scholarly journals Kinetic frustration by limited bond availability controls the LAT protein condensation phase transition on membranes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simou Sun ◽  
Trevor GrandPre ◽  
David T. Limmer ◽  
Jay T. Groves
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Kinetic Measurements ◽  
Coarse Grained Model ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

AbstractLAT is a membrane-linked scaffold protein that undergoes a phase transition to form a two-dimensional protein condensate on the membrane during T cell activation. Governed by tyrosine phosphorylation, LAT recruits various proteins that ultimately enable condensation through a percolation network of discrete and selective protein-protein interactions. Here we describe detailed kinetic measurements of the phase transition, along with coarse-grained model simulations, that reveal LAT condensation is kinetically frustrated by the availability of bonds to form the network. Unlike typical miscibility transitions in which compact domains may coexist at equilibrium, the LAT condensates are dynamically arrested in extended states, kinetically trapped out of equilibrium. Modeling identifies the structural basis for this kinetic arrest as the formation of spindle arrangements, favored by limited multivalent binding interactions along the flexible, intrinsically disordered LAT protein. These results reveal how local factors controlling the kinetics of LAT condensation enable formation of different, stable condensates, which may ultimately coexist within the cell.

scholarly journals Expansion of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Increases the Range of Stability of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (20) ◽  
pp. 4705
Author(s):  
Adiran Garaizar ◽  
Ignacio Sanchez-Burgos ◽  
Rosana Collepardo-Guevara ◽  
Jorge R. Espinosa
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Conformational Dynamics ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
Phase Behaviour ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Proteins containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are ubiquitous within biomolecular condensates, which are liquid-like compartments within cells formed through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS). The sequence of amino acids of a protein encodes its phase behaviour, not only by establishing the patterning and chemical nature (e.g., hydrophobic, polar, charged) of the various binding sites that facilitate multivalent interactions, but also by dictating the protein conformational dynamics. Besides behaving as random coils, IDRs can exhibit a wide-range of structural behaviours, including conformational switching, where they transition between alternate conformational ensembles. Using Molecular Dynamics simulations of a minimal coarse-grained model for IDRs, we show that the role of protein conformation has a non-trivial effect in the liquid–liquid phase behaviour of IDRs. When an IDR transitions to a conformational ensemble enriched in disordered extended states, LLPS is enhanced. In contrast, IDRs that switch to ensembles that preferentially sample more compact and structured states show inhibited LLPS. This occurs because extended and disordered protein conformations facilitate LLPS-stabilising multivalent protein–protein interactions by reducing steric hindrance; thereby, such conformations maximize the molecular connectivity of the condensed liquid network. Extended protein configurations promote phase separation regardless of whether LLPS is driven by homotypic and/or heterotypic protein–protein interactions. This study sheds light on the link between the dynamic conformational plasticity of IDRs and their liquid–liquid phase behaviour.

scholarly journals Liquid network connectivity regulates the stability and composition of biomolecular condensates with many components

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (24) ◽  
pp. 13238-13247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge R. Espinosa ◽  
Jerelle A. Joseph ◽  
Ignacio Sanchez-Burgos ◽  
Adiran Garaizar ◽  
Daan Frenkel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Critical Points ◽  
Network Connectivity ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Coarse Grained Model ◽  
Bond Network ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

One of the key mechanisms used by cells to control the spatiotemporal organization of their many components is the formation and dissolution of biomolecular condensates through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS). Using a minimal coarse-grained model that allows us to simulate thousands of interacting multivalent proteins, we investigate the physical parameters dictating the stability and composition of multicomponent biomolecular condensates. We demonstrate that the molecular connectivity of the condensed-liquid network—i.e., the number of weak attractive protein–protein interactions per unit of volume—determines the stability (e.g., in temperature, pH, salt concentration) of multicomponent condensates, where stability is positively correlated with connectivity. While the connectivity of scaffolds (biomolecules essential for LLPS) dominates the phase landscape, introduction of clients (species recruited via scaffold–client interactions) fine-tunes it by transforming the scaffold–scaffold bond network. Whereas low-valency clients that compete for scaffold–scaffold binding sites decrease connectivity and stability, those that bind to alternate scaffold sites not required for LLPS or that have higher-than-scaffold valencies form additional scaffold–client–scaffold bridges increasing stability. Proteins that establish more connections (via increased valencies, promiscuous binding, and topologies that enable multivalent interactions) support the stability of and are enriched within multicomponent condensates. Importantly, proteins that increase the connectivity of multicomponent condensates have higher critical points as pure systems or, if pure LLPS is unfeasible, as binary scaffold–client mixtures. Hence, critical points of accessible systems (i.e., with just a few components) might serve as a unified thermodynamic parameter to predict the composition of multicomponent condensates.

