scholarly journals Dissecting the coma spectrum using Bayesian classification

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Dietz ◽  
Bochra Zareini ◽  
Risto Näätänen ◽  
Morten Overgaard

AbstractA patient who does not regain full consciousness after coma is typically classified as being in a vegetative state or a minimally conscious state. While the key determinants in this differential diagnosis are inferred uniquely from the observed behaviour of the patient, nothing can, in principle, be known about the patient’s awareness of the external world. Given the subjective nature of current diagnostic practice, the quest for neurophysiological markers that could complement the nosology of the coma spectrum is becoming more and more acute. We here present a method for the classification of patients based on electrophysiological responses using Bayesian model selection. We validate the method in a sample of fourteen patients with a clinical disorder of consciousness (DoC) and a control group of fifteen healthy adults. By formally comparing a set of alternative hypotheses about the nosology of DoC patients, the results of our validation study show that we can disambiguate between alternative models of how patients are classified. Although limited to this small sample of patients, this allowed us to assert that there is no evidence of subgroups when looking at the MMN response in this sample of patients. We believe that the methods presented in this article are an important contribution to testing alternative hypotheses about how patients are grouped at both the group and single-patient level and propose that electrophysiological responses, recorded invasively or non-invasively, may be informative for the nosology of the coma spectrum on a par with behavioural diagnosis.

Author(s):  
Orsola Masotta ◽  
Luigi Trojano ◽  
Vincenzo Loreto ◽  
Pasquale Moretta ◽  
Anna Estraneo

AbstractThis open study investigated the clinical effects of 10-week selegiline administration in six patients in vegetative state and in four patients in a minimally conscious state, at least 6 months after onset. Clinical outcome was assessed by Coma Recovery Scale-Revised once a week during selegiline administration and 1 month later. Three patients stopped treatment because of possible side effects. After treatment and at 1 month of follow-up, four patients showed improvements in clinical diagnosis, and three patients showed an increase in arousal level only. Selegiline might represent a relatively safe option to enhance arousal and promote recovery in brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness.


2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 972-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Magrassi ◽  
Giorgio Maggioni ◽  
Caterina Pistarini ◽  
Carol Di Perri ◽  
Stefano Bastianello ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus was introduced more than 40 years ago with the objective of improving the performance and attention of patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Here, the authors report the results of the Cortical Activation by Thalamic Stimulation (CATS) study, a prospective multiinstitutional study on the effects of bilateral chronic stimulation of the anterior intralaminar thalamic nuclei and adjacent paralaminar regions in patients affected by a disorder of consciousness. METHODS The authors evaluated the clinical and radiological data of 29 patients in a vegetative state (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) and 11 in a minimally conscious state that lasted for more than 6 months. Of these patients, 5 were selected for bilateral stereotactic implantation of deep brain stimulating electrodes into their thalamus. A definitive consensus for surgery was obtained for 3 of the selected patients. All 3 patients (2 in a vegetative state and 1 in a minimally conscious state) underwent implantation of bilateral thalamic electrodes and submitted to chronic stimulation for a minimum of 18 months and a maximum of 48 months. RESULTS In each case, there was an increase in desynchronization and the power spectrum of electroencephalograms, and improvement in the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised scores was found. Furthermore, the severity of limb spasticity and the number and severity of pathological movements were reduced. However, none of these patients returned to a fully conscious state. CONCLUSIONS Despite the limited number of patients studied, the authors confirmed that bilateral thalamic stimulation can improve the clinical status of patients affected by a disorder of consciousness, even though this stimulation did not induce persistent, clinically evident conscious behavior in the patients. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01027572 (ClinicalTrials.gov)


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-260
Author(s):  
Richard W.M. Law ◽  
Kartina A. Choong

