Stroke risk reassessment and oral anticoagulant initiation in primary care patients with atrial fibrillation: A ten‐year follow‐up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woldesellassie M. Bezabhe ◽  
Luke R. Bereznicki ◽  
Jan Radford ◽  
Barbara C. Wimmer ◽  
Mohammed S. Salahudeen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Abstract W MP66: Rates of Ischemic Stroke after Intracranial Hemorrhage in a Population-Based Sample of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P Lerario ◽  
Gino Gialdini ◽  
Daniel Lapidus ◽  
Mesha Shaw ◽  
Babak Navi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Index Visit

Introduction: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who experience intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) often cannot tolerate anticoagulant therapy and presumably face a higher risk of thromboembolism. However, there are little population-based data on long-term rates of stroke after ICH in patients with AF. Methods: Using validated diagnosis codes and administrative claims data from all nonfederal acute care hospitals and emergency departments in California, Florida, and New York from 2005 to 2012, we identified patients at their first encounter with a recorded diagnosis of AF. We excluded patients with diagnoses of stroke or ICH prior to their index visit or a diagnosis of stroke at the index visit. A time-varying covariate was used to account for ICH (intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage) at the index visit or during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival statistics were used to calculate cumulative rates of stroke, and Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between incident ICH and stroke while adjusting for the CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score. Results: During a mean 3.2 years of follow-up among 2,376,207 patients with AF, 25,243 (1.06%) developed ICH and 93,183 (3.92%) developed stroke. The cumulative 1-year rate of stroke was 6.50% (95% CI, 6.06-6.96%) after ICH versus 2.22% (95% CI, 2.20-2.24) in those without ICH. ICH remained associated with higher stroke risk after adjusting for the CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 2.18-2.40). Among patients with ICH, stroke risk rose in step with the CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score. Conclusions: In a large population-based cohort, patients with AF faced a substantially higher risk of stroke after ICH. This risk rose proportionally with increasing CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score. These findings point to patients with AF and ICH as a vulnerable population who may especially benefit from therapeutic alternatives to anticoagulant therapy for preventing thromboembolism in AF.

Ten‐year trends in prescribing of antiarrhythmic drugs in Australian primary care patients with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1732-1735
Author(s):  
Woldesellassie M. Bezabhe ◽  
Luke R. Bereznicki ◽  
Jan Radford ◽  
Mohammed S. Salahudeen ◽  
Edward Garrahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Antiarrhythmic Drugs ◽  
Primary Care Patients

scholarly journals Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Prescription in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Across the Spectrum of Stroke Risk

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Hsu ◽  
Thomas M. Maddox ◽  
Kevin F. Kennedy ◽  
David F. Katz ◽  
Lucas N. Marzec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy

Abstract 171: Warfarin Use And Stroke Risk Among Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation In A Large Managed Care Population

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven B Deitelzweig ◽  
Erin Buysman ◽  
Brett Pinsky ◽  
Michael Lacey ◽  
Yonghua Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Managed Care ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Real World ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chads2 Score ◽  
Warfarin Treatment

Introduction Warfarin discontinuation among real world nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is common. Hypothesis We hypothesized that in a managed care population, warfarin discontinuation is associated with increased stroke risk. Methods Patients who initiated warfarin therapy between Jan 2005 and Jun 2009 and had a healthcare claim related to AF within 30 days prior to the first warfarin claim, but no evidence of valvular disease, were included. Warfarin discontinuation was defined as a supply gap of >60 days without evidence of International Normalized Ratio (INR) measurements. Follow-up was divided into periods of warfarin treatment and discontinuation. Stroke events were identified based on claims for inpatient stays with a primary diagnosis for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the relationship between warfarin discontinuation and incident stroke while adjusting for baseline demographics, stroke and bleeding risk, and comorbidities, as well as time-dependent antiplatelet use, stroke, and bleeding events in the prior warfarin treatment period. Results The mean (SD) age of the study sample (N=16,253) was 67±12 years; 64.8% was male. Mean CHADS2 score was 1.84±1.30; mean HAS-BLED score was 2.00±1.18. Half (51.4%) of patients discontinued warfarin therapy at least once and the overall sample had a mean of 1.87 warfarin treatment periods during a mean of 668 days follow-up. Approximately 1186 patients (7%) had a stroke or TIA at any site of service during follow-up. Risk of stroke significantly increased during warfarin discontinuation periods compared with therapy periods (HR 1.60; 95%CI 1.35-1.90; P<.0001). Stroke risk was significantly increased for patients with baseline CHADS2 score ≥2 (HR 2.69; 95%CI 1.44-5.03; P=.002), HAS-BLED score ≥3 (HR 1.46; 95%CI 1.05-2.05; P=.027), or who had a bleeding (HR 1.29; 95%CI 1.06-1.57; P=.013) or stroke event (HR 3.04; 95%CI 2.47-3.75; P<.0001) in the prior treatment period. Conclusions In the real world, over half of patients on anticoagulation therapy had treatment gaps or permanently discontinued therapy. These usage patterns, as well as prior bleeding, were associated with increased stroke risk.

