scholarly journals Dilution and titration of cell-cycle regulators may control cell size in budding yeast

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Heldt ◽  
Reece Lunstone ◽  
John J. Tyson ◽  
Béla Novák
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Gene Copy Number ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Gene Copy ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators

AbstractThe size of a cell sets the scale for all biochemical processes within it, thereby affecting cellular fitness and survival. Hence, cell size needs to be kept within certain limits and relatively constant over multiple generations. However, how cells measure their size and use this information to regulate growth and division remains controversial. Here, we present two mechanistic mathematical models of the budding yeast (S. cerevisiae) cell cycle to investigate competing hypotheses on size control: inhibitor dilution and titration of nuclear sites. Our results suggest that an inhibitor-dilution mechanism, in which cell growth dilutes the transcriptional inhibitor Whi5 against the constant activator Cln3, can facilitate size homeostasis. This is achieved by utilising a positive feedback loop to establish a fixed size threshold for the START transition, which efficiently couples cell growth to cell cycle progression. Yet, we show that inhibitor dilution cannot reproduce the size of mutants that alter the cell’s overall ploidy and WHI5 gene copy number. By contrast, size control through titration of Cln3 against a constant number of genomic binding sites for the transcription factor SBF recapitulates both size homeostasis and the size of these mutant strains. Moreover, this model produces an imperfect ‘sizer’ behaviour in G1 and a ‘timer’ in S/G2/M, which combine to yield an ‘adder’ over the whole cell cycle; an observation recently made in experiments. Hence, our model connects these phenomenological data with the molecular details of the cell cycle, providing a systems-level perspective of budding yeast size control.

scholarly journals PP2ARts1 is a master regulator of pathways that control cell size

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Zapata ◽  
Noah Dephoure ◽  
Tracy MacDonough ◽  
Yaxin Yu ◽  
Emily J. Parnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Delay Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Entry ◽  
G1 Cyclin

Cell size checkpoints ensure that passage through G1 and mitosis occurs only when sufficient growth has occurred. The mechanisms by which these checkpoints work are largely unknown. PP2A associated with the Rts1 regulatory subunit (PP2ARts1) is required for cell size control in budding yeast, but the relevant targets are unknown. In this paper, we used quantitative proteome-wide mass spectrometry to identify proteins controlled by PP2ARts1. This revealed that PP2ARts1 controls the two key checkpoint pathways thought to regulate the cell cycle in response to cell growth. To investigate the role of PP2ARts1 in these pathways, we focused on the Ace2 transcription factor, which is thought to delay cell cycle entry by repressing transcription of the G1 cyclin CLN3. Diverse experiments suggest that PP2ARts1 promotes cell cycle entry by inhibiting the repressor functions of Ace2. We hypothesize that control of Ace2 by PP2ARts1 plays a role in mechanisms that link G1 cyclin accumulation to cell growth.

scholarly journals Dilution and titration of cell-cycle regulators may control cell size in budding yeast

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e1006548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Heldt ◽  
Reece Lunstone ◽  
John J. Tyson ◽  
Béla Novák
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators

scholarly journals A conserved Lkb1 signaling axis modulates TORC2 signaling in budding yeast

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Alcaide-Gavilán ◽  
Rafael Lucena ◽  
Katherine Schubert ◽  
Karen Artiles ◽  
Jessica Zapata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Carbon Source ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Nutrient Availability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression

ABSTRACTNutrient availability, growth rate and cell size are closely linked. For example, in budding yeast, the rate of cell growth is proportional to nutrient availability, cell size is proportional to growth rate, and growth rate is proportional to cell size. Thus, cells grow slowly in poor nutrients and are nearly half the size of cells growing in rich nutrients. Moreover, large cells grow faster than small cells. A signaling network that surrounds Tor kinase complex 2 (TORC2) plays an important role in enforcing these proportional relationships. Cells that lack components of the TORC2 network fail to modulate their growth rate or size in response to changes in nutrient availability. Here, we show that budding yeast homologs of the Lkb1 tumor suppressor kinase are required for normal modulation of TORC2 signaling and in response to changes in carbon source. Lkb1 kinases activate Snf1/AMPK to initiate transcription of genes required for utilization of poor carbon sources. However, Lkb1 influences TORC2 signaling via a novel pathway that is independent of Snf1/AMPK. Of the three Lkb1 homologs in budding yeast, Elm1 plays the most important role in modulating TORC2. Elm1 activates a pair of related kinases called Gin4 and Hsl1. Previous work found that loss of Gin4 and Hsl1 causes cells to undergo unrestrained growth during a prolonged mitotic arrest, which suggests that play a role in linking cell cycle progression to cell growth. We found that Gin4 and Hsl1 also control the TORC2 network. In addition, Gin4 and Hsl1 are themselves influenced by signals from the TORC2 network, consistent with previous work showing that the TORC2 network constitutes a feedback loop. Together, the data suggest a model in which the TORC2 network sets growth rate in response to carbon source, while also relaying signals via Gin4 and Hsl1 that set the critical amount of growth required for cell cycle progression. This kind of close linkage between control of cell growth and size would suggest a simple mechanistic explanation for the proportional relationship between cell size and growth rate.

