterm infants: infection risks and ventriculoperitoneal shunt rate

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Y. Wang ◽  
Anubhav G. Amin ◽  
George I. Jallo ◽  
Edward S. Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus ◽  
Vp Shunt ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Device Infection ◽  
Ventriculosubgaleal Shunt ◽  
Ventricular Reservoir

Object The most common neurosurgical condition observed in preterm infants is intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), which often results in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH). These conditions portend an unfavorable prognosis; therefore, the potential for poor neurodevelopmental outcomes necessitates a better understanding of the comparative effectiveness of 2 temporary devices commonly used before the permanent insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt: the ventricular reservoir and the ventriculosubgaleal shunt (VSGS). Methods The authors analyzed retrospectively collected information for 90 patients with IVH and PHH who were treated with insertion of a ventricular reservoir (n = 44) or VSGS (n = 46) at their institution over a 14-year period. Results The mean gestational age and weight at device insertion were lower for VSGS patients (30.1 ± 1.9 weeks, 1.12 ± 0.31 kg) than for reservoir patients (31.8 ± 2.9 weeks, 1.33 ± 0.37 kg; p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively). Ventricular reservoir insertion was predictive of more CSF taps prior to VP shunt placement compared with VSGS placement (10 ± 8.7 taps vs 1.6 ± 1.7 taps, p < 0.001). VSGS patients experienced a longer time interval prior to VP shunt placement than reservoir patients (80.8 ± 67.5 days vs 48.8 ± 26.4 days, p = 0.012), which corresponded to VSGS patients gaining more weight by the time of shunt placement than reservoir patients (3.31 ± 2.0 kg vs 2.42 ± 0.63 kg, p = 0.016). Reservoir patients demonstrated a trend toward more positive CSF cultures compared with VSGS patients (n = 9 [20.5%] vs n = 5 [10.9%], p = 0.21). There were no significant differences in the rates of overt device infection requiring removal (reservoir, 6.8%; VSGS, 6.5%), VP shunt insertion (reservoir, 77.3%; VSGS, 76.1%), or early VP shunt infection (reservoir, 11.4%; VSGS, 13.0%) between the 2 cohorts. Conclusions Although the rates of VP shunt requirement and device infection were similar between patients treated with the reservoir versus the VSGS, VSGS patients were significantly older and had achieved greater weights at the time of VP shunt insertion. The authors' results suggest that the VSGS requires less labor-intensive management by ventricular tapping; the VSGS patients also attained higher weights and more optimal surgical candidacy at the time of VP shunt insertion. The potential differences in long-term developmental and neurological outcomes between VSGS and reservoir placement warrant further study.

Shunt complications in children with myelomeningocele: effect of timing of shunt placement

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Radmanesh ◽  
Farideh Nejat ◽  
Mostafa El Khashab ◽  
Syed Mohammad Ghodsi ◽  
Hasan Eftekhar Ardebili
Keyword(s):  
Shunt Infection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Csf Shunt ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Shunt Surgery ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Shunt Complications ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference

Object There has been controversy over whether CSF shunt insertion simultaneously with repair of myelomeningocele (MMC) might increase shunt-related complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate shunt complication rates in patients who underwent concurrent MMC surgery and shunt placement and compare them to the rates in patients treated with shunt placement in a separate procedure. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the outcome of shunt placement in 127 patients with MMC who were followed up for ≥ 1 year after shunt surgery. In 65 patients shunt surgery was performed in a second operation after MMC repair and in 46 the 2 procedures were performed concurrently. In 7 patients shunt placement was the initial surgery, and in 9 it was the only procedure performed. The patients were evaluated for shunt complications. Results There was no statistically significant between-groups difference in age at which patients underwent shunt placement. The overall rates of shunt infection and shunt malfunction were 16.5 and 39.4%, respectively. There was a high rate of shunt infection and mortality in those patients treated with CSF shunting only. There was no statistically significant difference between complication rates in patients in whom the 2 procedures were performed concurrently and those who underwent separate operations. Conclusions The order in which myelomeningocele repair and shunt placement were carried out did not have a significant effect on the rate of shunt complications. Thus, when indicated these procedures can be performed concurrently with a level of risk comparable to that associated with delayed shunt placement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document