scholarly journals Development, validation, and evaluation of prediction models to identify individuals at high risk of lung cancer for screening in the English primary care population using the QResearch database: research protocol and statistical analysis plan

Author(s):  
Weiqi Liao ◽  
Judith Burchardt ◽  
Carol Coupland ◽  
Fergus Gleeson ◽  
Julia Hippisley-Cox ◽  
...  

Background and research aim: Lung cancer is a research priority in the UK. Early diagnosis of lung cancer can improve patients' survival outcomes. The DART-QResearch project is part of a larger academic-industrial collaborative initiative, using big data and artificial intelligence to improve patient outcomes with thoracic diseases. There are two general research aims in the DART-QResearch project: (1) to understand the natural history of lung cancer, (2) to develop, validate, and evaluate risk prediction models to select patients at high risk for lung cancer screening. Methods: This population-based cohort study uses the QResearch database (version 45) and includes patients aged between 25 and 84 years old and without a diagnosis of lung cancer at cohort entry (study period: 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2020). The team conducted a literature review (with additional clinical input) to inform the inclusion of variables for data extraction from the QResearch database. The following statistical techniques will be used for different research objectives, including descriptive statistics, multi-level modelling, multiple imputation for missing data, fractional polynomials to explore non-linear relationships between continuous variables and the outcome, and Cox regression for the prediction model. We will update our QCancer (lung, 10-year risk) algorithm, and compare it with the other two mainstream models (LLP and PLCOM2012) for lung cancer screening using the same dataset. We will evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the prediction models, and recommend the best one for lung cancer screening for the English primary care population. Discussion: The DART-QResearch project focuses on both symptomatic presentation and asymptomatic patients in the lung cancer care pathway. A better understanding of the patterns, trajectories, and phenotypes of symptomatic presentation may help GPs consider lung cancer earlier. Screening asymptomatic patients at high risk is another route to achieve earlier diagnosis of lung cancer. The strengths of this study include using large-scale representative population-based clinical data, robust methodology, and a transparent research process. This project has great potential to contribute to the national cancer strategic plan and yields substantial public and societal benefits through earlier diagnosis of lung cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1563-1563
Author(s):  
Qian Wang ◽  
Changchuan Jiang ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
Yaning Zhang ◽  
Gabriel Albert Sara

1563 Background: In 2013, USPSTF recommended low-dose CT screening (LCS) for lung cancer in high-risk adults. The change in real-world practice is largely unknown, as well as the association with socio-demographic factors. Methods: Data were extracted from the population-based 2010 and 2015 NHIS. LCS was defined as a chest CT to check for lung cancer within the past year. We included adults aged 55 to 80 years who 1) have 30+ pack-year smoking history; 2) are currently smokers or have quitted within the past 15 years. We excluded adults who 1) have lung cancer; 2) had not seen a physician in the past year. We used weighted analyses to estimate national lung cancer screening rates. Results: A total of 874 and 1041 high-risk smokers responded to the LCS questions for lung cancer in 2010 and 2015, respectively. The screening rate more than doubled from 4.1% to 9.1% (P < 0.01) in all respondents. The increase was greater in women (2.9% to 9.5%, p < 0.01) than men (5.2% to 8.8%, p = 0.03) and in age 65-80 (4.7% to 12.3%, p < 0.01) than age 55-64 (3.8% to 6.3%, p = 0.16). White saw the largest increase and highest rate in 2015 (4.0% to 9.3%, p = < 0.01). Those with some college or above education had the highest rate in 2010, but the lowest in 2015. Household income above 75,000 dollars was associated with the lowest rate in both 2010 and 2015. Conclusions: Since the recommendation of USPSTF, LCS rate for lung cancer has doubled but remains less than 10%. Higher education and household income are associated with lower screening rate, in contrast to studies of other cancers. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000811
Author(s):  
Oluf Dimitri Røe

