scholarly journals Multi-stability in cellular differentiation enabled by a network of three mutually repressing master regulators

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (170) ◽  
pp. 20200631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atchuta Srinivas Duddu ◽  
Sarthak Sahoo ◽  
Souvadra Hati ◽  
Siddharth Jhunjhunwala ◽  
Mohit Kumar Jolly

Identifying the design principles of complex regulatory networks driving cellular decision-making remains essential to decode embryonic development as well as enhance cellular reprogramming. A well-studied network motif involved in cellular decision-making is a toggle switch—a set of two opposing transcription factors A and B, each of which is a master regulator of a specific cell fate and can inhibit the activity of the other. A toggle switch can lead to two possible states—(high A, low B) and (low A, high B)—and drives the ‘either-or' choice between these two cell fates for a common progenitor cell. However, the principles of coupled toggle switches remain unclear. Here, we investigate the dynamics of three master regulators A, B and C inhibiting each other, thus forming three-coupled toggle switches to form a toggle triad. Our simulations show that this toggle triad can lead to co-existence of cells into three differentiated ‘single positive' phenotypes—(high A, low B, low C), (low A, high B, low C) and (low A, low B, high C). Moreover, the hybrid or ‘double positive' phenotypes—(high A, high B, low C), (low A, high B, high C) and (high A, low B, high C)—can coexist together with ‘single positive' phenotypes. Including self-activation loops on A, B and C can increase the frequency of ‘double positive' states. Finally, we apply our results to understand cellular decision-making in terms of differentiation of naive CD4 + T cells into Th1, Th2 and Th17 states, where hybrid Th1/Th2 and hybrid Th1/Th17 cells have been reported in addition to the Th1, Th2 and Th17 ones. Our results offer novel insights into the design principles of a multi-stable network topology and provide a framework for synthetic biology to design tristable systems.

Author(s):  
Atchuta Srinivas Duddu ◽  
Sarthak Sahoo ◽  
Souvadra Hati ◽  
Siddharth Jhunjhunwala ◽  
Mohit Kumar Jolly

AbstractIdentifying the design principles of complex regulatory networks driving cellular decision-making remains essential to decode embryonic development as well as enhance cellular reprogramming. A well-studied network motif involved in cellular decision-making is a toggle switch – a set of two opposing transcription factors A and B, each of which is a master regulator of a specific cell-fate and can inhibit the activity of the other. A toggle switch can lead to two possible states – (high A, low B) and (low A, high B), and drives the ‘either-or’ choice between these two cell-fates for a common progenitor cell. However, the principles of coupled toggle switches remains unclear. Here, we investigate the dynamics of three master regulators A, B and C inhibiting each other, thus forming three coupled toggle switches to form a toggle triad. Our simulations show that this toggle triad can lead to co-existence of cells into three differentiated ‘single positive’ phenotypes – (high A, low B, low C), (low A, high B, low C), and (low A, low B, high C). Moreover, the hybrid or ‘double positive’ phenotypes – (high A, high B, low C), (low A, high B, high C) and (high A, low B, high C) – can co-exist together with ‘single positive’ phenotypes. Including self-activation loops on A, B and C can increase the frequency of ‘double positive’ states. Finally, we apply our results to understand the cellular decision-making in terms of differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th1, Th2 and Th17 states, where hybrid Th1/Th2 and hybrid Th1/Th17 cells have been reported in addition to the Th1, Th2 and Th17 ones. Our results offer novel insights into the design principles of a multistable network topology and provides a framework for synthetic biology to design tristable systems.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souvadra Hati ◽  
Atchuta Srinivas Duddu ◽  
Mohit Kumar Jolly

AbstractDecoding the dynamics of cellular decision-making and cell differentiation is a central question in cell and developmental biology. A common network motif involved in many cell-fate decisions is a mutually inhibitory feedback loop between two self-activating ‘master regulators’ A and B, also called as toggle switch. Typically, it can allow for three stable states – (high A, low B), (low A, high B) and (medium A, medium B). A toggle triad – three mutually repressing regulators A, B and C, i.e. three toggle switches arranged circularly (between A and B, between B and C, and between A and C) – can allow for six stable states: three ‘single positive’ and three ‘double positive’ ones. However, the operating principles of larger toggle polygons, i.e. toggle switches arranged circularly to form a polygon, remain unclear. Here, we simulate using both discrete and continuous methods the dynamics of different sized toggle polygons. We observed a pattern in their steady state frequency depending on whether the polygon was an even or odd numbered one. The even-numbered toggle polygons result in two dominant states with consecutive components of the network expressing alternating high and low levels. The odd-numbered toggle polygons, on the other hand, enable more number of states, usually twice the number of components with the states that follow ‘circular permutation’ patterns in their composition. Incorporating self-activations preserved these trends while increasing the frequency of multistability in the corresponding network. Our results offer insights into design principles of circular arrangement of regulatory units involved in cell-fate decision making, and can offer design strategies for synthesizing genetic circuits.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradyumna Harlapur ◽  
Atchuta Srinivas Duddu ◽  
Kishore Hari ◽  
Mohit Kumar Jolly

