scholarly journals The Relationship between Extent of Internationalization and Firm Performance (Taiwan 1992–2017)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Shih-Yung Wei ◽  
Li-Wei Lin
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Moderating Variables ◽  
Average Operating ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study was to discuss the impact of the extent of internationalization on firm performance measured for firms with a high Tobin’s Q (firms with good operating performance), a median Tobin’s Q (firms with average operating performance), and a low Tobin’s Q (firms with poor operating performance). In addition to discussion on the impact of internationalization on firm performance, this study also discussed the impact of corporate proprietary assets (using assets, R&D, marketing, and management-related variables as moderating variables) and control variables (scale of company, debt-asset ratio, firm age, board structure, and proportion of pledged shares by directors) on firm performance. The research results showed that there is an S-shaped relationship between extent of internationalization and firm performance. However, further discussion found that there is an S-shaped relationship between extent of internationalization and performance for firms with a high Tobin’s Q but a slight decline in the middle of the S-shaped curve, as well as a general linear negative correlation between extent of internationalization and performance for firms with a median Tobin’s Q and an inverted U-shaped correlation between extent of internationalization and performance for firms with a low Tobin’s Q.

Impact of CEO Overconfidence on Firm Performance: An Evidence from S&P BSE 200

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-243
Author(s):  
Hardeep Singh Mundi ◽  
Parmjit Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Full Sample ◽  
Forecasting Error ◽  
Research Article ◽  
The Impact

The current research article considers the impact of CEO overconfidence on firm performance for S&P BSE 200 firms. The CEO overconfidence is measured using revealed beliefs (holder 67, long holder and net buyer), press coverage and forecasting error proxies of CEO overconfidence. CEO Overconfidence measures are constructed as per the methodology of Malmendier and Tate (2005b, 2008). Firm performance is measured using Tobin’s Q and return on assets. The data are collected from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) prowess, S&P Capital IQ and the annual reports of the sample firms over a period of 15 years starting from 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2015. Regression results for each of the proxy of CEO overconfidence with the proxies of firm performance indicate that large Indian firms with overconfident CEOs enjoy a higher return on assets and Tobin’s Q as compared to the full sample firms. Overconfident CEOs consider themselves better-than-average, are involved with over-investment and show superior performance for the firm. The overconfident CEOs increase firm performance by following optimal levels of investments in the firm.

CEO Duality and Firm Performance

2020 ◽  
pp. 227-246
Author(s):  
Sandra Alves
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Ceo Duality ◽  
Ordinary Least Square ◽  
Leadership Structure ◽  
And Control

Two divergent theories emerge from the literature on CEO duality. The agency theory advocates that a dual CEO negatively affects corporate performance, because it compromises the monitoring and control of the CEO, whilst the stewardship theory suggests the contrary effect due to the unity of command it presents. For a sample of 26 non-financial listed Portuguese firms from 2002 to 2016, this study draws on agency and stewardship theories to evaluate the relationship between CEO duality and firm performance, proxied by Tobin's Q. Using ordinary least square (OLS) and two stage least squares (2SLS) techniques to control potential problems simultaneity between CEO duality and firm performance, the author finds a negative relationship between CEO duality and Tobin's Q. This suggests that investors perceive no value in having a concentration of power with a dual leadership structure. Therefore, this study recommends that the positions of chairman and CEO should be separated for listed Portuguese firms.

Effect of ownership structure and board structure on firm value: evidence from India

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Mishra ◽  
Sheeba Kapil
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Reverse Causality ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose This paper aims to explore the relationship of promoter ownership and board structure with firm performance for Indian companies. Design/methodology/approach Corporate governance structures of 391 Indian companies out of CRISIL NSE Index (CNX) 500 companies listed on national stock exchange (NSE) have been studied for their impact on performance of companies. Panel data regression methodology has been used on data for five financial years from 2010 to 2014 for the selected companies. Performance measures considered are market-based measure (Tobin’s Q) and accounting-based measure (return on assets [ROA]). Findings The empirical findings indicate that market-based measure (Tobin’s Q) is more impacted by corporate governance than accounting-based measure. There is significant positive association between promoter ownership and firm performance. It is also indicated that the relationship between promoter ownership and firm performance is different at different levels of promoter ownership. Board size is found to be positively related to ROA; however, board independence is not found to be related to any of the performance measures. Research limitations/implications Limitations of the study are in terms of data methodology and possible omission of some variables. It is felt that endogeneity and reverse causality might be better addressed using simultaneous equation methodology. Originality/value The paper adds to the emerging body of literature on corporate governance performance relationship in Indian context using a reasonably wider and newer data set.

scholarly journals GENDER DIVERSITY ON BOARD AND ITS RELEVANCE TO FIRM PERFORMANCE: A STUDY ON PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Size Firm ◽  
The Relationship

The study tries to examine the relationship between gender diversity on the Board and firms' profitability in Bangladesh's Pharmaceutical industry. The study employs a panel data approach with all the Pharmaceutical companies listed under Dhaka Stock Exchanges. The sample period covers eight years from 2012-2019. To conduct the study, Return on Equity and Tobin's Q was taken as a proxy of accounting measure of profitability and market measure of profitability, respectively. The proportion of women on board structure was taken as a proxy for gender diversity. Some other variables: board size, firm age, leverage, and firm size, were incorporated to control the effect of these variables on profitability. The study reveals that gender diversity shows a positive but insignificant relationship with the firm's performance in terms of ROE. The R square of this model was 11.67%. In terms of Tobin's Q, gender diversity exhibited a significant positive relationship with firm performance. The R square of this model was 17%. This implies that the market ascribes a great value to the inclusion of women in board structure since it increases the board structure's independence and profitability.

