Does a CIO Matter? Investigating the Impact of IT Security Breaches on Firm Performance Using Tobin's q

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humayun Zafar ◽  
Myung Ko ◽  
Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
It Security ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Security Breaches ◽  
The Impact

Impact of CEO Overconfidence on Firm Performance: An Evidence from S&P BSE 200

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-243
Author(s):  
Hardeep Singh Mundi ◽  
Parmjit Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Full Sample ◽  
Forecasting Error ◽  
Research Article ◽  
The Impact

The current research article considers the impact of CEO overconfidence on firm performance for S&P BSE 200 firms. The CEO overconfidence is measured using revealed beliefs (holder 67, long holder and net buyer), press coverage and forecasting error proxies of CEO overconfidence. CEO Overconfidence measures are constructed as per the methodology of Malmendier and Tate (2005b, 2008). Firm performance is measured using Tobin’s Q and return on assets. The data are collected from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) prowess, S&P Capital IQ and the annual reports of the sample firms over a period of 15 years starting from 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2015. Regression results for each of the proxy of CEO overconfidence with the proxies of firm performance indicate that large Indian firms with overconfident CEOs enjoy a higher return on assets and Tobin’s Q as compared to the full sample firms. Overconfident CEOs consider themselves better-than-average, are involved with over-investment and show superior performance for the firm. The overconfident CEOs increase firm performance by following optimal levels of investments in the firm.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Extent of Internationalization and Firm Performance (Taiwan 1992–2017)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Shih-Yung Wei ◽  
Li-Wei Lin
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Moderating Variables ◽  
Average Operating ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study was to discuss the impact of the extent of internationalization on firm performance measured for firms with a high Tobin’s Q (firms with good operating performance), a median Tobin’s Q (firms with average operating performance), and a low Tobin’s Q (firms with poor operating performance). In addition to discussion on the impact of internationalization on firm performance, this study also discussed the impact of corporate proprietary assets (using assets, R&D, marketing, and management-related variables as moderating variables) and control variables (scale of company, debt-asset ratio, firm age, board structure, and proportion of pledged shares by directors) on firm performance. The research results showed that there is an S-shaped relationship between extent of internationalization and firm performance. However, further discussion found that there is an S-shaped relationship between extent of internationalization and performance for firms with a high Tobin’s Q but a slight decline in the middle of the S-shaped curve, as well as a general linear negative correlation between extent of internationalization and performance for firms with a median Tobin’s Q and an inverted U-shaped correlation between extent of internationalization and performance for firms with a low Tobin’s Q.

Understanding the effects of economic policy uncertainty on US tourism firms’ performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 135481662098314
Author(s):  
Conrado Diego García-Gómez ◽  
Ender Demir ◽  
Ming-Hsiang Chen ◽  
José María Díez-Esteban
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
High Growth ◽  
Policy Uncertainty ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Economic Policy Uncertainty ◽  
The Impact

This study analyzes the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on the performance of US tourism firms using a sample of 296 publicly traded tourism companies from 2000 to 2018 with a sample of 3068 firm-year observations. Estimation results of panel regressio tests based on the system-generalized method of moments indicate that EPU has a negative impact on return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q. Our results are consistent for different variable specifications. We also find that firm size and leverage play a moderating role in the relationship between EPU and firm performance. Panel quantile regression results show that the impact of EPU on US tourism firm performance is asymmetric. Specifically, low-performing (25% quantile of ROA and ROE) firms are less affected by EPU, and for the case of Tobin’s Q, EPU does not affect firms with a high growth opportunity (100% quantile of Tobin’s Q).

scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 215
Author(s):  
Kojima Koji ◽  
Bishnu Kumar Adhikary ◽  
Le Tram
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to explore the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of publicly listed family and non-family firms in the Japanese manufacturing industry. The study obtains data from Bloomberg over the period 2014–2018 and covers 1412 firms comprising of 861 non-family and 551 family firms. Our results show that family firms outperform non-family counterparts in terms of return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q when a univariate analysis is invoked. On multivariate analysis, family firms show superior performance to non-family firms with Tobin’s Q. However, family ownership negates firm performance when ROA is taken into account. Regarding the impact of governance elements on Tobin’s Q, institutional shareholding appears to be a significant and positive factor for promoting the performance of both family and non-family firms. Furthermore, board size encourages the performance of non-family firms, while such influence is not observed for family firms. In terms of ROA, foreign ownership inspires the performance of both family and non-family firms. Moreover, government ownership stimulates the performance of family firms, while board independence significantly negates the same. Besides, we find that the performance of family firms run by the founder’s descendants is superior to that of family firms run by the founder. These findings have critical policy implications for family firms in Japan.

Corporate governance and firm performance: empirical evidence from Jordan

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yuosef Alodat ◽  
Zalailah Salleh ◽  
Hafiza Aishah Hashim ◽  
Farizah Sulong
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study aims to assess the effect of director board and audit committee attributes and ownership structure on firm performance. In general, resource dependency and agency theories have underlined the superior performance of firms equipped with stronger Corporate Governance (CG) versus those of deficient governance. Concurrently, the study delineated the provisions of ownership structure provision, specifically foreign ownership and institutional ownerships, thus describing the component denoting the structural significance in explicating firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The current study implemented an empirical approach involving the construction of extensive CG measures thus, subjected to 81 non-financial firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange spanning the period of 2014–2018. Findings The current study identified the positive and significant relationship between the board of directors and audit committee characteristics with the firm performance measures tested, namely, return on equity (ROE) and Tobin’s Q. In terms of ownership structure, both foreign and institutional ownerships yielded a significant and positive relationship with ROE. Meanwhile, Tobin’s Q led to an insignificant and negative relationship between both ownership types and firm performance measures. Practical implications The analytical outcomes substantiate the possibility of enhanced performance shown by growing global firms because of the implementation of CG mechanisms, specifically because of the practices resulting in minimised agency costs. Originality/value The current study offers novel evidence detailing the impact of CG effectiveness towards performance and its implementation in emerging markets following the minimal amount of scholarly efforts on the topic. It is a timely contribution towards the current understanding of the relationship linking governance and performance for the purpose of ensuring the adoption and imposition of a strong corporate governance code by the government.

Corporate governance and corporate performance: financial crisis (2008)

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1494-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oskar Kowalewski
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of corporate governance, as measured by the Corporate Governance Index, on firm performance and dividend payouts during the financial crisis of 2008. Design/methodology/approach The empirical approach followed in the study involved constructing a comprehensive measure of corporate governance for 298 non-financial companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in the years 2006-2010. Findings The results show that prior to the crisis, there was a positive association between corporate governance and performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Moreover, the study presents evidence that higher corporate governance leads to an increase in cash dividends. Amid the financial crisis, corporate governance was positively associated with a higher return on assets, yet this was not observed when measured by Tobin’s q. Additionally, during this period, better-governed companies paid dividends less generously than firms with lower corporate governance standards did. Originality/value The study provides new evidence on the impact of corporate governance on firm performance and valuation in an emerging market during the financial crisis. Moreover, the study shows that governance mechanisms operate differently in crisis and non-crisis periods.

scholarly journals The Influence of Founder Status on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Canadian IPO Firms

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saif Ullah ◽  
Dan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Firm Survival ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Survival Status ◽  
Income Stream

<p>This study compares performance for founder-managed firms and professional-managed firms by analyzing 138 Canadian IPO firms that went public from 2004 to 2013. In this paper, we measure firm performance in two ways: Tobin’s Q and ROA are used to measure a firm’s financial performance, while firm survival status is used as a supplementary performance measure. We find that founder-managed firms underperform and underlive their counterparts when firm performance is measured by Tobin’s Q and survival status. Founder status is proved to be unrelated to ROA. The negative influence of founder status can be explained by the relevant transaction hypothesis, which states that founder-managers may act for the controlling family and are more concerned with the associated private income stream than with maximizing the value of the firm.</p>

scholarly journals Effects of Infrastructure Development, Inflation and Economic Growth to Performance Company (ROA, Tobin's Q, PBV): Study on Registered Infrastructure Support Companies in IDX Period 2014-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eko Sarjono ◽  
◽  
Kartika Hendra Titisari ◽  
Supawi Pawenang
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
The Impact