Risk of ischemic stroke in asymptomatic atrial fibrillation incidentally-detected in primary care compared with other clinical presentations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wallenhorst ◽  
Carlos Martinez ◽  
Ben FREEDMAN
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Primary Hospital ◽  
Ischemic Stroke Risk ◽  
The Uk

Background: It is uncertain whether stroke risk of asymptomatic ambulatory atrial fibrillation (AA-AF) incidentally-detected in primary care is comparable with other clinical AF presentations in primary care or hospital. Methods: The stoke risk of 22,035 patients with incident non-valvular AF from the UK primary care Clinical Practice Research Datalink with linkage to hospitalization and mortality data, was compared to 23,605 controls without AF (age and sex-matched 5:1 to 5,409 AA-AF patients). Incident AF included 5,913 with symptomatic ambulatory AF (SA-AF); 4,989 with Primary and 5,724 with non-Primary Hospital AF discharge diagnosis (PH-AF and Non-PH-AF); and 5,409 with AA-AF. Ischemic stroke adjusted subhazard ratios (aSHR) within 3 years of AA-AF were compared with SA-AF, PH-AF, Non-PH-AF and controls, accounting for mortality as competing risk and adjusted for ischemic stroke risk factors. Results: There were 1026 ischemic strokes in 49,544 person-years in patients with incident AF (crude incidence rate 2.1 ischemic strokes/100 person-years). Ischemic stroke aSHR over 3 years showed no differences between AA-AF, and SA-AF, PH-AF and nonPH-AF groups (aSHR 0.87-1.01 vs AA-AF). All AF groups showed a significantly higher aSHR compared to controls. (subhazard rate ratio 0.40 [0.34 - 0.47]. Conclusion: Ischemic stroke risk in patients with AA-AF incidentally-detected in primary care is far from benign, and not less than incident AF presenting clinically in general practice or hospital. This provides justification for identification of previously undetected AF, e.g. by opportunistic screening, and subsequent stroke prevention with thromboprophylaxis, to reduce the approximately 10% of ischemic strokes related to unrecognized AF.

Abstract 140: Comparison of Major Complication of Oral Anticoagulants in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Seok Lee
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Ischemic Stroke Risk ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: Oral anticoagulants known as a novel oral anticoagulant have been used for the management of non -valvular atrial fibrillation. There was no enough study regarding the efficacy and safety of three major new oral anticoagulants. We assessed major three oral anticoagulants in terms of major bleeding complication and stroke prevention by meta-analyses studies comparing those drugs. Method: Relevant studies were identified through electronic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov (from inception to February 24, 2016). RevMan and ITC software were used for direct comparisons, respectively. Results: Apixaban (N=6020), versus dabigatran(N=12038), apixaban versus rivaroxaban(N=8503) and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran were analyzed directly. There was significantly higher major bleeding risks in apixaban compared to dabigatran (both 110mg and 150mg) after adjusting baseline bleeding risk (Relative risk 3.41, 95% confidence interval(2.61 to 4.47) in 110mg, (5.62, 4.83 to 6.54) in 150mg. Intracranial bleeding risk in apixaban was significantly higher than in dabigatran (10.5, 6.10 to18.01). However, apixaban had less GI bleeding risk compared to dabigatran (0.80 , 0.65 to 0.98) and also had less ischemic stroke risk (0.31,0.22 to 0.42). Rivaroxaban showed higher major bleeding risk than dabigatran 110mg (2.34 , 1.81 to 3.03), however, Rivaroxaban had less bleeding risk compared to dabigatran 150mg (0.41, 0.35 to 0.46). Dabigatran 110mg and 150mg had less GI bleeding risk compared to rivaroxaban (0.31 , 0.24 to 0.39) and (0.23,0.17 to 0.29) respectively. Ischemic stroke risk was also decreased in dabigatran110mg (0.46, 0.38 to 0.57). and 150mg (0.66 ,0.52 to 0.83). Conclusion: Observed oral anticoagulants were associated with various complications. Overall, apixaban had higher intracranial bleeding risk than dabigatran. The highest GI bleeding risk in rivaroxaban compared to apixaban and dabigatran. Ischemic stroke risk was the highest in dabigatran. In conclusion, we may use those oral anticoagulant based on risks rates, however, a larger study with longer follow-up is needed to corroborate findings.

