scholarly journals Reciprocal EGFR signaling in the Anchor Cell ensures precise inter-organ connection during C. elegans vulval morphogenesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvan Spiri ◽  
Simon Berger ◽  
Louisa Mereu ◽  
Andrew DeMello ◽  
Alex Hajnal
Keyword(s):  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Adherens Junctions ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Sequence Of Events ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Anchor Cell

During C. elegans vulval development, the uterine anchor cell (AC) first secretes an epidermal growth factor (EGF) to specify the vulval cell fates and then invades into the underlying vulval epithelium. Thereby, the AC establishes direct contact with the invaginating primary vulF cells and attaches the developing uterus to the vulva. The signals involved and the exact sequence of events joining these two organs are not fully understood. Using a conditional let-23 egf receptor (EGFR) allele along with novel microfluidic short- and long-term imaging methods, we discovered a specific function of the EGFR in the AC during vulval lumen morphogenesis. Tissue-specific inactivation of let-23 in the AC resulted in imprecise alignment of the AC with the primary vulval cells, delayed AC invasion and disorganized adherens junctions at the newly forming contact site between the AC and the dorsal vulF toroid. We propose that EGFR signaling, activated by a reciprocal EGF cue from the primary vulval cells, positions the AC at the vulval midline, guides it during invasion and assembles a cytoskeletal scaffold organizing the adherens junctions that connect the developing uterus to the dorsal vulF toroid. EGFR signaling in the AC thus ensures the precise alignment of the two developing organs.

scholarly journals Reciprocal EGFR signaling in the anchor cell ensures precise inter-organ connection during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval morphogenesis

Development ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvan Spiri ◽  
Simon Berger ◽  
Louisa Mereu ◽  
Andrew DeMello ◽  
Alex Hajnal
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Adherens Junctions ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
Sequence Of Events ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Anchor Cell

ABSTRACT During Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development, the uterine anchor cell (AC) first secretes an epidermal growth factor (EGF) to specify the vulval cell fates and then invades the underlying vulval epithelium. By doing so, the AC establishes direct contact with the invaginating primary vulF cells and attaches the developing uterus to the vulva. The signals involved and the exact sequence of events joining these two organs are not fully understood. Using a conditional let-23 EGF receptor (EGFR) allele along with novel microfluidic short- and long-term imaging methods, we discovered a specific function of the EGFR in the AC during vulval lumen morphogenesis. Tissue-specific inactivation of let-23 in the AC resulted in imprecise alignment of the AC with the primary vulval cells, delayed AC invasion and disorganized adherens junctions at the contact site forming between the AC and the dorsal vulF toroid. We propose that EGFR signaling, activated by a reciprocal EGF cue from the primary vulval cells, positions the AC at the vulval midline, guides it during invasion and assembles a cytoskeletal scaffold organizing the adherens junctions that connect the developing uterus to the dorsal vulF toroid. Thus, EGFR signaling in the AC ensures the precise alignment of the two developing organs.

scholarly journals Rab8 and Rabin8-Mediated Tumor Formation by Hyperactivated EGFR Signaling via FGFR Signaling

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (20) ◽  
pp. 7770
Author(s):  
Junghwa Choi ◽  
Jee Young Sung ◽  
Saerom Lee ◽  
Jungyoen Yoo ◽  
Christopher Rongo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Tumor Model ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Rab Proteins ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Exon 19 Deletion ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Egfr Tki

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is important for normal development, such as vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans, and hyperactivation of the EGFR is often associated with cancer development. Our previous report demonstrated the multivulva (Muv) phenotype, a tumor model in C. elegans (jgIs25 strain) by engineering LET-23/EGFR with a TKI-resistant human EGFR T790-L858 mutant. Because Rab proteins regulate vesicle transport, which is important for receptor signaling, we screened the RNAi in the jgIs25 strain to find the Rabs critical for Muv formation. Herein, we show that rab-8 RNAi and the rab-8 (-/-) mutation effectively reduce Muv formation. We demonstrate that RABN-8, an ortholog of Rabin8, known as a GEF for Rab8, is also required for Muv formation by promoting the secretion of EGL-17/FGF from vulval precursor cells. In addition, FGFR inhibitors decreased Muv formation mediated by mutant EGFR. Our data suggest that Rab8 and Rabin8 mediate Muv formation through FGF secretion in the EGFR-TKI-resistant nematode model. Furthermore, FGFR-TKIs more effectively inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines in H1975 (EGFR T790M-L858R; EGFR-TKI-resistant) than H522 (wild-type EGFR) and H1650 (EGFR exon 19 deletion; EGFR-TKI-sensitive) cells, suggesting that FGFR-TKIs could be used to control cancers with EGFR-TKI-resistant mutations.

