scholarly journals Subpopulations of sensorless bacteria drive fitness in fluctuating environments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Julou ◽  
Ludovit Zweifel ◽  
Diana Blank ◽  
Athos Fiori ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Population Level ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Basal Expression ◽  
Fluctuating Environments ◽  
Operon Expression

AbstractPopulations of bacteria often undergo a lag in growth when switching conditions. Because growth lags can be large compared to typical doubling times, variations in growth lag are an important but often overlooked component of bacterial fitness in fluctuating environments. We here explore how growth lag variation is determined for the archetypical switch from glucose to lactose as a carbon source in E. coli. First, we show that single-cell lags are bimodally distributed and controlled by a single-molecule trigger. That is, gene expression noise causes the population before the switch to divide cells with zero pre-existing into subpopulations with zero and nonzero lac operon expression. While ’sensorless’ lac expression at the switch have long lags because they are unable to sense the lactose signal, any nonzero lac operon expression suffices to ensure a short lag. Second, we show that the growth lag at the population level depends crucially on the fraction of sensorless cells, and that this fraction in turn depends sensitively on the growth condition before the switch. Consequently, even small changes in basal expression affecting the fraction of sensorless cells can significantly affect population lags and fitness under switching conditions, and may thus be subject to significant natural selection. Indeed, we show that condition-dependent population lags vary across wild E. coli isolates. Since many sensory genes are naturally low expressed in conditions where their inducer is not present, bimodal responses due to subpopulations of sensorless cells may be a general mechanism inducing phenotypic heterogeneity and controlling population lags in switching environments. This mechanism also illustrates how gene expression noise can turn even simple sensory gene circuits into a bet-hedging module, and underlines the profound role of gene expression noise in regulatory responses.

scholarly journals Subpopulations of sensorless bacteria drive fitness in fluctuating environments

PLoS Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. e3000952
Author(s):  
Thomas Julou ◽  
Ludovit Zweifel ◽  
Diana Blank ◽  
Athos Fiori ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Population Level ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Basal Expression ◽  
Fluctuating Environments ◽  
Bacterial Fitness ◽  
Operon Expression

Populations of bacteria often undergo a lag in growth when switching conditions. Because growth lags can be large compared to typical doubling times, variations in growth lag are an important but often overlooked component of bacterial fitness in fluctuating environments. We here explore how growth lag variation is determined for the archetypical switch from glucose to lactose as a carbon source in Escherichia coli. First, we show that single-cell lags are bimodally distributed and controlled by a single-molecule trigger. That is, gene expression noise causes the population before the switch to divide into subpopulations with zero and nonzero lac operon expression. While “sensorless” cells with zero preexisting lac expression at the switch have long lags because they are unable to sense the lactose signal, any nonzero lac operon expression suffices to ensure a short lag. Second, we show that the growth lag at the population level depends crucially on the fraction of sensorless cells and that this fraction in turn depends sensitively on the growth condition before the switch. Consequently, even small changes in basal expression can significantly affect the fraction of sensorless cells, thereby population lags and fitness under switching conditions, and may thus be subject to significant natural selection. Indeed, we show that condition-dependent population lags vary across wild E. coli isolates. Since many sensory genes are naturally low expressed in conditions where their inducer is not present, bimodal responses due to subpopulations of sensorless cells may be a general mechanism inducing phenotypic heterogeneity and controlling population lags in switching environments. This mechanism also illustrates how gene expression noise can turn even a simple sensory gene circuit into a bet hedging module and underlines the profound role of gene expression noise in regulatory responses.

Reduction in gene expression noise by targeted increase in accessibility at gene loci

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (42) ◽  
pp. e2018640118
Author(s):  
LaTasha C. R. Fraser ◽  
Ryan J. Dikdan ◽  
Supravat Dey ◽  
Abhyudai Singh ◽  
Sanjay Tyagi
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Global Changes ◽  
Messenger Rnas ◽  
Histone Acetyl Transferase ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Eukaryotic Genes

Many eukaryotic genes are expressed in randomly initiated bursts that are punctuated by periods of quiescence. Here, we show that the intermittent access of the promoters to transcription factors through relatively impervious chromatin contributes to this “noisy” transcription. We tethered a nuclease-deficient Cas9 fused to a histone acetyl transferase at the promoters of two endogenous genes in HeLa cells. An assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing showed that the activity of the histone acetyl transferase altered the chromatin architecture locally without introducing global changes in the nucleus and rendered the targeted promoters constitutively accessible. We measured the gene expression variability from the gene loci by performing single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization against mature messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and by imaging nascent mRNA molecules present at active gene loci in single cells. Because of the increased accessibility of the promoter to transcription factors, the transcription from two genes became less noisy, even when the average levels of expression did not change. In addition to providing evidence for chromatin accessibility as a determinant of the noise in gene expression, our study offers a mechanism for controlling gene expression noise which is otherwise unavoidable.

