scholarly journals Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viivi Halla-aho ◽  
Harri Lähdesmäki

Background: cfMeDIP-seq is a low-cost method for determining the DNA methylation status of cell-free DNA and it has been successfully combined with statistical methods for accurate cancer diagnostics. We investigate the diagnostic classification aspect by applying statistical tests and dimension reduction techniques for feature selection and probabilistic modeling for the cancer type classification, and we also study the effect of sequencing depth. Methods: We experiment with a variety of statistical methods that use different feature selection and feature extraction methods as well as probabilistic classifiers for diagnostic decision making. We test the (moderated) t-tests and the Fisher's exact test for feature selection, principal component analysis (PCA) as well as iterative supervised PCA (ISPCA) for feature generation, and GLMnet and logistic regression methods with sparsity promoting priors for classification. Probabilistic programming language Stan is used to implement Bayesian inference for the probabilistic models. Results and conclusions: We compare overlaps of differentially methylated genomic regions as chosen by different feature selection methods, and evaluate probabilistic classifiers by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) scores on discovery and validation cohorts. While we observe that many methods perform equally well as, and occasionally considerably better than, GLMnet that was originally proposed for cfMeDIP-seq based cancer classification, we also observed that performance of different methods vary across sequencing depths, cancer types and study cohorts. Overall, methods that seem robust and promising include Fisher's exact test and ISPCA for feature selection as well as a simple logistic regression model with the number of hyper and hypo-methylated regions as features.

This paper is aimed to analyze the feature selection process based on different statistical methods viz., Correlation, Gain Ratio, Information gain, OneR, Chi-square MapReduce model, Fisher’s exact test for agricultural data. During the recent past, Fishers exact test was commonly used for feature selection process. However, it supports only for small data set. To handle large data set, the Chi square, one of the most popular statistical methods is used. But, it also finds irrelevant data and thus resultant accuracy is not as expected. As a novelty, Fisher’s exact test is combined with Map Reduce model to handle large data set. In addition, the simulation outcome proves that proposed fisher’s exact test finds the significant attributes with more accurate and reduced time complexity when compared to other existing methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wardah Mahmood ◽  
Lars Erichsen ◽  
Pauline Ott ◽  
Wolfgang A. Schulz ◽  
Johannes C. Fischer ◽  
...  

AbstractLINE-1 hypomethylation of cell-free DNA has been described as an epigenetic biomarker of human aging. However, in the past, insufficient differentiation between cellular and cell-free DNA may have confounded analyses of genome-wide methylation levels in aging cells. Here we present a new methodological strategy to properly and unambiguously extract DNA methylation patterns of repetitive, as well as single genetic loci from pure cell-free DNA from peripheral blood. Since this nucleic acid fraction originates mainly in apoptotic, senescent and cancerous cells, this approach allows efficient analysis of aged and cancerous cell-specific DNA methylation patterns for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Using this methodology, we observe a significant age-associated erosion of LINE-1 methylation in cfDNA suggesting that the threshold of hypomethylation sufficient for relevant LINE-1 activation and consequential harmful retrotransposition might be reached at higher age. We speculate that this process might contribute to making aging the main risk factor for many cancers.


2021 ◽  
pp. clincanres.1982.2021
Author(s):  
Raju Kandimalla ◽  
Jianfeng Xu ◽  
Alexander Link ◽  
Takatoshi Matsuyama ◽  
Kensuke Yamamura ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
IG Panagiotopoulou ◽  
D Fitzrol ◽  
RA Parker ◽  
J Kuzhively ◽  
N Luscombe ◽  
...  

Introduction We receive fast track referrals on the basis of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) for patients with normocytic anaemia or for patients with no iron studies. This study examined the yield of colorectal cancer (CRC) among fast track patients to ascertain whether awaiting confirmation of IDA is necessary prior to performing bowel investigations. Methods A review was undertaken of 321 and 930 consecutive fast track referrals from Centre A and Centre B respectively. Contingency tables were analysed using Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate significant predictors of CRC. Results Overall, 229 patients were included from Centre A and 689 from Centre B. The odds ratio for microcytic anaemia versus normocytic anaemia in the outcome of CRC was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–3.9) for Centre A and 1.6 (95% CI: 0.8–3.3) for Centre B. In a logistic regression analysis (Centre B only), no significant difference in CRC rates was seen between microcytic and normocytic anaemia (adjusted odds ratio: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.9–3.9). There was no statistically significant difference in the yield of CRC between microcytic and normocytic anaemia (p=0.515, Fisher’s exact test) in patients with anaemia only and no colorectal symptoms. Finally, CRC cases were seen in both microcytic and normocytic groups with or without low ferritin. Conclusions There is no significant difference in the yield of CRC between fast track patients with microcytic and normocytic anaemia. This study provides insufficient evidence to support awaiting confirmation of IDA in fast track patients with normocytic anaemia prior to requesting bowel investigations.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Jeronimo ◽  
Sandra Nunes ◽  
Catarina Moreira-Barbosa ◽  
Sofia Salta ◽  
Susana Palma de Sousa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 119143
Author(s):  
Ricardo Martins-Ferreira ◽  
Bárbara Guerra Leal ◽  
João Chaves ◽  
Carlos Fabregat ◽  
Tianlu Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Sabedot ◽  
Tathiane Malta ◽  
James Snyder ◽  
Kevin Nelson ◽  
Michael Wells ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document