scholarly journals Cell fate patterning during C. elegans vulval development

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 9-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell J. Hill ◽  
Paul W. Sternberg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Short Range ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Vulval Precursor Cells ◽  
Combined Action ◽  
Anchor Cell ◽  
Inductive Signal

Precursor cells of the vulva of the C. elegans hermaphrodite choose between two vulval cell fates (1° and 2°) and a non-vulval epidermal fate (3°) in response to three intercellular signals. An inductive signal produced by the anchor cell induces the vulval precursors to assume the 1° and 2° vulval fates. This inductive signal is an EGF-like growth factor encoded by the gene lin-3. An inhibitory signal mediated by lin-15, and which may originate from the surrounding epidermis, prevents the vulval precursors from assuming vulval fates in the absence of the inductive signal. A short range lateral signal, which acts through the gene lin-12, regulates the pattern of 1° and 2° fates assumed by the induced vulval precursors. The combined action of the three signals precisely directs the six vulval precursors to adopt a 3° 3° 2° 1° 2 ° 3° pattern of fates. The amount of inductive signal produced by the anchor cell appears to determine the number or vulval precursors that assume vulval fates. The three induced vulval precursors most proximal to the anchor cell are proposed to adopt the 2° 1° 2° pattern of fates in response to a gradient of the inductive signal and also in response to lateral signalling that inhibits adjacent vulval precursor cells from both assuming the 1° fate.

scholarly journals Insulated Switches: Dual-Function Protein RalGEFRGL-1 Promotes Developmental Fidelity

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (20) ◽  
pp. 7610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tam Duong ◽  
Neal R. Rasmussen ◽  
David J. Reiner
Keyword(s):  
Birth Defects ◽  
Dual Function ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Vulval Precursor Cells ◽  
Anchor Cell ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Wild Type Control

The C. elegans vulva is an excellent model for the study of developmental biology and cell–cell signaling. The developmental induction of vulval precursor cells (VPCs) to assume the 3°-3°-2°-1°-2°-3° patterning of cell fates occurs with 99.8% accuracy. During C. elegans vulval development, an EGF signal from the anchor cell initiates the activation of RasLET-60 > RafLIN-45 > MEKMEK-2 > ERKMPK-1 signaling cascade to induce the 1° cell. The presumptive 1° cell signals its two neighboring cells via NotchLIN-12 to develop 2° cells. In addition, RasLET-60 switches effectors to RalGEFRGL-1 > RalRAL-1 to promote 2° fate. Shin et al. (2019) showed that RalGEFRGL-1 is a dual-function protein in VPCs fate patterning. RalGEFRGL-1 functions as a scaffold for PDKPDK-1 > AktAKT-1/2 modulatory signaling to promote 1° fate in addition to propagating the RasLET-60 modulatory signal through RalRAL-1 to promote 2° fate. The deletion of RalGEFRGL-1 increases the frequency of VPC patterning errors 15-fold compared to the wild-type control. We speculate that RalGEFRGL-1 represents an “insulated switch”, whereby the promotion of one signaling activity curtails the promotion of the opposing activity. This property might increase the impact of the switch on fidelity more than two separately encoded proteins could. Understanding how developmental fidelity is controlled will help us to better understand the origins of cancer and birth defects, which occur in part due to the misspecification of cell fates.

scholarly journals LIN-10 can promote LET-23 EGFR signaling and trafficking independently of LIN-2 and LIN-7

2021 ◽  
pp. mbc.E20-07-0490
Author(s):  
Kimberley D. Gauthier ◽  
Christian E. Rocheleau
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transmission ◽  
Basolateral Membrane ◽  
Pdz Domain ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Pdz Domains ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Independent Function ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Epidermal Growth

