scholarly journals Agonistic CD40 antibody therapy induces tertiary lymphoid structures but impairs the response to immune checkpoint blockade in glioma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luuk van Hooren ◽  
Alessandra Vaccaro ◽  
Mohanraj Ramachandran ◽  
Konstantinos Vazaios ◽  
Sylwia Libard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Systemic Delivery ◽  
T Cell Infiltration ◽  
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Lymphoid Structures

AbstractGliomas are brain tumors characterized by immunosuppression. Immunostimulatory agonistic CD40 antibodies (αCD40) are in clinical development for solid tumors but are yet to be evaluated for glioma. Here, systemic delivery of αCD40 led to cytotoxic T cell dysfunction and impaired the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical glioma models. This was associated with an accumulation of suppressive CD11b+ B cells. However, αCD40 also induced tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). In human glioma, TLS correlated with increased T cell infiltration indicating enhanced immune responses. Our work unveils the pleiotropic effects of αCD40 therapy in glioma, which is of high clinical relevance.

scholarly journals Agonistic CD40 therapy induces tertiary lymphoid structures but impairs responses to checkpoint blockade in glioma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luuk van Hooren ◽  
Alessandra Vaccaro ◽  
Mohanraj Ramachandran ◽  
Konstantinos Vazaios ◽  
Sylwia Libard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Systemic Delivery ◽  
Systemic Induction ◽  
T Cell Infiltration ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Immunosuppressive Microenvironment ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Opening Up

AbstractGliomas are brain tumors characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Immunostimulatory agonistic CD40 antibodies (αCD40) are in clinical development for solid tumors, but are yet to be evaluated for glioma. Here, we demonstrate that systemic delivery of αCD40 in preclinical glioma models induces the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in proximity of meningeal tissue. In treatment-naïve glioma patients, the presence of TLS correlates with increased T cell infiltration. However, systemic delivery of αCD40 induces hypofunctional T cells and impairs the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in pre-clinical glioma models. This is associated with a systemic induction of suppressive CD11b+ B cells post-αCD40 treatment, which accumulate in the tumor microenvironment. Our work unveils the pleiotropic effects of αCD40 therapy in glioma and reveals that immunotherapies can modulate TLS formation in the brain, opening up for future opportunities to regulate the immune response.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Induction of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Cancer Through Stromal Remodeling

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Johansson-Percival ◽  
Ruth Ganss
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Tumor Rejection ◽  
Cell Infiltration ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
T Cell Infiltration ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Lymphoid Structures

Improving the effectiveness of anti-cancer immunotherapy remains a major clinical challenge. Cytotoxic T cell infiltration is crucial for immune-mediated tumor rejection, however, the suppressive tumor microenvironment impedes their recruitment, activation, maturation and function. Nevertheless, solid tumors can harbor specialized lymph node vasculature and immune cell clusters that are organized into tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). These TLS support naïve T cell infiltration and intratumoral priming. In many human cancers, their presence is a positive prognostic factor, and importantly, predictive for responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade. Thus, therapeutic induction of TLS is an attractive concept to boost anti-cancer immunotherapy. However, our understanding of how cancer-associated TLS could be initiated is rudimentary. Exciting new reagents which induce TLS in preclinical cancer models provide mechanistic insights into the exquisite stromal orchestration of TLS formation, a process often associated with a more functional or “normalized” tumor vasculature and fueled by LIGHT/LTα/LTβ, TNFα and CC/CXC chemokine signaling. These emerging insights provide innovative opportunities to induce and shape TLS in the tumor microenvironment to improve immunotherapies.

scholarly journals Rethinking immune checkpoint blockade: ‘Beyond the T cell’

