scholarly journals Basel IV implementation: a review of the case of the European Union

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-24
Author(s):  
Mete Feridun ◽  
Alper Özün
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Global Banking ◽  
Risk Framework

PurposeIntroducing radical changes to the methodologies for the determination of capital requirements, the final stage of the Basel III standards, which is referred to as “Basel IV” by the industry, will be a significant challenge for the global banking sector. This article reviews the main components of the new framework, analyses its ongoing implementation in the European Union and discusses its potential impact on banks, putting forward policy recommendations.Design/methodology/approachThis article uses primary sources such as the publications by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision and the European Commission. It also reviews the secondary sources, including both academic articles and analyses by various stakeholders. However, this article does not undertake any empirical analysis.FindingsThis article discusses that Basel IV will introduce strategic, operational and regulatory challenges for banks in scope. It also identifies a number of areas which are subject to further debate in the European Union such as the enhanced due diligence requirements under the new credit risk framework; governance, reporting and control rules under the operational risk framework; exemptions for certain derivative transactions under the credit valuation adjustment framework and the level of application of the capital floors within banking groups. This article concludes that the global implementation of the reforms by all jurisdictions and transposition into national banking laws concurrently with the European Union in line with the Basel Committee's implementation timeline is important from a financial stability standpoint.Originality/valueThe article presents an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the practical implications of Basel IV standards. It analyses the implementation of the standards in the case of the European Union, reviews the potential policy implications and presents recommendations for risk management practitioners.

EU Bank Regulation after the Great Financial Crisis

2021 ◽  
pp. 163-182
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Smoleńska
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Financial Repression ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Crisis Prevention ◽  
New Framework

The chapter outlines the main features of the post-crisis regulatory regime for banks in the European Union. It traces the evolution of the approach taken by EU legislators which transformed the deregulation which prevailed prior to the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) into a regulatory regime which though far from financial repression known in the 1970s, is oriented towards functionally prioritizing financial stability and banks’ functions in the broader economy. This is achieved through co-responsibilization of the banking sector for public objectives, explicit regulation of structure and operations as well as far-reaching powers granted to new oversight authorities. The chapter explains the features of such a new bespoke regulatory regime for EU cross-border banking drawing on the new framework for bank crisis prevention and management, that is EU resolution law.

scholarly journals Bank risk and performance in an emerging market setting: the case of Bangladesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (46) ◽  
pp. 199-229
Author(s):  
Md. Tofael Hossain Majumder ◽  
Xiaojing Li
Keyword(s):  
Banking Sector ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Generalized Methods Of Moments ◽  
And Performance ◽  
One Year ◽  
Bank Capital Requirements

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impacts of bank capital requirements on the performance and risk of the emerging economy, i.e. Bangladeshi banking sector.Design/methodology/approachThe study applies an unbalanced panel data which comprises 30 banks yielding a total of 413 bank-year observations over the period 2000 to 2015.FindingsUsing generalized methods of moments, the empirical results of this research reveal that bank capital is positively and significantly impressive on bank performance, whereas negatively and significantly impact on risk. The study also finds the inverse relationship between risk and performance in both the performance and risk equations. The results also indicate that there is a persistence of performance and risk from one year to the next year.Originality/valueThis is the unique investigation on Bangladeshi bank industry that considers the simultaneous effect of bank capital requirements on risk and performance. Therefore, it is predicted that the empirical evidence of this research shows policy implications to the regulatory authority of Bangladeshi banking industry to determine relevant policies.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Financial Stability Policy of The National Bank of Serbia and The European Central Bank

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-161
Author(s):  
Mirjana Jemović ◽  
Borko Krstić
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
System Stability ◽  
The European Union ◽  
National Bank ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis ◽  
The Eu

AbstractThe Republic of Serbia has successfully completed the first part in the European Union integration process, being granted candidate status for membership in the European Union (EU). The stage of accession negotiations is in progress, and it includes the full harmonization with the EU acquis, whereby the analytical review of legislation, the so-called screening is being carried out in 35 chapters. The global financial crisis that affected our country in 2008 has required a timely reaction of the National Bank of Serbia (NBS) in order to preserve the financial system stability, especially the banking sector as its most important segment. As the financial services sector adjusts within chapter 9, the aim of this paper is to assess the level of compliance of national legislation with the EU legislation regarding banking sector. Along with the regulatory initiatives in the field of preserving financial stability in the EU countries, the NBS has paid great attention to the harmonization of its financial stability policy with the financial stability policy of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB).

Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV

2017 ◽  
pp. 242-259 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Requirement ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Crd Iv

Capital requirement directives – as well as their significance in matters relating to implementation – in the European Union in particular, as well as other parts of the globe, are considered under this chapter. The chapter also aims to accentuate the importance of such directives in matters relating to global and financial stability.

scholarly journals Deposit insurance systems in the European union: legal regulation and development prospects

2019 ◽  
pp. 156-162
Author(s):  
N. M. Alsov
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Insurance Policy ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Eu

The paper provides a historical, substantive and functional analysis of the legal regulation of deposit insurance systems (hereinafter referred to as DIS) in the European Union based on Directive 2014/49 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 16, 2014. “On Deposit Insurance Systems” (revised). The author considers the contribution of DIS to improving the financial stability of the EU banking sector. The paper shows a conducted assessment of the measures implemented and planned for implementation initiated by the European Commission and the European Central Bank for the implementation of a single European DIS as the third pillar of the Banking Union. The author concludes that the third Directive “On DIS” allows for a qualitative step forward towards the creation of the third pillar of the Banking Union. Despite some unresolved and controversial issues, it creates uniform rules of the game for national DIS in a deposit insurance policy. Further development and movement towards European DIS will make it possible to increase the effectiveness of the EU deposit insurance policy by reducing costs, overcoming administrative barriers in national DISs, increase the level of protection of depositors’ rights, and strengthen confidence in the banking sector and its stability.

scholarly journals BASEL III LIQUIDITY RISK AND KOSOVO BANKING SYSTEM

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1329-1335
Author(s):  
Hysen Lajqi
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Basel Iii ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Coverage Ratio ◽  
Basel Committee

The financial crisis 2007-2009 prompted the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) to intensify its efforts to strengthen the principles and standards for capital, as well as for the measurement and management of liquidity risk. Risk management is very important in the financial system, especially in banks. Among various risks Banks face is a liquidity risk it’s managing enables Banks to fulfil their obligationsBasel III consists of set of measures internally agreed. The implementation of Basel III will considerably increase the quality of banks' capital and significantly raise the required level of their capital. In addition, it will provide a "macro prudential overlay" to better deal with systemic risk.Like all Basel Committee standards, Basel III standards are minimum requirements which apply to internationally active banks. Members are committed to implementing and applying standards in their jurisdictions within the time frame established by the Committee.To ensure that banks have sufficient liquidity to survive potential liquidity shocks, as happened few years ago, the Basel Committee has issued two new globally revised minimum standards under the Basel III rules for the first time in the banking history: LCR – Liquidity Coverage Ratio and NSFR – Net Stable Funding Ratio that contain new requirements for bank capital, as well as standardized rules in the liquidity area.Banks need to fully comply with LCR and NSFR rules by January 1, 2019, according to the Capital Requirements Directive & Capital Requirements Regulation (CRD IV & CRR) rules.Basel III rules, in the European Union attain their applicable judicial form through REGULATION (EU) No 575/2013. The regulatory package is due to enter into force on January 1st, 2014, but some provisions will be implemented gradually between 2014 and 2019 and will fully come into force on January 1st, 2019. But these rules are likely to undergo some revisions due to a proposal by European Union (EU), so implementation horizon could go being beyond 2019.Performance of the Kosovo banking sector continued to be positive, thus contributing in maintaining the financial and economic stability of the country. Kosovo’s financial system continues to be characterized with sustainable increase in all its constituent sectors. The banking sector in Kosovo as most successful story is developed by many international institutions, characterized by a large presence of foreign capital, where 89. 2% of all assets are managed by foreign banks and development is based on international standards.Banking sector continued to have good liquidity position, with the main liquidity indicators standing above the minimal level as a required by the regulation.The implementation of Basel III rules in Kosovo related to liquidity depends on the local regulator and Basel III standards.

scholarly journals Assessment of the European banking regulatory framework in light of its significance for the Republic of Serbia

Bankarstvo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-101
Author(s):  
Kristijan Ristić ◽  
Aleksandar Živković
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Markets ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Debt Crisis ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
The Eu

