scholarly journals Consultation length by multimorbidity and deprivation: observational study using electronic patient records

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anya Gopfert ◽  
Sarah Deeny ◽  
Rebecca Fisher ◽  
Mai Stafford
Keyword(s):  
Random Effect ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Opening And Closing ◽  
Multimorbid Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Deprived Areas

AbstractBackgroundLonger GP consultations are recommended for people with multimorbidity. In Scotland, multimorbid patients in deprived areas did not have longer consultations though their counterparts in the least deprived areas did. We are not aware of research testing this particular example of the inverse care law in England.AimTo assess length of GP consultation for patients with and without multimorbidity and whether this varies by socioeconomic deprivation.Design and SettingRandom sample of over 1.2 million consultations between 1st April 2014 and 31st March 2016 for 185,755 adults in England drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.MethodConsultation duration was derived from time of opening and closing the patient’s electronic record. Duration was modelled as a function of multimorbidity status, index of multiple deprivation, and their interaction, with adjustment for age, sex, GP trainee status and patient level random effect.ResultsMean adjusted consultation length in the most deprived fifth of areas was 10.8 (95% CI 10.7,10.9) minutes for people with 2+ physical conditions and 11.0 (95% CI 10.9,11.1) minutes for people with 2+ conditions including a mental health condition. This compares with 11.0 (95% CI 10.9,11.0) minutes for non-multimorbid people in the least deprived fifth of areas.ConclusionConsultation length for people with multimorbidity in the most deprived areas is no higher than that for non-multimorbid people in the least deprived areas. Further research is needed to assess the impact of consultation length on patient and system outcomes for people with multimorbidity.

scholarly journals Primary care consultation length by deprivation and multimorbidity in England: an observational study using electronic patient records

2020 ◽  
pp. bjgp20X714029
Author(s):  
Anya Gopfert ◽  
Sarah R Deeny ◽  
Rebecca Fisher ◽  
Mai Stafford
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Record ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Inverse Care Law ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Opening And Closing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Deprived Areas

BackgroundLonger GP consultations are recommended as one way of improving care for people with multimorbidity. In Scotland, patients who are multimorbid and living in deprived areas do not have longer consultations, although their counterparts in the least deprived areas do. This example of the inverse care law has not been examined in England.AimTo assess GP consultation length by socioeconomic deprivation and multimorbidity.Design and settingRandom sample of 1.2 million consultations from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2016 for 190 036 adults in England drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.MethodConsultation duration was derived from time of opening and closing the patient’s electronic record. Mean duration was estimated by multimorbidity level and type, adjusted for number of consultations and other patient and staff characteristics and patient and practice random effects.ResultsConsultations lasted 10.9 minutes on average and mean duration increased with number of conditions. Patients with ≥6 conditions had 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8 to 1.0) minutes longer than those with none. Patients who are multimorbid and with a mental health condition had 0.5 (CI = 0.4 to 0.5) minutes longer than patients who were not multimorbid. However, consultations were 0.5 (CI = 0.4 to 0.5) minutes shorter in the most compared with the least deprived fifth of areas at all levels of multimorbidity.ConclusionGPs in England spend longer with patients who have more conditions, but, at all multimorbidity levels, those in deprived areas have less time per GP consultation. Further research is needed to assess the impact of consultation length on patient and system outcomes for those with multimorbidity.

scholarly journals Primary Care Consultations after Hospitalisation for Pneumonia: A Large Population-based Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
pp. BJGP.2020.0890
Author(s):  
Vadsala Baskaran ◽  
Fiona Pearce ◽  
Rowan H Harwood ◽  
Tricia McKeever ◽  
Wei Shen Lim
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Respiratory Disorder ◽  
The Impact