Abstract Advances made in medical care mean that many critically ill patients with an acquired brain injury may survive with a disorder of consciousness. This may be in the form of a vegetative state (VS) or a minimally conscious state (MCS). Medically, there is a growing tendency to view these conditions as occupying the same clinical spectrum rather than be considered as discrete entities. In other words, their difference is now understood as one of degree rather than kind. However, is English law keeping pace with this development in medical knowledge? This article seeks to highlight the duality that exists in the legal decision-making process in England and Wales, and question the justifiability and sustainability of this dichotomous approach in the light of medicine’s current understanding on disorders of consciousness.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Francesca Lucca ◽  
Danilo Lofaro ◽  
Loris Pignolo ◽  
Elio Leto ◽  
Maria Ursino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate the utility of the revised coma remission scale (CRS-r), together with other clinical variables, in predicting emergence from a disorder of consciousness (DoC) after intensive rehabilitation care. Method: This is a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive 180 brain-injured patients with prolonged DoC upon admission to neurorehabilitation unit. 123 patients in a vegetative state (VS) and 57 in a minimally conscious state (MCS) were included and followed for a period of 8 weeks in the intensive care unit (ICU). Demographical and clinical factors were used as outcome measures. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were employed for examining potential predictors for clinical outcome along the time. Results: VS and MCS groups were matched for demographical and clinical (i.e., aetiology, tracheostomy and feed administration) variables. Within 2 months after admission in intensive neurorehabilitation unit, 3.9% were dead, 35.5% had a full recovery of consciousness and 111 66.7% remained in VS or MCS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the best predictor of functional improvement were the CRS-r scores. In particular, patients with values greater than 12 at admission were those with favorable likelihood of emergence from DoC. Conclusions: Our study highlights the role of the CRS-r scores for predicting short-term favorable outcome.


Author(s):  
Jerome B. Posner ◽  
Clifford B. Saper ◽  
Nicholas D. Schiff ◽  
Jan Claassen

This text is an update of a classic work on diagnosing the cause of coma, with the addition of new sections on the treatment of comatose patients. The first chapter provides an up-to-date review on the brain mechanisms that maintain a conscious state in humans and how lesions that damage these mechanisms cause loss of consciousness or coma. The second chapter reviews the neurological examination of the comatose patient, which provides the basis for determining whether the patient is suffering from a structural brain injury causing the coma or from a metabolic disorder of consciousness. The third and fourth chapters review the pathophysiology of structural lesions causing coma and the specific disease states that result in coma. Chapter 5 is a comprehensive treatment of the many causes of metabolic coma. Chapter 6 review psychiatric causes of unresponsiveness and how to identify and treat them. Chapters 7 and 8 review the overall emergency treatment of comatose patients, followed by the treatment of specific causes of coma. Chapter 9 examines the long-term outcomes of coma, including the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state, how they can be distinguished, and their implications for eventual useful recovery. Chapter 10 reviews the topic of brain death, the standards for examination of a patient that are required to make the determination of brain death, and the ethics of diagnosis and treatment of patients who, by definition, have no way to approve of or communicate about their wishes.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camillo Porcaro ◽  
Idan Efim Nemirovsky ◽  
Francesco Riganello ◽  
Zahra Mansour ◽  
Antonio Cerasa ◽  
...  

When treating patients with a disorder of consciousness (DOC), it is essential to obtain an accurate diagnosis as soon as possible to generate individualized treatment programs. However, accurately diagnosing patients with DOCs is challenging and prone to errors when differentiating patients in a Vegetative State/Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (VS/UWS) from those in a Minimally Conscious State (MCS). Upwards of ~40% of patients with a DOC can be misdiagnosed when specifically designed behavioral scales are not employed or improperly administered. To improve diagnostic accuracy for these patients, several important neuroimaging and electrophysiological technologies have been proposed. These include Positron Emission Tomography (PET), functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Electroencephalography (EEG), and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Here, we review the different ways in which these techniques can improve diagnostic differentiation between VS/UWS and MCS patients. We do so by referring to studies that were conducted within the last 10 years, which were extracted from the PubMed database. In total, 55 studies met our criteria (clinical diagnoses of VS/UWS from MCS as made by PET, fMRI, EEG and TMS- EEG tools) and were included in this review. By summarizing the promising results achieved in understanding and diagnosing these conditions, we aim to emphasize the need for more such tools to be incorporated in standard clinical practice, as well as the importance of data sharing to incentivize the community to meet these goals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 665
Author(s):  
Rocco Salvatore Calabrò ◽  
Loris Pignolo ◽  
Claudia Müller-Eising ◽  
Antonino Naro

