scholarly journals Antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with the Non-Homologous End-Joining machinery at DNA damage sites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salar Ahmad ◽  
Valerie Côté ◽  
Xue Cheng ◽  
Gaëlle Bourriquen ◽  
Vasileia Sapountzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
End Resection

AbstractThe NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex, apart from its known role in gene regulation, has also been directly implicated in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), favoring homologous recombination (HR) in S/G2 during the cell cycle. Here, we investigate the antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) factors. We show that budding yeast Rad9, the 53BP1 ortholog, can inhibit NuA4 acetyltransferase activity when bound to chromatin in vitro. While we previously reported that NuA4 is recruited at DSBs during the S/G2 phase, we can also detect its recruitment in G1 when genes for NHEJ factors Rad9, Yku80 and Nej1 are mutated. This is accompanied with the binding of single-strand DNA binding protein RPA and Rad52, indicating DNA end resection in G1 as well as recruitment of the HR machinery. This NuA4 recruitment to DSBs in G1 depends on both Xrs2 and Lcd1/Ddc2. Introducing an acetyltransferase defective allele in these NHEJ mutant backgrounds decreases their hyper-resection phenotype in G1. Interestingly, we identified two novel non-histone acetylation targets of NuA4, Nej1 and Yku80. Acetyl-mimicking mutant of Nej1 inhibits repair of DNA breaks by NHEJ, decreases its interaction with other core NHEJ factors such as Yku80 and Lif1 and favors end resection. Altogether, these results establish a strong reciprocal antagonistic regulatory function of NuA4 and NHEJ factors in repair pathway choice and suggests a role of NuA4 in alternative repair mechanism that involves DNA-end resection in G1.Author SummaryDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most harmful form of DNA damage. Cells employ two major repair pathways to resolve DSBs: Homologous Recombination (HR) and Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ). Here we wanted to dissect further the role played by the NuA4 (Nucleosome acetyltransferase of histone H4) complex in the repair of DSBs. Budding yeast NuA4 complex, like its mammalian homolog TIP60 complex, has been shown to favor repair by HR. Here, we show that indeed budding yeast NuA4 and components of the NHEJ repair pathway share an antagonistic relationship. Deletion of NHEJ components enables increased recruitment of NuA4 in the vicinity of DSBs, where NuA4 favors the end resection process which is an underlying mechanism for HR repair. We also describe two independent modes responsible for the recruitment of NuA4 to DSB sites. Additionally, we also present two NHEJ core components as new targets of NuA4 acetyltransferase activity and suggest that these acetylation events can disassemble the NHEJ repair complex from DSBs, favoring repair by HR. Our study demonstrates the importance of NuA4 in the modulation of DSB repair pathway choice.

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Region ◽  
Gene Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Repairing DNA double-strand breaks by the prokaryotic non-homologous end-joining pathway

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel C. Brissett ◽  
Aidan J. Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Model System ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Eukaryotic Organisms

The NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) pathway is one of the major mechanisms for repairing DSBs (double-strand breaks) that occur in genomic DNA. In common with eukaryotic organisms, many prokaryotes possess a conserved NHEJ apparatus that is essential for the repair of DSBs arising in the stationary phase of the cell cycle. Although the bacterial NHEJ complex is much more minimal than its eukaryotic counterpart, both pathways share a number of common mechanistic features. The relative simplicity of the prokaryotic NHEJ complex makes it a tractable model system for investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of DSB repair. The present review describes recent advances in our understanding of prokaryotic end-joining, focusing primarily on biochemical, structural and cellular aspects of the mycobacterial NHEJ repair pathway.

scholarly journals The non-homologous end joining factor Ku orchestrates replication fork resection and fine-tunes Rad51-mediated fork restart

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Teixeira-Silva ◽  
Anissia Ait Saada ◽  
Ismail Iraqui ◽  
Marina Charlotte Nocente ◽  
Karine Fréon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
List Type ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Replication Restart ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
End Resection

AbstractReplication requires Homologous Recombination (HR) to stabilize and restart terminally-arrested forks. HR-mediated fork processing requires single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps and not necessarily Double Strand Breaks. We used genetic and molecular assays to investigate fork-resection and restart at dysfunctional, unbroken forks in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We found that fork-resection is a two-step process coordinated by the non-homologous end joining factor Ku. An initial resection mediated by MRN/Ctp1 removes Ku from terminally-arrested forks, generating ~ 110 bp sized gaps obligatory for subsequent Exo1-mediated long-range resection and replication restart. The lack of Ku results in slower fork restart, excessive resection, and impaired RPA recruitment. We propose that terminally-arrested forks undergo fork reversal, providing a single DNA end for Ku binding which primes RPA-coated ssDNA. We uncover an unprecedented role for Ku in orchestrating resection of unbroken forks and in fine-tuning HR-mediated replication restart.Ku orchestrates a two-steps DNA end-resection of terminally-arrested and unbroken forksMRN/Ctp1 removes Ku from terminally-arrested forks to initiate fork-resectiona ~110 bp sized ssDNA gap is sufficient and necessary to promote fork restart.The lack of Ku decreases ssDNA RPA-coating, and slows down replication fork restart.