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuting Liu ◽  
Graham D Hogg ◽  
David G DeNardo
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antitumor Immunity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors has highlighted the central role of the immune system in cancer control. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can reinvigorate anti-cancer immunity and are now the standard of care in a number of malignancies. However, research on immune checkpoint blockade has largely been framed with the central dogma that checkpoint therapies intrinsically target the T cell, triggering the tumoricidal potential of the adaptive immune system. Although T cells undoubtedly remain a critical piece of the story, mounting evidence, reviewed herein, indicates that much of the efficacy of checkpoint therapies may be attributable to the innate immune system. Emerging research suggests that T cell-directed checkpoint antibodies such as anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) can impact innate immunity by both direct and indirect pathways, which may ultimately shape clinical efficacy. However, the mechanisms and impacts of these activities have yet to be fully elucidated, and checkpoint therapies have potentially beneficial and detrimental effects on innate antitumor immunity. Further research into the role of innate subsets during checkpoint blockade may be critical for developing combination therapies to help overcome checkpoint resistance. The potential of checkpoint therapies to amplify innate antitumor immunity represents a promising new field that can be translated into innovative immunotherapies for patients fighting refractory malignancies.

scholarly journals Risk Signature Related to Immunotherapy Reaction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on the Immune-Related Genes Associated With CD8+ T Cell Infiltration

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiping Zou ◽  
Zhihong Chen ◽  
Hongwei Han ◽  
Shiye Ruan ◽  
Liang Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Infiltration ◽  
T Cell Infiltration ◽  
Immune Related Genes

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common histological type of liver cancer, with an unsatisfactory long-term survival rate. Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors for HCC have got glories in recent clinical trials, the relatively low response rate is still a thorny problem. Therefore, there is an urgent need to screen biomarkers of HCC to predict the prognosis and efficacy of immunotherapy.Methods: Gene expression profiles of HCC were retrieved from TCGA, GEO, and ICGC databases while the immune-related genes (IRGs) were retrieved from the ImmPort database. CIBERSORT and WGCNA algorithms were combined to identify the gene module most related to CD8+ T cells in the GEO cohort. Subsequently, the genes in hub modules were subjected to univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses in the TCGA cohort to develop a risk signature. Afterward, the accuracy of the risk signature was validated by the ICGC cohort, and its relationships with CD8+ T cell infiltration and PDL1 expression were explored.Results: Nine IRGs were finally incorporated into a risk signature. Patients in the high-risk group had a poorer prognosis than those in the low-risk group. Confirmed by TCGA and ICGC cohorts, the risk signature possessed a relatively high accuracy. Additionally, the risk signature was demonstrated as an independent prognostic factor and closely related to the CD8+ T cell infiltration and PDL1 expression.Conclusion: A risk signature was constructed to predict the prognosis of HCC patients and detect patients who may have a higher positive response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals Beyond the Driver Mutation: Immunotherapies in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Roulleaux Dugage ◽  
Robin Lewis Jones ◽  
Jonathan Trent ◽  
Stéphane Champiat ◽  
Sarah Dumont
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Driver Mutation ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Lymphoid Structures

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and have become a concept of oncogenic addiction and targeted therapies.The large majority of these tumors develop after a mutation in KIT or platelet derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα), resulting in uncontrolled proliferation. GISTs are highly sensitive to imatinib. GISTs are immune infiltrated tumors with a predominance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and T-cells, including many CD8+ T-cells, whose numbers are prognostic. The genomic expression profile is that of an inhibited Th1 response and the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures and B cell signatures, which are known as predictive to response to ICI. However, the microtumoral environment has immunosuppressive attributes, with immunosuppressive M2 macrophages, overexpression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) or PD-L1, and loss of major histocompatibility complex type 1. In addition to inhibiting the KIT oncogene, imatinib appears to act by promoting cytotoxic T-cell activity, interacting with natural killer cells, and inhibiting the expression of PD-L1. Paradoxically, imatinib also appears to induce M2 polarization of macrophages. There have been few immunotherapy trials with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-L1drugs and available clinical data are not very promising. Based on this comprehensive analysis of TME, we believe three immunotherapeutic strategies must be underlined in GIST. First, patients included in clinical trials must be better selected, based on the identified driver mutation (such as PDGFRα D842V mutation), the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) or PD-L1 expression. Moreover, innovative immunotherapeutic agents also provide great interest in GIST, and there is a strong rationale for exploring IDO targeting after disease progression during imatinib therapy. Finally and most importantly, there is a strong rationale to combine of c-kit inhibition with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document