A new duck genome reveals conserved and convergently evolved chromosome architectures of birds and mammals

AbstractBackgroundDucks have a typical avian karyotype that consists of macro- and microchromosomes, but a pair of much less differentiated ZW sex chromosomes compared to chicken. To elucidate the evolution of chromosome architectures between duck and chicken, and between birds and mammals, we produced a nearly complete chromosomal assembly of a female Pekin duck by combining long-read sequencing and multiplatform scaffolding techniques.ResultsThe major improvement of genome assembly and annotation quality resulted from successful resolution of lineage-specific propagated repeats that fragmented the previous Illumina-based assembly. We found that the duck topologically associated domains (TAD) are demarcated by putative binding sites of the insulator protein CTCF, housekeeping genes, or transitions of active/inactive chromatin compartments, indicating the conserved mechanisms of spatial chromosome folding with mammals. There are extensive overlaps of TAD boundaries between duck and chicken, and also between the TAD boundaries and chromosome inversion breakpoints. This suggests strong natural selection on maintaining regulatory domain integrity, or vulnerability of TAD boundaries to DNA double-strand breaks. The duck W chromosome retains 2.5-fold more genes relative to chicken. Similar to the independently evolved human Y chromosome, the duck W evolved massive dispersed palindromic structures, and a pattern of sequence divergence with the Z chromosome that reflects stepwise suppression of homologous recombination.ConclusionsOur results provide novel insights into the conserved and convergently evolved chromosome features of birds and mammals, and also importantly add to the genomic resources for poultry studies.

Download Full-text

A high-resolution map of non-crossover events reveals impacts of genetic diversity on mammalian meiotic recombination

10.1101/428987 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ran Li ◽

Emmanuelle Bitoun ◽

Nicolas Altemose ◽

Robert W Davies ◽

Benjamin Davies ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Genetic Diversity ◽

Meiotic Recombination ◽

Sequence Divergence ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

High Sequence Divergence ◽

Local Sequence ◽

High Resolution Map ◽

The Impact ◽

Hybrid Mice

During meiotic recombination in most mammals, hundreds of programmed DNA Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs) occur across all chromosomes in each cell at sites bound by the protein PRDM9. Faithful DSB repair using the homologous chromosome is essential for fertility, yielding either non-crossovers, which are frequent but difficult to detect, or crossovers. In certain hybrid mice, high sequence divergence causes PRDM9 to bind each homologue at different sites, 'asymmetrically', and these mice exhibit meiotic failure and infertility, by unknown mechanisms. To investigate the impact of local sequence divergence on recombination, we intercrossed two mouse subspecies over five generations and deep-sequenced 119 offspring, whose high heterozygosity allowed detection of thousands of crossover and non-crossover events with unprecedented power and spatial resolution. Both crossovers and non-crossovers are strongly depleted at individual asymmetric sites, revealing that PRDM9 not only positions DSBs but also promotes their homologous repair by binding to the unbroken homologue at each site. Unexpectedly, we found that non-crossovers containing multiple mismatches repair by a different mechanism than single-mismatch sites, which undergo GC-biased gene conversion. These results demonstrate that local genetic diversity profoundly alters meiotic repair pathway decisions via at least two distinct mechanisms, impacting genome evolution and Prdm9-related hybrid infertility.

Download Full-text

CRISPR-Cas12a induced DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by locus-dependent and error-prone pathways in a fungal pathogen

10.1101/2021.09.08.459484 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jun Huang ◽

David Rowe ◽

Wei Zhang ◽

Tyler Suelter ◽

Barbara Valent ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Repair ◽

Dna Cleavage ◽

Large Scale ◽

Genome Engineering ◽

Natural Populations ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

Long Read ◽

Repair Pathways

AbstractCRISPR-Cas mediated genome engineering has revolutionized functional genomics. However, basic questions remain regarding the mechanisms of DNA repair following Cas-mediated DNA cleavage. We developed CRISPR-Cas12a ribonucleoprotein genome editing in the fungal plant pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, and found frequent donor DNA integration despite the absence of long sequence homology. Interestingly, genotyping from hundreds of transformants showed that frequent non-canonical DNA repair outcomes predominated the recovered genome edited strains. Detailed analysis using sanger and nanopore long-read sequencing revealed five classes of DNA repair mutations, including single donor DNA insertions, concatemer donor DNA insertions, large DNA deletions, deletions plus donor DNA insertions, and infrequently we observed INDELs. Our results show that different error-prone DNA repair pathways resolved the Cas12a-mediated double-strand breaks (DSBs) based on the DNA sequence of edited strains. Furthermore, we found that the frequency of the different DNA repair outcomes varied across the genome, with some tested loci resulting in more frequent large-scale mutations. These results suggest that DNA repair pathways provide preferential repair across the genome that could create biased genome variation, which has significant implications for genome engineering and the genome evolution in natural populations.

Download Full-text

Assembling nuclear domains: Lessons from DNA repair

The Journal of Cell Biology ◽

10.1083/jcb.201904202 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 218 (8) ◽

pp. 2444-2455 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Benjamin Schrank ◽

Jean Gautier

Keyword(s):

Rna Binding ◽

Rna Binding Proteins ◽

Low Complexity ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

Dna Dsbs ◽

Topologically Associated Domains ◽

Nuclear Domains ◽

Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Eukaryotic nuclei are organized into nuclear domains that unite loci sharing a common function. These domains are essential for diverse processes including (1) the formation of topologically associated domains (TADs) that coordinate replication and transcription, (2) the formation of specialized transcription and splicing factories, and (3) the clustering of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which concentrates damaged DNA for repair. The generation of nuclear domains requires forces that are beginning to be identified. In the case of DNA DSBs, DNA movement and clustering are driven by actin filament nucleators. Furthermore, RNAs and low-complexity protein domains such as RNA-binding proteins also accumulate around sites of transcription and repair. The link between liquid–liquid phase separation and actin nucleation in the formation of nuclear domains is still unknown. This review discusses DSB repair domain formation as a model for functional nuclear domains in other genomic contexts.

Download Full-text

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

Essays in Biochemistry ◽

10.1042/ebc20200007 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 64 (5) ◽

pp. 765-777 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Yixi Xu ◽

Dongyi Xu

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Homologous Region ◽

Gene Repair ◽

Repair Pathway ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Environmental Radiation ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

Dna End Resection ◽

End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Download Full-text