scholarly journals Replicated chromatin curtails 53BP1 recruitment in BRCA1-proficient and -deficient cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jone Michelena ◽  
Stefania Pellegrino ◽  
Vincent Spegg ◽  
Matthias Altmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Cellular Phenotypes ◽  
Template Dna

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks can be repaired by two competing mechanisms, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Whether one or the other repair pathway is favored depends on the availability of an undamaged template DNA that allows for homology-directed repair. The tumor suppressor proteins 53BP1 and BRCA1 are considered antagonistic players in this repair pathway choice, as 53BP1 restrains DNA end resection, whereas BRCA1, together with its partner protein BARD1, displaces 53BP1 from damaged replicated chromatin and promotes HR. How cells switch from a 53BP1-dominated to a BRCA1-dominated response as they progress through the cell cycle is incompletely understood. Here we reveal, using high-throughput microscopy and applying single cell normalization to control for increased genome size as cells replicate their DNA, that 53BP1 recruitment to damaged replicated chromatin is inefficient in both BRCA1-proficient and BRCA1-deficient cells, in comparison to 53BP1 accumulation at damaged unreplicated chromatin. These findings substantiate a dual switch model from a 53BP1-dominated response in unreplicated chromatin to a BRCA1-BARD1-dominated response in replicated chromatin, in which replication-coupled dilution of 53BP1’s binding mark H4K20me2 functionally cooperates with BRCA1-BARD1-mediated suppression of 53BP1 binding. More generally, we suggest that appropriate normalization of single cell data, e.g. to DNA content, provides additional layers of information, which can be critical for quantifying and interpreting cellular phenotypes.

scholarly journals Replicated chromatin curtails 53BP1 recruitment in BRCA1-proficient and BRCA1-deficient cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. e202101023
Author(s):  
Jone Michelena ◽  
Stefania Pellegrino ◽  
Vincent Spegg ◽  
Matthias Altmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Cellular Phenotypes ◽  
Template Dna ◽  
Cell Data

DNA double-strand breaks can be repaired by non-homologous end-joining or homologous recombination. Which pathway is used depends on the balance between the tumor suppressors 53BP1 and BRCA1 and on the availability of an undamaged template DNA for homology-directed repair. How cells switch from a 53BP1-dominated to a BRCA1-governed homologous recombination response as they progress through the cell cycle is incompletely understood. Here we reveal, using high-throughput microscopy and applying single cell normalization to control for increased genome size as cells replicate their DNA, that 53BP1 recruitment to damaged replicated chromatin is inefficient in both BRCA1-proficient and BRCA1-deficient cells. Our results substantiate a dual switch model from a 53BP1-dominated response in unreplicated chromatin to a BRCA1–BARD1–dominated response in replicated chromatin, in which replication-coupled dilution of 53BP1’s binding mark H4K20me2 functionally cooperates with BRCA1–BARD1–mediated suppression of 53BP1 binding. More generally, we suggest that appropriate normalization of single cell data, for example, to DNA content, provides additional layers of information, which can be critical for quantifying and interpreting cellular phenotypes.

scholarly journals Antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with the Non-Homologous End-Joining machinery at DNA damage sites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salar Ahmad ◽  
Valerie Côté ◽  
Xue Cheng ◽  
Gaëlle Bourriquen ◽  
Vasileia Sapountzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
End Resection

