scholarly journals Acquired FGFR and FGF alterations confer resistance to estrogen receptor (ER) targeted therapy in ER+ metastatic breast cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingping Mao ◽  
Ofir Cohen ◽  
Kailey J. Kowalski ◽  
Justin G. Kusiel ◽  
Jorge E. Buendia-Buendia ◽  
...  

AbstractBeyond acquired mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER), mechanisms of resistance to ER-directed therapies in ER+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. We conducted a genome-scale functional screen spanning 10,135 genes to investigate genes whose overexpression confer resistance to selective estrogen receptor degraders. Pathway analysis of candidate resistance genes demonstrated that the FGFR, ERBB, insulin receptor, and MAPK pathways represented key modalities of resistance. In parallel, we performed whole exome sequencing in paired pre-treatment and post-resistance biopsies from 60 patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer who had developed resistance to ER-targeted therapy. The FGFR pathway was altered via FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGF3 amplifications or FGFR2 mutations in 24 (40%) of the post-resistance biopsies. In 12 of the 24 post-resistance tumors exhibiting FGFR/FGF alterations, these alterations were not detected in the corresponding pre-treatment tumors, suggesting that they were acquired or enriched under the selective pressure of ER-directed therapy. In vitro experiments in ER+ breast cancer cells confirmed that FGFR/FGF alterations led to fulvestrant resistance as well as cross-resistance to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. RNA sequencing of resistant cell lines treated with different drug combinations demonstrated that FGFR/FGF induced resistance through ER reprogramming and activation of the MAPK pathway. The resistance phenotypes were reversed by FGFR inhibitors, a MEK inhibitor, and/or a SHP2 inhibitor, suggesting potential treatment strategies. The detection of targetable, clonally acquired genetic alterations in the FGFR pathway in metastatic tumor biopsies highlights the value of serial tumor testing to dissect mechanisms of resistance in human breast cancer and its potential application in directing clinical management.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13005-e13005
Author(s):  
Dirk Hempel ◽  
Florian Ebner ◽  
Valeria Milani ◽  
Wolfgang Janni ◽  
Amelie De Gregorio ◽  
...  

e13005 Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) together with protein expression analysis is back bone of molecularly targeted therapy in precision medicine. The present study shows the retrospective analysis of our experience with NGS using a panel of 324 genes in combination with protein expression in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) over the last 18 months. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence of individual genetic alterations combined with protein expression to define potential targets for an individualized therapy. Methods: We analyzed 41 patients with advanced BC using solid tumor genomic profiling test. The test was used to detect clinically relevant genomic alterations (point mutations, indels, rearrangements, CNAs, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI)) and to support the selection of appropriate targeted therapy. The protein expression (hormon receptors, ERBB2 and PDL1) of tumors was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: The most common BC subtypes were HR+/ERBB2- (n = 20), followed by triple-negative (n = 15), and HER2+ BC (n = 9). 41 different genetic alterations were reported. Most patients had more than one genetic alteration (n = 27), as determined by NGS. The most common alterations were PIK3CA (n = 14), out of which 11 (78%) were hormone-receptor positive/ERBB2 negative. Conclusions: The NGS of mBC supports the decision for the most promising treatment option in 58,5% of our patients with a Tier I evidence. For an appropriate treatment decision it is necessary to evaluate gene alterations und protein expression of metastases in account. For an appropriate interpretation of rare gene alterations in mBC basket trials on basis of real world data are necessary. We founded the OnkoVision alliance to bring MTB into clinically routine and to identify appropriate patients for basket trials.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 5974-5989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingping Mao ◽  
Ofir Cohen ◽  
Kailey J. Kowalski ◽  
Justin G. Kusiel ◽  
Jorge E. Buendia-Buendia ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Toss ◽  
Marta Venturelli ◽  
Chiara Peterle ◽  
Federico Piacentini ◽  
Stefano Cascinu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Darrigues ◽  
Jean-Yves Pierga ◽  
Alice Bernard-Tessier ◽  
Ivan Bièche ◽  
Amanda Bartolini Silveira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Following the PALOMA-3 study results, the combination of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, with fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, has become a standard therapy in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib has been shown to increase the progression-free survival (PFS) overall but no predictive biomarker of palbociclib efficacy has been validated so far. We thus evaluated whether early changes of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels are associated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant efficiency. Methods ER+ HER2− MBC patients were included in a prospective observational cohort before treatment initiation. Tumor response was assessed by radiological evaluation (RECIST v1.1) every 3 months. Plasma samples were collected before treatment (baseline), at day 15 (D15), at day 30 (D30), and at disease progression. We searched for somatic mutations from archived tumor tissues by targeted deep sequencing. For patients with somatic mutations identified, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was tracked using digital droplet PCR. Ratios of ctDNA levels ([D15/baseline] and [D30/baseline]) were then correlated with prospectively registered patient characteristics and outcomes. Results Twenty-five of the 61 patients enrolled had a somatic mutation testable in plasma (NPIK3CA = 21, NTP53 = 2, NAKT1 = 2). At baseline, 84% of patients had detectable ctDNA levels but ctDNA levels had no prognostic impact on PFS (p = 0.10). Among those patients, ctDNA was still detected in 82% at D15 and 68% at D30. ctDNA clearance observed at day 30 was associated with longer PFS (HR = 7.2, 95% CI = 1.5–32.6, p = 0.004). On the contrary, a [D30/baseline] ctDNA ratio > 1 was associated with a shorter PFS (HR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.4–18.3, p = 0.02) and all 5 patients with increased ctDNA levels at D30 showed disease progression after 3 months under palbociclib-fulvestrant. Finally, at the time of radiological tumor progression, ctDNA was detected in all patients tested. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that the efficiency of palbociclib and fulvestrant can be monitored by serial analyses of ctDNA before radiological evaluation and that early ctDNA variation is a prognostic factor of PFS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document