scholarly journals Co-ordination of cell cycle and differentiation in the developing nervous system

2012 ◽  
Vol 444 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Hindley ◽  
Anna Philpott
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Embryonic Development ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Developing Nervous System

During embryonic development, cells must divide to produce appropriate numbers, but later must exit the cell cycle to allow differentiation. How these processes of proliferation and differentiation are co-ordinated during embryonic development has been poorly understood until recently. However, a number of studies have now given an insight into how the cell cycle machinery, including cyclins, CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases), CDK inhibitors and other cell cycle regulators directly influence mechanisms that control cell fate and differentiation. Conversely, examples are emerging of transcriptional regulators that are better known for their role in driving the differentiated phenotype, which also play complementary roles in controlling cell cycle progression. The present review will summarise our current understanding of the mechanisms co-ordinating the cell cycle and differentiation in the developing nervous system, where these links have been, perhaps, most extensively studied.

scholarly journals JAK/STAT pathway promotes Drosophila neuroblast proliferation via the direct CycE regulation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Du ◽  
Jian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Proliferative Potential ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Stat Signaling ◽  
Stat Pathway

AbstractHow neural stem cells regulate their proliferative potential and lineage diversity is a central problem in developmental neurobiology. Drosophila Mushroom bodies (MBs), centers of olfactory learning and memory, are generated by a specific set of neuroblasts (Nbs) that are born in the embryonic stage and continuously proliferate till the end of the pupal stage. Although MB presents an excellent model for studying neural stem cell proliferation, the genetic and molecular mechanisms that control the unique proliferative characteristics of the MB Nbs are largely unknown. Further, the signaling cues controlling cell cycle regulators to promote cell cycle progression in MB Nbs remain poorly understood. Here, we report that JAK/STAT signaling pathway is required for the proliferation activity and maintenance of MB Nbs. Loss of JAK/STAT activity severely reduces the later-born MB neuron types and leads to premature neuroblast termination, which can be rescued by tissue-specific overexpression of CycE and diap1. Higher JAK/STAT pathway activity in MB results in more neurons, without producing supernumerary Nbs. Furthermore, we show that JAK/STAT signaling effector Stat92E directly regulates CycE transcription in MB Nbs. Finally, MB Nb clones of loss or excess CycE phenocopy those of decreased or increased JAK/STAT signaling pathway activities. We conclude that JAK/STAT signaling controls MB Nb proliferative activity through directly regulating CycE expression to control cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Characterization of Dependencies Between Growth and Division in Budding Yeast

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Mayhew ◽  
Edwin S. Iversen ◽  
Alexander J. Hartemink
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Statistical Framework ◽  
Cell Variation

AbstractCell growth and division are processes vital to the proliferation and development of life. Coordination between these two processes has been recognized for decades in a variety of organisms. In the budding yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae, this coordination or ‘size control’ appears as an inverse correlation between cell size and the rate of cell-cycle progression, routinely observed in G1prior to cell division commitment. Beyond this point, cells are presumed to complete S/G2/M at similar rates and in a size-independent manner. As such, studies of dependence between growth and division have focused on G1. Moreover, coordination between growth and division has commonly been analyzedwithinthe cycle of a single cell without accounting for correlations in growth and division characteristicsbetweencycles of related cells. In a comprehensive analysis of three published time-lapse microscopy datasets, we analyze both intra-and inter-cycle dependencies between growth and division, revisiting assumptions about the coordination between these two processes. Interestingly, we find evidence (1) that S/G2/M durations are systematically longer in daughters than in mothers, (2) of dependencies between S/G2/M and size at budding that echo the classical G1dependencies, and, (3) in contrast with recent bacterial studies, of negative dependencies between size at birth and size accumulated during the cell cycle. In addition, we develop a novel hierarchical model to uncover inter-cycle dependencies, and we find evidence for such dependencies in cells growing in sugar-poor environments. Our analysis highlights the need for experimentalists and modelers to account for new sources of cell-to-cell variation in growth and division, and our model provides a formal statistical framework for the continued study of dependencies between biological processes.

scholarly journals Growth-dependent signals drive an increase in early G1 cyclin concentration to link cell cycle entry with cell growth

