scholarly journals SMART-Q: An Integrative Pipeline Quantifying Cell Type-Specific RNA Transcription

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Bergenholtz ◽  
Xiaoyu Yang ◽  
Lenka Maliskova ◽  
Li Yun ◽  
Yin Shen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Rna Transcription ◽  
Quantitative Measurements ◽  
Gene Transcripts ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Batch Data

AbstractAccurate RNA quantification at the single-cell level is critical for understanding the dynamics of gene expression and regulation across space and time. Single molecule FISH (smFISH), such as RNAscope, provides spatial and quantitative measurements of individual transcripts, therefore, can be used to explore differential gene expression among a heterogeneous cell population if combined with cell identify information. However, such analysis is not straightforward, and existing image analysis pipelines cannot integrate both RNA transcripts and cellular staining information to automatically output cell type-specific gene expression. We developed an efficient and customizable analysis method, Single-Molecule Automatic RNA Transcription Quantification (SMART-Q), to enable the analysis of gene transcripts in a cell type-specific manner. SMART-Q efficiently infers cell identity information from multiplexed immuno-staining and quantifies cell type-specific transcripts using a 3D Gaussian fitting algorithm. Furthermore, we have optimized SMART-Q for user experiences, such as flexible parameters specification, batch data outputs, and visualization of analysis results. SMART-Q meets the demands for efficient quantification of single-molecule RNA and can be widely used for cell type-specific RNA transcript analysis.

New insights into promoter–enhancer communication mechanisms revealed by dynamic single-molecule imaging

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieru Li ◽  
Alexandros Pertsinidis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Single Molecule Imaging ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Regulatory Information ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Target Promoters

Establishing cell-type-specific gene expression programs relies on the action of distal enhancers, cis-regulatory elements that can activate target genes over large genomic distances — up to Mega-bases away. How distal enhancers physically relay regulatory information to target promoters has remained a mystery. Here, we review the latest developments and insights into promoter–enhancer communication mechanisms revealed by live-cell, real-time single-molecule imaging approaches.

scholarly journals Distinct CoREST complexes act in a cell-type-specific manner

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Mačinković ◽  
Ina Theofel ◽  
Tim Hundertmark ◽  
Kristina Kovač ◽  
Stephan Awe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
S2 Cells ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract CoREST has been identified as a subunit of several protein complexes that generate transcriptionally repressive chromatin structures during development. However, a comprehensive analysis of the CoREST interactome has not been carried out. We use proteomic approaches to define the interactomes of two dCoREST isoforms, dCoREST-L and dCoREST-M, in Drosophila. We identify three distinct histone deacetylase complexes built around a common dCoREST/dRPD3 core: A dLSD1/dCoREST complex, the LINT complex and a dG9a/dCoREST complex. The latter two complexes can incorporate both dCoREST isoforms. By contrast, the dLSD1/dCoREST complex exclusively assembles with the dCoREST-L isoform. Genome-wide studies show that the three dCoREST complexes associate with chromatin predominantly at promoters. Transcriptome analyses in S2 cells and testes reveal that different cell lineages utilize distinct dCoREST complexes to maintain cell-type-specific gene expression programmes: In macrophage-like S2 cells, LINT represses germ line-related genes whereas other dCoREST complexes are largely dispensable. By contrast, in testes, the dLSD1/dCoREST complex prevents transcription of germ line-inappropriate genes and is essential for spermatogenesis and fertility, whereas depletion of other dCoREST complexes has no effect. Our study uncovers three distinct dCoREST complexes that function in a lineage-restricted fashion to repress specific sets of genes thereby maintaining cell-type-specific gene expression programmes.