scholarly journals Plasmids for independently tunable, low-noise expression of two genes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
João P. N. Silva ◽  
Soraia Vidigal Lopes ◽  
Diogo J. Grilo ◽  
Zach Hensel
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Low Noise ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Compatible Plasmid ◽  
Noise Limit

AbstractSome microbiology experiments and biotechnology applications can be improved if it is possible to tune the expression of two different genes at the same time with cell-to-cell variation at or below the level of genes constitutively expressed from the chromosome (the “extrinsic noise limit”). This was recently achieved for a single gene by exploiting negative autoregulation by the tetracycline repressor (TetR) and bicistronic gene expression to reduce gene expression noise. We report new plasmids that use the same principles to achieve simultaneous, low-noise expression for two genes. The TetR system was moved to a compatible plasmid backbone, and a system based on the lac repressor (LacI) was found to also exhibit gene expression noise below the extrinsic noise limit. We characterize gene expression mean and noise across the range of induction levels for these plasmids, apply the LacI system to tune expression for single-molecule mRNA detection in two different growth conditions, and show that two plasmids can be co-transformed to independently tune expression of two different genes.

scholarly journals Controlling E. coli Gene Expression Noise

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hyuk Kim ◽  
Kiri Choi ◽  
Bryan Bartley ◽  
Herbert M. Sauro
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Expression Noise

scholarly journals Noise propagation shapes condition-dependent gene expression noise in Escherichia coli

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arantxa Urchueguía ◽  
Luca Galbusera ◽  
Gwendoline Bellement ◽  
Thomas Julou ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Transcriptional Noise ◽  
Noise Propagation ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Rate Dependent ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Principal Axes

AbstractAlthough it is well appreciated that gene expression is inherently noisy and that transcriptional noise is encoded in a promoter’s sequence, little is known about the variation in transcriptional noise across growth conditions. Using flow cytometry we here quantify transcriptional noise in E. coli genome-wide across 8 growth conditions, and find that noise and gene regulation are intimately coupled. Apart from a growth-rate dependent lower bound on noise, we find that individual promoters show highly condition-dependent noise and that condition-dependent expression noise is shaped by noise propagation from regulators to their targets. A simple model of noise propagation identifies TFs that most contribute to both condition-specific and condition-independent noise propagation. The overall correlation structure of sequence and expression properties of E. coli genes uncovers that genes are organized along two principal axes, with the first axis sorting genes by their mean expression and evolutionary rate of their coding regions, and the second axis sorting genes by their expression noise, the number of regulatory inputs in their promoter, and their expression plasticity.

scholarly journals Expression noise facilitates the evolution of gene regulation

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Wolf ◽  
Olin K Silander ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Low Noise ◽  
Noise Levels ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Evolution Of Gene Regulation ◽  
Rudimentary Form

Although it is often tacitly assumed that gene regulatory interactions are finely tuned, how accurate gene regulation could evolve from a state without regulation is unclear. Moreover, gene expression noise would seem to impede the evolution of accurate gene regulation, and previous investigations have provided circumstantial evidence that natural selection has acted to lower noise levels. By evolving synthetic Escherichia coli promoters de novo, we here show that, contrary to expectations, promoters exhibit low noise by default. Instead, selection must have acted to increase the noise levels of highly regulated E. coli promoters. We present a general theory of the interplay between gene expression noise and gene regulation that explains these observations. The theory shows that propagation of expression noise from regulators to their targets is not an unwanted side-effect of regulation, but rather acts as a rudimentary form of regulation that facilitates the evolution of more accurate regulation.

scholarly journals Enhancement of gene expression noise due to nonspecific transcription factor binding

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supravat Dey ◽  
Mohammad Soltani ◽  
Abhyudai Singh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Stochastic Dynamics ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
Downstream Target ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Expression Noise ◽  
Degradation Rates ◽  
Poisson Limit ◽  
Random Fluctuations

ABSTRACTThe genome contains several high-affinity non-functional binding sites for transcription factors (TFs) creating a hidden and unexplored layer of gene regulation. We investigate the role of such “decoy sites” in controlling noise (random fluctuations) in the level of a TF that is synthesized in stochastic bursts. Prior studies have assumed that decoy-bound TFs are protected from degradation, and in this case decoys function to buffer noise. Relaxing this assumption to consider arbitrary degradation rates for both bound/unbound TF states, we find rich noise behaviors. For low-affinity decoys, noise in the level of unbound TF always monotonically decreases to the Poisson limit with increasing decoy numbers. In contrast, for high affinity decoys, noise levels first increase with increasing decoy numbers, before decreasing back to the Poisson limit. Interestingly, while protection of bound TFs from degradation slows the time-scale of fluctuations in the unbound TF levels, decay of bounds TFs leads to faster fluctuations and smaller noise propagation to downstream target proteins. In summary, our analysis reveals stochastic dynamics emerging from nonspecific binding of TFs, and highlight the dual role of decoys as attenuators or amplifiers of gene expression noise depending on their binding affinity and stability of the bound TF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document