P4745Concomitant oral anticoagulant and antidepressant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke and bleeding: a population based cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Komen ◽  
P Hjemdahl ◽  
A K Mantel - Teeuwisse ◽  
O H Klungel ◽  
B Wettermark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Antidepressant Use

Abstract Background Anticoagulation treatment reduces the risk of stroke but increases the risk of bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Antidepressants use is associated with increased risk for stroke and bleeds. Objective To assess the association between antidepressant use in AF patients with oral anticoagulants and bleeding and stroke risk. Methods All AF patients newly prescribed with an oral anticoagulant in the Stockholm Healthcare database (n=2.3 million inhabitants) from July 2011 until 2016 were included and followed for one year or shorter if they stopped claiming oral anticoagulant treatment or had an outcome of interest. Outcomes were severe bleeds and strokes, requiring acute hospital care. During follow-up, patients were considered exposed to antidepressant after claiming a prescription for the duration of the prescription. With a time-varying Cox regression, we assessed the association between antidepressant use and strokes and bleeds, adjusting for confounders (i.e., age, sex, comorbidities, comedication, and year of inclusion). In addition, we performed a propensity score matched analysis to test the robustness of our findings. Results Of the 30,595 patients included after claiming a prescription for a NOAC (n=13,506) or warfarin (n=17,089), 4 303 claimed a prescription for an antidepressant during follow-up. A total of 712 severe bleeds and 551 strokes were recorded in the cohort. Concomitant oral anticoagulant and antidepressant use was associated with increased rates of severe bleeds (4.7 vs 2.7 per 100 person-years) compared to oral anticoagulant treatment without antidepressant use (aHR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.12–1.80), but not significantly associated with increased stroke rates (3.5 vs 2.1 per 100 person-years, aHR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.93–1.62). No significant differences were observed between different oral anticoagulant classes (i.e., warfarin or NOAC) or different antidepressant classes (i.e., SSRI, TCA, or other antidepressant). Additional propensity-score matched analyses yielded similar results but showed a significantly increased risk for stroke (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.08–2.02). Incidence rates of strokes and bleeds Conclusion Concomitant use of an oral anticoagulant and an antidepressant, irrespective of type, is associated with an increased bleeding risk. Increased awareness and a critical consideration for the need of an antidepressant is recommended in this population. Acknowledgement/Funding Swedish Heart Lung Foundation

scholarly journals Two-year effectiveness of a stepped-care depression prevention intervention and predictors of incident depression in primary care patients with diabetes type 2 and/or coronary heart disease and subthreshold depression: data from the Step-Dep cluster randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e020412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alide Danielle Pols ◽  
Marcel C Adriaanse ◽  
Maurits W van Tulder ◽  
Martijn W Heymans ◽  
Judith E Bosmans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Stepped Care ◽  
Subthreshold Depression ◽  
Depression Prevention ◽  
Primary Care Patients

IntroductionMajor depressive disorders (MDD), diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) and coronary heart disease (CHD) are leading contributors to the global burden of disease and often co-occur.ObjectivesTo evaluate the 2-year effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention to prevent MDD compared with usual care and to develop a prediction model for incident depression in patients with DM2 and/or CHD with subthreshold depression.MethodsData of 236 Dutch primary care patients with DM2/CHD with subthreshold depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score ≥6, no current MDD according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria)) who participated in the Step-Dep trial were used. A PHQ-9 score of ≥10 at minimally one measurement during follow-up (at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months) was used to determine the cumulative incidence of MDD. Potential demographic and psychological predictors were measured at baseline via web-based self-reported questionnaires and evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Model performance was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Nagelkerke’s R2explained variance and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Bootstrapping techniques were used to internally validate our model.Results192 patients (81%) were available at 2-year follow-up. The cumulative incidence of MDD was 97/192 (51%). There was no statistically significant overall treatment effect over 24 months of the intervention (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.52 to 3.55). Baseline levels of anxiety, depression, the presence of >3 chronic diseases and stressful life events predicted the incidence of MDD (AUC 0.80, IQR 0.79–0.80; Nagelkerke’s R20.34, IQR 0.33–0.36).ConclusionA model with 4 factors predicted depression incidence during 2-year follow-up in patients with DM2/CHD accurately, based on the AUC. The Step-Dep intervention did not influence the incidence of MDD. Future depression prevention programmes should target patients with these 4 predictors present, and aim to reduce both anxiety and depressive symptoms.Trial registration numberNTR3715.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document