scholarly journals Modelling river history and evolution

Author(s):  
T. J. Coulthard ◽  
M. J. Van De Wiel

Over the last few decades, a suite of numerical models has been developed for studying river history and evolution that is almost as diverse as the subject of river history itself. A distinction can be made between landscape evolution models (LEMs), alluvial architecture models, meander models, cellular models and computational fluid dynamics models. Although these models share some similarities, there also are notable differences between them, which make them more or less suitable for simulating particular aspects of river history and evolution. LEMs embrace entire drainage basins at the price of detail; alluvial architecture models simulate sedimentary facies but oversimplify flow characteristics; and computational fluid dynamics models have to assume a fixed channel form. While all these models have helped us to predict erosion and depositional processes as well as fluvial landscape evolution, some areas of prediction are likely to remain limited and short-term owing to the often nonlinear response of fluvial systems. Nevertheless, progress in model algorithms, computing and field data capture will lead to greater integration between these approaches and thus the ability to interpret river history more comprehensively.

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 204
Author(s):  
Kamran Fouladi ◽  
David J. Coughlin

This report presents the development of a fluid-structure interaction model using commercial Computational fluid dynamics software and in-house developed User Defined Function to simulate the motion of a trout Department of Mechanical Engineering, Widener University holding station in a moving water stream. The oscillation model used in this study is based on the observations of trout swimming in a respirometry tank in a laboratory experiment. The numerical simulations showed results that are consistent with laboratory observations of a trout holding station in the tank without obstruction and trout entrained to the side of the cylindrical obstruction. This paper will be helpful in the development of numerical models for the hydrodynamic analysis of bioinspired unmanned underwater vehicle systems.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1423-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Gundert ◽  
Shawn C. Shadden ◽  
Andrew R. Williams ◽  
Bon-Kwon Koo ◽  
Jeffrey A. Feinstein ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gonçalo Mendonça ◽  
Frederico Afonso ◽  
Fernando Lau

The need of the aerospace industry, at national or European level, of faster yet reliable computational fluid dynamics models is the main drive for the application of model reduction techniques. This need is linked to the time cost of high-fidelity models, rendering them inefficient for applications like multi-disciplinary optimization. With the goal of testing and applying model reduction to computational fluid dynamics models applicable to lifting surfaces, a bibliographical research covering reduction of nonlinear, dynamic, or steady models was conducted. This established the prevalence of projection and least mean squares methods, which rely on solutions of the original high-fidelity model and their proper orthogonal decomposition to work. Other complementary techniques such as adaptive sampling, greedy sampling, and hybrid models are also presented and discussed. These projection and least mean squares methods are then tested on simple and documented benchmarks to estimate the error and speed-up of the reduced order models thus generated. Dynamic, steady, nonlinear, and multiparametric problems were reduced, with the simplest version of these methods showing the most promise. These methods were later applied to single parameter problems, namely the lid-driven cavity with incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and varying Reynolds number, and the elliptic airfoil at varying angles of attack for compressible Euler flow. An analysis of the performance of these methods is given at the end of this article, highlighting the computational speed-up obtained with these techniques, and the challenges presented by multiparametric problems and problems showing point singularities in their domain.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e37842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Ong ◽  
Andrew J. C. King ◽  
Benjamin J. Mullins ◽  
Timothy F. Cooper ◽  
M. Julian Caley

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunxiang Chen ◽  
Xiaofeng Liu ◽  
Jason D. Gulley ◽  
Kenneth D. Mankoff

Author(s):  
Chang H. Oh ◽  
Eung S. Kim

Idaho National Laboratory (INL), under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is performing research and development that focuses on key phenomena important during potential scenarios that may occur in very high temperature reactors (VHTRs). Phenomena identification and ranking studies to date have ranked an air ingress event, following on the heels of a VHTR depressurization, as important with regard to core safety. Consequently, the development of advanced air-ingress-related models and verification and validation data are a very high priority. Following a loss of coolant and system depressurization incident, air will enter the core of the High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor through the break, possibly causing oxidation of the core and reflector graphite structure. Simple core and plant models indicate that, under certain circumstances, the oxidation may proceed at an elevated rate with additional heat generated from the oxidation reaction itself. Under postulated conditions of fluid flow and temperature, excessive degradation of lower plenum graphite can lead to a loss of structural support. Excessive oxidation of core graphite can also lead to a release of fission products into the confinement, which could be detrimental to reactor safety. Computational fluid dynamics models developed in this study will improve our understanding of this phenomenon. This paper presents two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) computational fluid dynamic (CFD) results for the quantitative assessment of the air ingress phenomena. A portion of the results from density-driven stratified flow in the inlet pipe will be compared with the experimental results.


Author(s):  
Christoph Reichel ◽  
Klaus Strohmeier

In many technical fields, e.g. heat exchangers, circular cylinders are involved in Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) problems. Therefore correct frequency and magnitude of fluid forces, respectively Strouhal number, drag and lift coefficient are needed. If fluid forces are evaluated with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), mostly flow around a rigid cylinder is used to verify model and numerical methods. Unfortunately experimental as well as numerical results show great variation, making verification and testing of models difficult. Reynolds number is regarded as main influencing parameter for a rigid cylinder in cross flow. Most of experimental deviations can be related to other parameters, which differ from experiment to experiment. In this paper such parameters are specified and it is shown, that a closer look is needed, if one really wants to verify a model. Besides experimental results, which can be found in literature, some parameters are investigated by numerical simulation. Like experiments CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations show a huge bandwidth of results, even when the same turbulence model is used. Flow around cylinders separates over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. It will be demonstrated that, using CFD, large deviations in fluid forces can often be related to miscalculation of the point of separation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document