Screening a population for a potentially deadly disease, the ultimate goal must be to prevent morbidity and mortality from this disease for the whole population. Unlike breast cancer or cervical cancer screening, where all women are screened after a certain age, CT screening for lung cancer has been based on selection of putative high-risk individuals based on age and smoking cut-off values. The type of selection used leaves too many high-risk individuals behind. The solution is to use only validated risk prediction models for selection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavia Cristina Gonçalves de Aquino ◽  
Thais M. Guedes ◽  
Arthur Pires ◽  
Heraldo Possolo de Souza

Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women. Screening patients at high risk of developing lung cancer is a worldwide priority, since it can be cured if diagnosed in early stages. Currently, screening in high risk individuals is made using low dose computed tomography, however, this method may lead to false-positive tests and overdiagnosis. The usefulness of serum biomarkers would be relevant in two situations: 1) the screening of large groups at high risk of developing lung cancer, where the biomarker should be very sensitive and 2) during the investigation of pulmonary nodules, where the biomarker should be very specific. Several serum biomarkers have been tested to work as biomarkers for lung cancer screening. Unfortunately, so far, none of them has come into current clinical practice. In this review, we analyze some of the serum biomarkers described in the last 10 years, evaluating their potential as tools to detect lung cancer, particularly in smokers. The use of serum biomarkers and imaging methods together seems to be a solution to early diagnosis of lung cancer, more efficient treatment and enhanced chance of cure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-103
Author(s):  
Seung Hun Jang

The results of large-scale clinical studies have shown that the lung cancer mortality rate can be reduced by lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in high-risk populations. Lung cancer screening requires rigorous quality control to ensure that imaging can be introduced into evidence-based medical systems and that results can be effectively delivered to examinees. Cessation of smoking is indispensable for reducing mortality in parallel with lung cancer screening. Pulmonary nodules found in LDCT during the Korean National Lung Cancer Screening are categorized according to their characteristics, size, and time of discovery based on the Lung Imaging Reporting And Data System (Lung-RADS); management guidelines are followed according to categorization. To improve the efficiency of lung cancer screening, studies are currently ongoing to enable selection of high-risk groups using lung cancer prediction models and biomarkers. Based on the risk estimation classification of lung cancer, it is expected that the selection of screening subjects and the screening cycle can be differentiated, which will increase the efficiency of screening, reduce the risk of unnecessary radiation exposure, and reduce the cost of screening.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vani N. Simmons ◽  
Jhanelle E. Gray ◽  
Matthew B. Schabath ◽  
Lauren E. Wilson ◽  
Gwendolyn P. Quinn

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Wei Hao Kok ◽  
Andrea Ban Yu-Lin ◽  
Shamsul Azhar Shah ◽  
Faisal Abdul Hamid

Background: Lung cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death and the third most common cancer in Malaysia. The rising prevalence of lung cancer suggests the need to consider disease screening for early detection, especially in the high-risk population, as it offers the best chance of cure. Objectives: The study aims to determine the willingness of high-risk respondents to participate in a lung cancer screening programme if made available to them, and to determine their attitude towards lung cancer screening and explore factors that might affect participation in a screening programme. Method: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study over 6 months conducted in adult patients attending medical clinics in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) using face-to-face administered questionnaires. Results: In total 180 respondents were analysed. There were 177 (98.3%) males. Mean age was 59.8 ± 9.1 years. Of the respondents, 138 (76.7%) had poor knowledge about cancer screening. Former smokers comprised 119 (66.1%) of the participants, and 61 (33.9%) were current smokers. In total, 141 (78.3%) respondents indicated willingness to participate in a lung cancer screening programme. Out of this group, 68 (48.2%) respondents were unwilling to pay for the procedure. Only 18 (12.8%) were unwilling to undergo lung cancer treatment if detected early. Conclusions: Awareness about general cancer screening is low. Our study showed that when informed of their high-risk status, respondents were willing to participate in lung cancer screening. There should be more health programmes to promote and raise awareness about lung cancer.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 749S
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Loewen ◽  
DongFeng Tan ◽  
Donald Klippenstein ◽  
Zachary Grossman ◽  
Enriqueta Nava ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. e008254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noor Ali ◽  
Kate J Lifford ◽  
Ben Carter ◽  
Fiona McRonald ◽  
Ghasem Yadegarfar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document