The gender pay gap of STEM professions in the United States

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 214-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Broyles
Author(s):  
JooHee Han ◽  
Michelle Budig

The “gender pay gap” refers to the average difference in men’s and women’s earnings, and is typically adjusted for hours worked. The gender pay gap can refer to differences in mean or median annual earnings, weekly earnings, or hourly wage. Because women tend to work part-time at higher rates than do men, and because part-time work tends to pay lower hourly wages relative to full-time work, the size of the gender pay gap is affected by whether full- and part-time, full-year or seasonal, and very young and very old workers are included in the estimates. Among full-time, year-round American workers aged sixteen and above in 2017, the gender pay gap (median weekly earnings) was 18.2 percent, meaning that women earned 81.8 cents of every man’s dollar. In the United States, women of color earn less relative to white men than white women do, owing to racial gaps in pay among women; moreover, within-race gender pay gaps are often smaller among racial/ethnic minorities, reflecting the low earnings of minority men. The gender gap has narrowed considerably since the early 20th century, yet disparities in women’s and men’s earnings persist. Moreover, this narrowing has not proceeded in a linear fashion and the gap has occasionally increased. This entry first introduces important literatures on historic and contemporary trends in the gender pay gap and then discusses the various explanations for the persistence of, and changes in, the gap. These explanations highlight the role of occupational gender segregation; the devaluation of female-typed work; gender differences in experience; family structure, care responsibilities, and the gendered impact of parenthood; workplace structures of inequality; glass ceilings and glass escalators. This entry concludes with a discussion of narrowing the gap and what it will take to close the gap.


ILR Review ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Ashraf

Previous studies of the gender pay gap in the United States have found a narrowing of that gap in the past two decades, but have differed substantially in the reported magnitude of that change. This study calculates gender earnings differences using Panel Study of Income Dynamics data for 1968–89, a longer time series than has been examined by any similar study. It also employs improved statistical techniques, notably an adjustment for selection bias and a recently recommended modification of the most commonly used decomposition technique. The author finds a significant decline both in the portion of the differential due to observed differences between men's and women's characteristics and in the “unexplained” component, which is often attributed to discrimination. The results of one analysis show that over the 1968–89 period the gender pay gap narrowed to as little as 47%.


ILR Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Quintana-García ◽  
Marta M. Elvira

To date, few empirical studies have explored potential differences in the effects of external labor market hiring on the compensation of male and female managers. Using longitudinal data from a sample of public high-technology firms on individual top executives’ total compensation in the United States, and the separate components of base and variable pay, the authors study the effects of being an external hire for men and women. The results suggest that women who are external labor market hires are disadvantaged, in both base and variable compensation, compared with internal placements. The analyses also provide some evidence that having greater representation of women in top positions reduces the disadvantaging effects for women of being an external hire.


2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 75-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francine D Blau ◽  
Lawrence M Kahn

We consider the gender pay gap in the United States. Both gender-specific factors, including gender differences in qualifications and discrimination, and overall wage structure, the rewards for skills and employment in particular sectors, importantly influence the gender pay gap. Declining gender differentials in the U.S., and the more rapid closing of the gender pay gap in the U.S. than elsewhere, appear to be primarily due to gender-specific factors. However, the relatively large gender pay gap in the U.S. compared to a number of other advanced countries seems primarily attributable to the very high level of U.S. wage inequality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (48) ◽  
pp. 30303-30308
Author(s):  
Adina D. Sterling ◽  
Marissa E. Thompson ◽  
Shiya Wang ◽  
Abisola Kusimo ◽  
Shannon Gilmartin ◽  
...  

