Hospital Ownership and Financial Stability: A Matched Case Comparison of a Nonprofit Health System and a Private Equity–Owned Health System

2021 ◽  
pp. 173-220
Author(s):  
Aimee La France ◽  
Rosemary Batt ◽  
Eileen Appelbaum
2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
UF Wellner ◽  
S Küsters ◽  
C Busch ◽  
O Sick ◽  
P Bronsert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
FDIC Working Paper Series ◽  
Manju Puri ◽  
Emily Johnston Ross ◽  
Song Ma

2010 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Seung Kim ◽  
Ju Yeong Kim ◽  
Noh Hyun Park ◽  
Kidong Kim ◽  
Hyun Hoon Chung ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 399 (7) ◽  
pp. 849-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Friedrich Wellner ◽  
Simon Küsters ◽  
Olivia Sick ◽  
Caroline Busch ◽  
Dirk Bausch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-200
Author(s):  
Jae Hyun Gwon

In the context of the protection of individual investors of private investment funds in South Korea, this study examines the current regulation of private placements from legal and economic perspectives. It compares Rule 506 of Regulation D in the United States with the similar regulation of South Korea. The most distinguishing feature of South Korea’s regulation is that any individual who can evidence a certain investment amount, regardless of accreditation or sophistication, is eligible to participate in private equity funds, which has recently resulted in “incomplete sales” problems in Korea. To conform to the definition of private equity, it is best to abolish the threshold criteria of minimum investment amount. Otherwise, the “sales” of private equity via commercial banks and central institutions for financial stability must at least be banned so that individual investors do not confuse private placement with public offering. In return, public advertisement can be permitted for private equity funds with only accredited investors and sophisticated investors. Public fund investment in private equities are de facto private equities; they are inappropriate for individuals, who may be confused with private funds and public funds. As such, they need to be limited.


Hand Therapy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Packer ◽  
Mark Williams ◽  
Dinesh Samuel ◽  
Jo Adams

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare hand impairment and function in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and matched healthy participants. Methods A matched case comparison research design comparing hand impairment and functional ability between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy participants (males or females, aged ≥ 50 years). Functional ability was assessed using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire, power and pinch grip strength and the nine-hole peg test. Results A total of 100 participants (50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 50 matched healthy participants) were recruited. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis reported significantly lower overall hand function, activities of daily living, work, aesthetics, satisfaction ( p < 0.001) and significantly higher pain scores when compared with healthy controls. The patients with rheumatoid arthritis had significantly lower maximum power and pinch grip strength in both left and right hands ( p < 0.001) when compared with healthy controls. The rheumatoid arthritis group took significantly longer to complete the nine-hole peg test using both right and left hands compared with healthy controls ( p < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, in rheumatoid arthritis patients, a significant moderate, positive correlation between power grip strength and activities of daily living (r = 0.584, n = 50, p < 0.01) and a weak-to-moderate, significant negative correlation between power grip strength and pain (r = −0.314, n = 50, p < 0.05) were reported. Conclusion Despite the recent substantial improvement of drug therapy and disease control, the functional impact of rheumatoid arthritis on hand pain and function remains significant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document