AbstractThe NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex, apart from its known role in gene regulation, has also been directly implicated in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), favoring homologous recombination (HR) in S/G2 during the cell cycle. Here, we investigate the antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) factors. We show that budding yeast Rad9, the 53BP1 ortholog, can inhibit NuA4 acetyltransferase activity when bound to chromatin in vitro. While we previously reported that NuA4 is recruited at DSBs during the S/G2 phase, we can also detect its recruitment in G1 when genes for NHEJ factors Rad9, Yku80 and Nej1 are mutated. This is accompanied with the binding of single-strand DNA binding protein RPA and Rad52, indicating DNA end resection in G1 as well as recruitment of the HR machinery. This NuA4 recruitment to DSBs in G1 depends on both Xrs2 and Lcd1/Ddc2. Introducing an acetyltransferase defective allele in these NHEJ mutant backgrounds decreases their hyper-resection phenotype in G1. Interestingly, we identified two novel non-histone acetylation targets of NuA4, Nej1 and Yku80. Acetyl-mimicking mutant of Nej1 inhibits repair of DNA breaks by NHEJ, decreases its interaction with other core NHEJ factors such as Yku80 and Lif1 and favors end resection. Altogether, these results establish a strong reciprocal antagonistic regulatory function of NuA4 and NHEJ factors in repair pathway choice and suggests a role of NuA4 in alternative repair mechanism that involves DNA-end resection in G1.Author SummaryDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most harmful form of DNA damage. Cells employ two major repair pathways to resolve DSBs: Homologous Recombination (HR) and Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ). Here we wanted to dissect further the role played by the NuA4 (Nucleosome acetyltransferase of histone H4) complex in the repair of DSBs. Budding yeast NuA4 complex, like its mammalian homolog TIP60 complex, has been shown to favor repair by HR. Here, we show that indeed budding yeast NuA4 and components of the NHEJ repair pathway share an antagonistic relationship. Deletion of NHEJ components enables increased recruitment of NuA4 in the vicinity of DSBs, where NuA4 favors the end resection process which is an underlying mechanism for HR repair. We also describe two independent modes responsible for the recruitment of NuA4 to DSB sites. Additionally, we also present two NHEJ core components as new targets of NuA4 acetyltransferase activity and suggest that these acetylation events can disassemble the NHEJ repair complex from DSBs, favoring repair by HR. Our study demonstrates the importance of NuA4 in the modulation of DSB repair pathway choice.

Repairing DNA double-strand breaks by the prokaryotic non-homologous end-joining pathway

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel C. Brissett ◽  
Aidan J. Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Model System ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Eukaryotic Organisms

The NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) pathway is one of the major mechanisms for repairing DSBs (double-strand breaks) that occur in genomic DNA. In common with eukaryotic organisms, many prokaryotes possess a conserved NHEJ apparatus that is essential for the repair of DSBs arising in the stationary phase of the cell cycle. Although the bacterial NHEJ complex is much more minimal than its eukaryotic counterpart, both pathways share a number of common mechanistic features. The relative simplicity of the prokaryotic NHEJ complex makes it a tractable model system for investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of DSB repair. The present review describes recent advances in our understanding of prokaryotic end-joining, focusing primarily on biochemical, structural and cellular aspects of the mycobacterial NHEJ repair pathway.

scholarly journals Homology Directed Repair by Cas9:Donor Co-localization in Mammalian Cells

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J.R. Roche ◽  
Heidi Gytz ◽  
Faiz Hussain ◽  
Christopher J.F. Cameron ◽  
Denis Paquette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Gene Editing ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractHomology directed repair (HDR) induced by site specific DNA double strand breaks (DSB) with CRISPR/Cas9 is a precision gene editing approach that occurs at low frequency in comparison to indel forming non homologous end joining (NHEJ). In order to obtain high HDR percentages in mammalian cells, we engineered Cas9 protein fused to a high-affinity monoavidin domain to deliver biotinylated donor DNA to a DSB site. In addition, we used the cationic polymer, polyethylenimine, to deliver Cas9 RNP-donor DNA complex into the cell. Combining these strategies improved HDR percentages of up to 90% in three tested loci (CXCR4, EMX1, and TLR) in standard HEK293 cells. Our approach offers a cost effective, simple and broadly applicable gene editing method, thereby expanding the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing toolbox.SummaryPrecision gene editing occurs at a low percentage in mammalian cells using Cas9. Colocalization of donor with Cas9MAV and PEI delivery raises HDR occurrence.

scholarly journals The DNAPKcs long-range C-NHEJ complex is required for blunt DNA end joining when XLF is weakened

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre ◽  
Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado ◽  
Linda Jillianne Tsai ◽  
Ragini Bhargava ◽  
Jeremy M Stark
Keyword(s):  
Long Range ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Maintenance ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