scholarly journals Amphipathic helical peptides hamper protein-protein interactions of the intrinsically disordered chromatin nuclear protein 1 (NUPR1)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1862 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Santofimia-Castaño ◽  
Bruno Rizzuti ◽  
Olga Abián ◽  
Adrián Velázquez-Campoy ◽  
Juan L. Iovanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Helical Peptides ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

scholarly journals Intrinsic Disorder in Tetratricopeptide Repeat Proteins

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan W. Van Bibber ◽  
Cornelia Haerle ◽  
Roy Khalife ◽  
Bin Xue ◽  
Vladimir N. Uversky
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeats ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat Proteins

Among the realm of repeat containing proteins that commonly serve as “scaffolds” promoting protein-protein interactions, there is a family of proteins containing between 2 and 20 tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs), which are functional motifs consisting of 34 amino acids. The most distinguishing feature of TPR domains is their ability to stack continuously one upon the other, with these stacked repeats being able to affect interaction with binding partners either sequentially or in combination. It is known that many repeat-containing proteins are characterized by high levels of intrinsic disorder, and that many protein tandem repeats can be intrinsically disordered. Furthermore, it seems that TPR-containing proteins share many characteristics with hybrid proteins containing ordered domains and intrinsically disordered protein regions. However, there has not been a systematic analysis of the intrinsic disorder status of TPR proteins. To fill this gap, we analyzed 166 human TPR proteins to determine the degree to which proteins containing TPR motifs are affected by intrinsic disorder. Our analysis revealed that these proteins are characterized by different levels of intrinsic disorder and contain functional disordered regions that are utilized for protein-protein interactions and often serve as targets of various posttranslational modifications.

scholarly journals Chasing coevolutionary signals in intrinsically disordered proteins complexes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Iserte ◽  
Tamas Lazar ◽  
Silvio C. E. Tosatto ◽  
Peter Tompa ◽  
Cristina Marino-Buslje
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Regulatory Processes ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Predict Protein Structure ◽  
Biological Interpretation

Abstract Intrinsically disordered proteins/regions (IDPs/IDRs) are crucial components of the cell, they are highly abundant and participate ubiquitously in a wide range of biological functions, such as regulatory processes and cell signaling. Many of their important functions rely on protein interactions, by which they trigger or modulate different pathways. Sequence covariation, a powerful tool for protein contact prediction, has been applied successfully to predict protein structure and to identify protein–protein interactions mostly of globular proteins. IDPs/IDRs also mediate a plethora of protein–protein interactions, highlighting the importance of addressing sequence covariation-based inter-protein contact prediction of this class of proteins. Despite their importance, a systematic approach to analyze the covariation phenomena of intrinsically disordered proteins and their complexes is still missing. Here we carry out a comprehensive critical assessment of coevolution-based contact prediction in IDP/IDR complexes and detail the challenges and possible limitations that emerge from their analysis. We found that the coevolutionary signal is faint in most of the complexes of disordered proteins but positively correlates with the interface size and binding affinity between partners. In addition, we discuss the state-of-art methodology by biological interpretation of the results, formulate evaluation guidelines and suggest future directions of development to the field.

scholarly journals Peptide-based Interaction Proteomics

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1070-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina Meyer ◽  
Matthias Selbach
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Synthetic Peptides ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Interaction Partners ◽  
Linear Motifs ◽  
Cellulose Membranes ◽  
Interaction Proteomics ◽  
Proteins Interactions

Protein-protein interactions are often mediated by short linear motifs (SLiMs) that are located in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of proteins. Interactions mediated by SLiMs are notoriously difficult to study, and many functionally relevant interactions likely remain to be uncovered. Recently, pull-downs with synthetic peptides in combination with quantitative mass spectrometry emerged as a powerful screening approach to study protein-protein interactions mediated by SLiMs. Specifically, arrays of synthetic peptides immobilized on cellulose membranes provide a scalable means to identify the interaction partners of many peptides in parallel. In this minireview we briefly highlight the relevance of SLiMs for protein-protein interactions, outline existing screening technologies, discuss unique advantages of peptide-based interaction screens and provide practical suggestions for setting up such peptide-based screens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document