Influence of two different ventilation modes on the function of an anaesthetic conserving device in sevoflurane anaesthetized piglets

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238
Author(s):  
Stijn Schauvliege ◽  
Stefaan Bouchez ◽  
Lindsey Devisscher ◽  
Tim Reyns ◽  
Sandra De Boever ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 208 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Abd El-Moneim ◽  
HO Fürste ◽  
A Abou Elmagd ◽  
M Brandis ◽  
R Hentschel

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Spraider ◽  
Gabriel Putzer ◽  
Robert Breitkopf ◽  
Julia Abram ◽  
Simon Mathis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. Case presentation A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H2O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. Conclusions An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient’s oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts.


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 569-574
Author(s):  
Katherine T. Moorhead ◽  
Lise Piquilloud ◽  
Bernard Lambermont ◽  
Jean Roeseler ◽  
J. Geoffrey Chase ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-404
Author(s):  
John J. Gallagher

Modern mechanical ventilators are more complex than those first developed in the 1950s. Newer ventilation modes can be difficult to understand and implement clinically, although they provide more treatment options than traditional modes. These newer modes, which can be considered alternative or nontraditional, generally are classified as either volume controlled or pressure controlled. Dual-control modes incorporate qualities of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled modes. Some ventilation modes provide variable ventilatory support depending on patient effort and may be classified as closed-loop ventilation modes. Alternative modes of ventilation are tools for lung protection, alveolar recruitment, and ventilator liberation. Understanding the function and application of these alternative modes prior to implementation is essential and is most beneficial for the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document