DNA End Resection: Mechanism and Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-307
Author(s):  
Petr Cejka ◽  
Lorraine S. Symington
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
And Control ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Dna Ends

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are cytotoxic lesions that threaten genome integrity and cell viability. Typically, cells repair DSBs by either nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The relative use of these two pathways depends on many factors, including cell cycle stage and the nature of the DNA ends. A critical determinant of repair pathway selection is the initiation of 5′→3′ nucleolytic degradation of DNA ends, a process referred to as DNA end resection. End resection is essential to create single-stranded DNA overhangs, which serve as the substrate for the Rad51 recombinase to initiate HR and are refractory to NHEJ repair. Here, we review recent insights into the mechanisms of end resection, how it is regulated, and the pathological consequences of its dysregulation.

scholarly journals Competing roles of DNA end resection and non-homologous end joining functions in the repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister-chromatid recombination

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 1669-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Muñoz-Galván ◽  
Ana López-Saavedra ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson ◽  
Pablo Huertas ◽  
Felipe Cortés-Ledesma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Sister Chromatid Recombination

scholarly journals Replicated chromatin curtails 53BP1 recruitment in BRCA1-proficient and -deficient cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jone Michelena ◽  
Stefania Pellegrino ◽  
Vincent Spegg ◽  
Matthias Altmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Cellular Phenotypes ◽  
Template Dna

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks can be repaired by two competing mechanisms, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Whether one or the other repair pathway is favored depends on the availability of an undamaged template DNA that allows for homology-directed repair. The tumor suppressor proteins 53BP1 and BRCA1 are considered antagonistic players in this repair pathway choice, as 53BP1 restrains DNA end resection, whereas BRCA1, together with its partner protein BARD1, displaces 53BP1 from damaged replicated chromatin and promotes HR. How cells switch from a 53BP1-dominated to a BRCA1-dominated response as they progress through the cell cycle is incompletely understood. Here we reveal, using high-throughput microscopy and applying single cell normalization to control for increased genome size as cells replicate their DNA, that 53BP1 recruitment to damaged replicated chromatin is inefficient in both BRCA1-proficient and BRCA1-deficient cells, in comparison to 53BP1 accumulation at damaged unreplicated chromatin. These findings substantiate a dual switch model from a 53BP1-dominated response in unreplicated chromatin to a BRCA1-BARD1-dominated response in replicated chromatin, in which replication-coupled dilution of 53BP1’s binding mark H4K20me2 functionally cooperates with BRCA1-BARD1-mediated suppression of 53BP1 binding. More generally, we suggest that appropriate normalization of single cell data, e.g. to DNA content, provides additional layers of information, which can be critical for quantifying and interpreting cellular phenotypes.

scholarly journals Antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with the non-homologous end-joining machinery at DNA damage sites

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. e1009816
Author(s):  
Salar Ahmad ◽  
Valérie Côté ◽  
Xue Cheng ◽  
Gaëlle Bourriquen ◽  
Vasileia Sapountzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Strand ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
End Resection

The NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex, apart from its known role in gene regulation, has also been directly implicated in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), favoring homologous recombination (HR) in S/G2 during the cell cycle. Here, we investigate the antagonistic relationship of NuA4 with non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) factors. We show that budding yeast Rad9, the 53BP1 ortholog, can inhibit NuA4 acetyltransferase activity when bound to chromatin in vitro. While we previously reported that NuA4 is recruited at DSBs during the S/G2 phase, we can also detect its recruitment in G1 when genes for Rad9 and NHEJ factors Yku80 and Nej1 are mutated. This is accompanied with the binding of single-strand DNA binding protein RPA and Rad52, indicating DNA end resection in G1 as well as recruitment of the HR machinery. This NuA4 recruitment to DSBs in G1 depends on Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) and Lcd1/Ddc2 and is linked to the hyper-resection phenotype of NHEJ mutants. It also implicates NuA4 in the resection-based single-strand annealing (SSA) repair pathway along Rad52. Interestingly, we identified two novel non-histone acetylation targets of NuA4, Nej1 and Yku80. Acetyl-mimicking mutant of Nej1 inhibits repair of DNA breaks by NHEJ, decreases its interaction with other core NHEJ factors such as Yku80 and Lif1 and favors end resection. Altogether, these results establish a strong reciprocal antagonistic regulatory function of NuA4 and NHEJ factors in repair pathway choice and suggests a role of NuA4 in alternative repair mechanisms in situations where some DNA-end resection can occur in G1.

scholarly journals Genetic dissection of vertebrate 53BP1: A major role in non-homologous end joining of DNA double strand breaks

DNA Repair ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Nakamura ◽  
Wataru Sakai ◽  
Takuo Kawamoto ◽  
Ronan T. Bree ◽  
Noel F. Lowndes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genetic Dissection ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document