During C. elegans larval development, an inductive signal mediated by LET-23 EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) specifies three of six vulva precursor cells (VPCs) to adopt vulval cell fates. An evolutionarily conserved complex consisting of PDZ domain-containing scaffold proteins LIN-2 (CASK), LIN-7 (Lin7 or Veli), and LIN-10 (APBA1 or Mint1) (LIN-2/7/10) mediates basolateral LET-23 EGFR localization in the VPCs to permit signal transmission and development of the vulva. We recently found that the LIN-2/7/10 complex likely forms at Golgi ministacks; however, the mechanism through which the complex targets the receptor to the basolateral membrane remains unknown. Here we found that overexpression of LIN-10 or LIN-7 can compensate for loss of their complex components by promoting LET-23 EGFR signaling through previously unknown complex-independent and receptor-dependent pathways. In particular, LIN-10 can independently promote basolateral LET-23 EGFR localization, and its complex-independent function uniquely requires its PDZ domains that also regulate its localization to Golgi. These studies point to a novel complex-independent function for LIN-7 and LIN-10 that broadens our understanding of how this complex regulates targeted sorting of membrane proteins.

scholarly journals LIN-10 can promote LET-23 EGFR signaling and trafficking independently of LIN-2 and LIN-7

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley D. Gauthier ◽  
Christian E. Rocheleau
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transmission ◽  
Basolateral Membrane ◽  
Pdz Domain ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Independent Function ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Recycling Endosomes ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Epidermal Growth

AbstractDuring C. elegans larval development, an inductive signal mediated by LET-23 EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) specifies three of six vulva precursor cells (VPCs) to adopt vulval cell fates. An evolutionarily conserved complex consisting of PDZ domain-containing scaffold proteins LIN-2 (CASK), LIN-7 (Lin7 or Veli), and LIN-10 (APBA1 or Mint1) (LIN-2/7/10) mediates basolateral LET-23 EGFR localization in the VPCs to permit signal transmission and development of the vulva. We recently found that the LIN-2/7/10 complex likely forms at Golgi ministacks or recycling endosomes; however, the mechanism through which the complex targets the receptor to the basolateral membrane remains unknown. Here we found that overexpression of LIN-10 or LIN-7 can compensate for loss of their complex components by promoting LET-23 EGFR signaling through previously unknown complex-independent and receptor-dependent pathways. In particular, LIN-10 can independently promote basolateral LET-23 EGFR localization, and its complex-independent function uniquely requires its PDZ domains that also regulate its localization to Golgi ministacks and recycling endosomes. These studies point to a novel complex-independent function for LIN-7 and LIN-10 that broadens our understanding of how this complex regulates targeted sorting of membrane proteins.

Patterning of the C. elegans 1 degrees vulval lineage by RAS and Wnt pathways

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (23) ◽  
pp. 5047-5058 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wang ◽  
P.W. Sternberg
Keyword(s):  
Short Range ◽  
Precursor Cell ◽  
Ras Signaling ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Asymmetric Divisions ◽  
Anchor Cell ◽  
Wnt Pathways ◽  
Vulval Precursor Cell ◽  
Proper Orientation

In C. elegans, the descendants of the 1 degrees vulval precursor cell (VPC) establish a fixed spatial pattern of two different cell fates: E-F-F-E. The two inner granddaughters attach to the somatic gonadal anchor cell (AC) and generate four vulF cells, while the two outer granddaughters produce four vulE progeny. zmp-1::GFP, a molecular marker that distinguishes these two fates, is expressed in vulE cells, but not vulF cells. We demonstrate that a short-range AC signal is required to ensure that the pattern of vulE and vulF fates is properly established. In addition, signaling between the inner and outer 1 degrees VPC descendants, as well as intrinsic polarity of the 1 degrees VPC daughters, is involved in the asymmetric divisions of the 1 degrees VPC daughters and the proper orientation of the outcome. Finally, we provide evidence that RAS signaling is used during this new AC signaling event, while the Wnt receptor LIN-17 appears to mediate signaling between the inner and outer 1 degrees VPC descendants.