Background: Up to 70% of patients report ongoing symptoms four weeks after hospitalisation for pneumonia, and the impact on primary care is poorly understood. Aim: To investigate the frequency of primary care consultations after hospitalisation for pneumonia, and the reasons for consultation. Design: Population-based cohort study. Setting: UK primary care database of anonymised medical records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, CPRD) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), England. Methods: Adults with the first ICD-10 code for pneumonia (J12-J18) recorded in HES between July 2002-June 2017 were included. Primary care consultation within 30 days of discharge was identified as the recording of any medical Read code (excluding administration-related codes) in CPRD. Competing-risks regression analyses were conducted to determine the predictors of consultation and antibiotic use at consultation; death and readmission were competing events. Reasons for consultation were examined. Results: Of 56,396 adults, 55.9% (n=31,542) consulted primary care within 30 days of discharge. The rate of consultation was highest within 7 days (4.7 per 100 person-days). The strongest predictor for consultation was a higher number of primary care consultations in the year prior to index admission (adjusted sHR 8.98, 95% CI 6.42-12.55). The commonest reason for consultation was for a respiratory disorder (40.7%, n=12,840), 12% for pneumonia specifically. At consultation, 31.1% (n=9,823) received further antibiotics. Penicillins (41.6%, n=5,753) and macrolides (21.9%, n=3,029) were the commonest antibiotics prescribed. Conclusion: Following hospitalisation for pneumonia, a significant proportion of patients consulted primary care within 30 days, highlighting the morbidity experienced by patients during recovery from pneumonia.

scholarly journals Cohort profile for the MASTERMIND study: using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to investigate stratification of response to treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e017989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren R Rodgers ◽  
Michael N Weedon ◽  
William E Henley ◽  
Andrew T Hattersley ◽  
Beverley M Shields
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Data Quality Control ◽  
Data Set ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThis is a retrospective cohort study using observational data from anonymised primary care records. We identify and extract all patients with type 2 diabetes and associated clinical data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to inform models of disease progression and stratification of treatment.ParticipantsData were extracted from CPRD on 8 August 2016. The initial data set contained all patients (n=313 485) in the database who had received a type 2 diabetes medication. Criteria were applied to identify and exclude those with type 1 diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome or other forms of diabetes (n=40 204), and for data quality control (n=12). We identified 251 338 patients for inclusion in future analyses of diabetes progression and treatment response.Findings to dateFor 6-month response to treatment, measured by change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), we have 91 765 patients with 119 785 treatment response episodes. The greatest impact on reduction of HbA1c occurs with first-line and second-line treatments, metformin and sulfonylurea. Patients moving to third-line treatments tend to have greater weights and higher body mass index. We have investigated the impact of non-adherence to commonly used glucose-lowering medications on HbA1c. For baseline-adjusted HbA1c change over 1 year, non-adherent patients had lower HbA1c reductions than adherent patients, with mean and 95% CI of −4.4 (−4.7 to −4.0) mmol/mol (−0.40 (−0.43 to −0.37) %).Future plansFindings from studies using these data will help inform future treatment plans and guidelines. Additional data are added with updates from CPRD. This will increase the numbers of patients on newer medications and add more data on those already receiving treatment. There are several ongoing studies investigating different hypotheses regarding differential response to treatment and progression of diabetes. For side effects, links to Hospital Episode Statistics data, where severe events such as hypoglycaemia will be recorded, will also be explored.

scholarly journals Evidence of disparities in the provision of the maternal postpartum 6-week check in primary care in England, 2015–2018: an observational study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

2021 ◽  
pp. jech-2021-216640
Author(s):  
Yangmei Li ◽  
Jennifer J Kurinczuk ◽  
Christopher Gale ◽  
Dimitrios Siassakos ◽  
Claire Carson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Policy Change ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Younger Women ◽  
Preterm Babies ◽  
Deprived Areas

