scholarly journals Expression noise facilitates the evolution of gene regulation

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Wolf ◽  
Olin K Silander ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen

Although it is often tacitly assumed that gene regulatory interactions are finely tuned, how accurate gene regulation could evolve from a state without regulation is unclear. Moreover, gene expression noise would seem to impede the evolution of accurate gene regulation, and previous investigations have provided circumstantial evidence that natural selection has acted to lower noise levels. By evolving synthetic Escherichia coli promoters de novo, we here show that, contrary to expectations, promoters exhibit low noise by default. Instead, selection must have acted to increase the noise levels of highly regulated E. coli promoters. We present a general theory of the interplay between gene expression noise and gene regulation that explains these observations. The theory shows that propagation of expression noise from regulators to their targets is not an unwanted side-effect of regulation, but rather acts as a rudimentary form of regulation that facilitates the evolution of more accurate regulation.

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Wolf ◽  
Olin K Silander ◽  
Erik J van Nimwegen

In studies of gene regulation, it is often tacitly assumed that the interactions between transcriptional regulators and their target promoters are finely tuned to ensure condition-appropriate gene expression of the targets. However, how natural selection might evolve such precise regulation from an initial state without regulation, is rarely discussed. In addition, the accuracy of gene regulation is affected by noise in gene expression [1]. Expression noise varies greatly across genes [2?5], suggesting that natural selection has affected noise levels, but the role of expression noise in gene regulation is currently poorly understood [6]. Here we present a combination of experimental evidence and theoretical modeling showing that the transmission of expression noise from regulators to their targets can function as a rudimentary form of gene regulation that facilitates the evolution of more finely tuned gene regulation. To assess how natural selection has affected transcriptional noise in E. coli, we evolved a large set of synthetic promoters under carefully controlled selective conditions and found, surprisingly, that native E. coli promoters show no signs of having been selected for minimizing their noise. Instead, a subset of native promoters, which are characterized by high expression plasticity and high numbers of regulatory inputs, show elevated noise levels. A general theoretical model, which recognizes that target genes are not only affected by the condition-dependent activities of their regulators, but also by the regulators? noise, explains these observations. Noise transmission from regulators to their targets is favored by selection whenever regulation is imprecise, and may even constitute the main function of coupling a promoter to a regulator. Our theory provides a novel framework for understanding the evolution of gene regulation, demonstrating that in many situations expression noise is not the mere unwanted side-effect of regulatory interactions, but a beneficial function that is key to the evolvability of regulatory interactions.


mSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
João P. N. Silva ◽  
Soraia Vidigal Lopes ◽  
Diogo J. Grilo ◽  
Zach Hensel

ABSTRACTSome microbiology experiments and biotechnology applications can be improved if it is possible to tune the expression of two different genes at the same time with cell-to-cell variation at or below the level of genes constitutively expressed from the chromosome (the “extrinsic noise limit”). This was recently achieved for a single gene by exploiting negative autoregulation by the tetracycline repressor (TetR) and bicistronic gene expression to reduce gene expression noise. We report new plasmids that use the same principles to achieve simultaneous, low-noise expression for two genes inEscherichia coli. The TetR system was moved to a compatible plasmid backbone, and a system based on thelacrepressor (LacI) was found to also exhibit gene expression noise below the extrinsic noise limit. We characterized gene expression mean and noise across the range of induction levels for these plasmids, applied the LacI system to tune expression for single-molecule mRNA detection under two different growth conditions, and showed that two plasmids can be cotransformed to independently tune expression of two different genes.IMPORTANCEMicrobiologists often express foreign proteins in bacteria in order study them or to use bacteria as a microbial factory. Usually, this requires controlling the number of foreign proteins expressed in each cell, but for many common protein expression systems, it is difficult to “tune” protein expression without large cell-to-cell variation in expression levels (called “noise” in protein expression). This work describes two protein expression systems that can be combined in the same cell, with tunable expression levels and very low protein expression noise. One new system was used to detect single mRNA molecules by fluorescence microscopy, and the two systems were shown to be independent of each other. These protein expression systems may be useful in any experiment or biotechnology application that can be improved with low protein expression noise.


Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 336 (6078) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Munsky ◽  
G. Neuert ◽  
A. van Oudenaarden

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
João P. N. Silva ◽  
Soraia Vidigal Lopes ◽  
Diogo J. Grilo ◽  
Zach Hensel

AbstractSome microbiology experiments and biotechnology applications can be improved if it is possible to tune the expression of two different genes at the same time with cell-to-cell variation at or below the level of genes constitutively expressed from the chromosome (the “extrinsic noise limit”). This was recently achieved for a single gene by exploiting negative autoregulation by the tetracycline repressor (TetR) and bicistronic gene expression to reduce gene expression noise. We report new plasmids that use the same principles to achieve simultaneous, low-noise expression for two genes. The TetR system was moved to a compatible plasmid backbone, and a system based on the lac repressor (LacI) was found to also exhibit gene expression noise below the extrinsic noise limit. We characterize gene expression mean and noise across the range of induction levels for these plasmids, apply the LacI system to tune expression for single-molecule mRNA detection in two different growth conditions, and show that two plasmids can be co-transformed to independently tune expression of two different genes.