Elucidating the design principles of regulatory networks driving cellular decision-making has important implications in understanding cell differentiation and guiding the design of synthetic circuits. Mutually repressing feedback loops between 'master regulators' of cell-fates can exhibit multistable dynamics, thus enabling multiple 'single-positive' phenotypes: (high A, low B) and (low A, high B) for a toggle switch, and (high A, low B, low C), (low A, high B, low C) and (low A, low B, high C) for a toggle triad. However, the dynamics of these two network motifs has been interrogated in isolation in silico, but in vitro and in vivo, they often operate while embedded in larger regulatory networks. Here, we embed these network motifs in complex larger networks of varying sizes and connectivity and identify conditions under which these motifs maintain their canonical dynamical behavior, thus identifying hallmarks of their functional resilience. We show that the in-degree of a motif - defined as the number of incoming edges onto a motif - determines its functional properties. For a smaller in-degree, the functional traits for both these motifs (bimodality, pairwise correlation coefficient(s), and the frequency of 'single-positive' phenotypes) are largely conserved, but increasing the in-degree can lead to a divergence from their stand-alone behaviors. These observations offer insights into design principles of biological networks containing these network motifs, as well as help devise optimal strategies for integration of these motifs into larger synthetic networks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (7A) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Kerr ◽  
Sara Jabbari ◽  
Iain Johnston

Cells generate phenotypic diversity both during development and in response to stressful and changing environments, aiding survival. Functionally vital cell fate decisions from a range of phenotypic choices are made by regulatory networks, the dynamics of which rely on gene expression and hence depend on the cellular energy budget (and particularly ATP levels). However, despite pronounced cell-to-cell ATP differences observed across biological systems, the influence of energy availability on regulatory network dynamics is often overlooked as a cellular decision-making modulator, limiting our knowledge of how energy budgets affect cell behaviour. Here, we consider a mathematical model of a highly generalisable, ATP-dependent, decision-making regulatory network, and show that cell-to-cell ATP variability changes the sets of decisions a cell can make. Our model shows that increasing intracellular energy levels can increase the number of supported stable phenotypes, corresponding to increased decision-making capacity. Model cells with sub-threshold intracellular energy are limited to a singular phenotype, forcing the adoption of a specific cell fate. We suggest that energetic differences between cells may be an important consideration to help explain observed variability in cellular decision-making across a broad range of biological systems, including bacteria and the blood stem cell system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Kerr ◽  
Sara Jabbari ◽  
Iain G. Johnston

AbstractCells generate phenotypic diversity both during development and in response to stressful and changing environments, aiding survival. Functionally vital cell fate decisions from a range of phenotypic choices are made by regulatory networks, the dynamics of which rely on gene expression and hence depend on the cellular energy budget (and particularly ATP levels). However, despite pronounced cell-to-cell ATP differences observed across biological systems, the influence of energy availability on regulatory network dynamics is often overlooked as a cellular decision-making modulator, limiting our knowledge of how energy budgets affect cell behaviour. Here, we consider a mathematical model of a highly generalisable, ATP-dependent, decision-making regulatory network, and show that cell-to-cell ATP variability changes the sets of decisions a cell can make. Our model shows that increasing intracellular energy levels can increase the number of supported stable phenotypes, corresponding to increased decision-making capacity. Model cells with sub-threshold intracellular energy are limited to a singular phenotype, forcing the adoption of a specific cell fate. We suggest that energetic differences between cells may be an important consideration to help explain observed variability in cellular decision-making across biological systems.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Kerr ◽  
Sara Jabbari ◽  
Iain G. Johnston

ABSTRACTCells are able to generate phenotypic diversity both during development and in response to stressful and changing environments, aiding survival. The biologically and medically vital process of a cell assuming a functionally important fate from a range of phenotypic possibilities can be thought of as a cell decision. To make these decisions, a cell relies on energy dependent pathways of signalling and expression. However, energy availability is often overlooked as a modulator of cellular decision-making. As cells can vary dramatically in energy availability, this limits our knowledge of how this key biological axis affects cell behaviour. Here, we consider the energy dependence of a highly generalisable decision-making regulatory network, and show that energy variability changes the sets of decisions a cell can make and the ease with which they can be made. Increasing intracellular energy levels can increase the number of stable phenotypes it can generate, corresponding to increased decision-making capacity. For this decision-making architecture, a cell with intracellular energy below a threshold is limited to a singular phenotype, potentially forcing the adoption of a specific cell fate. We suggest that common energetic differences between cells may explain some of the observed variability in cellular decision-making, and demonstrate the importance of considering energy levels in several diverse biological decision-making phenomena.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kishore Hari ◽  
Varun Ullanat ◽  
Archana Balasubramanian ◽  
Aditi Gopalan ◽  
Mohit Kumar Jolly