Canonical non-homologous end joining (C-NHEJ) factors can assemble into a long-range (LR) complex with DNA ends relatively far apart that contains DNAPKcs, XLF, XRCC4, LIG4, and the KU heterodimer and a short-range (SR) complex lacking DNAPKcs that has the ends positioned for ligation. Since the SR complex can form de novo, the role of the LR complex (i.e., DNAPKcs) for chromosomal EJ is unclear. We have examined EJ of chromosomal blunt DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), and found that DNAPKcs is significantly less important than XLF and XRCC4 for such EJ. However, weakening XLF via disrupting interaction interfaces (e.g., disrupting the XLF homodimer interface) causes a marked requirement for DNAPKcs, its kinase activity, and its ABCDE-cluster autophosphorylation sites for blunt DSB EJ. In contrast, other aspects of genome maintenance are sensitive to DNAPKcs kinase inhibition in a manner that is not further enhanced by XLF loss (i.e., suppression of homology-directed repair and structural variants, and IR-resistance). We suggest that DNAPKcs is required to position a weakened XLF in an LR complex that can transition into a functional SR complex for blunt DSB EJ, but also has distinct functions for other aspects of genome maintenance.

scholarly journals The (Lack of) DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice During V(D)J Recombination

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Libri ◽  
Timea Marton ◽  
Ludovic Deriano
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Gene Diversity ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Pathway Choice ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly toxic lesions that can be mended via several DNA repair pathways. Multiple factors can influence the choice and the restrictiveness of repair towards a given pathway in order to warrant the maintenance of genome integrity. During V(D)J recombination, RAG-induced DSBs are (almost) exclusively repaired by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway for the benefit of antigen receptor gene diversity. Here, we review the various parameters that constrain repair of RAG-generated DSBs to NHEJ, including the peculiarity of DNA DSB ends generated by the RAG nuclease, the establishment and maintenance of a post-cleavage synaptic complex, and the protection of DNA ends against resection and (micro)homology-directed repair. In this physiological context, we highlight that certain DSBs have limited DNA repair pathway choice options.

scholarly journals MiCas9 increases large size gene knock-in rates and reduces undesirable on-target and off-target indel edits

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linyuan Ma ◽  
Jinxue Ruan ◽  
Jun Song ◽  
Luan Wen ◽  
Dongshan Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Editing ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Repair Capacity ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
Large Size ◽  
Target Locus ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractGene editing nuclease represented by Cas9 efficiently generates DNA double strand breaks at the target locus, followed by repair through either the error-prone non-homologous end joining or the homology directed repair pathways. To improve Cas9’s homology directed repair capacity, here we report the development of miCas9 by fusing a minimal motif consisting of thirty-six amino acids to spCas9. MiCas9 binds RAD51 through this fusion motif and enriches RAD51 at the target locus. In comparison to spCas9, miCas9 enhances double-stranded DNA mediated large size gene knock-in rates, systematically reduces off-target insertion and deletion events, maintains or increases single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides mediated precise gene editing rates, and effectively reduces on-target insertion and deletion rates in knock-in applications. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this fusion motif can work as a “plug and play” module, compatible and synergistic with other Cas9 variants. MiCas9 and the minimal fusion motif may find broad applications in gene editing research and therapeutics.

scholarly journals Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR/Cas9 complex enhances homology-directed repair

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasa Savic ◽  
Femke Ringnalda ◽  
Katja Bargsten ◽  
Yizhou Li ◽  
Christian Berk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Genetic Modifications ◽  
Repair Template ◽  
Single Base Pair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractThe CRISPR/Cas9 targeted nuclease technology allows the insertion of genetic modifications with single base-pair precision. The preference of mammalian cells to repair Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) rather than via homology-directed repair (HDR) however leads to relatively low rates of correctly edited loci. Here we demonstrate that covalently linking the DNA repair template to Cas9 increases the ratio of HDR over NHEJ up to 23-fold, and therefore provides advantages for clinical applications where high-fidelity repair is needed.

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Region ◽  
Gene Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document