Author(s):  
Thomas Julou ◽  
Ludovit Zweifel ◽  
Diana Blank ◽  
Athos Fiori ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen

AbstractPopulations of bacteria often undergo a lag in growth when switching conditions. Because growth lags can be large compared to typical doubling times, variations in growth lag are an important but often overlooked component of bacterial fitness in fluctuating environments. We here explore how growth lag variation is determined for the archetypical switch from glucose to lactose as a carbon source in E. coli. First, we show that single-cell lags are bimodally distributed and controlled by a single-molecule trigger. That is, gene expression noise causes the population before the switch to divide cells with zero pre-existing into subpopulations with zero and nonzero lac operon expression. While ’sensorless’ lac expression at the switch have long lags because they are unable to sense the lactose signal, any nonzero lac operon expression suffices to ensure a short lag. Second, we show that the growth lag at the population level depends crucially on the fraction of sensorless cells, and that this fraction in turn depends sensitively on the growth condition before the switch. Consequently, even small changes in basal expression affecting the fraction of sensorless cells can significantly affect population lags and fitness under switching conditions, and may thus be subject to significant natural selection. Indeed, we show that condition-dependent population lags vary across wild E. coli isolates. Since many sensory genes are naturally low expressed in conditions where their inducer is not present, bimodal responses due to subpopulations of sensorless cells may be a general mechanism inducing phenotypic heterogeneity and controlling population lags in switching environments. This mechanism also illustrates how gene expression noise can turn even simple sensory gene circuits into a bet-hedging module, and underlines the profound role of gene expression noise in regulatory responses.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Hyuk Kim ◽  
Kiri Choi ◽  
Bryan Bartley ◽  
Herbert M. Sauro

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arantxa Urchueguía ◽  
Luca Galbusera ◽  
Gwendoline Bellement ◽  
Thomas Julou ◽  
Erik van Nimwegen

AbstractAlthough it is well appreciated that gene expression is inherently noisy and that transcriptional noise is encoded in a promoter’s sequence, little is known about the variation in transcriptional noise across growth conditions. Using flow cytometry we here quantify transcriptional noise in E. coli genome-wide across 8 growth conditions, and find that noise and gene regulation are intimately coupled. Apart from a growth-rate dependent lower bound on noise, we find that individual promoters show highly condition-dependent noise and that condition-dependent expression noise is shaped by noise propagation from regulators to their targets. A simple model of noise propagation identifies TFs that most contribute to both condition-specific and condition-independent noise propagation. The overall correlation structure of sequence and expression properties of E. coli genes uncovers that genes are organized along two principal axes, with the first axis sorting genes by their mean expression and evolutionary rate of their coding regions, and the second axis sorting genes by their expression noise, the number of regulatory inputs in their promoter, and their expression plasticity.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Bertaux ◽  
Samuel Marguerat ◽  
Vahid Shahrezaei

AbstractThe cell division rate, size, and gene expression programmes change in response to external conditions. These global changes impact on average concentrations of biomolecule and their variability or noise. Gene expression is inherently stochastic, and noise levels of individual proteins depend on synthesis and degradation rates as well as on cell-cycle dynamics. We have modelled stochastic gene expression inside growing and dividing cells to study the effect of division rates on noise in mRNA and protein expression. We use assumptions and parameters relevant to Escherichia coli, for which abundant quantitative data are available. We find that coupling of transcription, but not translation rates to the rate of cell division can result in protein concentration and noise homeostasis across conditions. Interestingly, we find that the increased cell size at fast division rates, observed in E. coli d other unicellular organisms, buffers noise levels even for proteins with decreased expression at faster growth. We then investigate the functional importance of these regulations using gene regulatory networks that exhibit bi-stability and oscillations. We find that network topology affects robustness to changes in division rate in complex and unexpected ways. In particular, a simple model of persistence, based on global physiological feedback, predicts increased proportion of persistors cells at slow division rates. Altogether, our study reveals how cell size regulation in response to cell division rate could help controlling gene expression noise. It also highlights that understanding of circuits’ robustness across growth conditions is key for the effective design of synthetic biological systems.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenio Azpeitia ◽  
Andreas Wagner

AbstractGene expression noise is not just ubiquitous but also variable, and we still do not understand some of the most elementary factors that affect it. Among them is the residence time of a transcription factor (TF) on DNA, the mean time that a DNA-bound TF remains bound. Here, we use a stochastic model of transcriptional regulation to study how this residence time affects gene expression. We find that the effect of residence time on gene expression depends on the level of induction of the gene. At high levels of induction, residence time has no effect on gene expression. However, as the level of induction decreases, short residence times reduce gene expression noise. The reason is that fast on-off TF binding dynamics prevent long periods where proteins are predominantly synthesized or degraded, which can cause excessive fluctuations in gene expression. As a consequence, short residence times can help a gene regulation system acquire information about the cellular environment it operates in. Our predictions are consistent with the observation that experimentally measured residence times are usually modest and lie between seconds to minutes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document