Multi-Target Decision-Making of Saturation Attack for Anti-Ship Missile Weapon-Target Assignment

Author(s):  
Fei Yang ◽  
Chaoyang Dong ◽  
Qing Wang
Author(s):  
Chai Hua ◽  
Wang Lei

The effectiveness of exoatmospheric interceptor is analyzed in this paper based on the reachable set model. Firstly, the connotations of the reachable set model, including its precise definition, mathematic description and analysis algorithms are briefly introduced. Secondly, concerning the problem of interceptor system deployment, the defense zone is introduced as a metric of effectiveness. The factors that influence the configurations of defense zone are explored. Thirdly, concerning the problem of incoming target assignment, an index system composed of earliest intercept moment, interception time window and radar support distance is drawn to capture the effectiveness. The selection of optimal intercept plan is treated as a multi-alternatives sequencing problem and addressed by the multiple attribute decision making method. Simulation examples prove the efficiency of the raised approach. The reachable set-based approach proposed in this paper serves as a ready support to other studies related to interceptor capability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document