BackgroundA maternal postpartum 6-week check (SWC) with a general practitioner (GP) is now considered an essential service in England, a recent policy change intended to improve women’s health. We aimed to provide an up-to-date snapshot of the prevalence of SWC prior to the policy change as a baseline, and to explore factors associated with having a late or no check.MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using primary care records in England (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)). 34 337 women who gave birth between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2018 and had ≥12 weeks of follow-up post partum were identified in the CPRD Pregnancy Register. The proportion who had evidence of an SWC with a GP was calculated, and regression analysis was used to assess the association between women’s characteristics and risks of a late or no check.ResultsSixty-two per cent (95% CI 58% to 67%) of women had an SWC recorded at their GP practice within 12 weeks post partum, another 27% had other consultations. Forty per cent had an SWC at the recommended 6–8 weeks, 2% earlier and 20% later. A late or no check was more common among younger women, mothers of preterm babies or those registered in more deprived areas.ConclusionsNearly 40% of women did not have a postpartum SWC recorded. Provision or uptake was not equitable; younger women and those in more deprived areas were less likely to have a record of such check, suggesting postpartum care in general practice may be missing some women who need it most.

scholarly journals The Impact of Demographic, Socio-Economic and Geographic Factors on Mortality Risk among People Living with Dementia in England (2002–2016)

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (24) ◽  
pp. 13405
Author(s):  
James Watson ◽  
Frances Darlington-Pollock ◽  
Mark Green ◽  
Clarissa Giebel ◽  
Asangaedem Akpan
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Social Inequalities ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Geographic Factors ◽  
North East ◽  
Explanatory Factors ◽  
South Central ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Impact

Increasing numbers of people living with dementia (PLWD), and a pressured health and social care system, will exacerbate inequalities in mortality for PLWD. There is a dearth of research examining multiple factors in mortality risk among PLWD, including application of large administrative datasets to investigate these issues. This study explored variation mortality risk variation among people diagnosed with dementia between 2002–2016, based on: age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, geography and general practice (GP) contacts. Data were derived from electronic health records from a cohort of Clinical Practice Research Datalink GP patients in England (n = 142,340). Cox proportional hazards regression modelled mortality risk separately for people with early- and later- onset dementia. Few social inequalities were observed in early-onset dementia; men had greater risk of mortality. For early- and later-onset, higher rates of GP observations—and for later-onset only dementia medications—are associated with increased mortality risk. Social inequalities were evident in later-onset dementia. Accounting for other explanatory factors, Black and Mixed/Other ethnicity groups had lower mortality risk, more deprived areas had greater mortality risk, and higher mortality was observed in North East, South Central and South West GP regions. This study provides novel evidence of the extent of mortality risk inequalities among PLWD. Variance in mortality risk was observed by social, demographic and geographic factors, and frequency of GP contact. Findings illustrate need for greater person-centred care discussions, prioritising tackling inequalities among PLWD. Future research should explore more outcomes for PLWD, and more explanatory factors of health outcomes.

scholarly journals Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension related workload

2020 ◽  
pp. bjgp21X714281
Author(s):  
Sarah Lay-Flurrie ◽  
James Sheppard ◽  
Richard J Stevens ◽  
Christian Mallen ◽  
Carl Heneghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Interrupted Time Series Analysis ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
General Practices ◽  
The Impact

Background: In 2011, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommended the routine use of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring for the diagnosis of hypertension. These changes were predicted to reduce unnecessary treatment costs and workload associated with misdiagnosis. Aim: To assess the impact of guideline change on rates of hypertension-related consultation in general practice. Design and Setting: Cohort study in adults registered with English general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1/4/2006 and 31/3/2017. Method: The primary outcome was the rate of face-to-face, telephone and visit consultations related to hypertension with a GP or nurse. Age and sex standardized rates were analysed using interrupted time-series analysis. Results: In 3,937,191 adults (median follow-up = 4.2 years) there were 12,253,836 hypertension related consultations. The rate of hypertension related consultation was 71.0 per 100 person-years (95% CI 67.8 to 74.2) in April 2006, which remained flat prior to 2011. The introduction of the NICE hypertension guideline in 2011 was associated with a change in yearly trend (change in trend = -3.60 per 100 person-years, 95% CI -5.12 to -2.09). The rate of consultation subsequently decreased to 59.2 per 100 person-years (95% CI 56.5 to 61.8) in March 2017. These changes occurred around the time of diagnosis and persisted when accounting for wider trends in all consultations. Conclusion: Hypertension-related workload has declined in the last decade, in association with guideline changes. This is due to changes in workload at the time of diagnosis, rather than reductions in misdiagnosis.