Pain perception in individuals with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) is still a matter of debate. Advanced neuroimaging studies suggest some cortical activations even in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) compared to those with a minimally conscious state (MCS). Therefore, pain perception has to be considered even in individuals with UWS. However, advanced neuroimaging assessment can be challenging to conduct, and its findings are sometimes difficult to be interpreted. Conversely, multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) can be carried out quickly and are more adaptable to the clinical needs. In this scoping review, we dealt with the neurophysiological basis underpinning pain in PDOC, pointing out how pain perception assessment in these individuals might help in reducing the misdiagnosis rate. The available literature data suggest that patients with UWS show a more severe functional connectivity breakdown among the pain-related brain areas compared to individuals in MCS, pointing out that pain perception increases with the level of consciousness. However, there are noteworthy exceptions, because some UWS patients show pain-related cortical activations that partially overlap those observed in MCS individuals. This suggests that some patients with UWS may have residual brain functional connectivity supporting the somatosensory, affective, and cognitive aspects of pain processing (i.e., a conscious experience of the unpleasantness of pain), rather than only being able to show autonomic responses to potentially harmful stimuli. Therefore, the significance of the neurophysiological approach to pain perception in PDOC seems to be clear, and despite some methodological caveats (including intensity of stimulation, multimodal paradigms, and active vs. passive stimulation protocols), remain to be solved. To summarize, an accurate clinical and neurophysiological assessment should always be performed for a better understanding of pain perception neurophysiological underpinnings, a more precise differential diagnosis at the level of individual cases as well as group comparisons, and patient-tailored management.


Brain Injury ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Sarah Elizabeth Patricia Munce ◽  
Fiona Webster ◽  
Jennifer Christian ◽  
Laura E. Gonzalez-Lara ◽  
Adrian M. Owen ◽  
...  

NeuroSci ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-265
Author(s):  
Jihad Aburas ◽  
Areej Aziz ◽  
Maryam Butt ◽  
Angela Leschinsky ◽  
Marsha L. Pierce

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of loss of consciousness, long-term disability, and death in children and young adults (age 1 to 44). Currently, there are no United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pharmacological treatments for post-TBI regeneration and recovery, particularly related to permanent disability and level of consciousness. In some cases, long-term disorders of consciousness (DoC) exist, including the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) characterized by the exhibition of reflexive behaviors only or a minimally conscious state (MCS) with few purposeful movements and reflexive behaviors. Electroceuticals, including non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) have proved efficacious in some patients with TBI and DoC. In this review, we examine how electroceuticals have improved our understanding of the neuroanatomy of consciousness. However, the level of improvements in general arousal or basic bodily and visual pursuit that constitute clinically meaningful recovery on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) remain undefined. Nevertheless, these advancements demonstrate the importance of the vagal nerve, thalamus, reticular activating system, and cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical loop in the process of consciousness recovery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 905-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Feng ◽  
Jiaqi Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Zhongfei Bai ◽  
Ying Yin

AbstractNoninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been used to facilitate the recovery from prolonged unconsciousness as a result of brain injury. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the effects of NIBS in patients with a disorder of consciousness (DOC). We searched four databases for any randomized controlled trials on the effect of NIBS in patients with a DOC, which used the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) as the primary outcome measure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect sizes. Fourteen studies with 273 participants were included in this review, of which 12 studies with sufficient data were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed a significant effect on increasing CRS-R scores in favor of real stimulation as compared to sham (Hedges’ g = 0.522; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.318–0.726; P < 0.0001, I2 = 0.00%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that only anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) significantly enhances the CRS-R scores in patients with a DOC, as compared to sham (Hedges’ g = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.419–0.986; P < 0.001), and this effect was predominant in patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) (Hedges’ g = 0.815; 95% CI, 0.429–1.200; P < 0.001). Anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC appears to be an effective approach for patients with MCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document