Facilitating creativity: Shaping team processes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agata Ewa Wróbel ◽  
Martin Kirk Johansen ◽  
Morten Schnack Jørgensen ◽  
Philip Cash
Keyword(s):  
Team Processes

Perceived Mutual Understanding (PMU)

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Burtscher ◽  
Jeannette Oostlander
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Understanding ◽  
Team Cognition ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Item Parameters ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
The Individual

Abstract. Team cognition plays an important role in predicting team processes and outcomes. Thus far, research has focused on structured cognition while paying little attention to perceptual cognition. The lack of research on perceptual team cognition can be attributed to the absence of an appropriate measure. To address this gap, we introduce the construct of perceived mutual understanding (PMU) as a type of perceptual team cognition and describe the development of a respective measure – the PMU-scale. Based on three samples from different team settings ( NTotal = 566), our findings show that the scale has good psychometric properties – both at the individual as well as at the team-level. Item parameters were improved during a multistage process. Exploratory as well as confirmatory factor analyses indicate that PMU is a one-dimensional construct. The scale demonstrates sufficient internal reliability. Correlational analyses provide initial proof of construct validity. Finally, common indicators for inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement suggest that treating PMU as a team-level construct is justified. The PMU-scale represents a convenient and versatile measure that will potentially foster empirical research on perceptual team cognition and thereby contribute to the advancement of team cognition research in general.

Capturing the Four-Phase Team Adaptation Process With Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-347
Author(s):  
Eleni Georganta ◽  
Felix C. Brodbeck
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scales ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Team Development ◽  
Adaptation Process ◽  
Adaptation Studies ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Team Adaptation ◽  
The Common ◽  
Acceptable Reliability ◽  
Adaptation Phase

Abstract. As a response to the lack of quantitative and reliable measures of the team adaptation process, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the four phases of the team adaptation process as described by Rosen and colleagues (2011) . Two trained raters and two subject matter expert groups contributed to the development of four behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) that span across the spectrum of team processes involved in each team adaptation phase. To validate the four BARS, two different trained raters assessed independently the team adaptation phases of 66 four-person teams. The validation study provided empirical support for the BARS’ psychometric adequacy. The BARS measures overcame the common middle anchor problem, showed sensitivity in differentiating between teams and between the four phases, showed evidence for acceptable reliability, construct, and criterion validity, and supported the theoretical team adaptation process assumptions. The study contributes to research and praxis by enabling the direct assessment of the overall team adaptation process, thereby facilitating our understanding of this complex phenomenon. This allows the identification of behavioral strengths and weaknesses for targeted team development and comprehensive team adaptation studies.

Team leader coaching intervention: An investigation of the impact on team processes and performance within a surgical context.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Travis Maynard ◽  
John E. Mathieu ◽  
Tammy L. Rapp ◽  
Lucy L. Gilson ◽  
Cathy Kleiner
Keyword(s):  
Team Leader ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Coaching Intervention ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

Relationship Between Interaction Anxiety and Team Performance Through Team Processes

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Naber ◽  
Jennifer N. McDonald ◽  
Winfred Arthur
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Interaction Anxiety

Considering the Influence of Task Complexity on Macrocognitive Team Processes

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Lyons ◽  
Davin Pavlas ◽  
Heather C. Lum ◽  
Stephen M. Fiore ◽  
Eduardo Salas
Keyword(s):  
Task Complexity ◽  
Team Processes

Linking individual-level technical, contextual, and adaptive performance to team processes

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith L. Cracraft ◽  
Gonzalo Ferro ◽  
David W. Dorsey ◽  
Johnathan Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Performance ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Individual Level

An application of the punctuated equilibrium model to team processes

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher K. Adair ◽  
Suzanne T. Bell ◽  
Brian J. Marentette ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
David Gerding
Keyword(s):  
Equilibrium Model ◽  
Punctuated Equilibrium ◽  
Team Processes

The effects of charismatic leadership on team processes

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Schilpzand ◽  
Marieke C. Schilpzand ◽  
Vilmos Misangyi ◽  
Amir Erez ◽  
Thomas Greckhamer
Keyword(s):  
Charismatic Leadership ◽  
Team Processes

The Effect of Diversity and the Mediating Role of Elaboration on Multidisciplinary Greenhouse Gas Assurance Team Effectiveness

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erboon Ekasingh ◽  
Roger Simnett ◽  
Wendy J. Green
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Team Effectiveness ◽  
Team Member ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Educational Diversity

ABSTRACT Greenhouse gas (GHG) assurance is increasingly used by companies as a means to increase stakeholder confidence in the quality of externally reported carbon emissions. The multidisciplinary nature of these engagements means that assurance is performed primarily by multidisciplinary teams. Prior research suggests the effectiveness of such teams could be affected by team composition and team processes. We employ a retrospective field study to examine the impact of educational diversity and team member elaboration on multidisciplinary GHG assurance team effectiveness. Results show that team processes such as sufficiency of elaboration on different team member perspectives significantly increases the perceived effectiveness of the teams. While educational diversity is not found to directly improve perceived team effectiveness, it is found to have a positive effect through increasing perceived sufficiency of elaboration. These findings have important implications for standard setters and audit firms undertaking GHG assurance engagements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document