scholarly journals Risk of Recurrent Bleeding Events in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Vitamin K Antagonists: A Clinical Practice Research Datalink Study

TH Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. e316-e324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raza Alikhan ◽  
Cinira Lefevre ◽  
Ian Menown ◽  
Steven Lister ◽  
Alex Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Recurrent Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background There is little evidence on how the occurrence of a bleed in individuals on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) impacts the risk of subsequent bleeds, and thromboembolic and ischemic events. Such information would help to inform treatment decisions following bleeds. Objective To estimate the impact of bleeding events on the risk of subsequent bleeds, venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) among patients initiating VKA treatment for new-onset nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods We conducted an observational cohort study using a linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink—Hospital Episode Statistics dataset. Among a cohort of individuals with NVAF, the risk of clinically relevant bleeding, VTE, stroke, and MI was compared between the period prior to the first bleed and the periods following each subsequent bleed. The rate and cost of general practitioner (GP) consultations, prescriptions, and hospitalizations were also compared across these periods. Results The risk of clinically relevant bleeding events was observed to be elevated at least twofold in all periods following the first bleeding event. The risk of VTE, stroke, and MI was not found to differ according to the number of clinically relevant bleeding events. The rate and cost of GP consultations, GP prescriptions, and hospitalizations were increased in all periods relative to the period prior to the first bleed. Conclusions The doubling in the risk of bleeding following the first bleed, taken alongside the stable risk of MI, VTE, and stroke, suggests that the risk–benefit balance for VKA treatment should be reconsidered following the first clinically relevant bleed.

scholarly journals Health of mothers of children with a life-limiting condition: a protocol for comparative cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e034024
Author(s):  
Lorna Katharine Fraser ◽  
Fliss E M Murtagh ◽  
Trevor Sheldon ◽  
Simon Gilbody ◽  
Catherine Hewitt
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Comparative Cohort Study ◽  
Limiting Condition ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThere are now nearly 50 000 children with a life-limiting or life-threatening condition in the UK. These include conditions where there is no reasonable hope of cure and from which they will die, as well as conditions for which curative treatment may be feasible but can fail, for example, cancer or heart failure. Having a child with a life-limiting condition involves being a coordinator and provider of healthcare in addition to the responsibilities and pressures of parenting a child who is expected to die young. This adversely affects the health and well-being of these mothers and affects their ability to care for their child, but the extent of the impact is poorly understood.This study aims to quantify the incidence and nature of mental and physical morbidity in mothers of children with a life-limiting condition, their healthcare use and to assess whether there is a relationship between the health of the mother and the child’s condition.Methods and analysisA comparative cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked hospital data will include three groups of children and their mothers (those with a life-limiting condition, those with a chronic condition and those with no long-term health condition total=20 000 mother–child dyads). Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios will be used to quantify and compare the outcomes between groups with multivariable regression modelling used to assess the relationship between the child’s disease trajectory and mother’s health.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol has approval from the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee for the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Database Research. The results of this study will be reported according to the STROBE and RECORD guidelines. There will also be a lay summary for parents which will be available to download from the Martin House Research Centre website (www.york.ac.uk/mhrc).

scholarly journals Commonly used definitions in real-world studies may underestimate the prevalence of renal disease among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 961-968
Author(s):  
Anna Schultze ◽  
Sophie Graham ◽  
Beth L Nordstrom ◽  
Faisal Mehmud ◽  
Sreeram V Ramagopalan
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
Prevalence Estimates ◽  
Look Back ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
The Impact

Aim: To describe comorbidities among treated nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients and assess the impact of using different time (‘look back’ windows) on the prevalence estimates. Patients & methods: We included all adult nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly initiating treatment in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Comorbidities included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index were defined using an all available, 3- and 1-year look back window before the start of treatment. Results: The prevalence of comorbidities was high and increased when using longer look back windows; the largest difference was observed for renal disease (+15.6%). Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the importance of using all available data when characterizing chronic conditions and highlights the high comorbidity burden in this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document