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Sommer ◽  
Jerry T. DeWitt ◽  
Raymond Tan ◽  
Douglas R. Kellogg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Transcriptional Repressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Entry ◽  
G1 Cyclin

AbstractEntry into the cell cycle occurs only when sufficient growth has occurred. In budding yeast, the cyclin Cln3 initiates cell cycle entry by inactivating a transcriptional repressor called Whi5. Growth-dependent changes in the concentrations of Cln3 or Whi5 have been proposed to link cell cycle entry to cell growth. However, there are conflicting reports regarding the behavior and roles of Cln3 and Whi5. Here, we found no evidence that changes in the concentration of Whi5 play a major role in controlling cell cycle entry. Rather, the data suggest that cell growth triggers cell cycle entry by driving an increase in the concentration of Cln3. We further found that accumulation of Cln3 is dependent upon homologs of mammalian SGK kinases that play roles in control of cell growth and size. Together, the data are consistent with models in which Cln3 serves as the crucial link between the cell cycle and signals that control cell growth and size.

scholarly journals Cell-size regulation in budding yeast does not depend on linear accumulation of Whi5

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (25) ◽  
pp. 14243-14250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Barber ◽  
Ariel Amir ◽  
Andrew W. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gal1 Promoter ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Cells must couple cell-cycle progress to their growth rate to restrict the spread of cell sizes present throughout a population. Linear, rather than exponential, accumulation of Whi5, was proposed to provide this coordination by causing a higher Whi5 concentration in cells born at a smaller size. We tested this model using the inducibleGAL1promoter to make the Whi5 concentration independent of cell size. At an expression level that equalizes the mean cell size with that of wild-type cells, the size distributions of cells with galactose-induced Whi5 expression and wild-type cells are indistinguishable. Fluorescence microscopy confirms that the endogenous andGAL1promoters produce different relationships between Whi5 concentration and cell volume without diminishing size control in the G1 phase. We also expressed Cln3 from the GAL1 promoter, finding that the spread in cell sizes for an asynchronous population is unaffected by this perturbation. Our findings indicate that size control in budding yeast does not fundamentally originate from the linear accumulation of Whi5, contradicting a previous claim and demonstrating the need for further models of cell-cycle regulation to explain how cell size controls passage through Start.

scholarly journals The duration of mitosis and daughter cell size are modulated by nutrients in budding yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (11) ◽  
pp. 3463-3470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo M. Leitao ◽  
Douglas R. Kellogg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Daughter Cell ◽  
Slow Growth ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Size Control ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Large Reduction ◽  
Duration Of Mitosis ◽  
Cell Cycle Entry

The size of nearly all cells is modulated by nutrients. Thus, cells growing in poor nutrients can be nearly half the size of cells in rich nutrients. In budding yeast, cell size is thought to be controlled almost entirely by a mechanism that delays cell cycle entry until sufficient growth has occurred in G1 phase. Here, we show that most growth of a new daughter cell occurs in mitosis. When the rate of growth is slowed by poor nutrients, the duration of mitosis is increased, which suggests that cells compensate for slow growth in mitosis by increasing the duration of growth. The amount of growth required to complete mitosis is reduced in poor nutrients, leading to a large reduction in cell size. Together, these observations suggest that mechanisms that control the extent of growth in mitosis play a major role in cell size control in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Growth Rate and Cell Size Modulate the Synthesis of, and Requirement for, G1-Phase Cyclins at Start

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 10802-10813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandt L. Schneider ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
J. Markwardt ◽  
George Tokiwa ◽  
Tom Volpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Small Cells ◽  
Critical Threshold ◽  
Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, commitment to cell cycle progression occurs at Start. Progression past Start requires cell growth and protein synthesis, a minimum cell size, and G1-phase cyclins. We examined the relationships among these factors. Rapidly growing cells expressed, and required, dramatically more Cln protein than did slowly growing cells. To clarify the role of cell size, we expressed defined amounts of CLN mRNA in cells of different sizes. When Cln was expressed at nearly physiological levels, a critical threshold of Cln expression was required for cell cycle progression, and this critical threshold varied with both cell size and growth rate: as cells grew larger, they needed less CLN mRNA, but as cells grew faster, they needed more Cln protein. At least in part, large cells had a reduced requirement for CLN mRNA because large cells generated more Cln protein per unit of mRNA than did small cells. When Cln was overexpressed, it was capable of promoting Start rapidly, regardless of cell size or growth rate. In summary, the amount of Cln required for Start depends dramatically on both cell size and growth rate. Large cells generate more Cln1 or Cln2 protein for a given amount of CLN mRNA, suggesting the existence of a novel posttranscriptional size control mechanism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document