scholarly journals Our Italian experience using lung ultrasound for identification, grading and serial follow‐up of severity of lung involvement for management of patients with COVID‐19

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Vetrugno ◽  
Tiziana Bove ◽  
Daniele Orso ◽  
Federico Barbariol ◽  
Flavio Bassi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ying-Hua Sun ◽  
Lin Yuan ◽  
Yang Du ◽  
Jian-Guo Zhou ◽  
Sam Bill Lin ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a bedside technique that can be used on diagnosis and follow-up of neonatal respiratory diseases. However, there are rare reports on the ultrasound features of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) which is one of the most common chronic lung diseases in preterm infants. OBJECTIVE: To describe the ultrasound features of different BPD levels, and to investigate the value of ultrasound in evaluating moderate-to-severe BPD. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, newborns of less than 37 weeks’ gestational age in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were included. The LUS characteristics including pleural line, alveolar-interstitial syndrome (AIS), retrodiaphragmatic hyperechogenicity and diaphragmatic morphology were observed and recorded. The reliability of LUS in evaluating moderate and severe BPD were compared and calculated. RESULTS: A total of 108 infants were enrolled in our study: 39, 24, 29, 16 infants had non, mild, moderate and severe BPD. The median(IQR) pleura thickness in the moderate-to-severe BPD group was 1.7(1.6–1.85) mm, which was thicker than that in the none-to-mild BPD infants (P <  0.001), meanwhile the proportions of rough pleural lines, diffuse AIS, retrodiaphragmatic hyperechogenicity, small cysts above the diaphragm and rough diaphragm in the moderate-to-severe BPD group were also higher than those in none-to-mild BPD group (86.7% vs 36.5, 57.8% vs 7.9%, 37.8% vs 0, 33.3% vs 0, P <  0.001). In evaluating moderate-to-severe BPD, rough pleura had 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.793–0.965) in sensitivity, 91.3% (95% CI: 0.797–0.966) in negative predictive value (NPV), and 66.7% (95% CI: 0.544–0.771) in specificity. Small cysts had 100% (95% CI: 0.941-1) in specificity, 100% (95% CI: 0.816-1) in PPV, and 37.8% in sensitivity (95% CI: 0.251–0.524). Rough diaphragm had 100% (95% CI: 0.943-1) in sensitivity, 100% (95% CI: 0.796-1) in PPV and 33.3% (95% CI: 0.211–0.478) in specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on its unique advantages such as convenient, no radiation and repeatable, LUS is a valuable imaging method in assessing the severity of BPD, especially in moderate and severe BPD.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayato Taniguchi ◽  
Aimi Ohya ◽  
Hidehiro Yamagata ◽  
Masayuki Iwashita ◽  
Takeru Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Some patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) who present with fibrosis on computed tomography (CT) require prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). Lung ultrasound (LUS), a rapid, bedside test, has been reported to have findings consistent with those of CT. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether serial LUS scores could predict PMV or successful extubation in severe COVID-19 patients.Methods: LUS was performed for 20 consecutive severe COVID-19 patients at three time points: admission (day 1), after 48 h (day 3), and seventh-day follow-up (day 7). We compared the LUS score with the results of chest X-rays and laboratory tests at three time points. Moreover, we assessed LUS score to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the results among examiners.Results: While there were no significant differences in mortality in each PMV and successful extubation groups, there were significant differences in LUS scores on day 3 and day 7; XP score on day 7; and P/F ratio on day 7 in the PMV group (p<0.05). There were significant differences in LUS scores on days 3 and 7, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on day 7, and P/F ratio on day 7 in the successful extubation group (p<0.05). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of LUS score on days 3 and 7, XP score on day 7, and P/F ratio were 0.88, 0.98, 0.77, and 0.80, respectively in the PMV group; and the AUCs of LUS score on days 3 and 7, CRP levels on day 7, and P/F ratio 0.79, 0.90, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively, in the successful extubation group. Variations in serial LUS scores exhibited significant differences between the groups. The serial LUS score on day 7 was higher than that on day 1 in the PMV group but lower in the successful extubation group (p<0.05). However, there was slight IRR agreement in the LUS score changes on days 1 to 7 (κ= 0.15 [95% CI: 0-0.31]). Conclusions: The serial LUS score of severe COVID-19 patients could predicted PMV and successful extubation. To overcome IRR disagreement, the automatic ultrasound judgement, such as deep learning, would be needed.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisham A Awad ◽  
Soha M Khafagy ◽  
Nivan T Ahmed ◽  
Basma M Shehata ◽  
Ayah M Shabana

Abstract Background Timing is crucial when deciding if a patient can be successfully extubated. Both premature discontinuation and unnecessary delay of mechanical ventilation weaning have been associated with poor outcome. There are no enough guidelines for the assessment of readiness of newborns for extubation. The degree of lung aeration loss in different clinical conditions can be quantified via lung ultrasound (LUS). Objectives To evaluate the lung ultrasound score as a follow up tool in ventilated neonates and its validity as predictor of extubation. Subjects and Methods Prospective study done on 39 mechanically ventilated neonates 27-42 weeks’ gestation. Lung ultrasound was done daily for each patient till the day of weaning and lung ultrasound (LUS) score was calculated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to trial of weaning; Success “S” group: in which weaning succeeded and Failure “F” group: in which weaning failed. Results The “F” group had significantly higher LUS score at time of intubation, pre- extubation and post-extubation compared with the “S” group (P- value= 0.002, 0.003 and 0.001 respectively). A cut off value of ≤ 10 for LUS score pre-extubation predict successful weaning with sensitivity 76% and specificity 64.3%. Conclusion LUS is an indicator for lung aeration and can be used as a tool to predict success of weaning of ventilated neonates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2204-2211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Omran ◽  
Samah Eesai ◽  
Mostafa Ibrahim ◽  
Sonya El-Sharkawy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document