scholarly journals Tet2 Controls β cells Responses to Inflammation in Type 1 Diabetes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxiu Rui ◽  
Songyan Deng ◽  
Gerald Ponath ◽  
Romy Kursawe ◽  
Nathan Lawlor ◽  
...  

Abstractβ cells may participate and contribute to their own demise during Type 1 diabetes (T1D). We identified a novel role of Tet2 in regulating immune killing of β cells. Tet2 is induced in murine and human β cells with inflammation but its expression is reduced in surviving β cells. Tet2-KO mice that receive WT bone marrow transplants develop insulitis but not diabetes and islet infiltrates do not eliminate β cells even though immune cells from the mice can transfer diabetes to NOD/scid recipients. Tet2-KO β cells show reduced expression of inflammatory genes, associated with closed transcription factor binding sites. Tet2-KO recipients are protected from transfer of disease by diabetogenic immune cells. We conclude that Tet2 regulates pathologic interactions between β cells and immune cells and controls intrinsic protective pathways. Modulating TET2 may enable survival of β cells or their replacements in the setting of pathologic immune cells.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxiu Rui ◽  
Songyan Deng ◽  
Ana Luisa Perdigoto ◽  
Gerald Ponath ◽  
Romy Kursawe ◽  
...  

Abstractβ cells may participate and contribute to their own demise during Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Here we report a role of their expression of Tet2 in regulating immune killing. Tet2 is induced in murine and human β cells with inflammation but its expression is reduced in surviving β cells. Tet2-KO mice that receive WT bone marrow transplants develop insulitis but not diabetes and islet infiltrates do not eliminate β cells even though immune cells from the mice can transfer diabetes to NOD/scid recipients. Tet2-KO recipients are protected from transfer of disease by diabetogenic immune cells.Tet2-KO β cells show reduced expression of IFNγ-induced inflammatory genes that are needed to activate diabetogenic T cells. Here we show that Tet2 regulates pathologic interactions between β cells and immune cells and controls damaging inflammatory pathways. Our data suggests that eliminating TET2 in β cells may reduce activating pathologic immune cells and killing of β cells.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Olivares Costa ◽  
Fernando Faunes ◽  
María Estela Andrés

Abstract ObjectiveThe objectives of this work were to find genes regulated by Nur77 in neurons and to evaluate the possible common role of this transcription factor in neurons and lymphatic cells using published experimentally generated databases of ChIP-Seq and a microarray. We also characterized Nur77 binding throughout the genome. ResultsWe identified 113 Nur77 target genes in neuronal stem cells and 116 in neuronal cells. Cell adhesion and anchoring processes emerged as regulated by Nur77 in neurons and lymphatic cells. We found 9 common genes regulated by Nur77. Finally, we described a significant distribution of Nur77 binding sites in strong enhancers and active promoters. This work is a first step to understand the role of Nur77 and its common targets in neurons and immune cells.