Elucidating the principles of cellular decision-making is of fundamental importance. These decisions are often orchestrated by underlying regulatory networks. While we understand the dynamics of simple network motifs, how do large networks lead to a limited number of phenotypes, despite their complexity, remains largely elusive. Here, we investigate five different networks governing epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and identified a latent design principles in their topology that limits their phenotypic repertoire - the presence of two 'teams' of nodes engaging in a mutually inhibitory feedback loop, forming a toggle switch. These teams are specific to these networks and directly shape the phenotypic landscape and consequently the frequency and stability of terminal phenotypes vs. the intermediary ones. Our analysis reveals that network topology alone can contain information about phenotypic distributions it can lead to, thus obviating the need to simulate them. We unravel topological signatures that can drive canalization of cell-fates during diverse decision-making processes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amitava Basu ◽  
Vijay K. Tiwari

AbstractEpigenetic mechanisms are known to define cell-type identity and function. Hence, reprogramming of one cell type into another essentially requires a rewiring of the underlying epigenome. Cellular reprogramming can convert somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that can be directed to differentiate to specific cell types. Trans-differentiation or direct reprogramming, on the other hand, involves the direct conversion of one cell type into another. In this review, we highlight how gene regulatory mechanisms identified to be critical for developmental processes were successfully used for cellular reprogramming of various cell types. We also discuss how the therapeutic use of the reprogrammed cells is beginning to revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine particularly in the repair and regeneration of damaged tissue and organs arising from pathological conditions or accidents. Lastly, we highlight some key challenges hindering the application of cellular reprogramming for therapeutic purposes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A586-A586
Author(s):  
Sara Schad ◽  
Andrew Chow ◽  
Heng Pan ◽  
Levi Mangarin ◽  
Roberta Zappasodi ◽  
...  

BackgroundCD4 and CD8 T cells are genetically and functionally distinct cell subsets of the adaptive immune system that play pivotal roles in immune surveillance and disease control. During development in the thymus, transcription factors ThPOK and Runx3 regulate the differentiation and maturation of these two lineages into single positive T cells that enter the periphery with mutually exclusive expression of either the CD4 or CD8 co-receptor.1–2 Despite our expectation that these two cell fates are fixed, mature CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) T cells have been described in the context of numerous immunological responses, including cancer, but their molecular and functional properties and therapeutic relevance remain controversial and largely unknown.3–5MethodsOur lab has identified and characterized a heterogenous DP T cell population in murine and human melanoma tumors comprised of CD4 and CD8 T cells re-expressing the opposite co-receptor and a parallel uptake in the opposite cell type’s phenotype and function. Using CD4 (Trp1) and CD8 (Pmel) transgenic TCR T cells specific to B16 melanoma antigens gp75 and gp100 respectively, we demonstrate the re-expression of the opposite co-receptor following adoptive T cell transfer in B16 melanoma tumor bearing mice.ResultsSpecifically, up to 50% of transferred CD4 Trp1 T cells will re-express CD8 to become a DP T cell in the tumor microenvironment. Further, these CD4 derived DP T cells upregulate CD8 lineage regulator Runx3 and cytolytic genes Gzmb, Gzmk, and Prf1 to become potent cytotoxic T cells. Alternatively, a subset of CD8 Pmel T cells differentiate into DP T cells characterized by the increased expression of CD4, ThPOK, and regulatory marker FoxP3 (figure 1). In addition, we utilized 10x single cell and ATAC sequencing to further characterize these divergent DP T cell populations among open repertoire T cells isolated from murine and human melanoma tumors.ConclusionsOur findings highlight the capability of single positive T cells to differentiate in response to antigen and local stimuli into novel T cell subsets with polyfunctional characteristics. The resulting cell subsets will potentially affect the tumor microenvironment in distinct ways. Our studies may inform therapeutic approaches to identify antigen specific T cells as well as innovative signaling pathways to target when genetically engineering T cells to optimize cytotoxic function in the setting of adoptive cell therapy.Ethics ApprovalThe human biospecimen analyses were approved by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center IRB #06-107ReferencesEllmeier W, Haust L & Tschismarov R. Transcriptional control of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor expression during T cell development. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013;70:4537–4553.Luckey MA, et al. The transcription factor ThPOK suppresses Runx3 and imposes CD4+ lineage fate by inducing the SOCS suppressors of cytokine signaling. Nature Immunology 2014; 15, 638–645.Bohner P, et al. Double positive CD4(+)CD8(+) T Cells are enriched in urological cancers and favor T Helper-2 polarization. Front Immunol 2019; 10, 622.Nascimbeni M, Shin E-C, Chiriboga L, Kleiner DE & Rehermann B. Peripheral CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells are differentiated effector memory cells with antiviral functions. Blood 2004;104:478–486.Nishida K, et al. Clinical importance of the expression of CD4+CD8+ T cells in renal cell carcinoma. Int Immunol 2020;32:347–357.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document