Women make less than men in some science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. While explanations for this gender pay gap vary, they have tended to focus on differences that arise for women and men after they have worked for a period of time. In this study we argue that the gender pay gap begins when women and men with earned degrees enter the workforce. Further, we contend the gender pay gap may arise due to cultural beliefs about the appropriateness of women and men for STEM professions that shape individuals’ self-beliefs in the form of self-efficacy. Using a three-wave NSF-funded longitudinal survey of 559 engineering and computer science students that graduated from over two dozen institutions in the United States between 2015 and 2017, we find women earn less than men, net of human capital factors like engineering degree and grade point average, and that the influence of gender on starting salaries is associated with self-efficacy. We find no support for a competing hypothesis that the importance placed on pay explains the pay gap; there is no gender difference in reported importance placed on pay. We also find no support for the idea that women earn less because they place more importance on workplace culture; women do value workplace culture more, but those who hold such values earn more rather than less. Overall, the results suggest that addressing cultural beliefs as manifested in self-beliefs—that is, the confidence gap—commands attention to reduce the gender pay gap.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo (Adam) Chen ◽  
Yihong Zhang ◽  
Huabin Luo ◽  
Donglan Zhang ◽  
Janani Rajbhandari-Thapa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. The gender pay gap in the United States (US) has narrowed over the last several decades, with the female/male earnings ratio in the US increased from about 60% before the 1980s to about 79% by 2014. However, the gender pay gap among the healthcare workforce persists. The objective of this study is to estimate the gender pay gap in the US federal health workforce during 2010-2018. Methods. We used an administrative dataset including annual pay rates and job characteristics of employees of the US Department of Health and Human Services. Employees’ gender was classified based on first names. Regression analyses were used to estimate the gender pay gap using the predicted gender. Results. Women employees of the DHHS earn about 13% less than men in 2010, and 9.2% less in 2018. Occupation, pay plan, and location explain more than half of the gender pay gap. Controlling job grade further reduces the gap. The unexplained portion of the gender pay gap in 2018 may fall between 1.0% and 3.5%. Women have a small advantage in terms of pay increase over the study period.Conclusions. While the gender pay gap has narrowed within the last two decades, the pay gap between men and women in the federal health workforce persists and warrants continuing attention and research. Continued efforts should be implemented to reduce the gender pay gap among the health workforce.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-387
Author(s):  
Dustin R Bunch ◽  
Joe M El-Khoury ◽  
Jennifer Colby ◽  
Jessica Colon-Franco ◽  
Sarah A Hackenmueller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Doctoral level board-certified clinical chemists play an invaluable role in many facets of laboratory medicine and healthcare. However, information concerning their total compensation is sparse. Content A confidential self-reported compensation survey was conducted by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry’s Society for Young Clinical Laboratorians (AACC SYCL) Core Committee from April 1 to April 17, 2018. Respondents provided information on geographic location, employment sector, gender, and years of experience to account for the influence of these variables on compensation. There were 199 respondents in total from the United States and Canada, however, only respondents employed in the United States with an earned doctoral degree and certification by the American Board of Clinical Chemistry (n = 133), were included in the full analysis. In comparison to compensation reported in AACC SYCL salary surveys conducted in 2010 and 2013, early career median salaries are trending upwards after correction for inflation. Summary This survey is the first to collect the gender of respondents, and identify a pay gap for some geographic groups. However, this gap could be due in part to a difference in the years of experience, since males were highly represented in the group with >20 years of experience (25 out of 35, 71%). Future studies on compensation trends within clinical chemistry that do not rely on self-report are needed to ensure accuracy and completeness of the dataset.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanna Lawter ◽  
Tuvana Rua ◽  
Jeanine Andreassi

Self-employment is often viewed as a more desirable work arrangement than working as an employee for a firm. Women are pushed into self-employment due to organizational factors, such as a shrinking workforce or limited job opportunities, while being attracted to self-employment by the many psychological and social benefits (e.g., independence, flexibility, work-life balance, job satisfaction). Despite more women moving into self-employment, this type of employment still has different financial consequences for men and women. This article investigates whether a pay gap exists for self-employed women after controlling for industry, occupation, and hours worked and seeks to quantify the gender wage gap for the self-employed. A sample of 467 self-employed independent contractors in the United States was examined from the 2008 National Study of the Changing Workforce. The results indicate a large financial disparity between self-employed women and men. On average men earned $54,959 as compared to women who earned on average $28,554. Regardless of the parity in education, work experience, number of hours worked, or occupations, women earn less than men in self-employment. Findings suggest the existence of the glass cage‐a phenomenon whereby self-employed women earn significantly less than self-employed men with limited abilities to narrow the economic inequality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document