Trust and negotiation tactics: perceptions about business‐to‐business negotiations in Mexico

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 397-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Elahee ◽  
Charles M. Brooks
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldís Guðný Sigurðardóttir ◽  
Ali Hotait ◽  
Tilman Eichstädt

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinash Malshe ◽  
Jamal A. Al-Khatib ◽  
John J. Sailors

2008 ◽  
pp. 2900-2914
Author(s):  
Hokey Min ◽  
Ahmed Emam

A successful path to purchasing negotiation often hinges on the buyer’s ability to gain relative bargaining strength. The buyer’s bargaining strength, in turn, depends upon the extent of the buyer’s preparation and preplanning for the negotiation. We postulate that the buyer’s level of expertise and/or simulated negotiation experiences through the experiential learning process help him/her better prepare for the negotiation and, thereby, increase his/her bargaining strength. Under such a premise, this study empirically investigates the impact of expertise and experiential learning on the bargaining position of purchasing professionals and their subsequent negotiation outcomes. The main objective of this chapter is to use both statistical data analysis and data mining techniques and demonstrate their usefulness in the optimal performance of business-to-business negotiations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldis Gudny Sigurdardottir ◽  
Anna Ujwary-Gil ◽  
Marina Candi

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the negotiation tactics used in business-to-business (B2B) negotiations in creative sectors and to shed light on some of the characteristics of creative sectors that might drive these behaviors. Design/methodology/approach This is a multiple-case study involving interviews with 18 creative sector negotiators engaged in B2B negotiations. Findings The findings suggest that negotiators in B2B firms in creative sectors use a variety of negotiation tactics to reach agreement, but that there are some differences compared with other sectors. One group of tactics, not represented in existing taxonomies, is identified and termed closure-seeking tactics, referring to tactics intended to speed up the negotiation process and reach agreement as quickly as possible. The reasons for creative sector negotiators’ choice of closure-seeking tactics might stem from their desire to expedite the start of new projects to enable them to fulfill their creative drive. Research limitations/implications In addition to the identification of group of tactics observed in creative sectors, but not anticipated by existing research, the findings indicate that negotiators in creative sectors seem to lack interest in, and expertise for, negotiating and might be driven more by the desire to get on with the creative process than by concerns over monetary gains when negotiating. This could reflect unique characteristics of creative sectors and the people who work in these sectors. Practical implications This work offers new insights and understanding about tactics used in B2B negotiations in creative sectors. These findings have important implications for both practitioners in creative sectors, who might be too eager to reach closure quickly, and practitioners negotiating with firms in creative sectors, who need to understand the unique characteristics of these firms. Originality/value The originality of this work lies in its consideration of tactics used in B2B negotiations in the under-studied context of creative sectors and investigation of the reasons that drive the choice of tactics.


2011 ◽  
pp. 109-124
Author(s):  
Hokey Min ◽  
Ahmed Emam

A successful path to purchasing negotiation often hinges on the buyer’s ability to gain relative bargaining strength. The buyer’s bargaining strength, in turn, depends upon the extent of the buyer’s preparation and preplanning for the negotiation. We postulate that the buyer’s level of expertise and/or simulated negotiation experiences through the experiential learning process help him/her better prepare for the negotiation and, thereby, increase his/her bargaining strength. Under such a premise, this study empirically investigates the impact of expertise and experiential learning on the bargaining position of purchasing professionals and their subsequent negotiation outcomes. The main objective of this chapter is to use both statistical data analysis and data mining techniques and demonstrate their usefulness in the optimal performance of business-to-business negotiations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Gadke ◽  
Renée M. Tobin ◽  
W. Joel Schneider

Abstract. This study examined the association between Agreeableness and children’s selection of conflict resolution tactics and their overt behaviors at school. A total of 157 second graders responded to a series of conflict resolution vignettes and were observed three times during physical education classes at school. We hypothesized that Agreeableness would be inversely related to the endorsement of power assertion tactics and to displays of problem behaviors, and positively related to the endorsement of negotiation tactics and to displays of adaptive behaviors. Consistent with hypotheses, Agreeableness was inversely related to power assertion tactics and to displays of off-task, disruptive, and verbally aggressive behaviors. There was no evidence that Agreeableness was related to more socially sophisticated responses to conflict, such as negotiation, with our sample of second grade students; however, it was related to displays of adaptive behaviors, specifically on-task behaviors. Limitations, including potential reactivity effects and the restriction of observational data collection to one school-based setting, are discussed. Future researchers are encouraged to collect data from multiple sources in more than one setting over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document