scholarly journals Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero

Author(s):  
Euan G. Nisbet ◽  
Edward J. Dlugokencky ◽  
Rebecca E. Fisher ◽  
James L. France ◽  
David Lowry ◽  
...  

The causes of methane's renewed rise since 2007, accelerated growth from 2014 and record rise in 2020, concurrent with an isotopic shift to values more depleted in 13 C, remain poorly understood. This rise is the dominant departure from greenhouse gas scenarios that limit global heating to less than 2°C. Thus a comprehensive understanding of methane sources and sinks, their trends and inter-annual variations are becoming more urgent. Efforts to quantify both sources and sinks and understand latitudinal and seasonal variations will improve our understanding of the methane cycle and its anthropogenic component. Nationally declared emissions inventories under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and promised contributions to emissions reductions under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement need to be verified independently by top-down observation. Furthermore, indirect effects on natural emissions, such as changes in aquatic ecosystems, also need to be quantified. Nitrous oxide is even more poorly understood. Despite this, options for mitigating methane and nitrous oxide emissions are improving rapidly, both in cutting emissions from gas, oil and coal extraction and use, and also from agricultural and waste sources. Reductions in methane and nitrous oxide emission are arguably among the most attractive immediate options for climate action. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)'.

2017 ◽  
Vol 250 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Fitton ◽  
A. Datta ◽  
J.M. Cloy ◽  
R.M. Rees ◽  
C.F.E. Topp ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1666-1675
Author(s):  
Hai-Ming TANG ◽  
Xiao-Ping XIAO ◽  
Wen-Guang TANG ◽  
Guang-Li YANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadim Dawar ◽  
Shah Fahad ◽  
M. M. R. Jahangir ◽  
Iqbal Munir ◽  
Syed Sartaj Alam ◽  
...  

AbstractIn this study, we explored the role of biochar (BC) and/or urease inhibitor (UI) in mitigating ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) discharge from urea fertilized wheat cultivated fields in Pakistan (34.01°N, 71.71°E). The experiment included five treatments [control, urea (150 kg N ha−1), BC (10 Mg ha−1), urea + BC and urea + BC + UI (1 L ton−1)], which were all repeated four times and were carried out in a randomized complete block design. Urea supplementation along with BC and BC + UI reduced soil NH3 emissions by 27% and 69%, respectively, compared to sole urea application. Nitrous oxide emissions from urea fertilized plots were also reduced by 24% and 53% applying BC and BC + UI, respectively, compared to urea alone. Application of BC with urea improved the grain yield, shoot biomass, and total N uptake of wheat by 13%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, compared to urea alone. Moreover, UI further promoted biomass and grain yield, and N assimilation in wheat by 38%, 22% and 27%, respectively, over sole urea application. In conclusion, application of BC and/or UI can mitigate NH3 and N2O emissions from urea fertilized soil, improve N use efficiency (NUE) and overall crop productivity.


Eos ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (51) ◽  
pp. 529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Del Grosso ◽  
Tom Wirth ◽  
Stephen M. Ogle ◽  
William J. Parton

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debasish Saha ◽  
Jason P. Kaye ◽  
Arnab Bhowmik ◽  
Mary Ann Bruns ◽  
John M. Wallace ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arezoo Taghizadeh-Toosi ◽  
Baldur Janz ◽  
Rodrigo Labouriau ◽  
Jørgen E. Olesen ◽  
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 108197
Author(s):  
Hollie E. Emery ◽  
John H. Angell ◽  
Akaash Tawade ◽  
Robinson W. Fulweiler

Author(s):  
Muhammad Khalid Anser ◽  
Danish Iqbal Godil ◽  
Muhammad Azhar Khan ◽  
Abdelmohsen A. Nassani ◽  
Khalid Zaman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document