scholarly journals Cardiac Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author(s):  
Nso Nso Vialli ◽  
Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng ◽  
Bryce D. Beutler ◽  
Mark B. Ulanja ◽  
Jasmine Ghuman ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel therapeutic agents used for various types of cancer. ICIs have revolutionized cancer treatment and improved clinical outcomes among cancer patients. However, immune-related adverse effects of ICI therapy are common. Cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are rare but potentially life-threatening complications. We aimed to estimate the incidence of cardiovascular irAEs among patients undergoing ICI therapy for various malignancies.MethodsWe conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases for relevant interventional trials reporting cardiovascular irAEs. We performed a single-arm meta-analysis using OpenMeta [Analyst] software of the following outcomes: myocarditis, pericardial effusion, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 test and managed to solve it with Cochrane’s leave-one-out method. The risk of bias was performed with the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool.ResultsA total of 26 studies were included. The incidence of irAEs follows: myocarditis: 0.5% (95% CI [0.1%-0.9%]); pericardial effusion: 0.5% (95% CI [0.1%-1.0%]); heart failure: 0.3% (95% CI [0.0%-0.5%]); cardiomyopathy: 0.3% (95% CI [-0.1%-0.6%]); atrial fibrillation: 7.6% (95% CI [1.0%-14.1%]); myocardial infarction: 0.4% (95% CI [0.0%-0.7%]); and cardiac arrest: 0.4% (95% CI [0.1%-0.8%]).ConclusionThe most common cardiovascular irAEs were atrial fibrillation, myocarditis, and pericardial effusion. Although rare, data from post market surveillance will provide estimates of the long-term prevalence and prognosis in patients with ICI-associated cardiovascular complications.

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 1555-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidar Ruddox ◽  
Irene Sandven ◽  
John Munkhaugen ◽  
Julie Skattebu ◽  
Thor Edvardsen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR<1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Daniel Eiger ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document