Validation of buccal swabs for noninvasive DNA sampling of small-bodied imperiled fishes

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Reid ◽  
A. Kidd ◽  
C. C. Wilson
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Hatfield ◽  
Rebecca K. Hoffman ◽  
Rosemary C. Polomano ◽  
Yvette Conley

Purpose: To recruit healthy full- and preterm infants into genetic research and determine the effectiveness of a noninvasive DNA sampling technique for comparing epigenetic modifications. Background: Noxious stimuli during a vulnerable period of infant neuronal plasticity may trigger long-term epigenetic changes affecting neurodevelopment, pain modulation, and reactivity. Recognizing epigenetic pain findings is problematic because parents are reluctant to enroll newborns into genetic research. Methods: Design: Within-subject change over time candidate-gene DNA methylation association study. Setting/ sample: Urban teaching hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit and newborn nursery. Convenience sample of healthy full- (>37 weeks, n = 6) and preterm (<37 weeks, n = 6) infants. Procedure: Parents participated in a genetic presentation prior to informed consent. Infant buccal saliva was collected after admission to the unit and prior to discharge. Analysis: The methylation pattern at the 5′ end of µ-opioid receptor gene ( OPRM1) was examined. DNA was treated with bisulfite to convert all cytosines to uracil residues, leaving methylated cytosines unchanged. Sequencing of untreated and bisulfite-converted DNA was carried out. The sequences of unconverted and bisulfite-converted DNA were aligned with ClustalW, fidelity of the polymerase chain reaction and the sequencing reaction evaluated, and the methylation pattern identified. Results: Recruitment and assessment of a noninvasive DNA sampling technique for comparing epigenetic modifications were successful; however, infant stress did not produce a change in OPRM1 methylation expression. Relevance: This study established the feasibility of recruiting healthy full-term infants into genetic research and the effectiveness of noninvasive DNA sampling for comparing epigenetic modification in infants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (23-24) ◽  
pp. 1439-1449
Author(s):  
Yamna Karssene ◽  
Raquel Godinho ◽  
Mohsen Chammem ◽  
Berardino Cocchiararo ◽  
Said Nouira ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yamna Karssene ◽  
Carsten Nowak ◽  
Mohsen Chammem ◽  
Berardino Cocchiararo ◽  
Said Nouira

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Scott Mills ◽  
John J. Citta ◽  
Kevin P. Lair ◽  
Michael K. Schwartz ◽  
David A. Tallmon

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1370-1374
Author(s):  
Wei-feng ZHU ◽  
Da-ya LUO ◽  
Shuo TU ◽  
Xia-li ZHANG ◽  
Ke-min JIE ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110169
Author(s):  
Ritu Gaur ◽  
Dipesh Kumar Verma ◽  
Ritin Mohindra ◽  
Kapil Goyal ◽  
Shipra Gupta ◽  
...  

Introduction The current gold standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA involves subjecting nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs to reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). However, both sample types need to be collected by trained professionals. Using self-collected buccal swabs as an alternative could simplify and accelerate diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective To assess self-collected buccal swab samples as an alternative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection in patients with COVID-19. Methods Buccal swab samples were self-collected by 73 patients with COVID-19. Total RNA was extracted using Qiagen kits. RNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Env protein and human RNase P as an internal control was amplified using the TRUPCR® SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR kit version 2.1 and a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time Detection System. Result The sensitivity of RT-qPCR from buccal swabs was 58.9% (43/73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 46.77%–70.27%) and that of RT-qPCR from saliva was 62.90% (39/62; 95% CI 49.69%–74.84%) taking positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR from nasopharyngeal swabs as the gold standard. Conclusion Self-collected buccal swabs are promising alternatives to nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs for SARS CoV-2 detection.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Demay ◽  
Janet L. Rachlow ◽  
Lisette P. Waits ◽  
Penny A. Becker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document