scholarly journals Inducible cell-specific mouse models for paired epigenetic and transcriptomic studies of microglia and astroglia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana J. Chucair-Elliott ◽  
Sarah R. Ocañas ◽  
David R. Stanford ◽  
Victor A. Ansere ◽  
Kyla B. Buettner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractEpigenetic regulation of gene expression occurs in a cell type-specific manner. Current cell-type specific neuroepigenetic studies rely on cell sorting methods that can alter cell phenotype and introduce potential confounds. Here we demonstrate and validate a Nuclear Tagging and Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (NuTRAP) approach for temporally controlled labeling and isolation of ribosomes and nuclei, and thus RNA and DNA, from specific central nervous system cell types. Analysis of gene expression and DNA modifications in astrocytes or microglia from the same animal demonstrates differential usage of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in CpG and non-CpG contexts that corresponds to cell type-specific gene expression. Application of this approach in LPS treated mice uncovers microglia-specific transcriptome and epigenome changes in inflammatory pathways that cannot be detected with tissue-level analysis. The NuTRAP model and the validation approaches presented can be applied to any brain cell type for which a cell type-specific cre is available.

scholarly journals Inducible cell-specific mouse models for paired epigenetic and transcriptomic studies of microglia and astroglia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana J. Chucair-Elliott ◽  
Sarah R. Ocañas ◽  
David R. Stanford ◽  
Victor A. Ansere ◽  
Kyla B. Buettner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Current Cell ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractEpigenetic regulation of gene expression occurs in a cell type-specific manner. Current cell-type specific neuroepigenetic studies rely on cell sorting methods that can alter cell phenotype and introduce potential confounds. Here we demonstrate and validate a Nuclear Tagging and Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (NuTRAP) approach for temporally controlled labeling and isolation of ribosomes and nuclei, and thus RNA and DNA, from specific CNS cell types. Paired analysis of the transcriptome and DNA modifications in astrocytes and microglia demonstrates differential usage of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in CG and non-CG contexts that corresponds to cell type-specific gene expression. Application of this approach in LPS treated mice uncovers microglia-specific transcriptome and epigenome changes in inflammatory pathways that cannot be detected with tissue-level analysis. The NuTRAP model and the validation approaches presented can be applied to any CNS cell type for which a cell type-specific cre is available.

scholarly journals Rel Induces Interferon Regulatory Factor 4 (IRF-4) Expression in Lymphocytes

2000 ◽  
Vol 191 (8) ◽  
pp. 1281-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raelene J. Grumont ◽  
Steve Gerondakis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Nuclear Factor Κb ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Regulatory Factor ◽  
Specific Manner ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Interferon Regulatory Factor 4

In lymphocytes, the Rel transcription factor is essential in establishing a pattern of gene expression that promotes cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Here we show that mitogen-induced expression of interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 4 (IRF-4), a lymphoid-specific member of the IFN family of transcription factors, is Rel dependent. Consistent with IRF-4 functioning as a repressor of IFN-induced gene expression, the absence of IRF-4 expression in c-rel−/− B cells coincided with a greater sensitivity of these cells to the antiproliferative activity of IFNs. In turn, enforced expression of an IRF-4 transgene restored IFN modulated c-rel−/− B cell proliferation to that of wild-type cells. This cross-regulation between two different signaling pathways represents a novel mechanism that Rel/nuclear factor κB can repress the transcription of IFN-regulated genes in a cell type–specific manner.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on cell type specific gene expression and splicing during neurogenesis elucidate regulatory mechanisms of brain traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nil Aygün ◽  
Angela L. Elwell ◽  
Dan Liang ◽  
Michael J. Lafferty ◽  
Kerry E. Cheek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Regulatory Effects

SummaryInterpretation of the function of non-coding risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders and brain-relevant traits via gene expression and alternative splicing is mainly performed in bulk post-mortem adult tissue. However, genetic risk loci are enriched in regulatory elements of cells present during neocortical differentiation, and regulatory effects of risk variants may be masked by heterogeneity in bulk tissue. Here, we map e/sQTLs and allele specific expression in primary human neural progenitors (n=85) and their sorted neuronal progeny (n=74). Using colocalization and TWAS, we uncover cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms underlying risk for these traits.

scholarly journals Srf destabilizes cellular identity by suppressing cell-type-specific gene expression programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Ikeda ◽  
Takafusa Hikichi ◽  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Hirofumi Shibata ◽  
Kanae Mitsunaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Cellular Identity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document