The evolution of cell lineage in nematodes

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1994 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Ralf J. Sommer ◽  
Lynn K. Carta ◽  
Paul W. Sternberg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Experimental System ◽  
Nematode Species ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Equivalence Group ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Somatic Gonad ◽  
Vulval Precursor Cell ◽  
P Cells

The invariant development of free-living nematodes combined with the extensive knowledge of Caenorhabditis elegans developmental biology provides an experimental system for an analysis of the evolution of developmental mechanisms. We have collected a number of new nematode species from soil samples. Most are easily cultured and their development can be analyzed at the level of individual cells using techniques standard to Caenorhabditis. So far, we have focused on differences in the development of the vulva among species of the families Rhabditidae and Panagrolaimidae. Preceding vulval development, twelve Pn cells migrate into the ventral cord and divide to produce posterior daughters [Pn.p cells] whose fates vary in a position specific manner [from P1.p anterior to P12.p posterior]. In C. elegans hermaphrodites, P(3-8).p are tripotent and form an equivalence group. These cells can express either of two vulval fates (1° or 2°) in response to a signal from the anchor cell of the somatic gonad, or a non-vulval fate (3°), resulting in a 3°-3°-2°-1°-2°-3° pattern of cell fates. Evolutionary differences in vulval development include the number of cells in the vulval equivalence group, the number of 1° cells, the number of progeny generated by each vulval precursor cell, and the position of VPCs before morphogenesis. Examples of three Rhabditidae genera have a posterior vulva in the position of P9-P11 ectoblasts. In Cruznema tripartitum, P(5-7).p form the vulva as in Caenorhabditis, but they migrate posteriorly before dividing. Induction occurs after the gonad grows posteriorly to the position of P(5-7).p cells. In two other species, Mesorhabditis sp. PS 1179 and Teratorhabditis palmarum, we have found changes in induction and competence with respect to their presumably more C. elegans-like ancestor. In Mesorhabditis, P(5-7).p form the vulva after migrating to a posterior position. However, the gonad is not required to specify the pattern of cell fates 3°-2°-1°-2°-3°. Moreover, the Pn.p cells are not equivalent in their potentials to form the vulva. A regulatory constraint in this family thus forces the same set of precursors to generate the vulva, rather than more appropriately positioned Pn.p cells.

Alternative Pathways of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mediated Contractile Force in NR6 Fibroblasts

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred D. Allen ◽  
Clara F. Asnes ◽  
Alan Wells ◽  
Elliot L. Elson ◽  
Douglas A. Lauffenburger
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Contractile Force ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Egfr Signaling ◽  
Signaling Mechanism ◽  
Force Increase ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Abstract We investigated the contractile force response to epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation in 3T3-derived NR6 fibroblast cells in order to determine significant pathways of biochemical signaling that mediate the response. We examined the force generating specificity of the EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling mechanism by using mutant NR6 fibroblasts expressing variations of the EGFR construct. The wild-type (WT) cell presented the complete internalizing EGFR signaling construct while the c’973 cell presented an internalization-defective EGFR construct, and the M721 cell presented a kinase-defective EGFR construct making it signaling inert. Additionally we examined the roles of the phospholipasc C-γ (PLCγ) pathway by using the PLC inhibitor U73122 (1 μM) and the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway using the inhibitor PD98059 (10 μM) in the observed contractile force responses. We found that the WT cells showed a rapid but transient force increase within the first hour post-stimulation and the c’973 showed a more gradual increase in force which it sustained for several hours post-stimulation. Blocking the PLCγ activation in the WT cells reduced the peak force increase by 50% while blocking MAPK did not affect the force development in either WT or c’973 cells.

The beta-catenin homolog BAR-1 and LET-60 Ras coordinately regulate the Hox gene lin-39 during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (18) ◽  
pp. 3667-3680 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.M. Eisenmann ◽  
J.N. Maloof ◽  
J.S. Simske ◽  
C. Kenyon ◽  
S.K. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Precursor Cell ◽  
Ras Signaling ◽  
Beta Catenin ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Vulval Development ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Vulval Precursor Cell

In C. elegans, the epithelial Pn.p cells adopt either a vulval precursor cell fate or fuse with the surrounding hypodermis (the F fate). Our results suggest that a Wnt signal transduced through a pathway involving the beta-catenin homolog BAR-1 controls whether P3.p through P8.p adopt the vulval precursor cell fate. In bar-1 mutants, P3.p through P8.p can adopt F fates instead of vulval precursor cell fates. The Wnt/bar-1 signaling pathway acts by regulating the expression of the Hox gene lin-39, since bar-1 is required for LIN-39 expression and forced lin-39 expression rescues the bar-1 mutant phenotype. LIN-39 activity is also regulated by the anchor cell signal/let-23 receptor tyrosine kinase/let-60 Ras signaling pathway. Our genetic and molecular experiments show that the vulval precursor cells can integrate the input from the BAR-1 and LET-60 Ras signaling pathways by coordinately regulating activity of the common target LIN-39 Hox.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document