Understanding the effects of economic policy uncertainty on US tourism firms’ performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 135481662098314
Author(s):  
Conrado Diego García-Gómez ◽  
Ender Demir ◽  
Ming-Hsiang Chen ◽  
José María Díez-Esteban
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
High Growth ◽  
Policy Uncertainty ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Economic Policy Uncertainty ◽  
The Impact

This study analyzes the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on the performance of US tourism firms using a sample of 296 publicly traded tourism companies from 2000 to 2018 with a sample of 3068 firm-year observations. Estimation results of panel regressio tests based on the system-generalized method of moments indicate that EPU has a negative impact on return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q. Our results are consistent for different variable specifications. We also find that firm size and leverage play a moderating role in the relationship between EPU and firm performance. Panel quantile regression results show that the impact of EPU on US tourism firm performance is asymmetric. Specifically, low-performing (25% quantile of ROA and ROE) firms are less affected by EPU, and for the case of Tobin’s Q, EPU does not affect firms with a high growth opportunity (100% quantile of Tobin’s Q).

scholarly journals How does board structure impact on firm performance in the UK?

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Alqatan ◽  
Imad Chbib ◽  
Khaled Hussainey
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Uk

The aim of this paper is to examine whether or not the structure of the board of directors and, in particular, board size, independence and remuneration have an impact on firm performance. The sample examined is UK FTSE 100 non-financial companies using data from the period 2012 to 2015. A regression analysis has been used concluding a significant positive correlation between board remuneration and firm performance, namely Return on Assets and Tobin’s Q. The study also concluded a positive correlation between board size and ROA, and between board independence and Tobin’s Q. Additionally, a significant negative correlation between the control variables (i.e. company size and industry) and Return on Assets.

scholarly journals The impact of board structure on the financial performance of listed South African companies

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Meyer ◽  
JHvH de Wet
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
South African ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Corporate Board ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Enterprise Value ◽  
Earnings Per Share ◽  
Positive Effect

This study focuses on the role of the corporate board of directors and the relationship between the dynamics of board structure and the financial performance of listed South African companies. The research results found that the proportion of independent non-executive directors had a significant positive effect on firm performance as measured by earnings per share and enterprise value, but had no significant effect on Tobin’s Q ratio. Board ownership had a significant negative correlation with firm performance as measured by earnings per share, enterprise value and Tobin’s Q ratio. The number of directors serving on the corporate board had a significant positive effect on firm performance as measured by earnings per share, enterprise value and Tobin’s Q ratio. The study suggests that greater independent non-executive director representation, lower board share-ownership and larger board sizes should be encouraged to enhance firm performance.

scholarly journals Board structure, D&O insurance and the variability of firm performance

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuwei Wang ◽  
Chia-wei Chen
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Liability Insurance ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Percent Increase

We examine the relation between the disclosure of Directors’ & Officers’ (D&O) Liability insurance and the variability of firm performance. Our results show D&O insurance is positively correlated with the variability of firm performance. Specifically, the evidence shows a one percent increment in D&O insurance coverage will lead to a 0.31, 30, and 0.0008 percent increase in the variability of corporate performance measured in monthly stock returns, annual accounting returns on assets (ROA), and Tobin’s Q respectively. Therefore, instead of reducing risk, the findings of this paper suggest D&O insurance may actually increase firm risk, which is very different from the essential purpose of implementing this insurance

scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 215
Author(s):  
Kojima Koji ◽  
Bishnu Kumar Adhikary ◽  
Le Tram
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to explore the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of publicly listed family and non-family firms in the Japanese manufacturing industry. The study obtains data from Bloomberg over the period 2014–2018 and covers 1412 firms comprising of 861 non-family and 551 family firms. Our results show that family firms outperform non-family counterparts in terms of return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q when a univariate analysis is invoked. On multivariate analysis, family firms show superior performance to non-family firms with Tobin’s Q. However, family ownership negates firm performance when ROA is taken into account. Regarding the impact of governance elements on Tobin’s Q, institutional shareholding appears to be a significant and positive factor for promoting the performance of both family and non-family firms. Furthermore, board size encourages the performance of non-family firms, while such influence is not observed for family firms. In terms of ROA, foreign ownership inspires the performance of both family and non-family firms. Moreover, government ownership stimulates the performance of family firms, while board independence significantly negates the same. Besides, we find that the performance of family firms run by the founder’s descendants is superior to that of family firms run by the founder. These findings have critical policy implications for family firms in Japan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document