Author(s):  
Mark Peakman

The concept that the pathological hallmark of type 1 diabetes—namely, irreparable damage to β‎ cells—is the result of an autoimmune process has gained sustained credence since it was first intimated in the 1970s. Forty years on, a robust set of criteria can be applied to settle this important question. As a result of numerous, reproducible research findings (Table 13.2.3.1), there is now an overwhelming case to support the assertion that type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease. Perhaps the most persuasive evidence is provided by the case reports of diabetes arising in recipients of bone marrow from patients with type 1 diabetes (1, 2). In these cases, the recipients underwent bone marrow ablation as part of the treatment for their underlying condition (e.g. relapsed haematological cancers) that effectively removed all autologous innate and adaptive immune cells. To reconstitute their immune system, they then received bone marrow from a sibling with type 1 diabetes. They developed the disease themselves some years later. It is hard to argue against the proposal that immune cells transferred in the bone marrow inoculum were responsible for β‎ cell destruction. Indeed, current practice in these circumstances is to ensure immune depletion of any mature T lymphocytes that may be present in the transplanted bone marrow using specific monoclonal antibodies. This successfully circumvents the problem—and also provides clear evidence for the pivotal role for T lymphocytes in causing β‎ cell damage. It should be noted that the overwhelming majority of patients with type 1 diabetes—especially those inhabiting the Western, developed world—have evidence of the underlying autoimmune processes, as discussed in this chapter. However, there is a recognition that type 1 diabetes may be heterogeneous, as, in some patients, evidence of autoimmunity is lacking (WHO diabetes classification type 1B). In Japan, a fulminant form of diabetes has been described as representing 15–20% of type 1 disease (15). Presentation is characterized by a high prevalence of preceding common cold-like and gastrointestinal symptoms, a near-normal level of HbA1c (despite very high plasma glucose levels and ketoacidosis), raised serum pancreatic enzyme levels, and absent C-peptide—but only rarely any evidence of autoantibodies against islet cell autoantigens (16). Some cases of type 1 diabetes arising in sub-Saharan Africa have also been described as lacking evidence of autoimmunity against islet cells (see Chapter 13.4.3.4); however, these data require clarification, since it is known that the autoantibodies decline and may disappear from the circulation soon after diagnosis, making retrospective classification of cohorts with established disease highly problematic (17). Future studies in these locations will need to establish evidence of autoimmunity at diagnosis in currently equivocal situations, using the most comprehensive, up-to-date range of serological markers (see Table 13.2.3.2, below), as well as to establish the clinical and immunogenetic features of the disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Rodriguez-Calvo ◽  
Gustaf Christoffersson ◽  
Christine Bender ◽  
Matthias G. von Herrath ◽  
Roberto Mallone ◽  
...  

In human type 1 diabetes and animal models of the disease, a diverse assortment of immune cells infiltrates the pancreatic islets. CD8+ T cells are well represented within infiltrates and HLA multimer staining of pancreas sections provides clear evidence that islet epitope reactive T cells are present within autoimmune lesions. These bona fide effectors have been a key research focus because these cells represent an intellectually attractive culprit for β cell destruction. However, T cell receptors are highly diverse in human insulitis. This suggests correspondingly broad antigen specificity, which includes a majority of T cells for which there is no evidence of islet-specific reactivity. The presence of “non-cognate” T cells in insulitis raises suspicion that their role could be beyond that of an innocent bystander. In this perspective, we consider the potential pathogenic contribution of non-islet-reactive T cells. Our intellectual framework will be that of a criminal investigation. Having arraigned islet-specific CD8+ T cells for the murder of pancreatic β cells, we then turn our attention to the non-target immune cells present in human insulitis and consider the possible regulatory, benign, or effector roles that they may play in disease. Considering available evidence, we overview the case that can be made that non-islet-reactive infiltrating T cells should be suspected as co-conspirators or accessories to the crime and suggest some possible routes forward for reaching a better understanding of their role in disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Predieri ◽  
Patrizia Bruzzi ◽  
Elena Bigi ◽  
Silvia Ciancia ◽  
Simona F. Madeo ◽  
...  

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most common chronic metabolic disease in children and adolescents. The etiology of T1D is not fully understood but it seems multifactorial. The genetic background determines the predisposition to develop T1D, while the autoimmune process against β-cells seems to be also determined by environmental triggers, such as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Environmental EDCs may act throughout different temporal windows as single chemical agent or as chemical mixtures. They could affect the development and the function of the immune system or of the β-cells function, promoting autoimmunity and increasing the susceptibility to autoimmune attack. Human studies evaluating the potential role of exposure to EDCs on the pathogenesis of T1D are few and demonstrated contradictory results. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize experimental and epidemiological studies on the potential role of exposure to EDCs in the development of T1D. We highlight what we know by animals about EDCs’ effects on mechanisms leading to T1D development and progression. Studies evaluating the EDC levels in patients with T1D were also reported. Moreover, we discussed why further studies are needed and how they should be designed to better understand the causal mechanisms and the next prevention interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document