The financial performance can be used as a benchmark of the ability of an organization or company in achieving its goals. Performance measurement is one of the most important factors for an organization or company, performance measurement is a process of measuring the extent to which a company does work to achieve its goals. The research investigated the impact of infrastructure, economic growth and inflation on financial performance of infrastructure support companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange Period 2014-2019 which is proxied by ROA (Return on Assets), Tobin’s Q and PBV (Price to Book Value). The population of this research was the infrastructure support companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2014-2019. Research sampling was conducted using The Purposive Sampling Method. The data analysis was camed out using classical assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis, t-test, F-test and determinan (R2) test with SPSS 21. The research finding showed that the model has an effect on the financial performance as proxied by ROA. So the results of the hypothesis test show that: (1) Infrastructure development has a negative and significant effect on ROA. (2) The inflation rate has a positive and significant effect on ROA. (3) Economic growth has no significant effect on ROA. Meanwhile, the model has no effect on financial performance which is proxied in Tobin's Q and PBV.

Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate performance of firms in Nigeria and Ghana

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Coleman ◽  
Mengyun Wu
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Structure Index ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeThis study investigates the impact of corporate governance (CG) mechanisms with inclusion of compliance and diligence index on corporate performance (CP) of firms in Nigeria and Ghana. It further examines the moderating effect of financial distress on the relationship between CG and CP.Design/methodology/approachThe study used panel data of 102 nonfinancial listed firms of Nigeria and Ghana stock exchange for the period 2012–2016 with total observation of 510. The study first used OLS in estimating the influence of CG mechanisms on CP. Due to multicollinearity in the independent variables, ridge regression was employed.FindingsIt was revealed that ownership structure index and board compliance and diligence index, board size, board disclosure, ownership structure, shareholders' right and board compliance and diligence index had positive influence on ROA and ROE. Growth of Tobin's Q depends on board procedure and board compliance and diligence index. Also, financial distress (ZFS) negatively moderates the relationship between board structure index, board disclosure index, board procedure index, shareholders' right and performance (ROA and ROE) but negatively moderates between ownership structure index and Tobin's Q.Practical implicationsThis study provides interesting findings to policymakers in full implementation of CG codes as stated by OCED (2015) by West African firms with greater emphasis on compliance and diligence index since it positively influences all CP measures.Originality/valueThe study provides evidence of the importance of the introduction of the new index: compliance and diligence, which looks at disclosure of CSR activities. This has been overlooked by most researchers especially in Africa in assessing quality CG mechanisms.

scholarly journals The relationship of capital structure decisions with firm performance: A study of the engineering sector of Pakistan

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Ghafoor Khan
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Engineering Industry ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Financial Leverage ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find the relationship of capital structure decision with the performance of the firms in the developing market economies like Pakistan.Methodology: Pooled Ordinary Least Square regression was applied to 36 engineering sector firms in Pakistani market listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) during the period 2003-2009.Findings: The results show that financial leverage measured by short term debt to total assets (STDTA) and total debt to total assets (TDTA) has a significantly negative relationship with the firm performance measured by Return on Assets (ROA), Gross Profit Margin (GM) and Tobin’s Q. The relationship between financial leverage and firm performance measured by the return on equity (ROE) is negative but insignificant. Asset size has an insignificant relationship with the firm performance measured by ROA and GM but negative and significant relationship exists with Tobin’s Q. Firms in the engineering sector of Pakistan are largely dependent on short term debt but debts are attached with strong covenants which affect the performance of the firm.Originality/Value: This is first paper to study an individual sector like engineering industry in Pakistan on the mentioned topic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document