The debt crisis in the European Union is known to be caused by the interdependence of banking and state financial stability, and, together with the non-existence of the fiscal union, it has taken on the existential dimensions of the EU project itself. Under the guise of financial fragmentation within the financial markets of the Eurozone, and from the aspect of the outbreak of the crisis, EU member states resorted to national interventions, thus closing national banking and financial markets, which ultimately resulted in deepened and stronger structural foundation of the crisis and its economic and financial consequences. In that context, the Banking Union is the regulatory and institutional response of the EU after the global financial crisis, about which the first proposals have found a place in institutional controversies since 2012. In addition to the key moment and motive for establishing such an institutional regulatory arrangement, the reason for its creation is more to create a union that is connected with the creation of a single market for financial services and free money circulation, and certainly with the tendency of fuller monetary integration. However, certain questions which arose remained relevant to date: whether these established and instrumentalized frameworks, mechanisms and procedures are in fact sufficient; whether the EU banking union, conceptually designed, really represents banking integration; and whether the "centralized-common" and "sovereign-national" relationships continued in the EU financial architecture, the use of the principle "one measure for all" in the implementation of the Basel III, non-inclusion of all types of banks, and the conflict of emission and supervisory roles of the Central Bank, be a structural conflict in achieving the desired financial stability, which is the ultimate goal. In the broader context of the functioning of the EU, financial stability can also be interpreted as a factor in the survival of the common currency and the European Union itself, regardless of the intertwined contradictions and construction conflict. In this paper, we analyze the functional scope of the regulatory framework for banking supervision in the EU during the five-year existence to date, and finally the effects and impact that this framework has had on the regulatory adjustment of the Serbian banking sector.

scholarly journals Competition, capital growth and risk-taking in emerging markets: Policy implications for banking sector stability during COVID-19 pandemic

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253803
Author(s):  
Miroslav Mateev ◽  
Muhammad Usman Tariq ◽  
Ahmad Sahyouni
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Banking Competition ◽  
Capital Ratios

This paper investigates how banking competition and capital level impact on the risk-taking behavior of banking institutions in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The topic is perceived to be of significant importance during the COVID-19 pandemic. We use data for more than 225 banks in 18 countries in the MENA region to test whether increased competition causes banks to hold higher capital ratios. Employing panel data techniques, and distinguishing between Islamic and conventional banks, we show that banks tend to hold higher capital ratios when operating in a more competitive environment. We also provide evidence that banks in the MENA region increase their capitalization levels in response to a higher risk and vice versa. Further, banking concentration (measured by the HH-index) and credit risk have a significant and positive impact on capital ratios of IBs, whereas competition does play a restrictive role in determining the level of their capital. The results hold when controlling for ownership structure, regulatory and institutional environment, bank-specific and macroeconomic characteristics. Our findings inform regulatory authorities concerned with improving the financial stability of banking sector in the MENA region to strengthen their policies in order to force banks to better align with capital requirements and risk during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Basel Capital Adequacy Ratio Standard in The Light of Islamic Law Perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 308-317
Author(s):  
Adi Rahmanur Ibnu
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crises ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
Global Banking ◽  
Banking Development

Bank is one of the most important pillars of economy activities. However, banking sector has a real potential crisis threat. Alongside with the steady current global banking development, financial crises that have happened clearly affected global economy. Based on that situation, BIS (Bank for International Settlement) – an international financial standard setting organization, realizes the urgency to establishan international financial standard and supervision to anticipate future potential financial crises. This research aims to identify how Capital Adequacy Ratio Standard in Basel Capital Accord (II) based on Islamic law perspective. The research is conducted by analyzing Basel Capital Accord published by BIS. The research uses library research method to find out the aimed result. The focus is on the 1st pillar of Basel II publication that is Minimum Capital Requirements (CAR) policy. CAR, as an Islamic economics policy, will be analyzed using falāḥ approach. Falāḥ is an Islamic economics objective that consists of happiness, success, accomplishment or good luck concept. The earthly dimension of falāḥ has some parameters that can be used to analyze Islamic economics policy. Additionally, the Islamic fiqh maxim takes part in analyzing the policy. The maṣlaḥat concept in fiqh maxim approach shares aim with falāḥ concept in the sense that all of sharia law aims for success, happiness, eternal survival etc. The maṣlaḥat can be accomplished by extinguishing mafsadat or seizing maṣlaḥat. The maṣlaḥat aspect is essential to determine the compatibility Basel Capital Accord with jurisprudential maxim i.e harm must be dispelled (al-dharāru yuzāl). The conclusion results are, 1) Basel Capital Accord focuses on macro-prudential aspect in order to anticipate potential financial crises, 2) beneficial/interest (maṣlaḥat) aspects of the hereafter, cooperation principle, justice, fairness and the prohibition of exploitation are not the core value of Basel Capital Accord frame work, thus 3) the achievement of maslahat as intended by sharia i.e. jurisprudential maxim are not convincing. Therefore, 4) Basel Capital Accord as a regulation basis is not in line with jurisprudential maxim i.e harm must be dispelled (al-dharāru yuzāl).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document